Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

England vs Ireland ODI Series 2020

  • 28-07-2020 9:56pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭


    Ireland will finally get a chance to play some cricket this summer in an 3 match ODI series against England which starts this week.

    Thursday 30th July vs England - Southampton - 1st ODI (D/N) - 2pm - Live on Sky Sports

    Saturday 1st August vs England - Southampton - 2nd ODI (D/N) - 2pm - Live on Sky Sports

    Tuesday 4th August vs England - Southampton - 3rd ODI (D/N) - 2pm - Live on Sky Sports

    Ireland squad for first ODI: Andrew Balbirnie (c), Curtis Campher, Gareth Delany, Josh Little, Andrew McBrine, Barry McCarthy, Kevin O'Brien, William Porterfield, Boyd Rankin, Simi Singh, Paul Stirling, Harry Tector, Lorcan Tucker, Craig Young

    Reserves: Mark Adair, Peter Chase, George Dockrell, JJ Garth, Tyrone Kane, James McCollum, Stuart Thompson, Gary Wilson

    England squad: Eoin Morgan (capt), Moeen Ali, Jonny Bairstow, Tom Banton, Sam Billings, Tom Curran, Liam Dawson, Joe Denly, Saqib Mahmood, Adil Rashid, Jason Roy, Reece Topley, James Vince, David Willey

    Reserves: Richard Gleeson, Lewis Gregory, Liam Livingstone

    Ireland have 22 players staying on site and will name their squads on a match-by-match basis. Curtis Campher and Harry Tector could both make their debuts. All-rounder Campher who played for South Africa at underage level qualifies for Ireland through his mother and should be a good addition to the squad.

    England include none of the test squad and have a nice mix of youth and experience which will make it very difficult for Ireland.

    This will be the first series under the banner of the ICC Cricket World Cup Super League which looks fairly complex. Featuring 13 teams - the top 12 and Netherlands, who qualified by winning the ICC World Cricket Super League 2015-17 - the league will see each side play four home and four away three-match ODI series in a fixed timeframe, with the top seven sides apart from hosts India earning automatic qualification for the next 50-over World Cup, to be played in October-November 2023.

    Each team gets ten points for a win, five for a tie, no result or abandonment and none for a loss. The five sides failing to qualify directly will play along with five Associate sides in the World Cup Qualifier 2023, with two teams from the Qualifier making it to the ten-team World Cup.


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭nice bit of green


    Looking forward to it. Had tickets for Edgbaston. Bloody shame.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Did I read something about 14 man match squads with some sort of interchange possible?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭gavinoontheweb


    Great to have Irish cricket back and looking forward to the series. The warm-up game and some of the performances from the Caribbean have demonstrated that we now have a solid one day batting lineup, especially with the likes of Tucker and Tector in the middle order. We are capable of getting at or around par scores more consistently lately.

    However, we lack the firepower of the English with scores of 300+. Batsmen like Vince, Salt and Morgan can take the game away in the space of a few overs. Adair's injury is a big blow to the attack but hopefully McCarthy and Young can be a bit more penetrative.

    Hoping that our batting remains consistent and we are competitve in all 3 fixtures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Can't say I'm too hopeful. If we can post up 250+ it will be respectable. England team bat so deep, they can go hell for leather all day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,724 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'm interested in cricket but don't know much about the individual players. What kind of teams are they fielding? Full strength teams or are England giving their young lads a run out?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Stirling out 4th ball for 2 runs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    I'm interested in cricket but don't know much about the individual players. What kind of teams are they fielding? Full strength teams or are England giving their young lads a run out?

    Ireland full strength. England not playing any of the guys that played the tests v West Indies due to Covid 'bubble'. Its still a very strong ODI squad though including 8 of those from the world cup win


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Anjobe


    I'm interested in cricket but don't know much about the individual players. What kind of teams are they fielding? Full strength teams or are England giving their young lads a run out?

    The England squad looks about as strong as it could be without any of the test players. The test and ODI squads are in different biosecure bubbles so there are no players in both. Even then it is really only Stokes, Root, Buttler, Archer and Wood missing.

    England own the toss and bowl first, everyone takes a knee and we're off. Stirling out in the first over!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,724 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Anjobe wrote: »
    The England squad looks about as strong as it could be without any of the test players. The test and ODI squads are in different biosecure bubbles so there are no players in both. Even then it is really only Stokes, Root, Buttler, Archer and Wood missing.

    England own the toss and bowl first, everyone takes a knee and we're off. Stirling out in the first over!

    Cheers for the explanation.

    Was Stirling a hope to be a big scorer? Who else are Irelands main batsmen?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Cheers for the explanation.

    Was Stirling a hope to be a big scorer? Who else are Irelands main batsmen?

    Yeah Stirling is critical. Himself and Balbirnie the best. Kev O Brien can be explosive but just as often gets out going for the big hit. Delaney and Tector are young but promising, not a hell of a lot outside these though


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,724 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    KevIRL wrote: »
    Yeah Stirling is critical. Himself and Balbirnie the best. Kev O Brien can be explosive but just as often gets out going for the big hit. Delaney and Tector are young but promising, not a hell of a lot outside these though

    Not looking brilliant then!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Balbirnie out for 3 runs. This is going to be grim


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    In the buildup KP talked about how batsmen know what Willey is going to do but still get out to him. Like Arjen Robben in football cutting in on his left foot and scoring loads of goals. Very impressive comeback by him, bit of extra pace it looks like too.

    Good over this. Bit of a counterattack.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Tector duck


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    We'll be lucky to get 100 at this rate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,862 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    28-4 now they are rubbish


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    We'll be lucky to get 100 at this rate

    50 even


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    Good review. Just where it pitched.

    Nightmare stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    35 is the lowest ODI innings score


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,862 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    KevIRL wrote: »
    35 is the lowest ODI innings score

    Woundnt say it was made on a good batting wicket, this looks like a 300 pitch for a proper team. Think that 35 was Canada v Sri Lanka, Chaminda Vaas had a field day


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,763 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Oh dear, just dropped by the beeb to see the score, truly woeful :(

    28/5 off 7.1 overs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Ireland making Willey look like a world beater. Fun fact my sister in law used to babysit him.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    England looked to have done their homework. Offering zero width either side of the wicket. Full reliable lengths, straight and no room for the Irish guys to manipulate the ball for too many singles. Not too many opportunities to swing the arms and the field is keeping pretty much ones as the major currency. Five down and not many on the board there is little expectation of many over 240 which unless something extraordinary, won’t be good enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    Rashid bowling very well. Back to his best after his shoulder operation.

    50 run partnership.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    Well, well. Shot was not needed KOB. Build to some kind of total even if Roy and Bairstow knock them with ease later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    A silly run out exactly whats needed when you are 79/6


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    If today is a rout, do you reckon England would let Morgan play for Ireland on Saturday and Tuesday to make it a bit competitive? Lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 873 ✭✭✭StackSteevens


    KevIRL wrote: »
    A silly run out exactly whats needed when you are 79/6

    I'm surprised at an experienced player like Simi giving it away like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    McBrine out 40.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    150 up. Good recovery I suppose but it looks a very good wicket as shown by the two 50 partnerships.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,876 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    All out for 172...some degree of respectability after being 28/5.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    Campher and McBrine offering some light in a sea of $hite


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Only 5 batsmen into double figures, disappointing. Just not a competitive score. 35 overs should see England win, less if they hold onto wickets at the start of their innings


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    KevIRL wrote: »
    Campher and McBrine offering some light in a sea of $hite

    The manner of the wickets being lost is the worrying aspect. It was rank bad batting over great deliveries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    Looks a great pitch on a lovely day and 300 you would think is even a below par score.

    To only get 172 was poor, but it could have even been a whole lot worse than that. Credit to Campher on debut for his knock. He looks a nice tidy player in defence and was able to milk the single and two's on offer rather than just throwing the bat at it and giving his wicket away like so many others did.

    Hopefully the bowlers can pick up a few wickets but it should be a very straight-forward chase for England.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,691 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    good to get an early wicket anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    Jason Roy was starting to tee off for England but Craig Young gets him.

    34-2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭nice bit of green


    And another. Come on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    Vince edges to Tucker. Young has another one.

    England 59-3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    Vince is a beautiful batsman but always gives it away too casually. Wasted talent.

    Billings in now, another talent with little substance so far at this level. Morgan dropping himself way down.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    4 down now, for 82


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    Billings looking good.

    No scoreboard pressure at all. Another 50 runs might have made a game of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    An awful lots of boundaries for England.

    Couldn't really ask much more from the bowlers to be fair though.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Feels like they've all decided just to finish it as quickly as possible now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    A win for England with 22.1 overs to spare. Ireland obviously won’t be happy but neither will the English. A game like that so so far from being competitive isn’t really helping them. Not much of a spectacle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭Shakey_jake


    I like balbo as a captain I think he's great but I just never feel confident when he steps up to bat.

    Middle to lower batsman imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    Game was lost with Willey's four early strikes. 28-5 is too big a hole to do anything. Salvaging the innings to 172 was a good effort.

    Do it all again on the same pitch on Saturday. A lot of batsmen will hope to be better for playing this game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,763 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Gillespy wrote: »
    Game was lost with Willey's four early strikes. 28-5 is too big a hole to do anything. Salvaging the innings to 172 was a good effort.

    Do it all again on the same pitch on Saturday. A lot of batsmen will hope to be better for playing this game.

    If we had Morgan, it would have been a finely balanced game!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,763 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Won the toss, having a bat, lets hope it goes better than Thurs! COYBIG!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Solid start, 11 after 2. Outfield looks last which will help.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement