Calls for Minister for Children Roderic O'Gorman to resign..

drunkmonkey

His links to Peter Thatchell seems to be raising a few eyebrows especially from the one and only Gemma, https://www.bitchute.com/video/LVSj0LNd83xR/
I see a lot of people giving out about Roderics new roll across different media not just Gemma.
I don't know anything about the chap but from his association with Thatchell it would make you wonder if he's been given the right Ministry.

Gatling

Why .

Eric Cartman

Gatling wrote: »

Why .

Thatchell advocated for lowering the age of consent to 14 years old, not only in a 'Romeo and Juliet' laws scenario which would only make it legal if the older partner was under 18/21 etc... he just wants it opened up so that any dirty old pervert can pray on 14 year olds.

An age of consent of 14 might be more realistic and reasonable than 16. If sex at 14 is consensual, and no one is hurt or complains, is criminalisation in the public interest? Is it in the 14-year-old's interest? It is fair?

It reinforces the idea that young people under the age of 16 do not have the right to control their own bodies.

They don't, they're children....

drunkmonkey

Gatling wrote: »

Why .

He's a way with words, it's not someone the minister for children should be associating with or have associated with in the past.



We had all this with Norris before and his Isralie friend, we don't need a minster with similar baggage again.

Gatling

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Thatchell advocated for lowering the age of consent to 14 years old, not only in a 'Romeo and Juliet' laws scenario which would only make it legal if the older partner was under 18/21 etc... he just wants it opened up so that any dirty old pervert can pray on 14 year olds.

Not true though it was supposed to allow 14 -17 (maximum three year gap ) without facing prosecution which there is likely tens of thousands of 14 year olds sexually active ,other countries looked at the idea too it wasn't a case of anyone could just sleep with someone 14 years and up

suicide_circus

how serious/tenuous are these links between Roderick O'Gorman and Peter Thatchell?

Peter Thatchell didn't say anything in that quote that beloved Senator David Norris hasn't intimated in the past btw.

Eric Cartman

Gatling wrote: »

Not true though it was supposed to allow 14 -17 (maximum three year gap ) without facing prosecution which there is likely tens of thousands of 14 year olds sexually active ,other countries looked at the idea too it wasn't a case of anyone could just sleep with someone 14 years and up

that is not how any of the media read on it. Romeo and Juliet laws (that kind of case you illustrate) are definitely required. Almost every publication on the man paints it as a straight up drop to 14 , however another poster above has a more worrying quote from this man.

Romeo and Juliet laws are fine, paedophile apologism is barbaric.

Eric Cartman

suicide_circus wrote: »

how serious/tenuous are these links between Roderick O'Gorman and Peter Thatchell?

Peter Thatchell didn't say anything in that quote that beloved Senator David Norris hasn't intimated in the past btw.

which was also incredibly wrong and rightly received condemnation.

Galwayguy35

drunkmonkey wrote: »

He's a way with words, it's not someone the minister for children should be associating with or have associated with in the past.



We had all this with Norris before and his Isralie friend, we don't need a minster with similar baggage again.

That fella needs watching, thats not a normal way of thinking.

walshb

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

That fella needs watching, thats not a normal way of thinking.

Yes.

Whatever about 14...9 is young. End of...

Gatling

Eric Cartman wrote: »

that is not how any of the media read on it. Romeo and Juliet laws (that kind of case you illustrate) are definitely required.

He litterally said the same thing .


I'd wonder if there is a full varifed interview which claims the above or was it posted on a quote maker page and posted on social media?

jimmycrackcorm

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Thatchell advocated for lowering the age of consent to 14 years old, not only in a 'Romeo and Juliet' laws scenario which would only make it legal if the older partner was under 18/21 etc... he just wants it opened up so that any dirty old pervert can pray on 14 year olds.



They don't, they're children....

And what exactly is the connection with O'Gorman?

GarIT

jimmycrackcorm wrote: »

And what exactly is the connection with O'Gorman?

They were in a picture together at a pride march.

gmisk

Calls from GOD....er I wouldn't pay much heed to that eejit...she spends most of her day screaming into the void about anyone and everyone. So it's really "call" from one looper

What are the links? All I can see is a picture of them at a pride march...who cares! Tenuous to say the least

suicide_circus

GarIT wrote: »

They stood beside each other in a picture.

well if that's the extent of it, this is a non story.

gmisk

GarIT wrote: »

They were in a picture together at a pride march.

Oh the scandal of it all!!!!
Christ if that's the best Genmski can do.... laughable

jimmycrackcorm

suicide_circus wrote: »

how serious/tenuous are these links between Roderick O'Gorman and Peter Thatchell?

Peter Thatchell didn't say anything in that quote that beloved Senator David Norris hasn't intimated in the past btw.

The difference is that Norris himself made remarks and proffered his opinion. This seems more Salem material.

ExMachina1000

If he was a ff or fg member the loudest minority would be on here screaming for his resignation.

He is a member of the greens so instead an excuse will be looked for instead.

For shame guys

CrankyHaus

suicide_circus wrote: »

well if that's the extent of it, this is a non story.

But the several years old photo was dug up and commented on by John Connors (the one from Cardboard Gangsters, not the one from The Terminator)
The real question is who's feeding him this stuff. I doubt he's trawling politician's old Twitter photos at random.

gmisk

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

If he was a ff or fg member the loudest minority would be on here screaming for his resignation.

He is a member of the greens so instead an excuse will be looked for instead.

For shame guys

Complete and utter BS.
Who are this loudest minority?

Id say tatchell has been pictured with plenty of mainstream politicians, especially in the UK, zero controversy this is a reach even for GOD. Embarrassing.

GarIT

CrankyHaus wrote: »

But the several years old photo was dug up and commented on by John Connors (the one from Cardboard Gangsters, not the one from The Terminator)
The real question is who's feeding him this stuff. I doubt he's trawling politician's old Twitter photos at random.

There has to be something wrong with anyone who listens to anything he says

Str8outtaWuhan

walshb wrote: »

Yes.

Whatever about 14...9 is young. End of...

Tell that to the wife of a particular prophet :eek:

Eric Cartman

Gatling wrote: »

He litterally said the same thing .


I'd wonder if there is a full varifed interview which claims the above or was it posted on a quote maker page and posted on social media?

its from a 1997 guardian article


the tweet in question is not just 'appeared together' he calls him a legendary lgbt activist and names him, not like its a 'random' photo
https://twitter.com/greenparty_ie/status/1013045330223489024?s=20

This thread doesn't half stink of homophobia... Source for "call" is Gemma O'Doherty. Similar to all the stuff about Katherine Zappone plotting bookman sacrifice. So no, there isn't really any demand for him to resign.

gmisk

Eric Cartman wrote: »

its from a 1997 guardian article


the tweet in question is not just 'appeared together' he calls him a legendary lgbt activist and names him, not like its a 'random' photo
https://twitter.com/greenparty_ie/status/1013045330223489024?s=20

Well he is a well known LGBT activist, it doesn't mean that TD agrees with everything he says ffs, that was from 20+ years ago

Rows Grower

Eric Cartman wrote: »

its from a 1997 guardian article


the tweet in question is not just 'appeared together' he calls him a legendary lgbt activist and names him, not like its a 'random' photo
https://twitter.com/greenparty_ie/status/1013045330223489024?s=20

Good God, that's an awful lot more than a random photo.

eviltwin

Tatchell is also a member of the Green Party which might be another reason for the photo op.

Eric Cartman

Deleted User wrote: »

This thread doesn't half stink of homophobia... Source for "call" is Gemma O'Doherty. Similar to all the stuff about Katherine Zappone plotting bookman sacrifice. So no, there isn't really any demand for him to resign.

are you conflating paedophelia with the lgbt community ? thats not right.

Eric Cartman

eviltwin wrote: »

Tatchell is also a member of the Green Party which might be another reason for the photo op.

so the Green Party are harbouring a known paedophile sympathiser.... thats much better... :rolleyes:

gmisk

Rows Grower wrote: »

Good God, that's an awful lot more than a random photo.

What are you on about?
Did Roderic o Gorman write that letter 23+ years ago...no... bizarre faux outrage

gmisk

Douple post apologies.

pjohnson

It seems clear Thatchwell is a creep and shouldn't be allowed be a TD. Thankfully he isnt a TD.


Whats the whining about again?

c.p.w.g.w

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Romeo and Juliet laws are fine

No its not...it provides unequal punishment based on gender

Eric Cartman

Eric Cartman wrote: »

are you conflating paedophelia with the lgbt community ? thats not right.

I'm referring to the fact that Gemma O'Doherty and her fanbase are targeting a gay minister within days of entering the role when he's done nothing wrong and has not advocated anything. The exact same bs occurred with Zappone.

Rows Grower

gmisk wrote: »

What are you on about?
Did Roderic o Gorman write that letter 23+ years ago...no... bizarre faux outrage

Did you actually read what the current Minister for Children wrote under the photo when he posted it on Twitter?

If that doesn't give you cause for concern then you need to have a word with yourself lad.

gmisk

Rows Grower wrote: »

Did you actually read what the current Minister for Children wrote under the photo when he posted it on Twitter?

If that doesn't give you cause for concern then you need to have a word with yourself lad.

He referred to tatchell as a legendary LGBT activist which he is....he did not say he agreed with every statement or a letter he wrote 23 years ago ffs.
You need to catch yourself on not me.
Your views align with a homophobic looper like GOD...lol

eviltwin

Eric Cartman wrote: »

so the Green Party are harbouring a known paedophile sympathiser.... thats much better... :rolleyes:

That’s some reach now in fairness

sabat

Well here's Tatchell advising several Irish politicians and activists on how to bludgeon their agenda into schools:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/w0dFEi3mgMRq/

Eric Cartman

Deleted User wrote: »

I'm referring to the fact that Gemma O'Doherty and her fanbase are targeting a gay minister within days of entering the role when he's done nothing wrong and has not advocated anything. The exact same bs occurred with Zappone.

Gemma has targeted multiple Green Party reps , gay or straight, I don't think it has much to do with it, but since its Gemma and nothing has to make sense, ill agree that it certainly could.

However aside from lumping Gemma into it, the minister for children certainly is keeping poor company considering this is hardly something new , thatchell has been banging on about this for 27 years. Any minister for children who posts in admiration of a paedophile sympathiser would get the same distaste from me and most other people in this thread.

Eric Cartman

For the record, Thatchell only ever did call for Romeo and Juliet laws. Anything outside of the 3 years he favoured prosecution.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1376619/Make-age-of-consent-lower-urges-Tatchell.html#:~:text=Peter%20Tatchell%2C%20of%20the%20pressure,three%20years%20difference%20in%20age.

He also adequately addressed his letter in 1997. So it's not really the most exciting.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6374467/Peter-Tatchell-forced-deny-advocating-paedophilia-1997-letter.html

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Gemma has targeted multiple Green Party reps , gay or straight, I don't think it has much to do with it, but since its Gemma and nothing has to make sense, ill agree that it certainly could.

However aside from lumping Gemma into it, the minister for children certainly is keeping poor company considering this is hardly something new , thatchell has been banging on about this for 27 years. Any minister for children who posts in admiration of a paedophile sympathiser would get the same distaste from me and most other people in this thread.

Nah, Gemma has a particular about people who don't look Irish and gay people. Also neither Thatchell or Roderic favour enabling paedophilia. So I'd say yes the primary motivation of this thread is homophobia.

GarIT

drunkmonkey wrote: »

For the record he said his friends have sex with 9yr olds. That's the issue, one of his friends is now minister for children.
There's no rowing back from a statement like that, there is no defense for such a person regardless of when he said it. Nobody should have friends like that and that especially goes for O'Gorman.

Since when are they friends?

drunkmonkey

drunkmonkey wrote: »

For the record he said his friends have sex with 9yr olds. That's the issue, one of his friends is now minister for children.
There's no rowing back from a statement like that, there is no defense for such a person regardless of when he said it. Nobody should have friends like that and that especially goes for O'Gorman.

He actually referred to his friends as the ones who had sex with older men so they were the minors. At incredibly young ages which is entirely messed up. He didn't advocate for it or favour making it legal. He just said that they there weren't damaged by it, which I'd be inclined to say is probably wrong.

So he doesn't have "friends like that" as you've claimed and nor did he claim to. It's a bit telling that you had to twist it into his friends being the adults. I'll happily disagree with him on it.

Galwayguy35

gmisk wrote: »

He referred to tatchell as a legendary LGBT activist which he is....he did not say he agreed with every statement or a letter he wrote 23 years ago ffs.
You need to catch yourself on not me.
Your views align with a homophobic looper like GOD...lol

It was poor judgement though referring to Tatchell as legendary considering the view he has about sex between adults and children.

Kivaro

Deleted User wrote: »

....
So I'd say yes the primary motivation of this thread is homophobia.

Similar to the poor retort of: if anyone dares to question Direct Provision or non-EU migration, then they are racist.
This is how attempts are made to shut down discussion on specific topics.

Ray Donovan

suicide_circus wrote: »

how serious/tenuous are these links between Roderick O'Gorman and Peter Thatchell?

Peter Thatchell didn't say anything in that quote that beloved Senator David Norris hasn't intimated in the past btw.

https://twitter.com/greenparty_ie/status/1013045330223489024

Ray Donovan

Ray Donovan wrote: »

https://twitter.com/greenparty_ie/status/1013045330223489024

And Thatchell explicitly said he doesn't advocate paedophilia. The remarks aren't hugely different to what Dawkins said a few years back. They're incredibly stupid remarks but neither were advocates of it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2416953/Richard-Dawkins-controversial-mild-paedophilia-comments.html

BoroMan32

Judging by this video, this Tatchell bloke is a sicko.

https://twitter.com/jenny87797866/status/1278155241557577735

Mr. Karate

How about a Children's Minister that actually actually has children.

BoroMan32

BoroMan32 wrote: »

Judging by this video, this Tatchell bloke is a sicko.

https://twitter.com/jenny87797866/status/1278155241557577735

Can you explain what exactly is sick about it? He wants children to have sex education that includes lgbt issues, that's a pretty reasonable expectation.

Warbeastrior

Sickening comment from Thatchell.

O'Gorman should have to address his relationship with this fella and if he doesn't cut all ties then he should be made to resign.

mikemac2

lol, Shane Ross, Catherine Zappone and others were ministers for 4 months when they failed at reelection and a newly appointed minister cannot last a week if he goes

That's a special kind of failure :pac: