Triangle/boomerang shaped UFO caught on video

Cheerful Spring2

Saw this recently for the first time. The ship went passed the Space Dragon X when it was approaching to dock with the space station in space. One of the most interesting UFO videos I have seen. You can see the lights of X reflect of it, when it passing, and the unknown craft, has a shape of a triangle or bommerang.

NIMAN

It looks like an aeroplane!

How come this wasn't on all the main news?

I smell fake.

MEGA BRO WOLF 5000

NIMAN wrote: »

It looks like an aeroplane!

How come this wasn't on all the main news?

I smell fake.

Because the main news always shows UFO sightings.

NIMAN

Wasn't that the Dragon that got so much coverage in the media?

I think if this video wasn't a fake it would have been on the news.

Tzardine

The camera is facing down towards earth. What you are seeing are city lights passing under Dragon as the earth spins.

But since this is CT, I'm gonna say that I think its Dennis O Brien out on his interstellar jet ski.

jaxxx

Pfft. Please. Obviously the triangle was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.

antodeco

Im more impressed that the video was 1m30s!

But I agree with Tzardine. A cluster of city lights below

namloc1980

Looks like city lights on the Earth below. If the exact time and orientation of this camera angle was known the city could be identified.

Cheerful Spring2

namloc1980 wrote: »

Looks like city lights on the Earth below. If the exact time and orientation of this camera angle was known the city could be identified.

That side is looking out to space. The other side is Earth, can't see it on that video. You couldn't miss the shape of the earth even if they passed over a location below at night.

It's a mystery. It better UFO video compared to others you see. A bright white dot in the sky could be anything.

antodeco

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

That side is looking out to space. The other side is Earth, can't see it on that video. You couldn't miss the shape of the earth even if they passed over a location below at night.

It's a mystery. It better UFO video compared to others you see. A bright white dot in the sky could be anything.

The camera is pointing downwards from the ISS, so the ship is moving away from earth (with the city lights below it)

Tzardine

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

That side is looking out to space. .

What makes you think that?

Cheerful Spring2

antodeco wrote: »

The camera is pointing downwards from the ISS, so the ship is moving away from earth (with the city lights below it)

The earth you can't see on the video that space. Earth shines brightly, its massive. Have you ever seen a video with the earth in total darkness?

Tzardine

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

The earth you can't see on the video that space. Earth shines brightly, its massive. Have you ever seen a video with the earth in total darkness?

Yes, plenty. There are numerous time lapse videos taken from the ISS at night. There are massive dark empty spaces around the world in areas such as Africa, Australia, Canada.

namloc1980

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

The earth you can't see on the video that space. Earth shines brightly, its massive. Have you ever seen a video with the earth in total darkness?

Nighttime side of earth obviously.

antodeco

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

The earth you can't see on the video that space. Earth shines brightly, its massive. Have you ever seen a video with the earth in total darkness?

Next time you're in a plane at night, look out the window. Guarantee you will see something similar to that video.

Cheerful Spring2

namloc1980 wrote: »

Nighttime side of earth obviously.

No. I even clipped a screenshot from the live video about six minutes in. You can see the opposite side of the Space Dragon x now and the earth is there not in darkness.

Cheerful Spring2

NIMAN wrote: »

It looks like an aeroplane!

How come this wasn't on all the main news?

I smell fake.

Not fake, this is original footage and upload to the Space X YouTube page.

The UFO at 1 minute 35 seconds. You can even tell its angle is to space when they switched the camera at 1 minute 15 seconds. Corner side of the space station (camera facing outwards) looking at the X arriving to dock.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDJ6A-0jpkE&t=266s

namloc1980

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

No. I even clipped a screenshot from the live video about six minutes in. You can see the opposite side of the Space Dragon x now and the earth is there not in darkness.

You do know that the ISS takes about 90 mins to orbit the Earth so it spends roughly 45 minutes in daylight and 45 minutes in darkness on EVERY orbit? The Dragon cargo resupply is captured by the ISS using the Canadian robotic arm Canadarm. See the docking video. The Earth is continuously in view but in darkness during the the approach and capture. For your conspiracy to work you think the Dragon flew up and over the ISS so that from the ISS camera point of view space is in the background away from the Earth?? I'm afraid that's not how this works at all. Even your own video that you posted shows that. Or maybe the video was taken by aliens??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysyK-J0tkEk

Cheerful Spring2

namloc1980 wrote: »

You do know that the ISS takes about 90 mins to orbit the Earth so it spends roughly 45 minutes in daylight and 45 minutes in darkness on EVERY orbit? The Dragon cargo resupply is captured by the ISS using the Canadian robotic arm Canadarm. See the docking video. The Earth is continuously in view but in darkness during the the approach and capture. For your conspiracy to work you think the Dragon flew up and over the ISS so that from the ISS camera point of view space is in the background away from the Earth?? I'm afraid that's not how this works at all. Even your own video that you posted shows that. Or maybe the video was taken by aliens??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysyK-J0tkEk

Namloc reason your wrong is the Dragon was in sunlight (daylight below on Earth), you can see that on video at the 3 minute mark. The Dragon then enters the shadow zone if you keep watching it and you will see on video the Dragon fades out and be darker and then you also notice the camera facing outwards towards space (notice the bright colors in the vastness of space?)

Watch it from 3 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDJ6A-0jpkE&t=266s

namloc1980

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Namloc reason your wrong is the Dragon was in sunlight (daylight below on Earth), you can see that on video at the 3 minute mark. The Dragon then enters the shadow zone if you keep watching it and you will see on video the Dragon fades out and be darker and then you also notice the camera facing outwards towards space (notice the bright colors in the vastness of space?)

Watch it from 3 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDJ6A-0jpkE&t=266s

But it can be in sunlight while the ground below is in darkness. It is over 400km up above the Earth. That's why we can see the ISS brightly passing overhead (lit by sunlight) when it is dark here on the ground. For your theory to be correct the Dragon has to be oriented in a completely illogical manner for a camera on the ISS to capture it with nothing but space behind. All of the videos posted support the fact that from the ISS perspective the Earth is behind the Dragon. I also have no idea what you mean by "notice the bright colors in the vastness of space".

Cheerful Spring2

namloc1980 wrote: »

But it can be in sunlight while the ground below is in darkness. It is over 400km up above the Earth..

Watch the YouTube video you posted. You can see the daytime and night cycles and no city lights below can be seen! The object looks to be flying and not stationary anyhow.

Tzardine

I honestly think you are just trolling at this point.

Overheal

Tzardine wrote: »

I honestly think you are just trolling at this point.

Please report posts rather than backseat modding (calling other users trolls are accusing of trolling) /mod

Clarence Boddiker

Big UFO disclosure article allegedly coming in the New York Times very soon.

Do I believe in UFOs? No

I'm just posting that there's a lot of chatter saying the New York Times are preparing a big article confirming the existence of UFOs.

This is the conspiracy theory forum so don't attack me. We'll see what happens.

4068ac1elhodqr

During an election year, all the candidates are/will be telling media they 'really, really' want to get to the bottom of Area51.
Think Hillary was banging on about it 4yrs ago, adds a couple of thousand easy truther-token votes.

Any genuine data (not blurry videos) won't ever see the light of day, unless a genuine global reset of sorts is desired.

Ipso

Clarence Boddiker wrote: »

Big UFO disclosure article allegedly coming in the New York Times very soon.

Do I believe in UFOs? No

I'm just posting that there's a lot of chatter saying the New York Times are preparing a big article confirming the existence of UFOs.

This is the conspiracy theory forum so don't attack me. We'll see what happens.

There is a writer there who is really into Tom DeLonge’s To the stars academy. Coincidentally they also have a new show coming to the “History” channel.
Not sure if it was the person who broke the pentagon super secret department/payback to Robert Bigelow for political donations.

beachhead

An earlier poster mentioned "the main news" What is the main news.RTE? RTE or any other terrestial stations in the ROI do not report news only minor incidents that impact their centric thinking and which happen to enter their solar system(to keep with the subject of this post)

Cheerful Spring2

Clarence Boddiker wrote: »

Big UFO disclosure article allegedly coming in the New York Times very soon.

Do I believe in UFOs? No

I'm just posting that there's a lot of chatter saying the New York Times are preparing a big article confirming the existence of UFOs.

This is the conspiracy theory forum so don't attack me. We'll see what happens.

Supposedly many US news media sites are investigating the Wilson memo leak and other stuff centred around UFOs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_R._Wilson

It's Alleged in the Wilson memo leak the US discovered and retrieved a non-human build spacecraft decades ago (Roswell?) The ship so advanced that made very little progress back engineering it. It like sending a F 35 fighter jet back through time to the Vikings! Would they know how to start it? They'll certainly have no clue how to fuel it for flight.

Cheerful Spring2

The news/rumor mill right now is the New York times has discovered fresh evidence there is a crash retrieval program for UFOs and the US has got alien technology and the New York times will confirm it in the article. I wait till i read the article and see how explosive the new info is for disclosure.

I'm hearing there some collaboration between Fox News and New York times for this piece.

Ipso

Even bigger collaboration with To the Stars Academy.

SlowMotion321

OK we have Fox, and De Longe, mentioned here, I am all into disclosure, but with these two I am backing away until i see some more creditable names attached to it.

Cheerful Spring2

SlowMotion321 wrote: »

OK we have Fox, and De Longe, mentioned here, I am all into disclosure, but with these two I am backing away until i see some more creditable names attached to it.

I not losing myself yet, we all end up recognizing the truth after this. I have to read the story first and look over what they discovered here that's original, fresh and new, and not known before. It just whisper right now a new article will talk about recovered alien craft. I have seen some sources in Ufology claim the UFOs are not kept by the US military, instead a private Aerospace company is the one keeping the information secret?

SlowMotion321

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

I not losing myself yet, we all end up recognizing the truth after this. I have to read the story first and look over what they discovered here that's original, fresh and new, and not known before. It just whisper right now a new article will talk about recovered alien craft. I have seen some sources in Ufology claim the UFOs are not kept by the US military, instead a private Aerospace company is the one keeping the information secret?

I hear ye. It's just that Fox is well Fox, if they said the sky is blue I would have to go outside and check, De Longue et al haven't exactly covered themselves in glory IMO, there is something a little off about the whole to the stars thing, the Aerospace company is probably Bigeloe Aerospace (BASS), he has been into the whole thing for years, not to mentioned he was the one who set up the whole skinwalker ranch NIDS investigation so he has a track record. As usual we will have to wait and see are they going to come out with something substantial and will the US military admit to anything without obfuscation!

Cheerful Spring2

SlowMotion321 wrote: »

I hear ye. It's just that Fox is well Fox, if they said the sky is blue I would have to go outside and check, De Longue et al haven't exactly covered themselves in glory IMO, there is something a little off about the whole to the stars thing, the Aerospace company is probably Bigeloe Aerospace (BASS), he has been into the whole thing for years, not to mentioned he was the one who set up the whole skinwalker ranch NIDS investigation so he has a track record. As usual we will have to wait and see are they going to come out with something substantial and will the US military admit to anything without obfuscation!

From what I heard, it's not Bigelow Aerospace. It's a private contractor company who runs a "special access program group" they got the technology and congress and the US military doesn't even have access to it.

Wilson memo/leak speaks to it. Wilson was Director of Intelligence for the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Deputy Director of Intelligence for the Joint Chiefs. He told Eric Davis a prominent scientist in the 90s, that there is a cabal like MJ12 and that are in control of this secret special access program. Wilson told Davis it took 45 days of phoning and investigation to find the program and when he tried to get access to it, he was told he didn't have the need to know. The classification is even beyond the Pentagon to bypass. This is the story.

Just a little bit more info.
Wilson told Davis in the memo he spoke to the manager, the security director, and the corporate attorney for the special access program and was denied access to it.

SlowMotion321

That's what i mean by obfuscation, the whole black projects setup is like one of those Russian dolls mated to an onion, trying to get at anything resembling the truth would make the xfiles look like a clear glass window. I often think the only way the truth will out is if the old landing on the white house lawn thing happens, but then if I see it on FOX......:P

Cheerful Spring2

SlowMotion321 wrote: »

That's what i mean by obfuscation, the whole black projects setup is like one of those Russian dolls mated to an onion, trying to get at anything resembling the truth would make the xfiles look like a clear glass window. I often think the only way the truth will out is if the old landing on the white house lawn thing happens, but then if I see it on FOX......:P

Memo is a fascinating read. The corporation because of Wilson rank in the military did disclose some details to him. He was not allowed in to see the craft.

Quoting tidbits now from the memo
They told Wilson “they were a reverse engineering program” of “technological hardware” recovered in the past.
They told Wilson they don't know the origin of the craft” who build it, but had some ideas and speculation around it.
They told Wilson the technology was not of this Earth.
Wilson said he spoke to the special access program committee to gain access but told him they be siding with the contractor here.They told him to forget it and leave this alone for his career.

SlowMotion321

As soon as you read the phrase "Reverse engineering" you know somethings up!

Cheerful Spring2

SlowMotion321 wrote: »

As soon as you read the phrase "Reverse engineering" you know somethings up!

The Wilson memo and many in the UFO community now believe its 100 percent legit leak. Progress in reverse engineering the alleged craft is non existent. Our science doesn't understand the technology here. Well they told Wilson progress is slow with little to know success.

Bubbaclaus

Why are lights that are clearly from a built up area on Earth being described as a UFO on this thread?

SlowMotion321

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

Why are lights that are clearly from a built up area on Earth being described as a UFO on this thread?

Because it's obviously not swamp gas duh!

Cheerful Spring2

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

Why are lights that are clearly from a built up area on Earth being described as a UFO on this thread?

Where is your city lights, you have daytime and night (shadow cycle) intervals shown on this video. Do you see city lights below?

Ipso

A bit more on Wilson.
https://badufos.blogspot.com/2020/06/richard-dolan-three-strikes-and-youre.html

Cheerful Spring2

Events are happening to let the pubic know more about the subject and we'll see where it ends up?

Last June, senators and staff involved in Intelligence and Defense subcommittees were reportedly “coming out of the woodwork” to receive briefings on unidentified flying objects. Whether inspired by the evidence or just a feeling of generosity, the Senate Intelligence Committee now wants to extend that courtesy to the public: On Tuesday, the committee voted to require the Defense Department and U.S. intelligence agencies to provide a public analysis of any data related to “unidentified aerial phenomenon” as soon as 2021.

The vote, part of the annual intelligence-authorization bill, comes at a time of a larger government reckoning surrounding the transparency of the UFO reporting process. “The [Intelligence Committee] remains concerned that there is no unified, comprehensive process within the federal government for collecting and analyzing intelligence on unidentified aerial phenomena, despite the potential threat,” the senators wrote in their report on the bill.

According to Politico, if the proposal is approved by the full Senate and the House, it would require the “executive branch to centralize all relevant information about such intrusions collected from a wide range of sources, including the Office of Naval Intelligence, the FBI, satellites or other technical means, and human spies.” Such an unclassified report would be compiled by the director of National Intelligence and the secretary of Defense and would have to identify “any incidents or patterns that indicate a potential adversary may have achieved breakthrough aerospace capabilities that could put United States strategic or conventional forces at risk.”

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/senate-intelligence-votes-to-allow-public-to-see-ufo-records.html

I not sure why people hate on Tom Delonge group, because it seems to me an open public discussion about the topic has started because of their involvement.

Bubbaclaus

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Where is your city lights, you have daytime and night (shadow cycle) intervals shown on this video. Do you see city lights below?

Sorry, I'm not sure what your argument is. Is it that you can't see city lights from space? Cos the video in the OP, along with thousands of other videos, is clear evidence that you can.

Cheerful Spring2

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

Sorry, I'm not sure what your argument is. Is it that you can't see city lights from space? Cos the video in the OP, along with thousands of other videos, is clear evidence that you can.

These Pictures and images taken by satellite's orbit around the earth. They zoom in to capture that below. The UFO was captured by a camera fitted it on the space station. Space X dragon was approaching to dock at the time when the UFO went by. You can even see the craft is not in focus it came from one side out of frame of the camera and went to the next side very fast and left.

SlowMotion321

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Events are happening to let the pubic know more about the subject and we'll see where it ends up?



https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/senate-intelligence-votes-to-allow-public-to-see-ufo-records.html

I not sure why people hate on Tom Delonge group, because it seems to me an open public discussion about the topic has started because of their involvement.

I heard him being interviewed by George Knapp talking about TTSA before he set it up and I thought cool sounds great but they just don't seem to be living up to what he was touting, not to mention that their fact checking is a bit suspect, they presented a known pic of a Mogul balloon at one of their press conferences as a genuine UFO, I really hope they live up to their hype but I have yet to be convinced, there is also a smell of commercialism about the whole thing, OK everybody needs to make a buck but he is not short of a bob or two!

Cheerful Spring2

SlowMotion321 wrote: »

I heard him being interviewed by George Knapp talking about TTSA before he set it up and I thought cool sounds great but they just don't seem to be living up to what he was touting, not to mention that their fact checking is a bit suspect, they presented a known pic of a Mogul balloon at one of their press conferences as a genuine UFO, I really hope they live up to their hype but I have yet to be convinced, there is also a smell of commercialism about the whole thing, OK everybody needs to make a buck but he is not short of a bob or two!

ATTIP was a UFO program set up to investigate military/aerial encounters with UFOs.The Pentagon admitted recently the videos Tom group released are genuine, not fake. TTSA is a civilian investigation of UFOs, so they don't have the same access anymore.

Does this look a known airplane to you? This is the classic/oval shaped saucer craft reported by people for decades. Its 19,000 feet up in the air and US Jet approaching it.


Video is more impressive because it moved off at rapid speed from a standstill position and left no evidence how it was fueled. There no smoke/fumes left behind.

SlowMotion321

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

ATTIP was a UFO program set up to investigate military/aerial encounters with UFOs.The Pentagon admitted recently the videos Tom group released are genuine, not fake. TTSA is a civilian investigation of UFOs, so they don't have the same access anymore.

Does this look a known airplane to you? This is the classic/oval shaped saucer craft reported by people for decades. Its 19,000 feet up in the air and US Jet approaching it.


Video is more impressive because it moved off at rapid speed from a standstill position and left no evidence how it was fueled. There no smoke/fumes left behind.

I've seen the videos and I agree with you they are convincing, I am more bitching about how TTSA have handled themselves, I think they dropped the ball a couple of times and cast doubt on their own credability, don't get me wrong I would love to see them succeed they just need to not make silly mistakes as it gives ammunition to those who would like to just call bull**** on the whole thing, i am not one of those!

Bubbaclaus

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

These Pictures and images taken by satellite's orbit around the earth. They zoom in to capture that below. The UFO was captured by a camera fitted it on the space station. Space X dragon was approaching to dock at the time when the UFO went by. You can even see the craft is not in focus it came from one side out of frame of the camera and went to the next side very fast and left.

And by UFO you mean the lights coming from the Earths surface in the video?

I think you are hoping so hard that it is something interesting that it has blinded you from what it obviously is.

Cheerful Spring2

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

I think you are hoping so hard that it is something interesting that it has blinded you from what it obviously is.

You convinced it lights from Earth that's fine, you have an opinion. I disagree.

Watch the video again the object passes the camera, and leaves the field of view. If it was lights, below you see that continually, as the camera focused towards the earth. The Camera not moving and panning around here.

Cheerful Spring2

SlowMotion321 wrote: »

I am more bitching about how TTSA have handled themselves, I think they dropped the ball a couple of times and cast doubt on their own credability, don't get me wrong

Can you be more specific here? What have they promised and failed to deliver on here?