Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

EU Biodiversity strategy 2030

Options
1…121314151618»

Comments

  • Options
    #512
    roosterman71
    Registered Users Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Even if this was rejected in the EU, the greens here were going to push it through locally. The vote today doesn't make much difference to us then in that regard



  • Options
    #513
    Jonnyc135
    Registered Users Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    So this is the written stipulation in the EU Document.

    "The obligation for Member States to meet the rewetting targets set out in the first subparagraph, points (a), (b) and (c), does not imply an obligation for farmers and private landowners to rewet their land, for whom rewetting on agricultural land remains voluntary, without prejudice to obligations stemming from national law".

    Have we been sold a full **** pup - does this "without prejudice to obligations stemming from national law" mean that this can be reneged on in order to meet obligations from national law. Sure sounds like it. Anyone have any ideas as I am not a legal professional or up to speed with that lingo?

    If this is the case then we really need to start opening our eyes and educating ourselves on this - we are being sold down the river by people we elect who then bare face misinform the truth to us and are currently in the process of bringing in misinformation laws to control the narrative.

    I hope I'm wrong, if anyone know any legal professional well that could interpret that sentence it would really help.



  • Options
    #514
    roosterman71
    Registered Users Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Sure reads like that. Remember, those in Dublin are a bigger danger to agriculture than those in the EU



  • Options
    #515
    jaymla627
    Registered Users Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/121832066#Comment_121832066

    For argumentsake, for farms bordering bord na mona bogs, that will be rewetted, and in all likelyhood lead to lands farmer owned bounding them been rewetted what's the backstop to protect these farmers?

    Eu/goverment will say its mother nature's faulty, tough s**t, the funny thing is the Chinese destroyed and confiscated millions of acres of land, to build dams, the EU is basically morphing into a authorian communist type rule of law



Advertisement