Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New regulations signed by Simon Harris last night

Options
13»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    GM228 wrote: »
    That's the ISB, not the Iris Oifigiúil, they are supposed to be "published" in the Iris Oifigiúil.

    They were published in Friday's edition (number 29).

    http://www.irisoifigiuil.ie/currentissues/Ir100420.pdf

    ta, the version of the regs I saw previously posted, said "draft"


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Juicee wrote: »
    But I've seen nothing that could override articles 15 and 40 with regard to personal liberty.

    This will be challenged in court I think.

    People all too often mention the Constitution without giving consideration to this important point:-
    4 1° No citizen shall be deprived of his personal liberty save in accordance with law.

    If there is a law which allows for your detention etc which is in force at the time and used accordingly you can't use Article 40 4 1° to make a claim that the law is unconstitutional, you need to use something else in the Constitution.


  • Registered Users Posts: 916 ✭✭✭Páid


    This is at the bottom of S.I. 121 of 2020
    The regulations come into effect on 8 April and will remain in operation until 12 April 2020.
    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2020/si/121/made/en/print

    Does this mean that the travel exemptions are no longer allowed?


  • Registered Users Posts: 916 ✭✭✭Páid


    Páid wrote: »
    This is at the bottom of S.I. 121 of 2020


    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2020/si/121/made/en/print

    Does this mean that the travel exemptions are no longer allowed?

    Just to answer my own question - the S.I. above was amended to 5th May 2020.

    https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/e9d120-minister-for-health-simon-harris-signs-regulations-to-give-an-garda-/


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Páid wrote: »
    This is at the bottom of S.I. 121 of 2020


    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2020/si/121/made/en/print

    Does this mean that the travel exemptions are no longer allowed?
    Páid wrote: »
    Just to answer my own question - the S.I. above was amended to 5th May 2020.

    https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/e9d120-minister-for-health-simon-harris-signs-regulations-to-give-an-garda-/

    The Regulations as they stand no longer apply until another Ministerial regulation is signed either amending the first set or otherwise extending their applicability, and like the first ones will need to be published in the Iris Oifigiúil.

    No such regulation appears to have been signed as yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    GM228 wrote: »
    The Regulations as they stand no longer apply until another Ministerial regulation is signed either amending the first set or otherwise extending their applicability, and like the first ones will need to be published in the Iris Oifigiúil.

    No such regulation appears to have been signed as yet.
    They have been signed, just not published yet.
    https://assets.gov.ie/72788/fe7a0c66cb9244a1b86162257d98cac3.pdf


  • Registered Users Posts: 916 ✭✭✭Páid


    Got your wish - Gemma O'Doherty and John Waters launch High Court proceedings claiming Covid-19 laws are unconstitutional https://jrnl.ie/5075234


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Páid wrote: »
    Got your wish - Gemma O'Doherty and John Waters launch High Court proceedings claiming Covid-19 laws are unconstitutional https://jrnl.ie/5075234

    Representing yourself in court can be difficult at the best of times, but representing yourself in a JR is just madness and highly likely doomed to fail.


  • Registered Users Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    GM228 wrote: »
    Representing yourself in court can be difficult at the best of times, but representing yourself in a JR is just madness and highly likely doomed to fail.

    Ya I agree, in a way, I am glad, they are representing themselves as these laws are morally right, but they are pushing the limits of the constitution, especially delegation of power to the minister and if they had a good legal team, they might of had a chance of winning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭BaronVon


    Is there any cost to bringing a JR when representing yourself? i.e. fees to lodge documents etc?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,243 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    BaronVon wrote: »
    Is there any cost to bringing a JR when representing yourself? i.e. fees to lodge documents etc?
    Yes, there are court fees payable. But they are modest compared to the cost of engaging legal representation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭ezra_


    BaronVon wrote: »
    Is there any cost to bringing a JR when representing yourself? i.e. fees to lodge documents etc?

    If they fail in their action, can the State have their legal fees awarded against Gemma and John?


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,243 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    ezra_ wrote: »
    If they fail in their action, can the State have their legal fees awarded against Gemma and John?
    Yes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭ezra_


    This isn't anyway at all off putting...

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1250580858093875201


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,065 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    Please don't give them clicks or oxygen, this is precisely what they want!!


Advertisement