Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Just One More Watch - Youtube reviewer

  • 26-03-2020 2:09pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,655 ✭✭✭


    His latest a "pagani design" €75 diver not for everyone, but a lot of watch for the money.

    Seiko NH35 movement, saphire crystal, 100M




    on sale here for the next day or so.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,925 ✭✭✭hitemfrank


    That's Just One More Watch to you pal ;)

    I do rather enjoy his videos.

    It would be nice to see Pagani branch out from the homage designs. They do pretty well spec'd watches but I would like to see some original designs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Latest AliExpress review from Justonemorewatch.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hF48E7rUL0

    I was sent this link for free and don't have to return it. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    I'm tempted by the Seagull 1963 with the sapphire crystal. It's a Chinese watch that doesn't pretend to be Italian, German or Swiss but still has a Swissy movement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭dinorebel


    Have to say I love his channel really enthusiastic with realistic options on watches people (me) can afford.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    dinorebel wrote: »
    Have to say I love his channel really enthusiastic with realistic options on watches people (me) can afford.
    I would take everything he says with a pinch of salt. Affiliate links galore, free review watches, sponsored reviews etc.

    Most Youtubers are desperate for content ("what video can I make today?") and it makes them beholden to wheover can supply them with a steady stream of 'things' to unbox/review.

    Not knocking him, it's the nature of the game. You see it with all types of products.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,655 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    I would take everything he says with a pinch of salt. Affiliate links galore, free review watches, sponsored reviews etc.

    Most Youtubers are desperate for content ("what video can I make today?") and it makes them beholden to wheover can supply them with a steady stream of 'things' to unbox/review.

    Not knocking him, it's the nature of the game. You see it with all types of products.

    In fairness he usually mentions if he has received a watch for free ( with a loud buzzer in the first few minutes ), also he does give the odd negative review


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭redlead


    celtic_oz wrote: »
    His latest a "pagani design" €75 diver not for everyone, but a lot of watch for the money.

    Seiko NH35 movement, saphire crystal, 100M




    on sale here for the next day or so.

    My friend has a previous incarnation of the pagani design sub rip off so I've seen it in the flesh. To be fair, it's serious value for money. Decent movement, ceramic bezel, sapphire crystal etc. I don't know how they make them so cheap. His criticism of it is the bezel is misaligned , realistically the bracelet is poor quality, the screw down crown is very very stiff and grainy, there's no AR coating, the crystal is flat etc For the money though, they've manged to put a decent watch together.

    These Chinese rip offs aren't my thing and I would have no interest in wearing one but if that doesn't bother you and you have very limited money to spend, you won't find much better quality wise at that very low price point. The pagani design watches are definitely a cut above the usual chinese crap if anyone has experience with Cadisen and the like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    redlead wrote: »

    These Chinese rip offs aren't my thing and I would have no interest in wearing one but if that doesn't bother you and you have very limited money to spend, you won't find much better quality wise at that very low price point. The pagani design watches are definitely a cut above the usual chinese crap if anyone has experience with Cadisen and the like.

    Go quartz and get a Casio Duro (Marlin) for about the same money. £76 + P&P on Amazon. A genuine original not some Chinese rip-off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,329 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    I've a better idea, buy what you like yourself and don't worry about what other people might think


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭redlead


    Go quartz and get a Casio Duro (Marlin) for about the same money. £76 + P&P on Amazon. A genuine original not some Chinese rip-off.

    That's a different type of watch though with it being a quartz. The OP may want an automatic or may really like rolex subs and want something that looks like it. For that money I'd personally opt for a vostok (I actually have one that never gets much wrist time to be honest), but hands down the pagani design is a better quality watch than a vostok. As the poster above alluded to, get what you like yourself. I was just pointing out that if he does get the Pagani, it's a well built watch for the money with a decent movement.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    redlead wrote: »
    That's a different type of watch though with it being a quartz. The OP may want an automatic or may really like rolex subs and want something that looks like it. For that money I'd personally opt for a vostok (I actually have one that never gets much wrist time to be honest), but hands down the pagani design is a better quality watch than a vostok. As the poster above alluded to, get what you like yourself. I was just pointing out that if he does get the Pagani, it's a well built watch for the money with a decent movement.

    It's a diver with 200m of water resistance as opposed to the PD's 100m which today hardly qualifies as a 'diver'. It has a quality bezel unlike the PD.

    The OP can spend his money how he likes but it pays to consider alternative options which is what forums are for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,329 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    I mean, under €40 for this is pretty impressive: https://a.aliexpress.com/_dXN2KsW


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Cienciano wrote: »
    I mean, under €40 for this is pretty impressive: https://a.aliexpress.com/_dXN2KsW

    It sure is.

    Although "Swimming Military Army" with only 50m WR, I wonder which army and if they just run through puddles. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,329 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    They're just keywords so it'll turn up in a search.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    And the original speedmasters (which did end up being dunked in the ocean on re-entry from orbit) only had 3ATM I believe - nothing wrong with 30m wr if it's actually 30m - you can go swimming with that no problems. You can dive to normal depths with a 50m too - deepest I've been was 28m. 200m nowadays (and especially for most desk divers out there :D) means very little - just like Omega's HE valve ;)

    If you have a 3atm watch that is actually tested to that then you shouldn't have much issues swimming with it - a 3atm watch may very well be on a leather strap though which wouldn't do well in water!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    And the original speedmasters (which did end up being dunked in the ocean on re-entry from orbit) only had 3ATM I believe - nothing wrong with 30m wr if it's actually 30m - you can go swimming with that no problems.

    They didn't get dunked, at least not any time I saw it on TV. They were still inside the capsule when it parachuted into the ocean.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    46ccd545df062f25618774675ad83223.jpg

    Here's one photo anyway - I saw a different one previously but my google-fu isn't working 100% right now. Anyhow 3ATM is perfectly fine for dips (as long as the manufacturer isn't just putting a 3atm tag on it and not sealing the watch correctly) - you'll see plenty of others who swim/shower etc. with their speedmasters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    That capsule isn't the right way up. Could be a photo of a training exercise.

    Not saying it never happened but normally they didn't even get their feet wet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    The latest video from the chirpy little Aussie-Scot. His review of the gold-tone Seiko 5 Model SNZH60 'Sports Watch'.
    I like the guy and he's very prolific.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tzsFPe76Fo&t=604s

    IMO a tacky piece of male jewellery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭dinorebel


    The latest video from the chirpy little Aussie-Scot. His review of the gold-tone Seiko 5 Model SNZH60 'Sports Watch'.
    I like the guy and he's very prolific.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tzsFPe76Fo&t=604s

    IMO a tacky piece of male jewellery.




    As I said I enjoy the channel but that watch..................My Eyes,My Eyes


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Thirdfox wrote: »

    Here's one photo anyway - I saw a different one previously but my google-fu isn't working 100% right now.
    That's a Gemini mission splashdown by the look of it. That's how the righted themselves automatically. The hatches are still closed so the guys and their Speedies are still inside. The guy in the water is likely another Navy diver who jumped in already.

    The only 60's era mission I can think of where anyone left the capsule and jumped into the water was Gus Grissom's Mercury splashdown. I'm not sure he was even wearing a Speedie at that stage of the game? It certainly wasn't yet the official flight watch anyway.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Wibbs wrote: »
    That's a Gemini mission splashdown by the look of it. That's how the righted themselves automatically. The hatches are still closed so the guys and their Speedies are still inside. The guy in the water is likely another Navy diver who jumped in already.

    The only 60's era mission I can think of where anyone left the capsule and jumped into the water was Gus Grissom's Mercury splashdown. I'm not sure he was even wearing a Speedie at that stage of the game? It certainly wasn't yet the official flight watch anyway.

    Right you are - the previous photo I saw was on WUS some time ago so it could well have been "fake news" :D

    Did get it confirmed:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Speedmaster

    that the first official flight the Speedmaster took once flight approved was Gemini 3 - here's a video of the recovery and certainly the astronauts weren't "dunked" - perhaps splashed a little :P
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CnNUra7I1M

    At 1:30:00ish I don't know if that's the speedmaster on the wrist as the astronaut is winched up or part of the winch contraption.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Thirdfox wrote: »

    At 1:30:00ish I don't know if that's the speedmaster on the wrist as the astronaut is winched up or part of the winch contraption.

    It's a watch and presumably the Speedmaster but he's wearing the watch on the inside of his wrist. This should be de rigueur for all Speedo owners from now on. :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 johnphillips


    I'm tempted by the Seagull 1963 with the sapphire crystal. It's a Chinese watch that doesn't pretend to be Italian, German or Swiss but still has a Swissy movement.

    I've ordered that a couple of weeks ago. Looking forward to seeing how it turns out!
    I like JOMW - he's consistent enough in reviewing in that he usually includes criticisms and he's open about when he's been provided with a free watch. Better than a lot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    I've ordered that a couple of weeks ago. Looking forward to seeing how it turns out!
    I like JOMW - he's consistent enough in reviewing in that he usually includes criticisms and he's open about when he's been provided with a free watch. Better than a lot.

    I was ready to 'pull the trigger' on it myself but then decided to take a year's break from watch buying. Hope you post photos and give your impressions of it once it arrives as I could probably be in the market for one this time next year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Jody's latest video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv31ziA4ftI

    A review of the new Invicta 1953, a Rolex homage that actually looks understated and quite good IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭dinorebel





    He gets this spot on I love the watch but will change the strap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,329 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    When he has it alongside the 2 seikos, I genuinely prefer the Orient. And I love seikos


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Citizen NY2300 was great too at that price point - discontinued now but both it and the NY0040 were fantastic tool dive watches.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Interesting video on the Seagull 1963 from Just One More Watch

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFLqBdcbhkc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Interesting video on the Seagull 1963 from Just One More Watch

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFLqBdcbhkc

    His info on this particular watch isn't really correct - unless he stated in the video that the 1963 isn't a Sea-Gull watch at all.

    The Sea-Gull version of the watch is called the D304:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=seagull+d304&client=firefox-b-d&sxsrf=ALeKk03IlYWVJ-Z39qzEqiIHU6Y2QJz__Q:1589139411777&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZu4zRharpAhUxonEKHUj_DYkQ_AUoAXoECAwQAw&biw=1920&bih=966

    In terms of the 1963 variants (and it's something I followed closely on the Chinese mech forum) - none of them are "Sea-Gull 1963s" - some were made by Tslinen Sea-Gull in HK in the original batch.

    You might notice that none of them have Sea-Gull logos or Sea-Gull wording. On the dial it states 21 jewels, Tianjin Watch Factory (that term isn't TM'd by Sea-Gull to my understanding hence it's more "homage"/inspiration than fake). They use ST1901 movements but you can buy these to install in anything you want.

    He is right that HKED makes pretty good 1963s right now - but they aren't Sea-Gull watches (banie01 likes the bund version I recommended him too that HKED made for people who liked the column wheel chrono movement but not necessarily the 1963 vintage throwback).

    So in short - none of the 1963s are Sea-Gull 1963s - so none of them could possibly be "fake".

    You can go ahead and ask any guangzhou factory to make you a 1963 if you like - exactly what the 1963s currently look like and there would be no issue with anyone suing you for trademark infringement. If you made a D304 though Sea-Gull could pursue you for making a fake.

    It's not helped by some sellers using the term "re-issue" which may suggest to some people that this was somehow officially sanctioned/released by Sea-Gull but instead it is like buying a Parnis or Alpha - not something directly from Sea-Gull themselves. Anything goes wrong you'll need to contact your seller and Sea-Gull won't be servicing this watch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,122 ✭✭✭✭Jimmy Bottlehead


    Big fan of Jody's channel. Only recently developed an interest in watches and my budget means that any collection I build for the next year will be budget based, so his channel is particularly relevant.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,535 ✭✭✭btkm8unsl0w5r4


    Be carefull with this stuff. Yes this channel is good and jody is charasmatic, but remember you are being sold stuff here. He is shilling watches and living on affiliate links. He does review quality watches also, but there is not a consistent standard which makes it hard to take it seriously. If you get to the point where you have 10 affordable watches, your really sitting on one good watch and now you stuck trying to shift 10 watches that look good in photos but feel like crap on the wrist after the thrill of "another new thing" is gone.

    Look at the graph below, a funny one. I am somewhere between 4,5 & 6, but generally the longer you are in the hobby the more this makes sense. If you are going to buy affordable be careful to buy watches you can shift without loosing too much money. Automatic seiko is a good example. Ovoid Orient, and parnis When you get to the point where you are going to spend good money like 500 - 1500 euro dont fall into that trap of ...."well I just buy what I like" thats an excuse to buy "Sh1tters". Take some advice from the long term collectors, I wish I had in the early days. Its a fun hobby but we are not all individual flowers, and quality is always worth the money/ Once your collection has a backbone of quality, then you can add individuality and flair. Do not underestimate the power of saving. A watch you think you will never own is quite attainable if you just wait a few years and save.

    8twodvpw7y921.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭redlead


    All valid points. Out of interest what is considered ****ty Swiss? Is this the likes of Hamilton and Tissot or would Oris and Longines fall into this category? People love to look down on TAG but is this warranted? I never had one so don't really know. What's so bad about them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Speaking from personal experience - I don't think there is anything bad per se about Tags at all. Most don't speak to me however - in the past when they were using ETA and Valjoux movements it seemed like they were trading on previous Heuer prestige without trying something different (but then again watchmaking can be a pretty conservative industry - no-one complains about Calatravas not "pushing the envelope" - but TG weren't positioning themselves in that arena - but doing the F1 tie in - young/dynamic positioning).

    TG's positioning can be seen in the very large depreciation they take on the 2nd hand market - you don't get the same with Rolex, Omega or even say a Seiko. Sadly they might be more like a Zenith (which is a brand I quite like for their one movement though) - as in unless you were happy to spend retail prices because you can afford anything you want and just wanted that Tag then you'll be in for a bad time if you ever want to sell your Tag.

    Put it this way - when I got burgled they took my Speedmaster and Aquaracer - I immediately started search for a replacement Speedmaster - never did replace that Aquaracer because (to me) the design didn't speak out differently compared to the other chronographs I had already and it just didn't feel "special" to me.

    @Fitzgeme - where do microbrands fit in on that graph? :D

    I agree that you'll find that if in time you have 10 affordable watches you might have been able to get that Omega/Rolex etc. - but going through the process of the affordables and discovering what you like/don't like is valuable too. I keep a spreadsheet on my watches - incoming/outgoings - I have seen that yeah - with all the watches that I've owned - if I just saved all that I can buy into the Patek level etc. - but would I be truly happy not having experienced all those watches - rotating in and out? Maybe for some - if they knew from the beginning that they would be 100% satisfied with that Nautilus and save up for it - but...how would they even know about a Nautilus without having experienced a Seiko Turtle, Hamtun H2, Longines Hydroconquest etc. beforehand?

    Would Wibbs be at 5, 6 or 7 I wonder? :D


    @red - I think the graph is a little outdated now - Tag actually has become that cutting edge brand they kinda aspired to be back in the 00s - their mikrograph movement, mikrogirder, super accurate movement (that LVMH forced them to give to Zenith) all point to them actually producing some really innovative stuff - if I had a mikrogirder watch I wouldn't be selling that I think - it'd occupy an interesting niche in any watch collection.
    https://www.calibre11.com/tag-heuer-mikrogirder-2000/
    https://www.professionalwatches.com/whatever-happened-to-the-zenith-defy-lab/ (this movement was researched by Tag)

    a "poopy Swiss" would be something more like Invicta I would have thought - and even they seem to have improved from their 00s pseudo-marketing BS of "RRP of 5 billion dollars so 99.999% off and available at only $900!!!"


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,535 ✭✭✭btkm8unsl0w5r4


    redlead wrote: »
    All valid points. Out of interest what is considered ****ty Swiss? Is this the likes of Hamilton and Tissot or would Oris and Longines fall into this category? People love to look down on TAG but is this warranted? I never had one so don't really know. What's so bad about them?

    I think the fun of the hobby is finding this out.(it can get heated talking about watches you know)...;) I am not brave enough tonight to comment but I have only started drinking.
    Thirdfox wrote: »
    @Fitzgeme - where do microbrands fit in on that graph? :D

    Microbrands are the flesh on the bones of a quality collection, but generally I try to avoid unless they are of very specific interest to me (like a certain Irish kickstarter I am following). Microbrands are by definition niche, and most collectors are better served building their knowledge on the classics first. Developing a unique style is an advanced move. Like a sexual fetish, you need some missionary experiance before you commit to the lifestyle. :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    I almost missed the edit you put in there Fitz :D - I guess I'd be the "helicopter" then - warning NSFW dictionary entry:
    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=helicopter&utm_source=search-action

    Pretty niche tastes.

    I think another potential benefit from microbrands is that you might be able to communicate directly with the owner and 1) well it could go terribly if the brand is something that's a fly by night (and that might not even be the intention of the owner either) and no trace is there in 2-3 years' time or 2) you might be able to get in touch on a 1 to 1 basis and influence the design of watches directly at source (try writing in to Omega with your ideas, or even to Sea-Gull ha).

    The graph probably needs to be updated though what with Seiko pushing their prices up - go get a respectable $50 Chinese (non-fake!) watch to get started into the world of automatic mechanicals - Seiko/Citizens might be 2nd stage now.

    I'd also put in a Vostok phase - when you realise that the world isn't just Swiss and a $50 watch can be "cool" too :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,375 ✭✭✭893bet


    I think you skipped 5 Fitz.......

    I see Paul Thorpe is hanging up his watch. And the urban gentry. Can’t say I will miss either.

    The one channels I watch every video of these days is watchfinder, timeless and bark and jack.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭redlead


    893bet wrote: »
    I think you skipped 5 Fitz.......

    I see Paul Thorpe is hanging up his watch. And the urban gentry. Can’t say I will miss either.

    The one channels I watch every V iuideo of these days is watchfinder, timeless and bark and jack.

    I don't think Urban Gentry is going away, it will probably just be in a slightly different format and with less regularity. I wonder do watch box actually own the rights to it now that his contract is up. Even though he's full of crap and apparently plagiarised a lot of material, the actual content is alright I think. I haven't really looked at it much recently but really enjoyed it when I first got into watches.

    Timeless is the best channel around at the moment in my opinion. If you look past his massive ego, the quality of his videos are superb. He must put massive work into filming and editing them and obviously has the artistic streak. His Breitling in Sienna video is TV quality. Obviously the channel is mostly rolex but that's where his collection is at at the moment (Fitzgemes stage 4 I believe). He's the best salesman Rolex never had. I am not generally a big fan of Rolex designs but now all I can think of is the yachtmaster 40 in dark rhodium.

    I find Bark and Jack to be a bit of a bluffer. His video on changing his mind on Bremont is vomit inducing. Archie (we won't even go there) did a hilarious response video https://youtu.be/TdQqW7TFxDg

    So many of the channels are just the same old lazy reviews of the same watches though. Even at that, hardly any will actually give a proper analysis of the watch like watchfinder or timeless will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,004 ✭✭✭micks_address


    redlead wrote: »
    I don't think Urban Gentry is going away, it will probably just be in a slightly different format and with less regularity. I wonder do watch box actually own the rights to it now that his contract is up. Even though he's full of crap and apparently plagiarised a lot of material, the actual content is alright I think. I haven't really looked at it much recently but really enjoyed it when I first got into watches.

    Timeless is the best channel around at the moment in my opinion. If you look past his massive ego, the quality of his videos are superb. He must put massive work into filming and editing them and obviously has the artistic streak. His Breitling in Sienna video is TV quality. Obviously the channel is mostly rolex but that's where his collection is at at the moment (Fitzgemes stage 4 I believe). He's the best salesman Rolex never had. I am not generally a big fan of Rolex designs but now all I can think of is the yachtmaster 40 in dark rhodium.

    I find Bark and Jack to be a bit of a bluffer. His video on changing his mind on Bremont is vomit inducing. Archie (we won't even go there) did a hilarious response video https://youtu.be/TdQqW7TFxDg

    So many of the channels are just the same old lazy reviews of the same watches though. Even at that, hardly any will actually give a proper analysis of the watch like watchfinder or timeless will.

    Yeah i dont mind TGV... he obviously got stung by the pandemic as id have thought the watchbox contract would have run longer otherwise.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    One channel I can suggest (and not because he accepted a review of my watch :D ) is Relative-time - he goes the extra mile in filming the watches (putting different straps on them etc.) - but of course he is operating in the affordables arena and not looking at Pateks/Rolexs etc.

    I can confirm that his reviews are honest too (i.e. no payment is necessary) and if a company decides to gift him a watch he apparently then auctions it off for charity later on too (and declares straight off that it was given to him).

    Not afraid to point out flaws too and calls it as he sees it (he did a review on a Boldr watch where the 12 o'clock index was clearly misaligned - and said so).

    He's covered a few Seiko watches etc. too so it's not just micro-brands.

    Put it this way - a reviewer that writes back asking exactly how to pronounce Sólás - is taking his work seriously :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,535 ✭✭✭btkm8unsl0w5r4


    Yeah i dont mind TGV... he obviously got stung by the pandemic as id have thought the watchbox contract would have run longer otherwise.

    I think the normal watchbox viewers hates TGV with a passion. I personally find him a pompus dingus and he is a awful shill. He does bring a lot of new people to the hobby but he is not a good fit for Watchbox.

    Watchbox and watchfinder to great vids and you know that they are sellers so you know you are being sold.

    Thorpe is good, but it takes him too long to get to the point and I couldnt trust him with all his bought subscribers that then vanished.

    Bark and Jack is good , I like that one, although prone to click bait.

    Caseback Watch Channel is good. German fellow,

    Timeless watch channel is good (although he makes two tone look good which is a skill in itself). One of our own and deserves some support, he has the skills and charisma to get his point across.

    London Watch Collector is great, guy has a fab collection, seems to by a 10k watch every week.

    I suppose most of these guys are reliant on their own collection, so you get either a Patek or Rolex heavy channel or you get a endless stream of tatt shop watches

    Then there is the pontiff...Archie Luxery aka Paul Pluta....say what you want but the entertainment value is something else, once you get into it and learn his shtick you soone realise this guy is a legend.

    Bear Clooney is a great channel if you are into Rolex and Omega.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭redlead


    Then there is the pontiff...Archie Luxery aka Paul Pluta....say what you want but the entertainment value is something else, once you get into it and learn his shtick you soone realise this guy is a legend.

    .

    sometimes I actually have tears running down my cheeks I find him so funny.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,122 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    redlead wrote: »
    Timeless is the best channel around at the moment in my opinion. If you look past his massive ego, the quality of his videos are superb. He must put massive work into filming and editing them and obviously has the artistic streak. His Breitling in Sienna video is TV quality. Obviously the channel is mostly rolex but that's where his collection is at at the moment (Fitzgemes stage 4 I believe).

    He says as much himself in the video I watched last night, mentions he had several Omegas before. Last minute or two:



    Someone calls him a Rolex fanboi, and he responds by saying we caught him in a Rolex moment.

    I think I've just landed myself at stage 4 too, if you would have told me this would happen a few years ago, I would have laughed in your face :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭redlead


    unkel wrote: »
    He says as much himself in the video I watched last night, mentions he had several Omegas before. Last minute or two:




    I think I've just landed myself at stage 4 too, if you would have told me this would happen a few years ago, I would have laughed in your face :D

    I think I'm at stage 4 mentally ..... eh except without having a Rolex :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,122 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    redlead wrote: »
    I think I'm at stage 4 mentally ..... eh except without having a Rolex :D

    That's where I was only 3 weeks ago. Then I got one. And now I already want other ones :o:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist



    Caseback Watch Channel is good. German fellow,

    Yeah Tim is about the only watch channel guy I warm to. Totally independent views and willing to branch out into his other interests, music, sartorial style, leather working and popular philosophy. A real renaissance man.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,535 ✭✭✭btkm8unsl0w5r4


    unkel wrote: »
    That's where I was only 3 weeks ago. Then I got one. And now I already want other ones :o:p

    The price of entry is high but the cost of ownership is practically nil if you buy right. Looks like the world will head into a high inflation period, cash is not where you want your money, and there are worse things to tie up money in than a few nice Rolex. The are very liquid (easy to sell) and you get the pleasure of wearing them to boot. Problem is that Rolex is seen as show off & snooty by those below and its seen a mid tier mass produced and unimaginative by those above.
    893Bet made a good point that watch collecting so long as you dont buy a load of garbage is a pretty cheap hobby, sometimes you make a few hundred, sometimes you loose a few hundred, but most hobbies are 100% loss.
    . A real renaissance man.

    Tending to the hipster some would say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    One other channel I watch is the TheWatches.tv - https://www.youtube.com/user/thewatchestv/videos

    They only look at the really high end stuff mostly - and they're pretty much positive about all the pieces they handle (I guess you won't get much access to high end pieces if you trash their watches) but having that kind of access is pretty cool.

    How many watch channels can get invited to tour through the ALS factory?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGAsib-4mCk

    So I think it's useful and they don't overegg how wondrously marvellous each 250,000 piece is - and anyway if you were spending 250k on a watch you wouldn't really care two hoots what Joe Public thinks :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Tending to the hipster some would say.

    He's too old to be a hipster, cool eccentric German IMO.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement