ASTI threaten strike action

Bobtheman

The asti has threatened strike action over unequal pay.
We are to be balloted soon.
I'm at present voting no as I'm sick of token strikes or the grand old Duke of York strategy.
I have seen younger staff climb over the bodies of older members to get promotion.
My generation have huge mortgage debt. NQTs have high rents but all drive cars and have a lifestyle I didn't have in my 20s and 30s.
The housing crisis will sort itself in 5 years.
A lot of them ran to the TUI last dispute or voted against strike action
Bottom line I don't trust my spine less colleagues.

mtoutlemonde

Bobtheman wrote: »

The asti has threatened strike action over unequal pay.
We are to be balloted soon.
I'm at present voting no as I'm sick of token strikes or the grand old Duke of York strategy.
I have seen younger staff climb over the bodies of older members to get promotion.
My generation have huge mortgage debt. NQTs have high rents but all drive cars and have a lifestyle I didn't have in my 20s and 30s.
The housing crisis will sort itself in 5 years.
A lot of them ran to the TUI last dispute or voted against strike action
Bottom line I don't trust my spine less colleagues.

+1 voting no. Was at branch meeting recently and that was the general feeling in the room. We lost enough last time while the NQTs hopped over to TUI or are still non union members - I hope nothing happens to them ie parent complaints, non renewal of contracts etc.

byhookorbycrook

I think it’s time for all 3 unions to get together and do a strike of 2-3 days . We might be listened to then.

Random sample

Two different payscales for people doing the same work in the same place is wrong. It will always be wrong. I will be voting yes on that basis.

It’s not about what individual younger teachers do or don’t do. It’s simply about righting a wrong.

km79

Random sample wrote: »

Two different payscales for people doing the same work in the same place is wrong. It will always be wrong. I will be voting yes on that basis.

It’s not about what individual younger teachers do or don’t do. It’s simply about righting a wrong.

I too will be voting yes
However I also echo a lot of the sentiments above
And
A lot of the people who should 100% be voting yes will be unable/unwilling to do so as they left for TUI /no union
For that reason I think it will be very tight with a very low turnout

Bobtheman

byhookorbycrook wrote: »

I think it’s time for all 3 unions to get together and do a strike of 2-3 days . We might be listened to then.

Primary school teachers - no way. They have no balls in the philosophical sense

Bobtheman

Not doing a token strike again.If the TuI and Asti agreed to 3 day perhaps but I see no sign of that. And even that can be classified as somewhat token.
Lower paid Tesco workers did 3 weeks for the love of Jesus
Token TUI strike today. Big deal . They can feel all smug about it.
Meanwhile two tier payscales continue...
Im voting No
Collegiality is dead as it is. The new promotion system and the selfishness of members old a s young took care of that

Benicetomonty

Bobtheman wrote: »

Not doing a token strike. If the TuI and Asti agreed to 3 day perhaps but I see no sign of that.
Token TUI strike today.

ASTI have made it clear that no action will be taken without the support of at least one other teacher union so thats something, I guess.

Hard to know where a lot of NQT heads are at tbh. Im aware that the vast majority of deserters who jumped ship to the TUI in 2016 and 2017 were established, pre 2011 teachers, and I know that a lot the nqts that left did so because they were on the verge of 2 year CIDs and were threatened (sorry, no other word) to do so on that basis by management. So I do sympathise with them in that regard, and obviously the pay and pension cuts were and remain appalling.

However, based on some comments Ive been reading these last few days on Voice for Teachers, it would seem that a lot of young teachers are holding their unions exclusively responsible for what happened to them back in 2010/2011 in a case of really embittered misdirection. Dont get me wrong, teaching unions probably didnt do enough to fight the unequal pay scales; bottom line is we accepted the CP Agreement and everything that went with it. Were we up against a hopeless govt that had to attack the PS with everything they had? Yep. Were we also fighting Europe itself, ie the Troika and the IMF? Yep. Did the ICTU roll over at the earliest possible chance, thus leaving the ASTI and a few other unions totally isolated? You bet. Did we have to cope with the resentment of thousands of private sector workers who were obviously suffering at the time? Sure did. Were we threatened with compulsory redundancies if we didnt play ball? We certainly were. And is a union's loyalty to its members or potential future members? Of course, it has to be the former. Were we told many of the measures were only temporary? Yes. But we accepted Croke Park. And the from what Ive read, that's all a lot of NQTs are seeing.

Posters say they dont see the point of going to branch meetings or even joining a union, and that is, imo, a dangerous situation. Taking action for pay equality would be a step towards showing disillusioned young teachers that unions are doing their bit to right a wrong that should never have happened, regardless of everything that led to it. If it isnt enough for them, so be it. Those that come after them will hopefully see the effort in a less prejudiced way.

acequion

Cannot for the life of me understand how anyone could even dream of voting no to a strike to end the injustice of pay apartheid no matter how token. Shame on those posters and those members with their petty grievances and petty grudges.:mad:

A one day strike isn't much and of course a week or three week strike by all three unions would be a hell of a lot better, but as pigs will fly before the latter happens, I'll take the former.

Any activity, even a token one, is keeping the pay dispute alive, it's putting it out there, it's fanning the coals that might eventually reignite into something a lot bigger. Do nothing and it goes away, the fire goes out. End of story!!

I'm no great fan of TUI but fair play to them for today and thanks for today! I don't think any one feels smug when they're down a day's pay and that's the result of a day's strike. Only a small bit of pain but pain nonetheless and worth it to keep the pay dispute alive.

So come on ASTI, forget all your petty squabbles which only feeds Govt agendas and vote yes to keep up the fight to end this blatant injustice that is unequal pay!

deisedevil

Random sample wrote: »

Two different payscales for people doing the same work in the same place is wrong. It will always be wrong. I will be voting yes on that basis.

It’s not about what individual younger teachers do or don’t do. It’s simply about righting a wrong.

Why is it just wrong? What specifically makes it wrong? Do you know why it was done in the first place?

It's a shame that teachers couldn't have a system where performance was linked to pay. For example the harder I work and the more productive I am the better an increase I can push for every year during my performance review. No guaranteed increase based on service.

I have yet to meet anyone who isn't a teacher who agrees that we should bring the lower payscale into line with the old payscale. It was changed with good reason and there's precious little appetite out there for a return to the old days where we were overpaying our public sector workers. Those on the lower payscale went into the profession with their eyes open. They knew the terms. We can all see them. They knew that there were teachers on a higher payscale and the reason why this is so. If I came out of college and suddenly realised how much I was going to earn and wasn't happy with my payscale, I'd have to suck it up or go back to college and change profession. Why do the teachers get to hold the country to ransom?

Benicetomonty

deisedevil wrote: »

Why is it just wrong? What specifically makes it wrong? Do you know why it was done in the first place?

It's a shame that teachers couldn't have a system where performance was linked to pay. For example the harder I work and the more productive I am the better an increase I can push for every year during my performance review. No guaranteed increase based on service.

I have yet to meet anyone who isn't a teacher who agrees that we should bring the lower payscale into line with the old payscale. It was changed with good reason and there's precious little appetite out there for a return to the old days where we were overpaying our public sector workers. Those on the lower payscale went into the profession with their eyes open. They knew the terms. We can all see them. They knew that there were teachers on a higher payscale and the reason why this is so. If I came out of college and suddenly realised how much I was going to earn and wasn't happy with my payscale, I'd have to suck it up or go back to college and change profession. Why do the teachers get to hold the country to ransom?

It is wrong on many levels. The 2 most important are
1) It is unfair. How do you justify a teacher who qualified in 2010 being on a different payscale than one who qualified the year after? You cant. Because it's wrong
2) It is contributing to a shortage of teachers and, to be brutally honest, it is lowering the standard of applicant. Both will have serious implications for the quality of our education system going forward.

Regarding your 2nd point, youre right: there is no tangible with which a teacher's 'performance' can be linked to his or her pay. Youre one of the very few non-teachers who have wound up in this forum who has the brains to see this. I commend you. Unfortunately it renders the rest of your point moot.

Youre aware Im sure that an entire cohort of student teachers were in the middle of their course when these changes were introduced. That means they categorically did not go into the job with their 'eyes wide open'. Regarding everybody who came after, they and we were told it was only a temporary measure that would be reversed after the recession. Like the pension levy. Like unpaid supervision. Like the croke park hours. They and we were lied to.

If teaching was all about money, we wouldnt have any. You really think front line public servants like nurses teachers etc were/are obscenely overpaid? The good ones, which is the vast majority, are worth every penny. And lets not forget that whatever money they make goes right back into the economy. They dont have Caymen Island investment funds or a rake of foreign properties like those in possession of actual wealth. Maybe those individuals would be a more suitable target for your ire?

RealJohn

deisedevil wrote: »

Why is it just wrong? What specifically makes it wrong? Do you know why it was done in the first place?

It's a shame that teachers couldn't have a system where performance was linked to pay. For example the harder I work and the more productive I am the better an increase I can push for every year during my performance review. No guaranteed increase based on service.

I have yet to meet anyone who isn't a teacher who agrees that we should bring the lower payscale into line with the old payscale. It was changed with good reason and there's precious little appetite out there for a return to the old days where we were overpaying our public sector workers. Those on the lower payscale went into the profession with their eyes open. They knew the terms. We can all see them. They knew that there were teachers on a higher payscale and the reason why this is so. If I came out of college and suddenly realised how much I was going to earn and wasn't happy with my payscale, I'd have to suck it up or go back to college and change profession. Why do the teachers get to hold the country to ransom?

I think Benicetomonty might have misread what I think you’re getting at in that second paragraph. If you’re arguing that there should be performance related pay for teachers (which is what I think you mean), that is simply unworkable, because there is so much diversity in our schools and in what is considered good performance. In many of the classes I teach, I have students who want to go to college and study medicine or engineering alongside students for whom getting a leaving cert at all is a big achievement (and not at all guaranteed). How do you propose that teachers in schools like that (of which there are hundreds of schools with thousands of teachers across the country) have their performance evaluated?

And while you’re at it, you seem to be very clear on the reason for the difference in pay scales but you haven’t actually told us what it is. Could you enlighten us, please?

Benicetomonty

RealJohn wrote: »

I think Benicetomonty might have misread what I think you’re getting at in that second paragraph. If you’re arguing that there should be performance related pay for teachers (which is what I think you mean), that is simply unworkable, because there is so much diversity in our schools and in what is considered good performance. In many of the classes I teach, I have students who want to go to college and study medicine or engineering alongside students for whom getting a leaving cert at all is a big achievement (and not at all guaranteed). How do you propose that teachers in schools like that (of which there are hundreds of schools with thousands of teachers across the country) have their performance evaluated?

And while you’re at it, you seem to be very clear on the reason for the difference in pay scales but you haven’t actually told us what it is. Could you enlighten us, please?

I didnt misread it. I may have given him/her too much credit however

deisedevil

Let's benchmark teachers in Ireland against their colleagues all around Europe and include their heavily subsided pensions in benchmarking. That would be fairest, wouldn't it? And to make sure it is fair for all, let's apply the results of the benchmarking to all teachers young and old and remove the current two tiers of pay. Shur who could argue with that. Everyone's happy then surely except for those who are currently earning far more than they are worth.

History Queen

deisedevil wrote: »

Why is it just wrong? What specifically makes it wrong? Do you know why it was done in the first place?

It's a shame that teachers couldn't have a system where performance was linked to pay. For example the harder I work and the more productive I am the better an increase I can push for every year during my performance review. No guaranteed increase based on service.

I have yet to meet anyone who isn't a teacher who agrees that we should bring the lower payscale into line with the old payscale. It was changed with good reason and there's precious little appetite out there for a return to the old days where we were overpaying our public sector workers. Those on the lower payscale went into the profession with their eyes open. They knew the terms. We can all see them. They knew that there were teachers on a higher payscale and the reason why this is so. If I came out of college and suddenly realised how much I was going to earn and wasn't happy with my payscale, I'd have to suck it up or go back to college and change profession. Why do the teachers get to hold the country to ransom?

On your point about lower paid teachers going inwith their eyes open and knowing the conditions. That is false. Inform yourself. I was completing my teaching training at the time. When i began studying one payscale was in force, when i qualified a different scalewas in force. Equal pay for equal work is not unreasonable.

RealJohn

deisedevil, I notice you didn’t answer either of my questions. They weren’t rhetorical. I was (and am) hoping that you’d answer them, because I’d genuinely like to know what you think in both cases.

History Queen

deisedevil wrote: »

Let's benchmark teachers in Ireland against their colleagues all around Europe and include their heavily subsided pensions in benchmarking. That would be fairest, wouldn't it? And to make sure it is fair for all, let's apply the results of the benchmarking to all teachers young and old and remove the current two tiers of pay. Shur who could argue with that. Everyone's happy then surely except for those who are currently earning far more than they are worth.

And of course we will account for the fact that across Europe widely different educational systems are in place as well as thefact that Irish teachers have more class contact time than most of their European counterparts.

I also would ask you to inform yourself about the pension scheme post2011 teachers are on (approx 12,000 per year assuming 40 years service....and the contributions they make towards it (three different pension related deductions in everypay cheque) .

Treppen

deisedevil wrote: »

Let's benchmark teachers in Ireland against their colleagues all around Europe and include their heavily subsided pensions in benchmarking. That would be fairest, wouldn't it? And to make sure it is fair for all, let's apply the results of the benchmarking to all teachers young and old and remove the current two tiers of pay. Shur who could argue with that. Everyone's happy then surely except for those who are currently earning far more than they are worth.

Could I get a source with that dogs dinner please?

RealJohn

Pretty sure deisedevil is gone. The people who come in for cheap digs at teachers don’t tend to hang around when people start asking them hard questions. Probably why they don’t like teachers in the first place: they used to ask them hard questions.

Treppen

RealJohn wrote: »

Pretty sure deisedevil is gone. The people who come in for cheap digs at teachers don’t tend to hang around when people start asking them hard questions. Probably why they don’t like teachers in the first place: they used to ask them hard questions.

:pac:

Bobtheman

Nothing I have read here convinces me to vote Yes. Collegiality is dead in most staffrooms. The last dispute has proven that.
I feel going off into the hills to wait for the next union Messiah. Because at the moment I see no change among younger staff in terms of wanting a strike. They have the numbers to take over the union If only they could get off their arses and try.

doc_17

deisedevil wrote: »

Why is it just wrong? What specifically makes it wrong? Do you know why it was done in the first place?

It's a shame that teachers couldn't have a system where performance was linked to pay. For example the harder I work and the more productive I am the better an increase I can push for every year during my performance review. No guaranteed increase based on service.

I have yet to meet anyone who isn't a teacher who agrees that we should bring the lower payscale into line with the old payscale. It was changed with good reason and there's precious little appetite out there for a return to the old days where we were overpaying our public sector workers. Those on the lower payscale went into the profession with their eyes open. They knew the terms. We can all see them. They knew that there were teachers on a higher payscale and the reason why this is so. If I came out of college and suddenly realised how much I was going to earn and wasn't happy with my payscale, I'd have to suck it up or go back to college and change profession. Why do the teachers get to hold the country to ransom?

You’ve heard of nurses right? They aren’t happy with it either. There’s loads of them. The new pay scales were changed in their last year of college so they had little control then to change course.

And the only group to ever really hold the country to ransom was the banks, a private sector company. That ransom was paid. Cop yourself on.

doc_17

deisedevil wrote: »

Let's benchmark teachers in Ireland against their colleagues all around Europe and include their heavily subsided pensions in benchmarking. That would be fairest, wouldn't it? And to make sure it is fair for all, let's apply the results of the benchmarking to all teachers young and old and remove the current two tiers of pay. Shur who could argue with that. Everyone's happy then surely except for those who are currently earning far more than they are worth.

What do you work at yourself anyway? It couldn’t be anything that requires too much intelligence if that’s the idea you’re putting forward. Tell us, how would it work? Go on, tell us.

And tell us how much you think I’m playing towards my pension and for how many years you think I’ll get it. Go on, tell us.

I know you’ve already being proven wrong already on this thread, gives you a chance to redeem yourself. Make us take you seriously.

I expect none of these questions to answered.

Treppen

doc_17 wrote: »

What do you work at yourself anyway? It couldn’t be anything that requires too much intelligence if that’s the idea you’re putting forward. Tell us, how would it work? Go on, tell us.

And tell us how much you think I’m playing towards my pension and for how many years you think I’ll get it. Go on, tell us.

I know you’ve already being proven wrong already on this thread, gives you a chance to redeem yourself. Make us take you seriously.

I expect none of these questions to answered.

He well gone now

political analyst

Benicetomonty wrote: »

ASTI have made it clear that no action will be taken without the support of at least one other teacher union so thats something, I guess.

Hard to know where a lot of NQT heads are at tbh. Im aware that the vast majority of deserters who jumped ship to the TUI in 2016 and 2017 were established, pre 2011 teachers, and I know that a lot the nqts that left did so because they were on the verge of 2 year CIDs and were threatened (sorry, no other word) to do so on that basis by management. So I do sympathise with them in that regard, and obviously the pay and pension cuts were and remain appalling.

However, based on some comments Ive been reading these last few days on Voice for Teachers, it would seem that a lot of young teachers are holding their unions exclusively responsible for what happened to them back in 2010/2011 in a case of really embittered misdirection. Dont get me wrong, teaching unions probably didnt do enough to fight the unequal pay scales; bottom line is we accepted the CP Agreement and everything that went with it. Were we up against a hopeless govt that had to attack the PS with everything they had? Yep. Were we also fighting Europe itself, ie the Troika and the IMF? Yep. Did the ICTU roll over at the earliest possible chance, thus leaving the ASTI and a few other unions totally isolated? You bet. Did we have to cope with the resentment of thousands of private sector workers who were obviously suffering at the time? Sure did. Were we threatened with compulsory redundancies if we didnt play ball? We certainly were. And is a union's loyalty to its members or potential future members? Of course, it has to be the former. Were we told many of the measures were only temporary? Yes. But we accepted Croke Park. And the from what Ive read, that's all a lot of NQTs are seeing.

Would it have made any difference if the ASTI had sent people to Germany to fight for public support over there? I think the German general public would have been sympathetic with teachers who were campaigning to protect education. After all, Germany takes education very seriously, given its recent history. However, I guess that's a matter for a different forum.

RealJohn

political analyst wrote: »

Would it have made any difference if the ASTI had sent people to Germany to fight for public support over there? I think the German general public would have been sympathetic with teachers who were campaigning to protect education. After all, Germany takes education very seriously, given its recent history. However, I guess that's a matter for a different forum.

That would be an interesting one alright. I wonder what would happen if planeloads of Irish teachers (on the higher scale, obvs) went over and marched in Brussels or Berlin, given that our politicians pretend to care what the EU thinks. I wonder how it would be received by the locals.
Might be a good session too.

Seriously though, it’d be interesting. Would never happen, but it would be interesting.

acequion

Closer to home and also probably one for its own thread, but I wonder what will happen today? Will the country boot out the Blueshirts and will the new Govt be more amenable to pay equality?

And are we stuck forever more with massively deteriorated conditions? Poor sick leave? The hated CP hours to follow us til death do we part? Or early retirement as is the case for many, even though they can't really afford it.

I was amazed that not one of the wannabes came to my door, though my letter box has been filled with junk. Am giving my first pref to FF. I did PBP last time out but this time I've decided to vote for an actual Govt and traditionally FF, though not much better and in ways worse than FG, are the lesser of the two evils for public servants.

km79

acequion wrote: »

Closer to home and also probably one for its own thread, but I wonder what will happen today? Will the country boot out the Blueshirts and will the new Govt be more amenable to pay equality?

And are we stuck forever more with massively deteriorated conditions? Poor sick leave? The hated CP hours to follow us til death do we part? Or early retirement as is the case for many, even though they can't really afford it.

I was amazed that not one of the wannabes came to my door, though my letter box has been filled with junk. Am giving my first pref to FF. I did PBP last time out but this time I've decided to vote for an actual Govt and traditionally FF, though not much better and in ways worse than FG, are the lesser of the two evils for public servants.

Education is not a priority for any of them

acequion

km79 wrote: »

Education is not a priority for any of them

You'd wonder if anything really is a priority for these people other than feathering their own nests.:rolleyes: Hard not to be cynical.

greenttc

Bobtheman wrote: »

My generation have huge mortgage debt. NQTs have high rents but all drive cars and have a lifestyle I didn't have in my 20s and 30s.
.

This is just a mad generalisation and totally incorrect. Why would you think NQT's don't have mortgages? You are thinking in a very linear way and have no concept of the demographics of NQT's because a huge number have mortgages and young families and have bills as big as yours to pay... NQT's are not all straight out of school and then college and into a teaching job, many have worked elsewhere for years and then moved into teaching. You need to broaden how you are thinking about this situation.

Regardless of all the inaccuracies in this thread, it is a clear example of how the division in teachers and unions over this is unbelievably beneficial to government. We are fighting among ourselves and it is hindering us in so many ways, government are going to leave us fight it out and they will sit back and do nothing because we are doing a fine job of suppressing our voice all on our own.

Nobody cared about the strike this week, even in schools it was a bit of a non event. Unity of Unions is most definitely what is needed but sadly we are so far away from that. It can only start though, with everyone being a little bit less selfish, NQT's need to support older colleagues and be more active in unions and likewise older colleagues need to understand how they are the ones with the power to help their younger lesser paid colleagues and so should be a little more sympathetic. Do you really think NQT's deserve less money than you? Do you think NQT's do less work or a worse job?

greenttc

Bobtheman wrote: »

I have seen younger staff climb over the bodies of older members to get promotion.

Id also like a little more information on what is being said here.

I wont jump to any conclusions yet.......

political analyst

acequion wrote: »

Closer to home and also probably one for its own thread, but I wonder what will happen today? Will the country boot out the Blueshirts and will the new Govt be more amenable to pay equality?

And are we stuck forever more with massively deteriorated conditions? Poor sick leave? The hated CP hours to follow us til death do we part? Or early retirement as is the case for many, even though they can't really afford it.

I was amazed that not one of the wannabes came to my door, though my letter box has been filled with junk. Am giving my first pref to FF. I did PBP last time out but this time I've decided to vote for an actual Govt and traditionally FF, though not much better and in ways worse than FG, are the lesser of the two evils for public servants.

I wonder would Irish teachers who have emigrated to Australia and are struggling to cope with the heat see it that way.

one world order

For what is effectively a part time job, teachers at entry level are paid far too much. Anyone else with a college degree going into a professional services job like accounting, law etc start off on around 27k and have to give another 4 years training and studying to become qualified.

acequion

political analyst wrote: »

I wonder would Irish teachers who have emigrated to Australia and are struggling to cope with the heat see it that way.

Yes I think they would. Are you completely unaware of the recruitment and retention crisis is some subjects and some areas? And has it ever occured to you to wonder why?

one world order wrote: »

For what is effectively a part time job, teachers at entry level are paid far too much. Anyone else with a college degree going into a professional services job like accounting, law etc start off on around 27k and have to give another 4 years training and studying to become qualified.

That has to be the funniest thing I've heard in ages. :pac::pac::D:D

one world order

acequion wrote: »

Yes I think they would. Are you completely unaware of the recruitment and retention crisis is some subjects and some areas? And has it ever occured to you to wonder why?



That has to be the funniest thing I've heard in ages. :pac::pac::D:D

But very true.

greenttc

acequion wrote: »

That has to be the funniest thing I've heard in ages. :pac::pac::D:D

Don't feed the troll!

Treppen

one world order wrote: »

But very true.

Says who?

RealJohn

one world order wrote: »

For what is effectively a part time job, teachers at entry level are paid far too much. Anyone else with a college degree going into a professional services job like accounting, law etc start off on around 27k and have to give another 4 years training and studying to become qualified.

You’re not wrong, except that you haven’t been clear that that part-time job comes with part-time pay. Half a teaching contract, which is probably best case scenario for newly qualified secondary teachers, is 13.5k for still having to be on site for the whole working week from 9 until 4, so any other part time work you engage in (which is completely necessary if you’re living in or near any of the cities, and are not living with your own parents) can still only be undertaken in the evenings and at weekends.
I presume that’s what you meant, right?
Very few people are stupid enough to think that NQTs actually wind up on 27k straight out of college, except for a very lucky few. Not to mention that NQTs now have to have a masters degree, not just a degree, unlike most other professions. And that’s before you account for the fact that an accountant, say, who gets an extra qualification can expect an immediate, significant jump in salary, whereas a teacher can get all the qualifications in the world but the only pay increase they’re getting is their increment, and they’re getting it based on full years teaching, so that teacher on half hours can expect their increment at the end of year 2.
That’s what you meant, right?

acequion

Why bother justifying our existence? No body in any other job has to,not even other public servants.

We're an easy target for a cheap shot from any idiot out there simply because every one of them, bar a tiny few, will have been to school at some stage.

No point being dragged down to the level of the ignorant, which is what happens when we engage with them.

solerina

We have a meeting scheduled for next Wednesday to discuss the vote on pay equality, I know from informal discussions in the staff room that the general vibe is along the lines of..we have been on strike a few times now for pay equality while the new teachers on staff have had a day off to go shopping( which they did and we heard all about it) so no more. The union rep is saying that the scales are now compatible anyway so is pushing for a no vote...people are generally in agreement....the gang of newer teachers who have joined the staff in the last few year are all still not in the union.....so if they won’t fight for themselves why should we lose more money, increments etc for them is definitely the vibe.

Treppen

solerina wrote: »

We have a meeting scheduled for next Wednesday to discuss the vote on pay equality, I know from informal discussions in the staff room that the general vibe is along the lines of..we have been on strike a few times now for pay equality while the new teachers on staff have had a day off to go shopping( which they did and we heard all about it) so no more. The union rep is saying that the scales are now compatible anyway so is pushing for a no vote...people are generally in agreement....the gang of newer teachers who have joined the staff in the last few year are all still not in the union.....so if they won’t fight for themselves why should we lose more money, increments etc for them is definitely the vibe.

I suppose all politics is local. But if it makes any difference to how you vote, in our school this week the 'young table' was approached by rep with sign up form for one teacher who asked for it, a bit of banter, gentle persuasion and reminding what their senior colleagues are balloting over, and 3 more requests for forms came out of it.

At this stage I just strike as it's in the ASTI DNA and we're used to it.
Any attack on one cohort is an attack on the whole group.

Sir123

solerina wrote: »

We have a meeting scheduled for next Wednesday to discuss the vote on pay equality, I know from informal discussions in the staff room that the general vibe is along the lines of..we have been on strike a few times now for pay equality while the new teachers on staff have had a day off to go shopping( which they did and we heard all about it) so no more. The union rep is saying that the scales are now compatible anyway so is pushing for a no vote...people are generally in agreement....the gang of newer teachers who have joined the staff in the last few year are all still not in the union.....so if they won’t fight for themselves why should we lose more money, increments etc for them is definitely the vibe.

Your union rep is wrong. There are still great differences in post/pre 2011 teacher pay, particularly in the early years of a teacher’s career. Examples of the continued pay injustice can been seen in the latest ASTI nuacht.

Ok we’ve been out before but remember, this mandate for strike is in conjunction with one or both of the other Teacher unions so in my eyes it’s a no brainer to vote Yes.

As Treppen has highlighted, an attack on one cohort is an attack on the whole group and they are exactly right.

I urge all teachers who may be reading, but not commenting, to familiarise themselves with the latest nuacht and to realise that we wouldn’t be going out on our own if we were to actually ever go on strike.

A Yes vote will however strengthen the ASTI’s hand in future pay negotiations so I urge all to vote Yes.

acequion

We had our ballot today in school and from what I could see, everybody was voting yes.

Voting yes is a no brainer. Think about it! We're already constantly at loggerheads with TUI and so constantly strengthening the hand of the DES against us all. Must the older be at loggerheads with younger now as well?? And within the same union?? Just how logical is that one!!

Granted, you have young teachers who do nothing to fight for their own rights and you have young teachers not even bothering to unionise. But let's stop taking that personally!! There are all sorts of reasons for their apathy and as Treppen said, an attack on one is an attack on all and this is one attack that we absolutely have to keep fighting against as the future of the profession and consequently the future of education is at stake here!

Also, the mindset of the young is sometimes different. When I was a young teacher the culture was that you'd be crazy not to join a union. Now such is the anti union vibe circulating in colleges, that it's almost, you'd be crazy to actually join a union.

Whatever their problem, we have to fight this one for them as well as with them. Vote yes!!

SligoBrewer

Can't believe anyone would vote no to strike action.

I'm out here breaking everything I can for LPT pay and union reps are advocating a no vote as the scales are compatible?
Give me a break.

hardybuck

SligoBrewer wrote: »

Can't believe anyone would vote no to strike action.

I'm out here breaking everything I can for LPT pay and union reps are advocating a no vote as the scales are compatible?
Give me a break.

Any strike action that is taken this year will result in teachers getting eaten alive in the media.

Treppen

hardybuck wrote: »

Any strike action that is taken this year will result in teachers getting eaten alive in the media.

The day teachers are relying for the media or the public to be on their side, hell would freeze over.

hardybuck

Treppen wrote: »

The day teachers are relying for the media or the public to be on their side, hell would freeze over.

Agreed, the approach taken in recent years has probably burned a lot bridges in terms of future support from the media and the public.

Benicetomonty

hardybuck wrote: »

Agreed, the approach taken in recent years has probably burned a lot bridges in terms of future support from the media and the public.

Name me one issue that the media has generally supported teachers on. One. With a link to at least 2 articles expressing said support. Il save you the bother because it cant be done.

Id imagine youd need to go back decades or more. The public in general and the govt by extension see teachers as easy targets. The newspapers can therefore publish whatever biased rubbish they want and people who have no clue what goes on in schools except from their own ageing experiences as students lap it up as gospel. The level of ignorance and begrudgery is not something any other profession has to put up with. Every now and again, reality dawns on certain, lucky individuals, but only if and when they become invested parents. Emphasis on 'invested'.

So you see, a teacher's union that holds off on vocalising discontent about or taking action around an area of dispute until they feel they may actually have broad public support is a deluded one. Because it will never happen. No matter what the issue.

hardybuck

Benicetomonty wrote: »

Name me one issue that the media has generally supported teachers on. One. With a link to at least 2 articles expressing said support. Il save you the bother because it cant be done.

Id imagine youd need to go back decades or more. The public in general and the govt by extension see teachers as easy targets. The newspapers can therefore publish whatever biased rubbish they want and people who have no clue what goes on in schools except from their own ageing experiences as students lap it up as gospel. The level of ignorance and begrudgery is not something any other profession has to put up with. Every now and again, reality dawns on certain, lucky individuals, but only if and when they become invested parents. Emphasis on 'invested'.

So you see, a teacher's union that holds off on vocalising discontent about or taking action around an area of dispute until they feel they may actually have broad public support is a deluded one. Because it will never happen. No matter what the issue.

I'm not going to waste my time dispelling your paranoia, but here's a couple of things from a 30 second Google:

1: https://www.thejournal.ie/teachers-delay-in-getting-paid-ireland-4765575-Aug2019/

2. https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/the-inequality-in-teacher-pay-is-divisive-and-wrong-1.3460820

Going out on a picket this year, of all years, would be the final nail in the coffin in terms of public opinion. On the other hand, there will be plenty of opportunities for the profession to win back a lot of people this year.

I don't foresee any extra money being available for the next public pay deal - that ship has already sailed I'd say.

Benicetomonty

hardybuck wrote: »

I'm not going to waste my time dispelling your paranoia, but here's a couple of things from a 30 second Google:

1: https://www.thejournal.ie/teachers-delay-in-getting-paid-ireland-4765575-Aug2019/

2. https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/the-inequality-in-teacher-pay-is-divisive-and-wrong-1.3460820

Going out on a picket this year, of all years, would be the final nail in the coffin in terms of public opinion. On the other hand, there will be plenty of opportunities for the profession to win back a lot of people this year.

I don't foresee any extra money being available for the next public pay deal - that ship has already sailed I'd say.

No surprise to see you couldnt find 2 on the same topic.

The first issue , disgraceful as it is, isnt something that has led to the threat of industrial action so doesnt qualify. Im talking industrial action threatened.

The second issue qualifies. And who does the Irish Times break out to articulate what were genuine issues? The ever popular (and a teacher to boot) Breda O Brien. Which will ensure that 90pc of non-teachers probably wont read the article and the remaining 10pc will receive it with contempt. Almost like they wanted it that way, right?

If I may narrow my criteria and ask you to check out the work of the education correspondants, supposedly in the know and unbiased, of our two main national newsapers and then come back to me with an article that reads like anything other than an anti union, pro DES rhetoric, you will have impressed me.

There wont be any picketing this year. There also wont be anybody 'won back' as regards supporting teachers no matter how they sort the LC out. That just isnt a thing that happens in Ireland these days.

hardybuck

Benicetomonty wrote: »

No surprise to see you couldnt find 2 on the same topic.

The first issue , disgraceful as it is, isnt something that has led to the threat of industrial action so doesnt qualify. Im talking industrial action threatened.

The second issue qualifies. And who does the Irish Times break out to articulate what were genuine issues? The ever popular (and a teacher to boot) Breda O Brien. Which will ensure that 90pc of non-teachers probably wont read the article and the remaining 10pc will receive it with contempt. Almost like they wanted it that way, right?

If I may narrow my criteria and ask you to check out the work of the education correspondants, supposedly in the know and unbiased, of our two main national newsapers and then come back to me with an article that reads like anything other than an anti union, pro DES rhetoric, you will have impressed me.

There wont be any picketing this year. There also wont be anybody 'won back' as regards supporting teachers no matter how they sort the LC out. That just isnt a thing that happens in Ireland these days.

You don't appear to have read my post properly - I said that I wouldn't waste my time on you, not that I couldn't find examples for you. I also think the Secret Teacher articles that the Irish Times ran a while back were great but haven't bothered listing them here - you can google them yourself if you're bothered.

Also, you sought evidence of articles that the media has generally supported the media on. Now you are changing the goal posts by trying to narrow your 'criteria' to matters involving industrial action.

If you're looking for something to do, you might consider reflecting on how a campaign of industrial action will reflect well upon the profession and generate a win for teachers in a year of unprecedented international crisis when:

- Our economy will slide into recession pretty shortly;
- Hundreds of thousands of workers will lose their jobs;
- When thousands, if not tens of thousands, of other public servants will be redeployed to assist with front-line efforts to tackle COVID-19;
- When schools will potentially be shut for six months

If you think a campaign of industrial action is worth pursuing in light of the above you've completely lost touch with reality.