Why is the cost of property, esp renting, so high in Dublin?

Shelga

With the general election looming, I really want to try and understand why the cost of housing for your average Joe is so astronomical in Ireland, especially Dublin, before I jump on the "it's all the politicians' fault" bandwagon- even if that does turn out to be the case!

I used to live in Birmingham, a city of a similar size to Dublin, for around 4 years. I lived in the city centre, in a 2-bedroom flat (old-ish, nothing spectacular, but nice, big bedrooms etc), next to Broad St, with a housemate, and our rent was £600 total, so £300 each per month. Now, this is not me having a whinge and a moan, I have zero desire to move back there, but I'm genuinely trying to understand why an apartment in a similarly centrally located part of Dublin would probably cost around €1900 to rent.

You usually hear it's a case of supply vs demand, but why is supply so low? Why is the cost to build so high? Why are there so few landlords, seemingly, compared to regional UK cities?

Would be good to strip all this back to basics and understand how it has come to this. The cost to buy is also quite high, but rent is the real killer, IMO. Would be great to hear from people who know about such things and hear their takes on it.

Basically, how much grief can I give the FG canvasser when he comes knocking on my door over the coming weeks!

Mike3549

But Birmingham is not a capital city. In this case size really doesnt matter. Plus supply and demand. More people coming to Dublin than builders can build. Regulations for newbuilds. I heard It costs extra 20k to build a house this year compared to last year. Last year min ber was a3, this year - a2. And so on and on...

lainey_d_123

What Mike said. Birmingham isn't a capital city and the bulk of the jobs are based in London. Dublin has loads of multinationals and there aren't a load of work opportunities elsewhere in Ireland, so it's a case of supply and demand. There are always more people looking for rooms/flats in Dublin and there are rooms and flats available.

I remember during the crash, the prices dropped right down, and the same studio in Rathmines I'd seen for 1200 euros pcm before the crash was going for 800, but that was short lived. I'd say rents are even worse than at the peak of the bubble right now.

Shelga

But Berlin is a capital city? And rent is probably half that of Dublin.

JustAThought

Shelga wrote: »

But Berlin is a capital city? And rent is probably half that of Dublin.

different country, high rise, rent control ,federal funding, givt owned blocks, lifelong leases at almost communist party rates , etc etc . Apples and oranges.

Taylor365

The brilliant idea not to build high and to strangle transport routes to death.

Another corker - Every apartment requiring a parking space.

Tiddlypeeps

Between 2005 and 2020 the population of Dublin has risen by around 200k people, that is around a 20% increase in population. During the crash construction all but stopped for a number of years despite the fact a lot of people were still moving to Dublin to find work. The supply side of things is still struggling to make up for that gap.

skooterblue2

The real issues are why is everything centered around Dublin.
There are too many factories in Dublin 15 that could be more evenly distributed the country town. I think its been mentioned before that towns like Longford, Tipperary, Nenagh Mitchelstown and border towns are dying for industry and suffering from outward migration.

Amirani

Shelga wrote: »

But Berlin is a capital city? And rent is probably half that of Dublin.

Per capita income in Dublin is about 50% higher than Berlin, and the general price levels are higher.

Berlin was economically stagnant for many years and has only really become a bit more vibrant in recent years: https://www.thelocal.de/20190424/new-report-shows-where-germanys-biggest-wealth-divisions-are

Rents in Berlin are actually high enough relative to disposable income.

Assetbacked

The high cost is related to the lack of supply versus the huge increase in demand the past five years.

Evidence of this is found on the rental section on daft; anything affordable (i.e. Less than €2k per month) is old stock which only commands such high rent (relative to median salaries) because supply has been static for a decade. FG rely on the market to deliver the necessary housing supply yet they pay millions in subsidising rent for the less well-off - this ensures the institutionals at the top cream from working classes and those at the bottom become more dependent on the State. All at the expense of anyone who works for a living. The best solution is to significantly increase the supply of social housing, which FG just won't do.

lainey_d_123

Shelga wrote: »

But Berlin is a capital city? And rent is probably half that of Dublin.

Have you been recently? Renting in Berlin is very expensive now, not that far off Dublin prices.

It's also not Germany's biggest industrial city where all the jobs are concentrated. There are loads of other big cities with jobs .- Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Dusseldorf, Cologne. Not the case in Ireland.

handlemaster

Shelga wrote: »

With the general election looming, I really want to try and understand why the cost of housing for your average Joe is so astronomical in Ireland, especially Dublin, before I jump on the "it's all the politicians' fault" bandwagon- even if that does turn out to be the case!

I used to live in Birmingham, a city of a similar size to Dublin, for around 4 years. I lived in the city centre, in a 2-bedroom flat (old-ish, nothing spectacular, but nice, big bedrooms etc), next to Broad St, with a housemate, and our rent was £600 total, so £300 each per month. Now, this is not me having a whinge and a moan, I have zero desire to move back there, but I'm genuinely trying to understand why an apartment in a similarly centrally located part of Dublin would probably cost around €1900 to rent.

You usually hear it's a case of supply vs demand, but why is supply so low? Why is the cost to build so high? Why are there so few landlords, seemingly, compared to regional UK cities?

Would be good to strip all this back to basics and understand how it has come to this. The cost to buy is also quite high, but rent is the real killer, IMO. Would be great to hear from people who know about such things and hear their takes on it.

Basically, how much grief can I give the FG canvasser when he comes knocking on my door over the coming weeks!

Can you compare salaries and quality of life for young professionals the driving force of the tech sector ?

ReReg Numpty

The property & land markets have been monetised as an asset class, which means they are a strategic component of the nation's wealth.

In order to build that wealth, which is by and large good for everyone, supply is deliberately restricted to increase value, and to leverage further economic growth.

In theory, this is not an issue although it clearly impacts on people's lives in a way that other asset classes don't. A growing number of people now have accommodation rather than a home. But how bad is that relative to the benefits of a wealthy economy? That is a divisive debate.

Dublin is the principal engine driving this asset class, like London is in the UK. Not sure where is all going, seeing as there are some innovative construction techniques coming that will make house building much cheaper. Along with remote working, property prices could well stagnate in cities for years.

handlemaster

skooterblue2 wrote: »

The real issues are why is everything centered around Dublin.
There are too many factories in Dublin 15 that could be more evenly distributed the country town. I think its been mentioned before that towns like Longford, Tipperary, Nenagh Mitchelstown and border towns are dying for industry and suffering from outward migration.

Cost of transport for goods and suitable labourer force. Who would want to live in longford if you have a skilled training. We need the best the world has to offer for industry and this is not always irish.

Op, why is renting/buying in some parts of London so much more expensive than Birmingham?

Idbatterim

Op for a far better understanding of why government wants and fully supports and encourages expensive property, just look at this! If you have an interest in this, this is going to fill in the dots for you!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL3n59wC8kk

humans are selfish by nature, that FG canvasser knocking to your door? likely a homeowner. Any politician running for election, likely a home owner. Those in planning? homeowners. You see where I am going with this... You dont need to be a landlord to want rising prices...

q85dw7osi4lebg

Because there is no incentive to be a landlord.

Rental income - €1800
Tax - up to €850
Mortgage payment - More than €850


Where's the incentive. Capital appreciation over 20 years isn't guaranteed.

Your tenant can choose to not pay rent for 2 years while you go through the PRTB process.


Stone mad to be a landlord in Ireland (Dublin at least)

Shelga

I suppose I'm not really asking why Berlin or Birmingham or wherever is so cheap, but rather, why is Dublin so expensive, and who is to blame, if anyone.

I get that salaries are high in Dublin and the economy is good, but no one who is of sound mind can think €1900 for a 2 bed in Santry is good value: https://www.daft.ie/dublin/apartments-for-rent/santry/parklands-northwood-santry-dublin-1993046/

So what are the many factors that contribute to why supply is so appalling? The economy has been growing for roughly 5/6 years now, so why is it so slow to catch up?

q85dw7osi4lebg

Shelga wrote: »

I suppose I'm not really asking why Berlin or Birmingham or wherever is so cheap, but rather, why is Dublin so expensive, and who is to blame, if anyone.

I get that salaries are high in Dublin and the economy is good, but no one who is of sound mind can think €1680 for a 2 bed in Santry is good value: https://www.daft.ie/21992011

So what are the many factors that contribute to why supply is so appalling? The economy has been growing for roughly 5/6 years now, so why is it so slow to catch up?

See above.

Landlords are selling, not buying.

Tenants have too many protections.

boring accountant

skooterblue2 wrote: »

The real issues are why is everything centered around Dublin.
There are too many factories in Dublin 15 that could be more evenly distributed the country town. I think its been mentioned before that towns like Longford, Tipperary, Nenagh Mitchelstown and border towns are dying for industry and suffering from outward migration.

Urbanisation is a global trend. Nothing you can do to change that. The only solution is to make the best of the situation by improving infrastructure and maybe incentivising retirees to move out of Dublin to make room for workers.

Idbatterim

Shelga wrote: »

I suppose I'm not really asking why Berlin or Birmingham or wherever is so cheap, but rather, why is Dublin so expensive, and who is to blame, if anyone.

I get that salaries are high in Dublin and the economy is good, but no one who is of sound mind can think €1900 for a 2 bed in Santry is good value: https://www.daft.ie/dublin/apartments-for-rent/santry/parklands-northwood-santry-dublin-1993046/

So what are the many factors that contribute to why supply is so appalling? The economy has been growing for roughly 5/6 years now, so why is it so slow to catch up?

moron planners would be top of the chain of blame! I take it youve seen the docklands? endless 5/6 floor lego blocks. Yet people commute to the masses of offices there, on the appalling transport system here from miles out, often sharing family homes. Moronic "planning" system is the prime culprit. Arbitrary height limits!

J_1980

Shelga wrote: »

But Berlin is a capital city? And rent is probably half that of Dublin.

Berlin has no jobs. No West German company built their headquarters in the enemy’s land and East Germany had no real white collar jobs. Might even be the only european capital city that is a net receiver in the national accounts.

Why are Irish rents high?
Socialism always makes everything expensive. Builders/tradies don’t come as there’s nothing left after tax, the bottom 10% of society get generously alimented, crowding out the working class above them etc.
I’m German, in East Germany (when we visited relatives) everyone was equal but anything slightly in demand was unaffordable.


And it doesn’t matter who comes into power in next election, Irish construction industry is pretty much at capacity anyway. If the left/ FF etc. wins then Wayne and Waynetta with their 5 kids benefit - not anyone working 9-5. Expect more emigration of key staff (trades, doctors, nurses). Seen it all before in East Germany, they built the wall and shot all trying to emigrate. Luckily this won’t happen here. Boris will happily snap up the Irish nurses to fill his new hospitals

skooterblue2

skooterblue2 wrote: »

The real issues are why is everything centered around Dublin.
There are too many factories in Dublin 15 that could be more evenly distributed the country town. I think its been mentioned before that towns like Longford, Tipperary, Nenagh Mitchelstown and border towns are dying for industry and suffering from outward migration.

This is precisely it. For everything to be centre around one city, in a country this size, is just abysmal long-term planning, stretching back decades.

c.30% of Irish population lives in Dublin.

For comparisons;

London c.14%
Oslo c.14%
Madrid c.14%
Copenhagen c.12%
Helsinki c.12%
Amsterdam c.10%
Brussels c.10%
Lisbon c.5%
Berlin c.5%
Paris c.3%

Marius34

The price for property in Dublin is very normal for that size and economy level, while the renting is absolutely to high.
The main factor for the very high rents is due to the very low supplies of residential property over the past 10 years (due to residential construction crisis), especially for such a young city with growing population and booming economy.
To make things worse, private landlords are highly taxed, typically 50-52% on the profit, I don’t know any other country with that high taxation for private landlords. And more than that property should be supplied furnished, whereas in many European countries it’s common to rent unfurnished (at least Denmark and Germany from my own experience).

Browney7

Hugh Attractive Signboard wrote: »

Because there is no incentive to be a landlord.

Rental income - €1800
Tax - up to €850
Mortgage payment - More than €850


Where's the incentive. Capital appreciation over 20 years isn't guaranteed.

Your tenant can choose to not pay rent for 2 years while you go through the PRTB process.


Stone mad to be a landlord in Ireland (Dublin at least)

Aren't you ignoring the pay down of the mortgage capital here?

Donald Trump

Hugh Attractive Signboard wrote: »

Because there is no incentive to be a landlord.

Rental income - €1800
Tax - up to €850
Mortgage payment - More than €850


Where's the incentive. Capital appreciation over 20 years isn't guaranteed.

Your tenant can choose to not pay rent for 2 years while you go through the PRTB process.


Stone mad to be a landlord in Ireland (Dublin at least)

Why should there be an incentive for speculative amateur landlords.

Do you think that you should be somehow given a risk-free guaranteed return to own an asset in 30 years which will be paid back by some tenant? There are too many people out there thinking that they should be entitled to go into the bank, spend a few hours filling out a few forms, buy a house, forget about it for 30 years and then come back to sell it and keep the proceeds after some gobshite paid off their mortgage for them.

Become a landlord by all means if you have the skills, time, effort and risk management ability to make it work.


I'll agree that tenant have too many protections - in the case of those that won't pay or overhold or damage the property. But those are the rules of the game. If you can't manage by those rules in worst case scenario, then put your money elsewhere

lainey_d_123

Shelga wrote: »

I suppose I'm not really asking why Berlin or Birmingham or wherever is so cheap, but rather, why is Dublin so expensive, and who is to blame, if anyone.

I get that salaries are high in Dublin and the economy is good, but no one who is of sound mind can think €1900 for a 2 bed in Santry is good value: https://www.daft.ie/dublin/apartments-for-rent/santry/parklands-northwood-santry-dublin-1993046/

So what are the many factors that contribute to why supply is so appalling? The economy has been growing for roughly 5/6 years now, so why is it so slow to catch up?

You don't seem to understand how supply and demand works.

There are far more people looking for housing than there is housing.

It's literally that simple.

People don't rent because they think it's good value, they rent because they need somewhere to lie so they can go to work. There are loads of cabin crew and airport workers living in that area - they want a nice enough place which is handy for getting to the airport, and that's what the going rate is.

Donald Trump

Donald Trump wrote: »

Why should there be an incentive for speculative amateur landlords.

Do you think that you should be somehow given a risk-free guaranteed return to own an asset in 30 years which will be paid back by some tenant? There are too many people out there thinking that they should be entitled to go into the bank, spend a few hours filling out a few forms, buy a house, forget about it for 30 years and then come back to sell it and keep the proceeds after some gobshite paid off their mortgage for them.

Become a landlord by all means if you have the skills, time, effort and risk management ability to make it work.


I'll agree that tenant have too many protections - in the case of those that won't pay or overhold or damage the property. But those are the rules of the game. If you can't manage by those rules in worst case scenario, then put your money elsewhere

Simple really, without a financial incentive to invest, there is no investment in rental property. REITS may be interested in investing in large cities, they certainly are not outside them.

I must admit, I now get a kick when I see posts like yours decrying “amateur landlords” in derogatory tones, you get what you deserve when large investment funds buy out complete developments before they are finished so they can rent at the highest market price, and automatically increase year on year. Then take their profits out of the country. That’ll show those pesky small time amateur landlords, oh hold on, that means you pay higher rents. Nice.

But you are correct in one sense, the incentives like high yields and capital appreciation should not be guaranteed, but they need to be a good possibility if you want to encourage investment and increase availability. Strange how at a time when rents are at an all time high, property values have increased, yet investors are leaving, go figure.

dubrov

In fairness, history has shown that incentives just drive up site and asset prices. Existing landlords benefit but the game stays the same for new entrants

hmmm

Shelga wrote: »

So what are the many factors that contribute to why supply is so appalling? The economy has been growing for roughly 5/6 years now, so why is it so slow to catch up?

We're seeing lots of supply coming along with big build-to-rent developments.

These are facing significant opposition however for reasons, much of it manufactured outrage by left-wing parties.

Bypassing the NIMBY brigade with ABP applications for large developments is a great and welcome development.

The Student

You have to encourage existing landlords to stay in the market while supply increases otherwise demand will continue to increase while supply decreases.

A two bed rented property may house 4 adults. If it is sold to an owner occupier it may only house two adults. Where do the other two adults go?

Shelga

lainey_d_123 wrote: »

You don't seem to understand how supply and demand works.

There are far more people looking for housing than there is housing.

It's literally that simple.

People don't rent because they think it's good value, they rent because they need somewhere to lie so they can go to work. There are loads of cabin crew and airport workers living in that area - they want a nice enough place which is handy for getting to the airport, and that's what the going rate is.

Of course I understand how supply and demand works, I'm not a simpleton.

If you read my question you would see I am trying to understand why the supply level is so abysmal, compared to similar sized cities. It seems there are many factors.

Heres Johnny

Not building into the sky in Dublin is an absolute crime for generations of politicians. Would solve the lot but somehow its still not happening.
You're more likely to see a tall building, by tall I mean 4 or floors, of apartments in the suburbs than in the city.

MSVforever

lainey_d_123 wrote: »

Have you been recently? Renting in Berlin is very expensive now, not that far off Dublin prices.

It's also not Germany's biggest industrial city where all the jobs are concentrated. There are loads of other big cities with jobs .- Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Dusseldorf, Cologne. Not the case in Ireland.

Munich is even worse than Dublin and it's only the capital of Bavaria....lol...

lainey_d_123

Shelga wrote: »

Of course I understand how supply and demand works, I'm not a simpleton.

If you read my question you would see I am trying to understand why the supply level is so abysmal, compared to similar sized cities. It seems there are many factors.

But you're saying things like 'who thinks these are good value?' as if you think people are choosing to pay that much. That's just what happens when there isn't enough housing stock.

Yes there are many factors. Not building up rather than out and the stall in construction during the crisis certainly didn't help anything.

Padre_Pio

lainey_d_123 wrote: »

You don't seem to understand how supply and demand works.

There are far more people looking for housing than there is housing.

It's literally that simple.

The recession killed many factories and businesses that sustained local towns around Ireland. Endless examples of this.

All these workers, and all the people who depended on the workers wages for jobs now have no jobs.
So there's f*ck all work in rural Ireland. All people of working age are forced to move to cities for work and education. Massive influx.

To many, city life is better than country life, especially if you have no kids, so employers also move to cities to attract young workers, not back to the parishes in Carlow and Leitrim, which are empty anyways, so this fuels more migration.

At the same time, house building stopped for about 5 years. Then a bunch of new housing regulations were introduced. Then a bunch of rental regulations too, and a bunch of regulations from the Central Bank. In the long term these will be good, short term not so good.

As a result, there's f*ck all housing stock, it's more expensive to build a house, planning requirements are stricter and landlords are leaving the market in droves. People can't afford to buy so they rent. Pressure is massive and increased by government programs. Then you have vulture funds and speculators influencing conditions. Now people can't afford to rent.

All this is very general but IMO it's a good 30second explanation.

Also, it's mainly restricted to cities and their hinterland.
You could buy a street in Leitrim for the cost of a 3 bed semi in a nice part of Dublin, but who wants to live in Leitrim.

Donald Trump

Dav010 wrote: »

Simple really, without a financial incentive to invest, there is no investment in rental property. REITS may be interested in investing in large cities, they certainly are not outside them.

I must admit, I now get a kick when I see posts like yours decrying “amateur landlords” in derogatory tones, you get what you deserve when large investment funds buy out complete developments before they are finished so they can rent at the highest market price, and automatically increase year on year. Then take their profits out of the country. That’ll show those pesky small time amateur landlords, oh hold on, that means you pay higher rents. Nice.

But you are correct in one sense, the incentives like high yields and capital appreciation should not be guaranteed, but they need to be a good possibility if you want to encourage investment and increase availability. Strange how at a time when rents are at an all time high, property values have increased, yet investors are leaving, go figure.

Rents are set by what the renters are willing to pay compared to other available opions. Simple as that. Unless you are getting into a monopoly situation, and a fund buying a large block of apartments is a whole world removed from that. Supply will also effect it but who owns the property will not have as much of an effect except that perhaps a more efficient landlord might be willing to provide it at a lower rate than it would be worth an amateur's effort. The effect of a Euro taken out in profit by an investment fund is no different to a Euro taken out in profit from a foreign company manufacturing here.

Shelga

lainey_d_123 wrote: »

But you're saying things like 'who thinks these are good value?' as if you think people are choosing to pay that much. That's just what happens when there isn't enough housing stock.

Yes there are many factors. Not building up rather than out and the stall in construction during the crisis certainly didn't help anything.

I didn't say "who thinks these are good value"- I said no one of sound mind would think they were good value- ie, we can all agree rent in Dublin is extortionate.

I am fully aware that people are paying these rents because they have no choice.

Why is supply low?

So far, main factors seem to be: not building up, population growth in Dublin in last 10-15 years, and it not being appealing to be a landlord.

Why is it so expensive and cumbersome to build medium rise apartments in the city? Who has the power to change this?

Padre_Pio

Shelga wrote: »

I didn't say "who thinks these are good value"- I said no one of sound mind would think they were good value- ie, we can all agree rent in Dublin is extortionate.

I am fully aware that people are paying these rents because they have no choice.

Why is supply low?

So far, main factors seem to be: not building up, population growth in Dublin in last 10-15 years, and it not being appealing to be a landlord.

Why is it so expensive and cumbersome to build medium rise apartments in the city? Who has the power to change this?

The government.

Remember that 70-80%% of voters are homeowners who have seen their house value increase dramatically in the last few years. Add to that we have record employment and wage growth. If I just bought a home yesterday after struggling for years, its in my best interest that my house appreciates and supply stays low.

If you own a home right now and have private health insurance, you are immune to the two biggest issues this election.
Why wouldn't you vote for FG or FF? No political party is going to pay your childcare or mortgage (although FG have made childcare slightly more bearable) The best you can hope for is the current system keeps going and we don't get a socialist government that lowers the value of your assets.

DubCount

OP. The cost of buying property in Dublin is expensive, but is kept under control by Central Bank mortgage rules. Requirements for high deposits and restrictions on how much people can borrow relative to their income is stopping expensive becoming insane.

The rental market is a different matter. Increases in population above housing supply, people who cant afford to buy and look the rent in stead, and government policy to use the rental market to meet social housing requirements. All this means demand for rental is going through the roof. Government policy is to control rental inflation with price control. This doesn't solve the problem though, because it doesn't create more supply to meet all that demand.

If you want to address rental costs in Dublin, build more property, and make eviction of non-paying tenants quicker and easier. Unfortunately, there is not one politician who will knock on your door, who agrees with that. All of them -FG/FF/Lab/SF/PBP/Greens/SD/Independents are of the mistaken belief that rent controls alone is how to deal with rent inflation. It doesn't matter who you vote for - nobody is suggesting what really needs to be done.

Donald Trump

Donald Trump wrote: »

Rents are set by what the renters are willing to pay compared to other available opions. Simple as that. Unless you are getting into a monopoly situation, and a fund buying a large block of apartments is a whole world removed from that. Supply will also effect it but who owns the property will not have as much of an effect except that perhaps a more efficient landlord might be willing to provide it at a lower rate than it would be worth an amateur's effort. The effect of a Euro taken out in profit by an investment fund is no different to a Euro taken out in profit from a foreign company manufacturing here.

So you are saying the tenants are actually setting the market rent? For many, there are no other available options, so the rental price set by the market is what they have to pay, not what they choose to pay, where have you been for the last 5 years?

If the small, amateur investors, as you call them, leave the market, that will leave a couple of investment funds as the majority landlords, I wouldn't say we are a whole world removed from that right now, in fact, I suspect those large investors are the main source of new rentals coming onto the Dublin market.

Investment companies require profits small time investors may settle for rent covering a mortgage and are more likely to have some personal contact with a tenant. A Reit on the other hand which buys whole new complexes will be able to set rents at the highest level as they are new to the market, and their business model is based on maximising yield by increasing rents to the highest amount at defined intervals allowed by the RTA. Expecting a REIT to give you a lower rate, because they are more efficient is naive.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/construction/cairn-sells-229-homes-to-landlord-for-78m-1.4135996?mode=amp

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/construction/us-investor-has-2bn-to-spend-on-irish-construction-1.3995574

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/german-fund-patrizia-acquires-52-5m-docklands-development-1.3991919

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/institutional-investors-villains-or-heroes-of-housing-woes-1.3950625

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/urbeo-in-pole-position-for-282-apartments-at-cairn-s-citywest-scheme-1.3922333

Comparing a vulture/investment fund to a manufacturing company is beyond comprehension. A property investment company requires limited staff to oversee their properties, many of the staff can be based in London or the US, manufacturers/IT employ large numbers of staff, I assume you are referring to Intel or Google etc who employ thousands?

Mad_maxx

Marius34 wrote: »

The price for property in Dublin is very normal for that size and economy level, while the renting is absolutely to high.
The main factor for the very high rents is due to the very low supplies of residential property over the past 10 years (due to residential construction crisis), especially for such a young city with growing population and booming economy.
To make things worse, private landlords are highly taxed, typically 50-52% on the profit, I don’t know any other country with that high taxation for private landlords. And more than that property should be supplied furnished, whereas in many European countries it’s common to rent unfurnished (at least Denmark and Germany from my own experience).

rogue tenants are not tolerated in germany either.

Mad_maxx

DubCount wrote: »

OP. The cost of buying property in Dublin is expensive, but is kept under control by Central Bank mortgage rules. Requirements for high deposits and restrictions on how much people can borrow relative to their income is stopping expensive becoming insane.

The rental market is a different matter. Increases in population above housing supply, people who cant afford to buy and look the rent in stead, and government policy to use the rental market to meet social housing requirements. All this means demand for rental is going through the roof. Government policy is to control rental inflation with price control. This doesn't solve the problem though, because it doesn't create more supply to meet all that demand.

If you want to address rental costs in Dublin, build more property, and make eviction of non-paying tenants quicker and easier. Unfortunately, there is not one politician who will knock on your door, who agrees with that. All of them -FG/FF/Lab/SF/PBP/Greens/SD/Independents are of the mistaken belief that rent controls alone is how to deal with rent inflation. It doesn't matter who you vote for - nobody is suggesting what really needs to be done.

the left spend an inordinate amount of time being concerned that others are making money , in this case landlords , therefore the goal of all these new regulations is primarily to hurt landlord rather than help tenants.

the media is entirely left wing in this country and have a major hard on for landlords , FF and FG want to be on side with the media so while knowing damn well that the policies introduced this past five years are doing more harm than good , give in to left wing politicians , media and activists in order to have peace , weak cowardly politicians are the cause of the mess.

personally id settle for a 5% return on property if rogue tenants were dealt with properly

Donald Trump

Dav010 wrote: »

So you are saying the tenants are actually setting the market rent? For many, there are no other available options, so the rental price set by the market is what they have to pay, not what they choose to pay, where have you been for the last 5 years?

If the small, amateur investors, as you call them, leave the market, that will leave a couple of investment funds as the majority landlords, I wouldn't say we are a whole world removed from that right now, in fact, I suspect those large investors are the main source of new rentals coming onto the Dublin market.

Investment companies require profits small time investors may settle for rent covering a mortgage and are more likely to have some personal contact with a tenant. A Reit on the other hand which buys whole new complexes will be able to set rents at the highest level as they are new to the market, and their business model is based on maximising yield by increasing rents to the highest amount at defined intervals allowed by the RTA. Expecting a REIT to give you a lower rate, because they are more efficient is naive.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/construction/cairn-sells-229-homes-to-landlord-for-78m-1.4135996?mode=amp

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/construction/us-investor-has-2bn-to-spend-on-irish-construction-1.3995574

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/german-fund-patrizia-acquires-52-5m-docklands-development-1.3991919

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/institutional-investors-villains-or-heroes-of-housing-woes-1.3950625

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/urbeo-in-pole-position-for-282-apartments-at-cairn-s-citywest-scheme-1.3922333

Comparing a vulture/investment fund to a manufacturing company is beyond comprehension. A property investment company requires limited staff to oversee their properties, many of the staff can be based in London or the US, manufacturers/IT employ large numbers of staff, I assume you are referring to Intel or Google etc who employ thousands?

Beyond your comprehension maybe. Tell me how one Euro sent back by Google to HQ is distinguished from one Euro sent back by a property fund.

Are you going to rabbit on about what is done to make that Euro? That is not my point. A Euro is a Euro is a Euro. Both will leave the country. Same as a Euro you will spend on your weekend away to Paris.

I didn't bother looking at your links dude. If you think that a fragmented system of amateur landlords just wanting a free pension because they filled out some forms at a Bank back in the day, will result in cheaper living then you are deluded. As you say yourself, the amateur landlord wants their mortgage covered. The professional landlord needs their cost of capital covered. Those are not the same thing.

Why should some greedy gobshite who doesn't even understand the business get their mortgage "covered" by a renter? That is part of the problem. They want a free house to convert into a lump sum at the end. The professional investor just needs to have enough value in the house to pay off the remaining loan at the end. It is the renter who is paying the difference.


And yes, the rents are set by the renters. That is 101 supply and demand. Following your logic, sure a REIT could buy up a block of apartments in Dublin city centre and charge rent of a billion euros a year and the renters would *have* to pay them :pac:

q85dw7osi4lebg

Donald Trump wrote: »

Why should there be an incentive for speculative amateur landlords.

Do you think that you should be somehow given a risk-free guaranteed return to own an asset in 30 years which will be paid back by some tenant? There are too many people out there thinking that they should be entitled to go into the bank, spend a few hours filling out a few forms, buy a house, forget about it for 30 years and then come back to sell it and keep the proceeds after some gobshite paid off their mortgage for them.

Become a landlord by all means if you have the skills, time, effort and risk management ability to make it work.


I'll agree that tenant have too many protections - in the case of those that won't pay or overhold or damage the property. But those are the rules of the game. If you can't manage by those rules in worst case scenario, then put your money elsewhere

Who said anything about risk free?

Landlords who bought apartments in Clongriffin in 2007 for €350,000 are about €100,000 in negative enquire right now, whilst paying at least half the mortgage.

Why do tenants think they should be entitled to decent rental accommodation provided by private landlords?

They should live within their means, out of the city, save up and get a mortgage like those before us.

q85dw7osi4lebg

I’m surprised there isn’t more landlords in Dublin since everyone here seems to think it’s a great gig altogether.

Donald Trump

Hugh Attractive Signboard wrote: »

Who said anything about risk free?

Landlords who bought apartments in Clongriffin in 2007 for €350,000 are about €100,000 in negative enquire right now, whilst paying at least half the mortgage.

Why do tenants think they should be entitled to decent rental accommodation provided by private landlords?

They should live within their means, out of the city, save up and get a mortgage like those before us.

Well, you see, plenty of greedy entitled amateurs pushed up demand which pushed up prices which meant those renters couldn't afford, or wisely chose not to, buy those clongriffin places. Why should they cover the mistakes of the eejits who got money thrown at them by stupid bank managers?

I'm not sure if yours is a serious post. You want the tenants to move out of houses and move to somewhere more affordable for them. I'd be for that too. It would bring rents down. It won't help the eejits with multiple apartments in Clongriffin but sure that's their loss.

Donald Trump

Hugh Attractive Signboard wrote: »

I’m surprised there isn’t more landlords in Dublin since everyone here seems to think it’s a great gig altogether.

Who said it's a great gig? There are plenty on crying that it should be a great gig i.e. that they should be allowed to gazump on a house or apartment and then have the rival bidder rent it from them and pay for their mortgage.

Why not just have what is effectively the equivalent rule? That if you see a house that you think will be nice for your pension in 30 years, that you can let Jimmy buy it and pay the mortgage and then in 30 years you are allowed to take it from him and sell it. It's the same attitude. In both scenarios it is the Bank's money you are buying it with. In both scenarios Jimmy will pay the mortgage. And in both scenarios you can sell it in 30 years and keep the money.

Jobs need to be moved away from Dublin City Centre. It has to happen!

While property is a big issue, traffic congestion is even worse.

I moved to Navan. Most of my commute home is queuing to get out of Dublin. Took me an hour today to get from Santry to Blanch. It’s 2 stops on the motorway like, ridiculous.
Only 20 mins then back to Navan.

Creating jobs elsewhere will help with both property and traffic.

Padre_Pio

Donald Trump wrote: »

Who said it's a great gig? There are plenty on crying that it should be a great gig i.e. that they should be allowed to gazump on a house or apartment and then have the rival bidder rent it from them and pay for their mortgage.

Why not just have what is effectively the equivalent rule? That if you see a house that you think will be nice for your pension in 30 years, that you can let Jimmy buy it and pay the mortgage and then in 30 years you are allowed to take it from him and sell it. It's the same attitude. In both scenarios it is the Bank's money you are buying it with. In both scenarios Jimmy will pay the mortgage. And in both scenarios you can sell it in 30 years and keep the money.

That's in no way a fair comparison.
Hertz uses the bank's money to buy a fleet of cars. Renter's cash pays the banks. After X years Hertz is left with fully paid off cars + profit. How is this different?

You also fail to mention the following:
"Jimmy" has no obligation or investment in the house.
Jimmy gets the use of the house immediately, for no cost other than a deposit and rent.

House burns down? no loss, save his posessions that happen to be inside.
Stuff breaks? Who cares? Landlord pays.
House price crashes? Not a problem. Walk away.
Want to move? Just leave.

And of course in Ireland:
Dont want to pay rent? That's fine.
Decide to pull the copper out of the walls? Go for it!
Decide to sublet to a group of lads who wreck the place? No problem.

Buy to let is an investment. If people arent allowed to rent and make an eventual profit then your argument is an argument against renting ANYTHING.

q85dw7osi4lebg

Padre_Pio wrote: »

That's in no way a fair comparison.

"Jimmy" has no obligation or investment in the house.
Jimmy gets the use of the house immediately, for no cost other than a deposit and rent.

House burns down? no loss, save his posessions that happen to be inside.
Stuff breaks? Who cares? Landlord pays.
House price crashes? Not a problem. Walk away.
Want to move? Just leave.

And of course in Ireland:
Dont want to pay rent? That's fine.
Decide to pull the copper out of the walls? Go for it!
Decide to sublet to a group of lads who wreck the place? No problem.

Buy to let is an investment. If people arent allowed to rent and make an eventual profit then your argument is an argument against renting ANYTHING.

Couldn’t have said it better myself