Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why is health insurance taxed?

  • 27-12-2019 4:45pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48


    If an employer is nice enough to provide health insurance, why should an employee pay tax on that? Shouldn't employer's covering health insurance be encouraged?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,535 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    If an employer is nice enough to provide health insurance, why should an employee pay tax on that? Shouldn't employer's covering health insurance be encouraged?

    Health insurance has a monetary value, therefore it's taxed same as any other payment that has a monetary value (with some small exceptions)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,152 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    If an employer is nice enough to provide health insurance, why should an employee pay tax on that? Shouldn't employer's covering health insurance be encouraged?

    It’s no different to an employer giving you an extra €1,000 to enable you to get your own health insurance.

    Why wouldn’t it be taxed?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48 Pooinloo


    Allinall wrote: »
    It’s no different to an employer giving you an extra €1,000 to enable you to get your own health insurance.

    Why wouldn’t it be taxed?

    It's very different. It's safeguarding your health. It's not a bonus scheme.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,152 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    It's very different. It's safeguarding your health. It's not a bonus scheme.

    So is buying your own health insurance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,037 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Another scrounger thread


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48 Pooinloo


    Allinall wrote: »
    So is buying your own health insurance.

    Of course it is, but you're completely ignoring the point of a person having something purchased for them, and then being penalised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 664 ✭✭✭starbaby2003


    You can claim tax relief on it. €1000 per adult and €500 per child


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48 Pooinloo


    Another scrounger thread

    How is it a scrounger thread?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,137 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    There was a time when the BIK tax was fully offset by the medical insurance tax relief (which was at whatever rate you paid). The socialists successfully lobbied against that saying it was unfair on those who only paid tax at standard rate so the relief was reduced to 20%. They've been lobbying for the same for pension tax relief, thankfully no success there so far.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48 Pooinloo


    You can claim tax relief on it. €1000 per adult and €500 per child

    Nope it's 20% of 1000 per adult, and 20% of 500 per child.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 664 ✭✭✭starbaby2003


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    Nope it's 20% of 1000 per adult, and 20% of 500 per child.

    That’s what I meant sorry.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48 Pooinloo


    Stark wrote: »
    There was a time when the BIK tax was fully offset by the medical insurance tax relief (which was at whatever rate you paid). The socialists successfully lobbied against that saying it was unfair on those who only paid tax at standard rate so the relief was reduced to 20%. They've been lobbying for the same for pension tax relief, thankfully no success there so far.

    That's the problem with the 'they have a lollipop and we don't' brigade. They really care about getting a lollipop, it's more about taking from people who already have one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,152 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    Of course it is, but you're completely ignoring the point of a person having something purchased for them, and then being penalised.

    And you’re ignoring the point that it’s no different than your employer giving you the money to purchase it yourself.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48 Pooinloo


    Allinall wrote: »
    And you’re ignoring the point that it’s no different than your employer giving you the money to purchase it yourself.

    So by that logic, shouldn't we be taxed on stationary, food or other perks that a company might provide?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,422 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    So by that logic, shouldn't we be taxed on stationary, food or other perks that a company might provide?

    You don't own the stationary, the company does

    Free lunch is not a taxable benefit in kind provided it is offered to all employees


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,152 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    So by that logic, shouldn't we be taxed on stationary, food or other perks that a company might provide?

    You are taxed on any perks that you’re employer provides, if they’re not used exclusively for your job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭beejee


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    So by that logic, shouldn't we be taxed on stationary, food or other perks that a company might provide?

    It's different because someone said so!

    We aren't the worst country for taxation, but it's little consolation when you live here and not Zambia.

    The more encompassing, intricate and complex taxation becomes, the more it encourages ducking, dodging, weaving and plain cash dealing.

    Where they get you by the twiddly bits is the area of essentials like health care and provision. But even so, stay floating like a butterfly :p


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48 Pooinloo


    Allinall wrote: »
    You are taxed on any perks that you’re employer provides, if they’re not used exclusively for your job.

    That's not necessarily true, you pay alot of tax for a company car, which is only given if it's needed for work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭mcgucc22


    That’s what I meant sorry.


    I forgive you.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    That's not necessarily true, you pay alot of tax for a company car, which is only given if it's needed for work.

    No not necessarily, sometimes cars are a perk of a job with the BIK tax paid depending on the business milage.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,152 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    That's not necessarily true, you pay alot of tax for a company car, which is only given if it's needed for work.

    If you only use it for work- I.e. don’t take it home with you, then there’s no tax on it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 48 Pooinloo


    No not necessarily, sometimes cars are a perk of a job with the BIK tax paid depending on the business milage.

    Yup, and the taxation rates are extortionate. For example if you drive 24000 in a €30000 car, you'll be liable for around 10k on the year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 635 ✭✭✭Idioteque


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    If an employer is nice enough to provide health insurance, why should an employee pay tax on that? Shouldn't employer's covering health insurance be encouraged?

    How does it not encourage an employer to provide it? The employer doesn't pay the tax.

    If an employee decides to not avail of the benefit, they'll most likely still pay a lot more to buy private health insurance themselves.

    It's a win-win for the employer, they get to offer insurance which is generally an expected benefit from prospective employees. For those employees that don't want to avail of it that's fine too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭9935452


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    Yup, and the taxation rates are extortionate. For example if you drive 24000 in a €30000 car, you'll be liable for around 10k on the year.

    10 grand a year tax bill ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,601 ✭✭✭893bet


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    Nope it's 20% of 1000 per adult, and 20% of 500 per child.

    If your employer is paying your insurance on your behalf (on pay slip) then do you automatically get relief and it’s factored in or do you need to claim it separately?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,137 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    You need to claim separately.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    If your company is paying your health insurance, I dont think you can claim tax back on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,601 ✭✭✭893bet


    Stark wrote: »
    You need to claim separately.

    So let’s say my company pays 2500 for me and my family per year.

    Net cost to me is circa 1250 per year as that’s what’s deducted from me via the taxation system from my salary.

    I can claim separately 20% on that 2500? How can I do this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,270 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    Yup, and the taxation rates are extortionate. For example if you drive 24000 in a €30000 car, you'll be liable for around 10k on the year.


    No - if the business mileage is less than 24k km p.a. AND the car is available throughout the year for personal use also AND all running costs associated with the car are paid by the business, then the taxable benefit would be €10k, and the tax liability would be a max of €5,200.

    If you do more 24000km for business purposes then the BIK assessable is reduced further.

    Either way - tax is only liable if the car is also available for personal use - and €5200 is the guaranteed annual cost. No fuel to pay for, no insurance, tax or maintenance. And of course, not having to pay to buy the car in the first place.

    Had a company car for nearly 10 years, absolute bargain compared to having to own and pay for one myself


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,270 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    893bet wrote: »
    So let’s say my company pays 2500 for me and my family per year.

    Net cost to me is circa 1250 per year as that’s what’s deducted from me via the taxation system from my salary.

    I can claim separately 20% on that 2500? How can I do this?

    The 20% is reduced from the price you pay to the insurance company.

    If your company has paid €2,500 then the actual insurance cost is €3,125. The insurance company gets the €2,500 from you/your company, and the remaining 20% (€625) is paid by Dept of Finance from your taxes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭9935452


    blackwhite wrote: »
    The 20% is reduced from the price you pay to the insurance company.

    If your company has paid €2,500 then the actual insurance cost is €3,125. The insurance company gets the €2,500 from you/your company, and the remaining 20% (€625) is paid by Dept of Finance from your taxes

    Are you sure about that.?
    We get health insurance as a BIK and have been claiming the 20% back

    https://www.revenue.ie/en/personal-tax-credits-reliefs-and-exemptions/health-and-age/medical-insurance-premiums/index.aspx


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭un5byh7sqpd2x0


    blackwhite wrote: »
    The 20% is reduced from the price you pay to the insurance company.

    If your company has paid €2,500 then the actual insurance cost is €3,125. The insurance company gets the €2,500 from you/your company, and the remaining 20% (€625) is paid by Dept of Finance from your taxes

    You are incorrect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,270 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Apologies

    I was thinking of my OHs situation - organised through work but set up is that policies are in individual's names and reimbursed by work.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    You are incorrect.

    What's the point in saying they are incorrect without showing why? I'm sure theres a few of us reading through this looking to understand it. But you're leaving us stumped here. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Pooinloo wrote: »
    It's very different. It's safeguarding your health. It's not a bonus scheme.

    It's getting above and beyond what most people get and is not compulsory. Sounds like a bonus to be fair.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,188 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    893bet wrote: »
    So let’s say my company pays 2500 for me and my family per year.

    Net cost to me is circa 1250 per year as that’s what’s deducted from me via the taxation system from my salary.

    I can claim separately 20% on that 2500? How can I do this?
    blackwhite wrote: »
    The 20% is reduced from the price you pay to the insurance company.

    If your company has paid €2,500 then the actual insurance cost is €3,125. The insurance company gets the €2,500 from you/your company, and the remaining 20% (€625) is paid by Dept of Finance from your taxes
    9935452 wrote: »
    Are you sure about that.?
    We get health insurance as a BIK and have been claiming the 20% back

    https://www.revenue.ie/en/personal-tax-credits-reliefs-and-exemptions/health-and-age/medical-insurance-premiums/index.aspx
    You are incorrect.

    Actually blackwhite is more or less correct here. Figures could be slightly different depending of individuals on the policy.

    Gross premium should be used to calculate BIK.
    Co pays Ins company the net premium.
    Co. Pays the revenue the tax relief amount
    Employee claims a credit of 20% of the gross premium. Capped at 200 per adult and 100 per kid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 373 ✭✭careless sherpa


    You can claim tax relief on it. €1000 per adult and €500 per child

    I thought tax relief was already incorporated into the price


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,188 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    I thought tax relief was already incorporated into the price

    Only if you pay it yourself
    If it is a BIK then it needs to be grossed up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭Turkish1


    What's the point in saying they are incorrect without showing why? I'm sure theres a few of us reading through this looking to understand it. But you're leaving us stumped here. :(

    Hopefully a Simple example here.

    Full value of health insurance policy is €1000.

    Benefit provided by the company.

    You will be assessed on a BIK of €1,000 in your payslips and in this example say higher rate of taxes applies (40% PAYE, 4% PRSI and 8% USC) so you will pay tax of €520 (€1,000*52%) on this benefit.

    As you have been taxed on the full amount you are entitled to claim back a credit of 20% of €1,000 (max allowed per adult).

    Ultimate cost to the employee through tax is 52% of €800 = €416 for a Policy worth €1,000

    This can be done on revenue online and will essentially increase your tax credits for the year by €200. Remember you can claim for up to the last 4years if you have not done so.

    Paid by you personally
    For a €1,000 policy you will actually pay €800 to the insurance company (€1000-(€1000*20%)) and therefore you cannot claim any additional tax relief as you have already received this when paying the insurance company.

    Above is from recollection and haven't looked at this in quite some time so open to correction.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭un5byh7sqpd2x0


    What's the point in saying they are incorrect without showing why? I'm sure theres a few of us reading through this looking to understand it. But you're leaving us stumped here. :(

    Because 9935452 already linked to the explanation in the previous post, I was just reaffirming it. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,188 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    Because 9935452 already linked to the explanation in the previous post, I was just reaffirming it. :rolleyes:

    But you are incorrect.


    As I explained above


Advertisement