silverharp wrote: »
a lot of fans arent going to like this, he is supposed to be a disfigured mute who wears a mask
EoinMcLovin wrote: »
Well this is his origin movie, so he will probably get disfigured near the end of the film and wear the mask
pixelburp wrote: »
Still trying to make GI Joe a thing eh. Another reminder that Hollywood truly is IP driven these days.
That director's CV is a real exercise in mediocrity though. Doesn't give optimism that if nothing else the martial arts might be decent.
speedboatchase wrote: »
As someone who played with GI Joe figures when I was four... it's just GI Joe. I appreciate that unlike the summer's other kung fu movie, Shang-Chi, this movie appears to have attractive people in it.
"However, "Snake Eyes" has bombed at the box office, only pulling in $13 million domestically alongside a measly $4 million worldwide in the first three days of its release. But with a talented lead and an $88 million budget, it's even more disappointing that "Snake Eyes" has flopped at the box office. So why has it had such a poor debut? Here's why "Snake Eyes" might have flopped so badly at the box office."
Read More: https://www.looper.com/470162/the-real-reason-snake-eyes-bombed-at-the-box-office/?utm_campaign=clip