President Donald Trump - Formal Impeachment Inquiry Announced

y0ssar1an22

duploelabs wrote: »

Can you answer the question regarding the people you mentioned who worked with the whistleblower?

obviously not - i'm not in the know. a few youtube vids were my source. perhaps i should add a disclaimer to my original post

Outlaw Pete

Interesting character reference on Vindman.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1190077852680634368.html

Spencerfreeman

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

obviously not - i'm not in the know. a few youtube vids were my source. perhaps i should add a disclaimer to my original post

I'm not going to link to any particular story, but if you search for "Alexandria Chalupa" you will find more. She has been closely linked to the whistleblower.

duploelabs

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I'm not going to link to any particular story, but if you search for "Alexandria Chalupa" you will find more. She has been closely linked to the whistleblower.

Well what viable source are you referencing for that connection?

If you search for Richard Gere, you're bound to find a lot of hamster entries, none of them credible

Spencerfreeman

duploelabs wrote: »

Well what viable source are you referencing for that connection?

If you search for Richard Gere, you're bound to find a lot of hamster entries, none of them credible

lol, true, but going on an independent journey is better.

I'm not providing links because where I read about the connection could be anywhere, I read lots.
I can just assure you that they are connected.

duploelabs

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

lol, true, but going on an independent journey is better.

I'm not providing links because where I read about the connection could be anywhere, I read lots.
I can just assure you that they are connected.

What connection? One you've preconceived?

Spencerfreeman

duploelabs wrote: »

What connection? One you've preconceived?

I suppose the connections to Brennan are easier to find. Have a look.

Igotadose

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Interesting character reference on Vindman.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1190077852680634368.html

Isn't all this hearsay? "I heard him say <blah>" Further, his recollection was of events in 2012. Vindman served in embassies starting in 2008?



:D:D

duploelabs

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I suppose the connections to Brennan are easier to find. Have a look.

But you're displaying blatent cognative bias there.

Outlaw Pete

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

so the whistleblower is a disgruntled ex employee who was sacked for leaking info. close ties with obama, susan rice, john brennan and biden. no wonder they wanted to keep his identity under wraps.

Starting to make sense why they don't want to interview him given what he might say.

Igotadose wrote: »

Isn't all this hearsay?

Yes. Did someone say it wasn't?

Spencerfreeman

duploelabs wrote: »

But you're displaying blatent cognative bias there.

Really Doctor?

Overheal

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Starting to make sense why they don't want to interview him given what he might say.



Yes. Did someone say it wasn't?

Focusing on it tbh just polarizes how people feel the whole affair without changing the findings of the inquiry

duploelabs

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

Really Doctor?

You're searching for proof of a preconceived concept rather than using imperical evidence to come to a conclusion.

Pretty textbook really

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases?wprov=sfla1

Spencerfreeman

duploelabs wrote: »

You're searching for proof of a preconceived concept rather than using imperical evidence to come to a conclusion.

Pretty textbook really

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases?wprov=sfla1

Here's something from Tim Pool to brighten your day.
It explores the connections that I previously suggested existed to you.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EQ3K1cyC0ls/

I actually don't expect you to watch it, but if you do I'll only be interested in discussing the content.

Overheal

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

Here's something from Tim Pool to brighten your day.
It explores the connections that I previously suggested existed to you.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EQ3K1cyC0ls/

I actually don't expect you to watch it, but if you do I'll only be interested in discussing the content.

What’s bitchute? Never heard of it. Who funds them?

mcmoustache

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

Here's something from Tim Pool to brighten your day.
It explores the connections that I previously suggested existed to you.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EQ3K1cyC0ls/

I actually don't expect you to watch it, but if you do I'll only be interested in discussing the content.

When serious people get up in the morning and want to know what's going on in the world, they check out credible media sources like the FT, Forbes, NYT or some other publication with a credible reputation. Even Trump does it as do most people in the administration despite their cries about "fake news".


What they don't do is look up some youtuber a popular talking head because they know that that kind of stuff is for the idiots beneath them. They might promote them to their marks to keep them stupid but they don't actually believe that stuff themselves (although there seems to be a few getting high on their own supply, like Giuliani).



Have you got any sources that might pass the smell test for serious people?

Spencerfreeman

Overheal wrote: »

What’s bitchute? Never heard of it. Who funds them?

They seem to be registered in England.

duploelabs

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

Here's something from Tim Pool to brighten your day.
It explores the connections that I previously suggested existed to you.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EQ3K1cyC0ls/

I actually don't expect you to watch it, but if you do I'll only be interested in discussing the content.

Like the others, can you quote a reputable source for what you're trying to explain

Spencerfreeman

mcmoustache wrote: »

When serious people get up in the morning and want to know what's going on in the world, they check out credible media sources like the FT, Forbes, NYT or some other publication with a credible reputation. Even Trump does it as do most people in the administration despite their cries about "fake news".


What they don't do is look up some youtuber a popular talking head because they know that that kind of stuff is for the idiots beneath them. They might promote them to their marks to keep them stupid but they don't actually believe that stuff themselves (although there seems to be a few getting high on their own supply, like Giuliani).



Have you got any sources that might pass the smell test for serious people?

I don't link to propaganda.

duploelabs

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I don't link to propaganda.

What's your definition of propaganda?

(and I don't mean a cockney having another look for something)

Spencerfreeman

duploelabs wrote: »

Like the others, can you quote a reputable source for what you're trying to explain

You didn't read the last line of my post did you?

Spencerfreeman

duploelabs wrote: »

What's your definition of propaganda?

(and I don't mean a cockney having another look for something)

Any source that considers the impeachment inquiry legitimate.

duploelabs

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

Any source that considers the impeachment inquiry legitimate.

OK so using that rational. Any sources that say its not legal are legitimate?


Homo Unius Libri


And how do you _know_ the impeachment is legitimate? By reading those sources, again confirmation bias

Spencerfreeman

duploelabs wrote: »

OK so using that rational. Any sources that say its not legal are legitimate?


Homo Unius Libri


And how do you _know_ the impeachment is legitimate? By reading those sources, again confirmation bias

I don't limit my sources. I don't feel threatened by contrary views.
I do my own news editing.

Overheal

Overheal wrote: »

What’s bitchute? Never heard of it. Who funds them?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitChute

Timberrrrrrrr

When asked about NYT, Forbes etc you said

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I don't link to propaganda.

Now you're saying

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I don't limit my sources. I don't feel threatened by contrary views.
I do my own news editing.

So you read the above? You watch CNN? Sky news? BBC? RTE?

duploelabs

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I don't limit my sources. I don't feel threatened by contrary views.
I do my own news editing.

You do your own editing. With what concept in mind? Do you double source your information to assertain credibility?

Professor Moriarty

DubInMeath wrote: »

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitChute

Looks like Breitbart for people who can't read.

Spencerfreeman

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Looks like Breitbart for people who can't read.

That's like blaming the satellite for the channels it carries.

Professor Moriarty

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Looks like Breitbart for people who can't read.

And like breitbart it appeals to a certain mindset and ****knuckles.