Toy Story Werewolf - One Night in Al's Toy Barn (GAME THREAD)

tusk

quickbeam 32
tusk 28
Ectoplasm 22
sKeith 18
fixxxer 12
Baggly 12
Clarabel 11
duffman13 9
Sixtoes 8
Dublinandy2 8
Necro 8
LadySkunk 8
Green&Red 3
sullivlo 1



Sully. GNR. Get talkin!

Clarabel

quickbeam wrote: »

I personally think the Ecto accusation is flimsy.

It'd be too obvious for both Bags and Duff to use it if both were wolves though.

I'd agree, it feels like clutching at straws, but I don't feel Bags and Duff wolf for doing it though

sKeith

Note: Ectoplasm

Sixtoes

Baggly wrote: »

Tusk Clara sixtoes all quiet since munch and accusations started flying.

That was like 4mins ago!

VOTE: CLARABEL

FFA#1
Clarabel- Very Wolfy. Cops at her gaff now.
Tusk - paranoid about votes.
Baggy - post about above.

Anyone else have ffas done yet?

Baggly

tusk wrote:

You were quiet up until munch and when asked about it you just said 'and?'

I was quiet. What was there to discuss ? And what Ecto posted, tusk, is what we call shade. Pointing out something that's supposed to be bad, without posting your own conclusions on it. As a counter accusation. It's what people post when they want to defend themselves without attracting attention.

quickbeam

Timeline:

19:10

Ectoplasm wrote: »

Well balls.

19:11

duffman13 wrote: »

Wolf

19:11

Baggly wrote: »

Ecto 4 wolf

I don't see it as impossible that Ecto would come in at the same minute as the munch post, with Duff and Bags following in pretty much the same amount of time to Ecto's post.

Consider, Ecto also replied fast to this:

19:10

duffman13 wrote: »

I'm both wolves Ecto

19:11

Ectoplasm wrote: »

Excellent. That's game so :P

fixXxer

Baggly wrote: »

You have been quiet since munch too. How come. Happy to sit back and let others accuse each other?

I'm posting chief. asking questions, reading replies. I don't like your angles for far but not sure if wolf or not.

tusk

Sixtoes wrote: »

That was like 4mins ago!

VOTE: CLARABEL

FFA#1
Clarabel- Very Wolfy. Cops at her gaff now.
Tusk - paranoid about votes.
Baggy - post about above.

Anyone else have ffas done yet?

Ok, so me trying not to get people maj lynched is wolfy? OK bud. Keep taking those drugs :pac:

Ectoplasm

Sixtoes accusing me of fluff and then duff too is weird. Why are my posts fluff and others not? It's bull. Baggly accuses and duff votes me.

Thinking one of them is a wolf anyway.

fixXxer

Clarabel wrote: »

I'd agree, it feels like clutching at straws, but I don't feel Bags and Duff wolf for doing it though

What bout voting between them?

quickbeam

12 players alive. First to 7 votes to reach majority before day ends.

Sixtoes

Clarabel wrote: »

Can someone with a spreadsheet tally votes? I'll do it after 8? deal pls?

Is that when wolf the backroom chats will be over?

tusk

FFA 1

Baggly - Reaction to being called out pre munch and then jumping on ecto
Sixtoes - Seems to be trying to cause random chaos
Sully - Low posts, no content, lying low?

sKeith

baggly, can you do some wild claim for us, its a sure fire way i can get a read on you.

Clarabel

fixxxer wrote: »

What bout voting between them?

What do you mean?

Sixtoes

Ectoplasm wrote: »

Sixtoes accusing me of fluff and then duff too is weird. Why are my posts fluff and others not? It's bull. Baggly accuses and duff votes me.

Thinking one of them is a wolf anyway.

More fluff. Someone iso his ass.

fixXxer

tusk wrote: »

Ok, so me trying not to get people maj lynched is wolfy? OK bud. Keep taking those drugs :pac:

Lynching is inevitable though. We learn things from which way people go. Trying to prevent that isn't helping.

Who are you thinking about voting?

Green&Red

#FFA1

Based purely on feel

QB
Fixxer
Dandy - for being undandy like

tusk

Sixtoes wrote: »

More fluff. Someone iso his ass.

Jesus christ. Am I the only one seeing this lad's posts?

fixXxer

Clarabel wrote: »

What do you mean?

A run off vote between Duffers and Bagly?

quickbeam

fixxxer wrote: »

Lynching is inevitable though. We learn things from which way people go. Trying to prevent that isn't helping.

Who are you thinking about voting?

Well, it sucks for Necro, but why not wait until closer to day end and use the time constructively.

I agree, rushed voting doesn't help village. At all.

Baggly

sKeith wrote:

baggly, can you do some wild claim for us, its a sure fire way i can get a read on you.

Lol I am Andy, the reverse protagonist bg vig.

Ectoplasm

Sixtoes wrote: »

More fluff. Someone iso his ass.

*her

If you're going to be so wrong at least be right about what you're wrong about


No see *this* could be considered fluff. The one you posted, not so much.

tusk

fixxxer wrote: »

Lynching is inevitable though. We learn things from which way people go. Trying to prevent that isn't helping.

Who are you thinking about voting?

Symantics. you know what i meant.

I'm trying to stop people getting a maj vote in early, because it means we've less info to use in our decisions...

I've posted my FFA. Baggly and Sixer seem most wolfy to me

sKeith

Baggly wrote: »

Lol I am Andy, the reverse protagonist bg vig.

Am i the inly one who thinks G&R is playing a wolf game..

quickbeam

Sixtoes is being annoying, but I'm not sure he's a wolf. Would a wolf play like that? Too wolfy to be a wolf, kinda. The wolves are probably acting more villagery than that.

Baggly

If someone has another lynch candidate with better reasoning than what I had on ecto let's be having it. Otherwise, that will be my vote. Sorry ecto if I'm wrong. Best read so far for me.

tusk

fixxxer wrote: »

A run off vote between Duffers and Bagly?

I also don't agree with Racing, but Baggly is top of my ffa, so unless he changes my mind, i'll be voting him closer to the time.

quickbeam

sKeith wrote: »

Am i the inly one who thinks G&R is playing a wolf game..

Did you mean Baggly? You quoted Baggly but said G&R.

Or did you mean G&R and quoted the wrong post?

Sixtoes

tusk wrote: »

Jesus christ. Am I the only one seeing this lad's posts?

The proof will be in the pudding.