Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Misdiagnosis

Options
  • 31-07-2019 5:49pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭


    If somebody gets tested for a condition in the public health system and is told that they are negative for a certain condition and subsequently get a positive diagnosis privately, can they then take a case against the HSE?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,419 ✭✭✭antix80


    Depends, did you suffer a loss or are you just a greedy opportunist?

    Mod
    Abusive and OTT imho. Be nice here


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,896 ✭✭✭Irishphotodesk


    If you can prove misdiagnosis then contact a solicitor, given your suspicions, I would suggest contacting a solicitor for advice, and see if they think you have a case, but be prepared with all legal actions there’s a risk that it could cost you money.

    Seek out a solicitor with personal injuries/med neg experience.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,526 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Misdiagnosis does not necessarily equate to medical negligence. You would have to show that there was an actual preventable mistake made. Talk to a solicitor

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭Seanachai


    28064212 wrote: »
    Misdiagnosis does not necessarily equate to medical negligence. You would have to show that there was an actual preventable mistake made. Talk to a solicitor

    Does saying that a certain test is unnecessary constitute negligence?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,061 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    Not every test is 100% accurate. A condition runs in my family. Available genetic test can only detect 20% of cases. So a positive result is a positive result but there's a huge chance a negative result could actually lead to the person developing the condition. As a result, none of the next generation have been tested.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,526 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Seanachai wrote: »
    Does saying that a certain test is unnecessary constitute negligence?
    I could walk in tomorrow and ask for an xray because I believe I have bowel cancer, even though I have no symptoms and a low risk profile. They could rightly tell me that the test is unnecessary That doesn't mean I don't have bowel cancer, but it also doesn't mean they were in the wrong

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,372 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    Caranica wrote: »
    A condition runs in my family. Available genetic test can only detect 20% of cases. So a positive result is a positive result but there's a huge chance a negative result could actually lead to the person developing the condition.

    Could 'lead' to the person developing the condition :eek:

    There are risks associated with procedures like biopsies but what you're suggesting is that simply doing a test for the condition can trigger the condition!

    Did you mean to say that, notwithstanding a negative result, a person can still go on to develop the condition?


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,372 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    Medicine is an inexact science, can you show that the condition existed at the time of the negative diagnosis? Is it a condition or illness that has a low rate of detection? Some conditions present as vague symptoms and/or can evade detection on the first test and require follow-up tests if the symptoms persist.

    In short, there is no simple answer to your question.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,061 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    coylemj wrote: »
    Could 'lead' to the person developing the condition :eek:

    There are risks associated with procedures like biopsies but what you're suggesting is that simply doing a test for the condition can trigger the condition!

    Did you mean to say that, notwithstanding a negative result, a person can still go on to develop the condition?

    Yeah, bad choice of words. Ironically, I was in hospital at the time I posted... Not with the condition ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 263 ✭✭PatrickSmithUS


    Seanachai wrote: »
    If somebody gets tested for a condition in the public health system and is told that they are negative for a certain condition and subsequently get a positive diagnosis privately, can they then take a case against the HSE?


    Sure are you not following the Ovarian Cancer scandal.



    You'll have a number of options and a solicitor would likely advise you to sue the Doctor, the HSE or any third party company that was responsible for conducting the test.


    There's another example of it

    Mod deletion. Reference to a firm offering med neg advice
    Patrick SmithUS, please do not post again on this thread


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Seanachai wrote: »
    If somebody gets tested for a condition in the public health system and is told that they are negative for a certain condition and subsequently get a positive diagnosis privately, can they then take a case against the HSE?

    The best people to advise are the Personal Injuries Board and the Patients Association. cannot post links here but google will help

    The PIA are very keen and excellent .

    And good luck; I mean that. I was too ill to pursue a valid claim.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,560 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    Graces7 wrote: »
    The best people to advise are the Personal Injuries Board and the Patients Association. cannot post links here but google will help

    The PIA are very keen and excellent .

    And good luck; I mean that. I was too ill to pursue a valid claim.
    Two things; PIAB will not advise in any way and PIAB do not deal with medical negligence claims.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Robbo wrote: »
    Two things; PIAB will not advise in any way and PIAB do not deal with medical negligence claims.

    They were to deal with it as a personal injury claim. Their idea. In their advice on the phone.


Advertisement