Most beautiful women in the world II - (NO CHAT! DO NOT QUOTE PICS !!!)

robertpatterson

GreenandRed wrote: »

I understand the question, I don't understand why it was asked. Her name is in the post.

It might not show in mobile maybe?

FFVII

robertpatterson wrote: »

It might not show in mobile maybe?

Must be in the heading.

Can't be seen.

lawred2

Yeah I can't see any name

Ronaldinho

Wibbs

Ronaldinho wrote: »

For the name folks: Alexandra Maria Lara





Very pretty alright. She was in that flic Downfall, played Hitler's secretary.

RabbleRouser2k

Kimberley Garner posted this on Xmas day...:D

Enjoy.

(No nudity, but nsfw)

https://instagram.fkix2-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t50.2886-16/81701330_162841115075647_458873022874841109_n.mp4?_nc_ht=instagram.fkix2-2.fna.fbcdn.net&_nc_cat=107&_nc_ohc=_2ClmM3Tqu8AX8I0gH2&oe=5E07E3E5&oh=89d0c294cb448701a4c58dc06daeec2b&dl=1

MMyers

jj880 wrote: »

Lock the thread

Pack it up

Home time

Thought you liked Katie :P

GreenandRed

Apologies lads. I can see the heading on phone in 2 browsers, posted from phone.

It's Emma Fischer from Deutschland '86.

Dufflecoat Fanny

Wibbs wrote: »

For the name folks: Alexandra Maria Lara





Very pretty alright. She was in that flic Downfall, played Hitler's secretary.

Had a crazy night with her cousin in Berlin last year

1o059k7ewrqj3n

Kinsey Golden

jpfahy

The first girl here:
https://boobsadventcalendar.com/

RabbleRouser2k

jpfahy wrote: »

The first girl here:

That's Lucie Donlan-she's been in the thread already. And the last one too.

storker

Colombian actress Juana del Rio...

1o059k7ewrqj3n

RabbleRouser2k wrote: »

That's Lucie Donlan-she's been in the thread already. And the last one too.

And it doesn’t matter, stop policing the thread.

RabbleRouser2k

Steyr 556 wrote: »

And it doesn’t matter, stop policing the thread.

How is 'naming the woman in the gif' policing the thread?

PErson didn't know who she was-I said her name.

That's not policing-that's helping out.

smilerf

RabbleRouser2k wrote: »

How is 'naming the woman in the gif' policing the thread?

PErson didn't know who she was-I said her name.

That's not policing-that's helping out.

you are constantly doing it and you are not just naming her.
You are implying that everybody should check the previous thread before posting

RabbleRouser2k

smilerf wrote: »

you are constantly doing it and you are not just naming her.
You are implying that everybody should check the previous thread before posting

Constant?

That's ridiculous.

Millionaire only not

RabbleRouser2k wrote: »

Kimberley Garner posted this on Xmas day...:D

Enjoy.

(No nudity, but nsfw)

https://instagram.fkix2-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t50.2886-16/81701330_162841115075647_458873022874841109_n.mp4?_nc_ht=instagram.fkix2-2.fna.fbcdn.net&_nc_cat=107&_nc_ohc=_2ClmM3Tqu8AX8I0gH2&oe=5E07E3E5&oh=89d0c294cb448701a4c58dc06daeec2b&dl=1

Lucky dog woof woof

MMyers

jonon9

Anya Chalotra from The Witcher

EmmetSpiceland

RabbleRouser2k wrote: »

Constant?

That's ridiculous.

It’s no big deal but you always mention any contribution if they appeared in the “last thread”.

If you want you could attach a link to the previous post in that thread for reference because I, honestly, don’t think anyone is going to spend days “working” through the old thread.

JohnnyFlash

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

It’s no big deal but you always mention any contribution if they appeared in the “last thread”.

If you want you could attach a link to the previous post in that thread for reference because I, honestly, don’t think anyone is going to spend days “working” through the old thread.

Busy working on something else, Emmet, would be my guess.

RabbleRouser2k

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

It’s no big deal but you always mention any contribution if they appeared in the “last thread”.

If you want you could attach a link to the previous post in that thread for reference because I, honestly, don’t think anyone is going to spend days “working” through the old thread.

Am I the only one who knows about the 'search thread' function in boards?

Plus there were a few posts with her-not just one.

1o059k7ewrqj3n

Johanne Landbo

EmmetSpiceland

RabbleRouser2k wrote: »

Am I the only one who knows about the 'search thread' function in boards?

Plus there were a few posts with her-not just one.

You don’t seem to get that no one cares about the “old thread”. No one remembers every single entry in it. How many pages do you think people even bother to go back in this one?

Like I said, it’s no big deal, but don’t deny that you seem to get a “kick” out of pointing out if someone was posted in the previous thread. You can keep doing it and everyone will keep ignoring it.

No harm, no foul.

lawred2

Steyr 556 wrote: »

Johanne Landbo

Smashing

RabbleRouser2k

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

You don’t seem to get that no one cares about the “old thread”. No one remembers every single entry in it. How many pages do you think people even bother to go back in this one?

Like I said, it’s no big deal, but don’t deny that you seem to get a “kick” out of pointing out if someone was posted in the previous thread. You can keep doing it and everyone will keep ignoring it.

No harm, no foul.

How quickly the festive spirit departs...

I don't get any kick out of it-far from it. I have a life, I get a kick out of that. Nothing on the internet is genuine, so I don't take any issue with it.

IF people kept ignoring it, then I wouldn't be reading responses, frankly.

EmmetSpiceland

RabbleRouser2k wrote: »

How quickly the festive spirit departs...

I don't get any kick out of it-far from it. I have a life, I get a kick out of that. Nothing on the internet is genuine, so I don't take any issue with it.

IF people kept ignoring it, then I wouldn't be reading responses, frankly.

The “spirit” is still strong over here, like I said, it’s all good but you acting like you don’t constantly point out “entrants” in the previous thread is just laughable. It’s like you know the whole lot inside out, it’s a little disconcerting. Obsessive even.

People were ignoring it, until you said you weren’t constantly “pointing” to the previous thread. Again, it’s not big deal, just don’t go making out that other “users” are lying.

Anyway, this has gone on long enough so I feel a “contender” needs to be posted. Here’s Elisa Cuthbert:








Go on, say it.

Relikk

I know I'd be breaking it here, but this thread really needs a strict "no chat" rule. Between the inane "I thought this was the most beautiful women thread?" type comments (everybody has different tastes and nobody really wants to hear that you don't find whatever was posted attractive), the creepy horndogs, and now this petty bickering.

Just shut the fuck up and post attractive ladies. :pac:

Montage of Feck

Hercule Poirot wrote: »

I'm very much aware of the allegations that were made against James Deen - including some women saying that they had asked him to stop while shooting a scene but he (and the rest of the crew) carried on with shooting the scene

But you've named a handful of people in an industry of hundreds - did you ever watch Louis Theroux's documentary on the industry? Really opened my eyes to the fact that aren't all raving head cases with Daddy issues

Anyways, we won't be agreeing on this anytime soon I think so have a nice day, peace and love, etc etc

It was hardly a glowing complement to the industry, most seemed to have varying degrees of psychological issues.