Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Taylor-made CVPL Chat Thread!

Options
13132343637229

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    The cameraman? All hands and arms correct. No phalic signs anywhere. I give up! :rolleyes:

    Rule 2: If Rule 1 doesn’t apply, look again!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Rule 2: If Rule 1 doesn’t apply, look again!
    Then Rule 34


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 76,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    8/2(2+2) = ?

    487673.jpg

    When I looked at the equation, the answer in my head I got was 16. Then I looked at both calculators, and I could see the two possible answers. Now, I don't know what the rules are suppose to be? What do we learn in school these days?

    Oh and btw, I hate those Facebook equations that tease people about what is the right answer causing arguments (hoping none start here).

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    astrofluff wrote: »
    When I looked at the equation, the answer in my head I got was 16. Then I looked at both calculators, and I could see the two possible answers. Now, I don't know what the rules are suppose to be? What do we learn in school these days?

    Oh and btw, I hate those Facebook equations that tease people about what is the right answer causing arguments (hoping none start here).
    Nowadays they have fancy names but the rules haven't changed

    BIDMAS

    So the order you should do your calculations in is:

    Brackets
    Indices
    Division and Multiplication (start on the left and work them out in the order that you find them)
    Addition and Subtraction (when only addition and subtraction are left in the sum, work them out in the order you find them - starting from the left of the sum and working towards the right)


    Anyone does it differently then they don't have a STEM background.
    Science Technology Engineering Maths


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    New Home wrote: »
    Hare today ... gone tomorrow


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 8,573 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wilberto


    Nowadays they have fancy names but the rules haven't changed

    BIDMAS

    So the order you should do your calculations in is:

    Brackets
    Indices
    Division and Multiplication (start on the left and work them out in the order that you find them)
    Addition and Subtraction (when only addition and subtraction are left in the sum, work them out in the order you find them - starting from the left of the sum and working towards the right)


    Anyone does it differently then they don't have a STEM background.
    Science Technology Engineering Maths




    Poor old BOMDAS got exiled I see. :(


    :pac::pac:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And that's the conundrum, BIDMAS or BOMDAS, different answer using each method.
    Lets just hope that whatever calculations a team are doing, that they ALL use the same method!
    Just imagine getting it wrong with a nuclear device or anything to do with navigation.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 8,573 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wilberto


    And that's the conundrum, BIDMAS or BOMDAS, different answer using each method.
    Lets just hope that whatever calculations a team are doing, that they ALL use the same method!
    Just imagine getting it wrong with a nuclear device or anything to do with navigation.


    But, BIDMAS and BOMDAS don't give different answers?

    It's just semantics, basically. The O and I are the same, but just use a different word to represent it.

    As for multiplying and dividing, it actually doesn't matter which one you do first. Same for addition and subtraction. So, if you work off BODMSA and it would still lead to the same result.


    There's effectively only four parts : B O MD AS.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    I think the key point is that if you're going to write out a sum like that, do it legibly and unambiguously


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    But if you read what it says on the calculator on the left it says "History" which I take to mean that is the history of the calculation in the order it was input so of course the answer is "wrong" compared to writing out the equation and then working it out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    Ah so the one on the left each calculation step should be on a different line
    8/2=4
    2+2=4
    4×4=16

    Still bonkers


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 76,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    No, not on a different line. You can omit the multiplication sign outside a bracket, IIRC.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    To be, or not to be, that is the question

    __
    2B . 2B
    


    The answer is of course -1.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,143 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    The calculator thing is nothing to do with PEMDAS or BODMAS.

    The issue is of associativity.

    One calculator is right associative, the other is left associative.

    So both answers are correct because the original equation is deliberately ambiguous so as to cause this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,123 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    One is taking the equation in left-right order for multiplication/division.
    The other is performing multiplication THEN division...

    At least that's how it appears to me!


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    8/2(2+2) = ?



    487673.jpg

    So, obviously and as others have said, resolving the brackets come first.

    Therefore (2+2) = 4

    That leaves 8/2(4).

    So the question then becomes:

    Does the process of "resolving the brackets" include "resolving the multiplication that is implicit in the opening bracket" or not?

    If the answer to the above question is 'Yes', then it becomes 8/8, or 1.

    If the answer is 'No', then it becomes 8/2*4, and you resolve the multiplication and division in the order they appear from left to right, and so it is 4*4 = 16.



    I do not know the correct answer to the question in bold. But I think it should be 'Yes'

    (Edited to add: This part of the Wikipedia article on the subject seems to imply that I'm right)


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,123 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    In order to be properly stated, it should probably be either:

    8/(2(2+2))

    or

    (8/2)(2+2)

    I really don't have a clue on what's the 'correct' way of handling it, tbh...


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,215 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    I stopped looking when neither answer was 58008.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭SolvableKnave


    Suckit wrote: »
    I stopped looking when neither answer was 58008.

    Don't you mean 5318008?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 30,123 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    ganmo wrote: »
    I call bull nuts, has to be photoshop

    Yeah, it's either a bit of sunshine through a crack in the curtains/blinds, or a torch trained on the dogs chest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    ganmo wrote: »
    I call bull nuts, has to be photoshop
    Wait, what? You mean I can't believe everything I see on the internet? :eek: I'm shocked :P


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    What? I didn't post that! :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,123 ✭✭✭✭Star Lord


    inforfun wrote: »
    https://i.imgur.com/rFpyjxE.mp4

    You want to have sound with this one

    This just made my morning!!! :D:D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭SolvableKnave




  • Registered Users Posts: 78,321 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    For a moment I thought a cryogenic Han Solo was about to pop out.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=110988622&postcount=909


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    Bootup wrote: »
    FEcRewz.jpg

    OK so I admit it sometimes I'm a bit slooooooow "oh fox sake"

    I must have looked at that one at least 5 times before it finally dawned on me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,334 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    my3cents wrote: »
    OK so I admit it sometimes I'm a bit slooooooow "oh fox sake"

    I must have looked at that one at least 5 times before it finally dawned on me.

    Don't quite have it yet


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,366 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Don't quite have it yet

    Oh four foxes sake.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    Oh four foxes sake.

    Just proves after 5 attempts I still didn't have it :D


Advertisement