Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Zombieland 2

  • 30-01-2019 10:33pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,004 ✭✭✭✭


    1

    Ruben Fleischer is returning to direct Zombieland Double Tap for cinema release on October 11th
    Columbus, Tallahasse, Wichita, and Little Rock move to the American heartland as they face off against evolved zombies, fellow survivors, and the growing pains of the snarky makeshift family


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭jones


    Nice loved the first one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭Defunkd


    10 years is a bit too long for a sequel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Defunkd wrote: »
    10 years is a bit too long for a sequel.

    Toy Story 3 was 11 years and worth the wait :)
    Rambo was 19 years and pretty good

    Then again Terminator 3 was 12 years and complete crap :(
    Indiana Jones was 19 years and was so bad I kinda agree with South Park about it.



    So.............maybe?

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Couldn't be any worse than the brief & abandoned (Amazon?) TV show that was attempted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭Defunkd


    Toy Story 3 was 11 years and worth the wait :)
    Rambo was 19 years and pretty good

    Then again Terminator 3 was 12 years and complete crap :(
    Indiana Jones was 19 years and was so bad I kinda agree with South Park about it.



    So.............maybe?
    I can't see the dynamic being as workable with such a large gap in the timeline. Eisenberg can't still be the geeky, insecure adult who's been banging Stone with the last 10 years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭w/s/p/c/


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Couldn't be any worse than the brief & abandoned (Amazon?) TV show that was attempted.

    God, I remember seeing the trailer for that on YouTube, I thought it was an SNL parody or something... dreadful.

    I'm a big fan of the first one, hopefully more of the same from this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed


    not sure about that


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Probably doesn't help that zombies are already a little passé, that was a weak trailer. To the point where I'm wondering if I remember the first more fondly than it deserves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,087 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy


    Not a great trailer in all honesty, but the cast might be able to carry it off again. We shall see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,282 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    I thought it was Crocodile Dundee at the start


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,857 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Thought the first one was awful - apart from Bill Murray - don't feel any more enthusiastic about the sequel after watching that trailer.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Arghus wrote: »
    Thought the first one was awful - apart from Bill Murray - don't feel any more enthusiastic about the sequel after watching that trailer.

    Yeah, this is what I mean when I say I'm suddenly wondering if I actually liked the first one. The Bill Murray scene was funny, and the opening credits to Metallica was cool, but the rest? Ehhhh... might rewatch and see


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed


    The first one was great .... The end ��


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,180 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    That looks dreadful!


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,514 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    It starts Ok, goes downhill with the Terrible cheech and Chong style story, then goes way off by ripping off a joke from Shaun of the Dead but not realising the joke and also thinking it was good enough for the trailer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,004 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Abigail Breslin looks older than Emma Stone and Jesse Eisenberg now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,286 ✭✭✭✭mdwexford


    First one is class.

    Looking forward to this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    I liked the first one a lot, it was all light hearted fun and games and everyone looked like they had fun making it.

    That trailer isn't looking as good, it looks like it's suffering from sequelitis where they figure they'll take the things that worked in the first and got totally OTT because surely that's what everyone wants....

    Also.... I dunno if I can deal with watching Emma Stone trying to talk through her false teeth for an hour and a half but that's just a personal bugbear of mine......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,129 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    they look like they had fun making it is usually a bad thing for the audience


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Emma stone has false teeth ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    Emma stone has false teeth ?

    False/ highly worked on teeth. All I can ever see is her trying to talk around her top row of perfect teeth. It's immensely distracting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,857 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Yeah, this is what I mean when I say I'm suddenly wondering if I actually liked the first one. The Bill Murray scene was funny, and the opening credits to Metallica was cool, but the rest? Ehhhh... might rewatch and see

    I thought it was the broadest, blandest and ultimately boring zombie movie possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,939 ✭✭✭Tazzimus


    False/ highly worked on teeth. All I can ever see is her trying to talk around her top row of perfect teeth. It's immensely distracting.
    Like a large portion of actors/actresses then.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 11,106 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    I liked the first one - once you know it was reworked from a tv series pitch certain elements of the pacing make sense but I liked the cast and enjoyed the dynamics and banter.

    The trailer feels a bit unconfident opening with that particular line (then returning clumsily to the runup to that scene and hobbling around it), but unless I hear really bad things I'll be watching this as some light relief between meatier films.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    emma stone is perfect..... leave HER ALONE !!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Red Band Trailer


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Wierd that metacritic is outta sync with IMDB and RottenTomatoes:

    55 - metacritic:
    7.3/10 - imdb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1560220/
    75% - rottentomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/zombieland_double_tap

    Gonna need to see a CinemaScore
    https://twitter.com/CinemaScore/status/1184162066841722881


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,870 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Slydice wrote: »
    Wierd that metacritic is outta sync with IMDB and RottenTomatoes:

    55 - metacritic:
    7.3/10 - imdb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1560220/
    75% - rottentomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/zombieland_double_tap

    Gonna need to see a CinemaScore
    https://twitter.com/CinemaScore/status/1184162066841722881
    Not that unusual Metacritic scores always tends to be lower than rottentomatoes.
    Metacritic is generally a better indicator imo.
    IMDb ratings are from every Tom, dick and Harry.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It's a sequel to a cult film, assuming it doesn't completely sh*t the bed, it's always going to play better with audiences - fans specifically - than critics with less or no emotional skin in the game. Wouldn't say it's a critic proof movie but if you've been waiting 10 years for a sequel, reviews ain't going to put you off at this stage.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,012 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Slydice wrote: »
    Wierd that metacritic is outta sync with IMDB and RottenTomatoes:

    Not really. Metacritic is weighted whereas Rotten Tomatoes isn’t. A 75% score on RT simply means 75% of critics gave it some sort of positive review (which can cover a range from ‘alright’ to ‘masterpiece’), whereas 75% on Metacritic means the average (albeit with some vague additional criteria) score was 75%.

    As for IMDB - user score unreliable at the best of times, but substantially more so for a film that isn’t out yet ;)


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 11,106 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    Caught this today - it was pretty enjoyable, though not quite as good as the first. If you liked the first you'll enjoy this, occasionally clunky and unsubtle though it is.

    Oddly enough it still has some odd pacing and narrative transition issues that feel adapted from a television pitch.

    I do hope that we don't see any further films or attempts at continuation, though - there's not a lot more than can be done with the characters and setting, and that's fine.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Ah ye, looks like it's just the generalised critics

    I'm guessing the audience into the type of film like it.
    89% - Audience Score - Verified Ratings: 5,990
    https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/zombieland_double_tap


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭kwestfan08


    Seen this during the week and really liked it. Was a fan of the first film and this is the rare case of a comedy sequel not being absolute ****e.

    It got three laugh out loud moments out of me so I was thoroughly happy with my evenings entertainment. Hadn't heard of Zoey Deutch before seeing this but I thought she was the best thing about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 Culchie_85


    I really enjoyed the first one and they really should've left it alone.

    Lazy jokes and lazy story. I thought they could've done better.

    Abigail Breslin looks busted now.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I enjoyed it some of the zombie killing was pretty epic, but no where near the first that being said


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,792 ✭✭✭2Mad2BeMad


    Watched it last night.

    Enjoyed it, a good sequel not great but Was worth watching.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Doodah7


    Watched this last night and found it quite enjoyable. Some funny moments, particularly from Woody Harrelson, who seemed to be having a ball making this.


Advertisement