Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ghostbusters Afterlife (Jason Reitman)

1457910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Yeh, the kids and I are looking forward to it. I think it looks like it will be fun for those who don’t take it too seriously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Like the fawlty towers episode that was banned ? I think you guys underestimate how sensitive some toxic online community’s are, South Park wouldn’t be able to start today, Trey Parker says as much. Along with Rick and Morty ,they are exceptions , not the rule.


    it’s extremely easy to get on the wrong side of these mobs. Ask Liam Neeson when he admitted something that I’m sure many have thought at some stage after being on the end of a crime from another race. People didn’t care of context, the mob wanted his head for speaking honestly on a topic that seems to trigger people into hysteria.


    In the 70s and 80s there just wasn’t anywhere near the danger and pushback as there is nowadays with many groups of people looking for reasons to be upset. As such, the appetite or willingness of studios to create dangerous stuff is nearly non existent.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Ah now let's not pretend South Park came out to a bevvy of praise, or even apathetic shoulder shrugs. Or was one of many like it - it was as exceptional as Rick and Morty or Always Sunny are now; boundary pushing shows beyond a middle ground and mainstream. But It was subjected to a tonne of outrage and remember it well from the time of those first seasons. Plenty of radio, TV and talking heads decrying this obscene, transgressive comedy. Maybe these days the internet might have changed the lyrics, but the song remains the same.

    Something like South Park could absolutely be made today, the only reason it wouldn't would be because the zeitgeist of humour has moved on from the style of the late 90s. The two aforementioned shows being a good example of what flies (extreme nihilism in the case of Rick and Morty). And the only reason nobody talks about South Park is cos, well, it's old hat now. Mainstream really.

    Heck. The SIMPSONS was transgressive and caused outrage fadó fadó.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I would disagree that most people would react the same way Liam Neeson did by not just wanting revenge on the perpetrator of a crime but wanting revenge on anyone who happened to be the same race.

    But bringing the thread back on topic, I watched the new trailer and completely forgot that the two movies this is sequelising were weird comedies, this looks neither weird nor funny. In fact it looks very serious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Southpark did cause a lot of unrest for good reason as it was tearing up everything. You could nearly deduce that the fact these modern shows don’t really have comparable global outrage suggests they aren’t as radical or bold as the likes of southpark. Kind of like how Father ted was too dangerous for Rte but any show slagging off religion today wouldn’t seem edgy.


    I never said “most” would agree with Neeson. He admitted something that I believe many people have had in moments . As John Barnes said, the real racists aren’t stupid enough to say it in public.

    Back to the movie, not sure how you managed to think the movie looks serious or more serious then the originals. The first movie was actually quite dark at times, only watched it recently with the kids . That scene where Dana is dragged into the kitchen with the monster groping her while in the couch is very creepy!

    The major humour outlet was Murray, I’m presuming this is passing to Rudd. That said, they won’t replace Rick Moranis character who nearly stole the show “ok so who brought the dog” !!



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Would it surprise Drumpot I don't agree with you? 🤣 Have you watched Always Sunny or R&M? The very first season of the former had an episode where a main character tried to pickup one night stands at an abortion clinic, playing both sides of the protests there. It never pulled back (and I don't even like either show!)

    I think the difference you speak of comes down to the reality that there are 35 billion shows on TV any given week now; it takes a lot to be "viral" these days and stand out in the era of "content"... unlike South Park where it was part of regularly scheduled network TV and a limited menu. Plus, and it's a big point IMO - cartoons then were still "for children". Nobody bats an eyelid at R&M cos culturally it's accepted cartoons can be for adults (heck if anything it has looped back on itself; grown adults now watching sequel shows of HeMan). Salty cartoons are just yeah, so what these days.

    Sorry though folks. Yes. Ghostbusters.

    Thing is about this trailer. It's all about sequels and the problem making them. Look at Ghostbusters 2; it basically tried to do all the same things again and people hated it. It was sloppy and tired. That's not to say you CAN'T do a sequel that clones the beats of the first film, but by their nature they can be a bit of a Lose Lose with the concept cos the familiarity is both a good and bad thing.

    So if you gotta do a sequel (and Hollywood says we do), at least the swerve here appears to be into something genetically tangential to the property - outcast kids investigate spookiness in Small Town America. Goosebumps with proton packs. Ok, it's not tonally similar to the original movies but IMO conceptually it fits, and is a recognisable genre that can slot in (as opposed to whatever the F the 2016 was trying to be). I'm definitely a bit more engaged with the proposition than most shameless nostalgia trawls that happen now

    Post edited by pixelburp on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,898 ✭✭✭daheff


    Now this looks like it's got quite a bit of potential. Not like the WOKE version made a few years back.

    F**k it I'm in.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    It's Aykroyd. Look at the name of the book shop. Same one he owned in GBII.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It was definitely Akroyd speaking, and the sign in the window read "... occult books", presumably then "Ray's Occult Books" from Ghostbusters 2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed


    peter could be working in the shop . PETER COULD BE WORING IN THE SHOP, don't ruin this for me




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    Tá sé wrong



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed


    an older peter venkman & the other survining cast members are in the new hasbro toy range with the new cast so it looks like they are all back



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Oh don't worry they're all back; I read a while ago that all three remaining cast members were not only appearing but (apparently) going to be taking part in some ghost-busting of their own. Presumably as some last-act appearance of the cavalry, then the kids find themselves out of their depth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,144 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    I was a bit on the fence with the first trailer. Probably unfairly. Thought it leaned a bit too hard into the whole "Strange Things" vibe. I'm sure some is down to editing and some of it accurately reflects the tone and that's OK. I think the C19 delay may actually have helped in this regard. Put a little distance between them.

    So I like the look of this. Like that it's not hauling the old team out (Apart from cameos). I do like the fact that they went with Egon's family as opposed to a wacky Venkmann (Murray) family - That is not to say anything bad about Bill Murray. He is a God :)

    I think it will be a modest success critically and commercially. While it probably won't make a bajillion dollars, I think it will make a decent amount and be well regarded


    I should say however, that I don't get the hate for the reboot. Thought it was reasonably funny. But that's another thread. Don't want to hijack this. Just thought I'd lay my cards on the table :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    I'm just rewatching the start of Ghostbusters 2. In the scene just after the opening credits they go the a kids party. A kid walks up and tells them his "dad says they are full of a crap". Straight away the kid looked familiar and when I looked up it up I was right, its was Jason Reitman.



  • Registered Users Posts: 64 ✭✭Lamar Davis


    Can't wait for this and hope they don't ruin it like the last Ghostbusters we had.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    Yea it is my hope they put the gear back on and come to the rescue. Hence that call to the Ray book store is the initial call for help.

    Post edited by py2006 on


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Those toys are being very generous to the lads' physiques - especially Akroyd's 😂



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,647 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Catherine Reitman, Ivan’s daughter shows up in the scene in Egon’s lab as the girl holding the puppy. Catherine, who had cosmetic surgery go wrong, is best known for the Netflix show Working Moms



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,647 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    Filming location today:




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    The first two movies definitely had moments of darkness and spookiness but they're comedies. Don't get me wrong I've never found them laugh out loud funny myself but they regarded as comedies.


    Aside from the obvious ties, tonally this feels very different, there's no kookiness, and certainly isn't being marketed as a comedy nor would I say is it being marketed towards fans of the originals. There's enough there to tease old fans but it's also definitely trying to appeal to a new audience. I don't have a lot of love for the originals myself so I'm not saying this is a bad thing, it just doesn't feel like it's the same franchise but it could still work on its own merits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,144 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    For Ernie you would literally just need to take the original model and give grey highlights


    That man is more of an immortal than Keanu



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,542 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    There used to be a great video shop on that street called Kims. I would get all my video nasties there.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Blame the parents (us) who enjoyed their own films



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,189 ✭✭✭ThePott


    "Suck in the guts guys, we're the Ghosbusters."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Yeh, thats fair.

    Ive alot of love for the first movie, prob more nastalgia for the second as I am fairly sure my dad took me to see it in the cinema. When I rewatched GB with the kids it was great that they enjoyed it with us.

    I remember having those glow in the dark jumpers of slimer from the first movie, they were cool. Sigh, god that feels like a different lifetime . .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    I’d be nearly disappointed if we agreed! 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    I hope the tone of the movie and the scare factor is more like the original. They toned down the adult humour and the scariness of the ghosts in the second one as the cartoon "The Real Ghostbusters" had come out and proved very popular with kids so the sequel reflected that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,987 ✭✭✭0ph0rce0



    Hope I'm wrong but...

    I'd say it's going to be like every other PG/Kiddy movie that we see today. Shíte

    Crappy CGI and tons of comedy one liners.

    Don't know what the craic is with that, every movie today no matter the genre seems to have a load of one liner jokes, For some movies it doesn't work but they put them in anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,542 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's what's considered good dialogue writing in modern Hollywood. Although, to be "fair", that kinda crap has been around since Bond's attempts at humorous pithiness in the 60's. It's just more prevalent now. What really pisses me off about these days is the timing of such utterances. It's usually in the middle of something bad happening, but the characters don't give a shit about their own existences and will rattle off a one liner that the writer spent days coming up with.

    What's worse is the current penchant for being "meta" and trying to wink at the audience all the bloody time.

    As for this movie, I have no doubt at all that it'll be just another forgettable slice of mediocre fare served up in hope that it will trigger enough member berries to make a few bob. Which is what you can say about the entire Ghostbusters "franchise" since the 80's.

    But I'll be honest and I've probably mentioned it before, I was genuinely surprised in 2016 to find that there were so many Ghostbusters fans out there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭tony1kenobi


    If she had cosmetic surgery go wrong then her father must have had the same surgery as well because they have the exact same face.


    Are you thinking of Maureen Ponderosa?



  • Registered Users Posts: 789 ✭✭✭Big Gerry


    Anyone know if Bill Murray has a big role in the new ghostbusters or is it just a small part ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    They are all in it. You would have to assume it's a small role for all.

    Hopefully slightly more than a lazy cameo.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,647 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 789 ✭✭✭Big Gerry


    Ghostbusters the video game is probably the closest we will ever get to a real Ghostbusters 3.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed


    Few twitter reviews out there (pinch of salt )




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    Look at the rest of his Twitter... he thinks everything is AMAZING and INCREDIBLE



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Now, I've been keeping an open mind and defending the potential of this film ... ... but that tweet is hyperbolic, even by the standards of online previews. Most just don't want to ruin their chances with studios and future premieres. Better than the original? Nawwww.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,284 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Exactly. How often do you see people criticising things in any special previews?

    I'll be seeing it anyway which is why I haven't watched any of the recent trailers



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,647 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    A film rebooting a franchise isn’t leaning too hard against nostalgia? LOL



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,563 ✭✭✭✭peteeeed


    film release has been put back a week to nov 19th



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    A new character called Muncher from the latest edition of Empire magazine





  • Advertisement
Advertisement