Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Weird, Wacky and Awesome World of the NFL - General Banter thread V3

11819212324265

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Masked Man wrote: »
    I think this is the only situation where the Browns deserve the benefit of the doubt!

    As long as he pisses clean he will have 4 or so teams willing to give him a shot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,546 ✭✭✭Masked Man


    Absolutely, but that doesn't mean they're mad to release/trade him. It's completely understandable that he's run out of road with them. They know him pretty well at this stage and if he ****ed up, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    As long as he pisses clean he will have 4 or so teams willing to give him a shot
    Easily... in 2013 he was probably top 5. I'm not sure if many remember, but the guy was close to Julio Jones levels of 'one man wrecking crew' and that was with journeyman backups passing to him, the 5th worst running game in the league (e.g. no need to stack the box) and the next biggest receiving threats to him being Greg Little and Davon Bess.

    He's been out a good long while but he did only go 27 in April so if he can shake all the rust he still has a 5-6 year window to get/keep at his best. Personally I'm just amazed almost, the Browns do have good options for Mayfield but Gordon even if Gordon is completely done he would have garnered a lot of attention for at least the first half of the year until teams wised on enough, and given more space of Mayfield's other options. Then feel free to ditch him the moment the season is over (and it's not like the Browns are making the playoffs) or once teams do notice and he stops providing more room for others.

    Unless there is something major we don't know, I really think the Browns did a full on Browns here because it's not just pass catcher this year this could impact, it's their #1 overall rookie QB.

    I just know GB won't go for Gordon, but the poor finish last year would place us better for waivers unlike the Pats as someone mentioned above - and it would be a pretty big boost on the boundary opposite Davante Adams with Cobb in the slot, Graham/M. Lewis at TE and all those young, huge athletic freaks in for depth. Rodgers really likes Geronimo Allison though so it's almost a certainty to not be happening.

    It's crazy to think that is anyone is completely devoid of boundary receivers right now, they can actually go and pick up Gordon AND Bryant even after two full weeks of the regular season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    The next three SNF games:

    NE @ DET
    BAL @ PIT
    DAL @ HOU

    :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭Hococop


    Teams I could see Gordon going to

    Cowboys ( hopefully not as I don't think it would be good for him)
    Colts
    49ers
    New England ( probably best place for him?)
    Eagles (hopefully ha)
    Jags maybe?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 828 ✭✭✭JaMarcus


    Hococop wrote: »
    Teams I could see Gordon going to

    Cowboys ( hopefully not as I don't think it would be good for him)
    Colts
    49ers
    New England ( probably best place for him?)
    Eagles (hopefully ha)
    Jags maybe?

    There's a Cowboys beat-writer who seems pretty clued in, and he's absolutely adamant that they have zero interest in Gordon so that appears to rule them out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭Hococop


    JaMarcus wrote: »
    There's a Cowboys beat-writer who seems pretty clued in, and he's absolutely adamant that they have zero interest in Gordon so that appears to rule them out.

    Good, not because I'm an eagles fan but I don't think that environment would be good for him just like Steelers and Seahawks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    First week was jammed with entertainment, and second week the kickers took the headlines. I love those sort of days.

    Been a very interesting start to the season, Browns offering the most entertainment in terms of finishes. Surely after yesterday Bailey will have more than enough offers on the table.

    Also do people remember Tavecchio, thought he was really good last year and now he's without a team. Wonder will someone take a punt on him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭TOss Sweep


    JaMarcus wrote: »
    There's a Cowboys beat-writer who seems pretty clued in, and he's absolutely adamant that they have zero interest in Gordon so that appears to rule them out.

    Wont be the Pats either. Browns say the compensation will be "Legit" in other words some team is going to give away prime picks and the Pats don't do that very often.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭cosatron


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    First week was jammed with entertainment, and second week the kickers took the headlines. I love those sort of days.

    Been a very interesting start to the season, Browns offering the most entertainment in terms of finishes. Surely after yesterday Bailey will have more than enough offers on the table.

    Also do people remember Tavecchio, thought he was really good last year and now he's without a team. Wonder will someone take a punt on him.

    surely the packers offered the best entertainment over the first 2 weeks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    cosatron wrote: »
    surely the packers offered the best entertainment over the first 2 weeks.

    That's true, Packers games have both been highly entertaining and up there.

    Maybe just bias as a lot of interest as turned on the Browns because of their drought and Hard Knocks. With the Browns games they have come so close now on two occasions to finally end the drought and in both times the manner of which they failed.

    Both games have been those where you sit up and the Browns have been unexpectedly in a good position to win it, and then they do something brilliant and eventually mess it up.

    Have to say though their Defence so far has looked very solid and they definitely should win a couple of games this season, but then again they could easily be 2-0!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭BaronVon


    https://twitter.com/fbgchase/status/1041679344932974593

    Have the new contact / roughing the passer rules gone a bit too far?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Average rating would have been higher had Alex Smith decided to continually throw the ball further than 3 yards when it was 3rd and 10.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭TOss Sweep


    infacteh wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/fbgchase/status/1041679344932974593

    Have the new contact / roughing the passer rules gone a bit too far?

    Im one for the rules but that rule is just ridiculous. Over the top trying to protect QBs these days. A guy bringing down his weight is a penalty now? I would love someone from the NFL to demonstrate how to disobey the law of gravity and physics.

    What is ridiculous is the how inconsistent they are with the rule also.

    One thing I do hate still though is players hitting QBs low at the knees helmet first. There has been a couple of them so far and people defending the hit and its a dick move. QBs have no protection at the knees. I have seen a HS QB getting hit at the knees and his football career over before it began really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    TOss Sweep wrote: »
    Wont be the Pats either. Browns say the compensation will be "Legit" in other words some team is going to give away prime picks and the Pats don't do that very often.

    Definitely won't be multiple early round picks and would be shocked if it is anything higher than what the Raiders traded for Bryant, and if that high it should be a conditional. I'd say the Browns will have to decide between a higher pick that is conditional or a lower pick that isn't.

    Would like the 9ers to go for him but only because Shanahan has a previous relationship and it looks like they've built a strong locker room and front office that should be able to provide Gordon the support he clearly needs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,111 ✭✭✭Christy42


    infacteh wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/fbgchase/status/1041679344932974593

    Have the new contact / roughing the passer rules gone a bit too far?
    I wonder if new tactics help. Stafford was continually going under neath the coverage. Generally the 49ers missed a tackle and they got half decent yardage.

    He took a few shots down field. The long ones all missed and he made a few mid ones into tight spaces.

    Before judging it I would like to see how yards after catch has changed (or missed tackles if you like).

    There were plenty of sacks in that game without a flag. You can easily avoid piling on a qb. It was down for an extra hit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Dan Bailey signing with the Vikings,Christ they gonna be stronger than they already are


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,136 ✭✭✭markc91


    brinty wrote: »
    Dan Bailey signing with the Vikings,Christ they gonna be stronger than they already are

    Source? would be great if true!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭TOss Sweep




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭TOss Sweep


    Seems like Vegas has Cowboys and Patriots as Favorites to grab Josh Gordon


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    markc91 wrote: »
    Source? would be great if true!

    Think it's legit.

    Twitter and Dallas new sites reporting it and the NFL fantasy football have his profile updated to say he's going Vikings.

    They've just confirmed Carlson has been released so looks true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    TOss Sweep wrote: »
    Seems like Vegas has Cowboys and Patriots as Favorites to grab Josh Gordon

    Think that was from yesterday. Odds as of 3 hours ago:

    https://twitter.com/OddsShark/status/1041722850468671489


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,477 ✭✭✭Adamcp898




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Think that was from yesterday. Odds as of 3 hours ago:

    https://twitter.com/OddsShark/status/1041722850468671489

    Given the latest info that +800 would have been some nice money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Very surprised the Patriots are going for Gordon.

    Yeah, Belichick has tolerated guys with attitude problems before, but add in stuff like being late for meetings and general accountability issues and I can’t see him lasting long there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭TOss Sweep


    Paully D wrote: »
    Very surprised the Patriots are going for Gordon.

    Yeah, Belichick has tolerated guys with attitude problems before, but add in stuff like being late for meetings and general accountability issues and I can’t see him lasting long there.

    Probably not but if Bill can fix him it works out great for both parties. Besides how much does Gordon want to win?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    TOss Sweep wrote: »
    Probably not but if Bill can fix him it works out great for both parties. Besides how much does Gordon want to win?

    I’d say Gordon doesn’t give a bollocks in all honesty, he seems to be a mess to me with football being one of the last things on his mind, but who knows?

    He must be a disaster for someone like the Browns to finally have had enough and give up on him and I doubt we’ve heard even the half of what he has been like behind closed doors.

    Interesting one though. If a move to the Patriots doesn’t light a fire under him then nothing will.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,905 ✭✭✭TOss Sweep


    Paully D wrote: »
    I’d say Gordon doesn’t give a bollocks in all honesty, he seems to be a mess to me with football being one of the last things on his mind, but who knows?

    He must be a disaster for someone like the Browns to finally have had enough and give up on him and I doubt we’ve heard even the half of what he has been like behind closed doors.

    Interesting one though. If a move to the Patriots doesn’t light a fire under him then nothing will.

    Yup going to be an interesting one


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 828 ✭✭✭JaMarcus




Advertisement