Crime and policing analyst in AGS (EO level)

Suaeva

Results are in, taking 384 to stage 2 on August 30th and 31st

barryos1505

Suaeva wrote: »

Results are in, taking 384 to stage 2 on August 30th and 31st

Where abouts you roughly Suaeva, Im round the 60s. Hard to know of its good or bad without knowing how many positions or how many applied.

Crunchymomma

Through to stage two, delighted!!

uck51js9zml2yt

I'm early 900's

Not surprised though . I was in a hotel lobby with no calculator!

Suaeva

barryos1505 wrote: »

Where abouts you roughly Suaeva, Im round the 60s. Hard to know of its good or bad without knowing how many positions or how many applied.

Don’t feel too bad then as I am over the 100! Gonna practise them more to try and pull myself up the oom in the supervised tests.

Mc Love

Sickener - 581

JHic28

Maliah Jolly Ammunition wrote: »

I'm early 900's

Not surprised though . I was in a hotel lobby with no calculator!

Same as myself... clearly I need alot of practise in these tests!

Crunchymomma

I wonder will they let us book our test slot like with the CO

Suaeva

Crunchymomma wrote: »

I wonder will they let us book our test slot like with the CO

Hopefully, I can only do one of the days!

PawneeRanger

In the 200s...surprised I managed to qualify tbh.
I did the tests with a massive hangover before disappearing to a festival, it was my only window in which to do it.

30th and 31st might be a problem for me though so I may have to bow out.

mac1ntosh

High OOM myself, all hope lost!

tomhenryford

I am gutted, got low 400’s. Are we out then, is that it, just one batch through!

Crunchymomma

Suaeva wrote: »

Hopefully, I can only do one of the days!

My little one is starting school so I'd like to be able to pick

mac1ntosh

tomhenryford wrote: »

I am gutted, got low 400’s. Are we out then, is that it, just one batch through!

Well even though we still qualify, there was only meant to be a very low number of jobs! Very disappointing

yessiryes

mac1ntosh wrote: »

Well even though we still qualify, there was only meant to be a very low number of jobs! Very disappointing

Yeah I'm over the 100s so not holding out much hope! On the general CO panel in Galway they have only reached about 20 and that panel is nearly over so I imagine this will be even worse! Anyway will practise loads and see can I jump up a bit!

Flippyfloppy

No. in the house! Delighted!!

Crunchymomma

Flippyfloppy wrote: »

No. in the house! Delighted!!

Congratulations!! Great score!

Crunchymomma

I wonder how much is between scores. Does anyone care to share their total scores? I want to have an idea of what variance I can allow myself for stage two

I came 2 and my total score was 142

Risoc

Crunchymomma wrote: »

I wonder how much is between scores. Does anyone care to share their total scores? I want to have an idea of what variance I can allow myself for stage two

I came 2 and my total score was 142

I'd be sharing that score alright.

Mc Love

Crunchymomma wrote: »

I wonder how much is between scores. Does anyone care to share their total scores? I want to have an idea of what variance I can allow myself for stage two

I came 2 and my total score was 142

as I said above 581 and my total score was 99.

Tipp star

Well done. Im in 170's with 112 points... i hope i can improve my verbal- but not confident.

Skip13

I failed by one point on the maths but best of luck everyone

Mc Love

Tipp star wrote: »

Well done. Im in 170's with 112 points... i hope i can improve my verbal- but not confident.

twas close enough so - pity.

yessiryes

Just realised I'm in the high 90s,read my score as my place. I scored 118. Doesn't bode well for my data analysis 😅

Crunchymomma

Skip13 wrote: »

I failed by one point on the maths but best of luck everyone

Oh no, hard luck!! If you are thinking of applying for more CS things just keep practicing..... Each time I do these I get a bit better

Harika

130s with 115 points

Too bad, half a second longer and I would have ticked the last question. I guess that would have brought me in the 100s

Supervised is in Dublin?

Crunchymomma

It all seems very tight! Not much in it at all

Maldesu

I've just about placed. 384 is my OOM (the actual cut off). Total score was 104.

tomhenryford

Maldesu wrote: »

I've just about placed. 384 is my OOM (the actual cut off). Total score was 104.

I got 102 and placed 453

Gerbmorgana

Hi all,
Got total score 96 and placed 715...ah well,didn't practise and it shows ðŸ™႒

Maldesu

tomhenryford wrote: »

I got 102 and placed 453

What was your breakdown? I was 52 and 52

marmieB

Same as maldestu

Jerichoholic

I barely passed. Is there much point in even doing the next stage now?

tomhenryford

Maldesu wrote: »

What was your breakdown? I was 52 and 52

47 and 55

spupazza

Is anybody able to answer those questions of mine ,please?
1-Is the score for this first test gonna be taken into consideration? I'm asking this because, as far as I can understand from the message received on publicjobs
the second test will be exactly the same as this one (I mean different questions but the same kind of test). So since the second test will be supervised I guess it will have way more value than the unsupervised test. Right?

2-Where's the second test gonna take place?

LordBasil

Passed the Tests but well down on the OOM so haven't a snowballs.

Tipp star

spupazza wrote: »

Is anybody able to answer those questions of mine ,please?
1-Is the score for this first test gonna be taken into consideration? I'm asking this because, as far as I can understand from the message received on publicjobs
the second test will be exactly the same as this one (I mean different questions but the same kind of test). So since the second test will be supervised I guess it will have way more value than the unsupervised test. Right?

2-Where's the second test gonna take place?[/quote

1. No. U can improve any ammount- but cannot disimprove by a certain % of prev test. With the 2nd test the oom can change.
2. pas office in middle abbey street im guessing

Xios

Number 384 checking in. I can confirm, I've no skin on my teeth left. Got a score of 104.

spupazza

Tipp star wrote: »

1. No. U can improve any ammount- but cannot disimprove by a certain % of prev test. With the 2nd test the oom can change.

Hi thanks for replying.
I should have been clearer with my question.
What I'm asking is this:
Example: 1st test unsupervised, P1 (person 1) score 120, and P2 (person 2) score 130.
On the second test (supervised) P1 scores 125 and P2 scores 120.

At the end of the second test who will rank higher in order of merit? P1 who has higher score in the 2nd supervised test (so in this case the 1st test acted only as a pre-selection,but its score won't count for the final selection), or P2 who scored lower in the supervised test but has a better average considering the result in the first unsupervised test?
I hope I'm clear this time and apologize for not having been sufficiently clear earlier.

lisa_celtic

I am absolutely devastated with a score of 109 which by the looks of it would have seen me placed very well... I am out! I got 41 in verbal and the cut off was 42.

Best of luck to all going forward.

mel123

116 placed 125

Tipp star

spupazza wrote: »

Hi thanks for replying.
I should have been clearer with my question.
What I'm asking is this:
Example: 1st test unsupervised, P1 (person 1) score 120, and P2 (person 2) score 130.
On the second test (supervised) P1 scores 125 and P2 scores 120.

At the end of the second test who will rank higher in order of merit? P1 who has higher score in the 2nd supervised test (so in this case the 1st test acted only as a pre-selection,but its score won't count for the final selection), or P2 who scored lower in the supervised test but has a better average considering the result in the first unsupervised test?
I hope I'm clear this time and apologize for not having been sufficiently clear earlier.

I think p1 will be higher ranking. Once you get through to supervised we all start at square 1 again I think!

Carolann1986

Hi all
Just wondering, and I know it's a long shot. I know it's probably not as clear cut or whatever as this but just curious.

My oom was 424, meaning in theory I was 40 places off the 384 cut off point. I read somewhere that someone got 104 and got the 384 th spot. I got 103 so not exactly sure how that worked out , unless there was 40+ people who got a score of 104 and we're giving that last place as a "joint 384th", if that makes sense..

So my question is, if there was enough people who weren't able to attend these tests to bring the numbers down, would the people next in line be called up? Or is it ball burst for anyone who hasn't made the cut now.

Sorry if my post is not explained well, I was just wondering if anyone with previous experience could shed any light on it.
Cheers

Risoc

I get your question.

Unfortunately, I think they factor in likely attendance rates when they decide how many to call.

wally101

Carolann1986 wrote: »

Hi all
Just wondering, and I know it's a long shot. I know it's probably not as clear cut or whatever as this but just curious.

My oom was 424, meaning in theory I was 40 places off the 384 cut off point. I read somewhere that someone got 104 and got the 384 th spot. I got 103 so not exactly sure how that worked out , unless there was 40+ people who got a score of 104 and we're giving that last place as a "joint 384th", if that makes sense..

So my question is, if there was enough people who weren't able to attend these tests to bring the numbers down, would the people next in line be called up? Or is it ball burst for anyone who hasn't made the cut now.

Sorry if my post is not explained well, I was just wondering if anyone with previous experience could shed any light on it.
Cheers

I also got 104pts and placed 384 .One of at least 3 posters in total here claim same score.
I'm unlikely to travel for test unless I can be sure second test is from scratch for all who passed.

Carolann1986

Risoc wrote: »

I get your question.

Unfortunately, I think they factor in likely attendance rates when they decide how many to call.

Hi ya,
Ya I figured as much, definitely was a long shot!
(Gutted though as I kind of done it in a panic, we were moving house and our broadband was being disconnected that day)
Ah sure such is life. Thanks for the reply!

Carolann1986

wally101 wrote: »

I also got 104pts and placed 384 .One of at least 3 posters in total here claim same score.
I'm unlikely to travel for test unless I can be sure second test is from scratch for all who passed.

Hi Wally. Thanks for reply.
If it's averaged out you don't see the point , is it? (No offense intended). I'd have preferred to be way off the mark then being so close! Little bit gutted but hey ho.
Congrats!

wally101

Carolann1986 wrote: »

Hi Wally. Thanks for reply.
If it's averaged out you don't see the point , is it? (No offense intended). I'd have preferred to be way off the mark then being so close! Little bit gutted but hey ho.
Congrats!

Exactly ya, based on the number of potential jobs in Sligo for example. I may still go if I get some time to practice tho!!

WoolyJumper

I passed with a score of 101 but I'm a fair bit off the OOM score to be called. TBH I'm surprised, I thought I really messed up the numerical reasoning section

Crunchymomma

I think it's very hard to gauge how we all fared without a location breakdown also. You could be 384 but if you picked a location where less people applied you could actually be in with a rather good shot.

Whether it's from scratch again for round two will be outlined in the information booklet when we get it

And to give hope to those who want to jump up the rankings, for general EO I came 1580 after stage one and I jumped to 158 after stage two