Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fighter jets

  • 23-05-2018 05:57AM
    #1
    Site Banned Posts: 13


    I was reading the other day about the RAF and how they will soon take delivery of their first batch of F-35 Lightning II multirole fighter jets. I must say, they are quite an impressive of kit.

    I have the price list here:


    F-35A - conventional takeoff and landing - $94.6M

    F-35B - short takeoff and vertical landing - $122.8M

    The F-35C is carrier-based and not relevant to my point.


    We are a neutral country and I respect that fact, but Switzerland for example, a famously neutral state, have modern fighter jets for air defence purposes. Why don't we?


    We could get Eurofighters, the above mentioned F-35 and others, we are spoiled for choice.

    I know that we would only use them in combat if the inevitable Loyalist conflict arises in NI should a border poll pass, but it is good to have them for defence. Our Air Corps is a joke.

    Costly - maybe.

    Worth it - I think yes.

    What are your thoughts on this?

    Should we have an air force with fighter jets? 57 votes

    Yes
    1% 1 vote
    No
    98% 56 votes


«13

Comments

  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Waste of money. Switzerland is situated smack bang in the middle of major powers and has been like that since the time of the Romans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,754 ✭✭✭✭namenotavailablE


    There is a similar thread on this discussion point here in the 'Military' forum.


  • Site Banned Posts: 13 Lord Maguire


    Waste of money. Switzerland is situated smack bang in the middle of major powers and has been like that since the time of the Romans.

    You could say the same about us and the Brits.


  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You could say the same. about us and the Brits.

    Not to the same extent at all.


  • Site Banned Posts: 13 Lord Maguire


    We could get drones?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Needles73


    So how many would we buy ? To keep one available at all times you would need at least 2 or 3. Then you'd need probably 4 trained pilots. Maintenance would primarily need to be external vendors as wouldn't be possible to have that expertise in Ireland for a few modern jets.
    Anyways complete pie in the sky fantasy nonsense for jets but Drones are something I'd agree with


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Pac1Man


    Brits look after us. It's in their interest strategically.

    Also, nobody knows we're here. We'll be grand.


  • Site Banned Posts: 13 Lord Maguire


    Needles73 wrote: »
    So how many would we buy ? To keep one available at all times you would need at least 2 or 3. Then you'd need probably 4 trained pilots. Maintenance would primarily need to be external vendors as wouldn't be possible to have that expertise in Ireland for a few modern jets.
    Anyways complete pie in the sky fantasy nonsense.

    20 Typhoons, 10 F-35A/Bs and some drones.

    That's it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Needles73


    20 Typhoons, 10 F-35A/Bs and some drones.

    That's it.

    I suppose we could get them on PCP......are you aged 12 ?


  • Site Banned Posts: 13 Lord Maguire


    20 Typhoons, 10 F-35A/Bs and some drones.

    That's it.
    Needles73 wrote: »
    I suppose we could get them on PCP......are you aged 12 ?

    Some people say it's peanuts, others hate the idea, it is just a thought is all.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,043 ✭✭✭gifted


    Ryanair looked at it but said no......something about the oul fighter pilots loading their own missiles or stuff like that....and dealing with the fighter pilot union...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    The RAF can be relied upon to police our skies better than we would be able to without massive unnecessary investment. This is not just about goodwill, it is about their own security.

    In the event of a clear active threat, the US Air Force could also be expected to deploy planes here, especially since we have provided a base for them.


  • Site Banned Posts: 13 Lord Maguire


    The RAF can be relied upon to police our skies better than we would be able to without massive unnecessary investment. This is not just about goodwill, it is about their own security.

    In the event of a clear active threat, the US Air Force could also be expected to deploy planes here, especially since we have provided a base for them.

    Ahem, the point in the OP about the 6 counties?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    The F35 still does not even work properly and the program has cost almost $1 trillion. It will be the biggest White Elephant in the history of military expenditure.

    The Sukhoi Su-57, Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang J-31 will turn out to better and cheaper planes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    I was reading the other day about the RAF and how they will soon take delivery of their first batch of F-35 Lightning II multirole fighter jets. I must say, they are quite an impressive of kit.

    I have the price list here:


    F-35A - conventional takeoff and landing - $94.6M

    F-35B - short takeoff and vertical landing - $122.8M

    The F-35C is carrier-based and not relevant to my point.


    We are a neutral country and I respect that fact, but Switzerland for example, a famously neutral state, have modern fighter jets for air defence purposes. Why don't we?


    We could get Eurofighters, the above mentioned F-35 and others, we are spoiled for choice.

    I know that we would only use them in combat if the inevitable Loyalist conflict arises in NI should a border poll pass, but it is good to have them for defence. Our Air Corps is a joke.

    Costly - maybe.

    Worth it - I think yes.

    What are your thoughts on this?

    I think the Irish army would be well capable of repelling a few auld lads in flat caps and shotguns without the need arising for fast jets to be strafing the countryside and firing missiles at the cost of hundreds of millions.


  • Site Banned Posts: 13 Lord Maguire


    The F35 still does not even work properly and the program has cost almost $1 trillion. It will be the biggest White Elephant in the history of military expenditure.

    The Sukhoi Su-57, Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang J-31 will turn out to better and cheaper planes.

    The F-35 is western.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭BarleySweets


    How naive are you? You really think a decision like that depends on the unit cost? Like we ring up whoever and go, “hey, gimme 10 of them there fancy planes ye’re hoarding all to yourself, boss! €94.2million each? Here’s €942million.”


    You’ve now bought 10 pieces of kit. You’ve now got to run them for the next 30 years too. So you’re the guts of a billion in the hole before you’ve begun and you think you’re going to get support from the people of Ireland to spend ten times that over the next 40 years to keep them airworthy? Where are we getting that cash from? And what justification do you have for us to spend that cash?

    Where do you get 4-5 trained F35 pilots (easily need this amount to have a standing reaction force available 24/7 to account for illnesses & holidays, unless you don’t care about having a 24/7 capability, along with having pilots undergo training/upskill/refresher courses)? Even 100 would be stretching it: 900 flight hours is the annual flight limit for civilian pilots but supersonic pilots are surely held to stricter standards.

    Also where do you house them? Ireland has precisely one large scale military aerodrome. So you’re either building massive infrastructure there or on a new site. Not just any auld infrastructure either. Massive, state of the art, top dollar F35 infrastructure that’ll have to be staffed and maintained for the next 40 years too!

    Where will the pilots train? Ireland doesn’t have much, if any, vacant space compared to most other fighter jet owning countries so that means they’ll have to deal with constant complaints about sonic booms and claims for broken windows etc.

    And even if they get some action, what then? Our 10 planes are not scaring off any invaders, who’ll likely have 100’s to throw at us. Even if we had 100, we’d be sitting ducks before we’ve fired a shot at them because our population spread is kind of crazy. In fact, forget the invasion, invaders wouldn’t even have to send in a bombing fleet to soften us up: a barrage of cruise missiles to Dublin, Cork, Baldonnel & maybe Shannon and the various barracks’s around the nation and that is it pal. Job done, the invaders can pretty much stroll right up O’Connel St with little effort to clear out the rest of the Irish Government’s defenses.

    And even if we get the best case scenario, no invasions! For all of these pilots, maintenance & admin staff, you’ve got to pay them for the next 40 years plus their massive pensions. And for what? No real military benefits but plane spotters don’t need to go to Wales to hear a big boom?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    Ahem, the point in the OP about the 6 counties?
    You think we should perform air strikes against NI..? LOL


  • Posts: 3,637 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ahem, the point in the OP about the 6 counties?

    Point? Hardly.


  • Site Banned Posts: 13 Lord Maguire


    How naive are you? You really think a decision like that depends on the unit cost? Like we ring up whoever and go, “hey, gimme 10 of them there fancy planes ye’re hoarding all to yourself, boss! €94.2million each? Here’s €942million.”


    You’ve now bought 10 pieces of kit. You’ve now got to run them for the next 30 years too. So you’re the guts of a billion in the hole before you’ve begun and you think you’re going to get support from the people of Ireland to spend ten times that over the next 30 years to keep them airworthy? Where are we getting that cash from? And what justification do you have for us to spend that cash?

    Where do you get 4-5 trained F35 pilots (easily need this amount to have a standing reaction force available 24/7 to account for illnesses & holidays, unless you don’t care about having a 24/7 capability, along with having pilots undergo training/upskill/refresher courses)? Even 100 would be stretching it: 900 flight hours is the annual flight limit for civilian pilots but supersonic pilots are surely held to stricter standards.

    Also where do you house them? Ireland has precisely one large scale military aerodrome. So you’re either building massive infrastructure there or on a new site. Not just any auld infrastructure either. Massive, state of the art, top dollar F35 infrastructure that’ll have to be staffed and maintained for the next 40 years too!

    Where will the pilots train? Ireland doesn’t have much, if any, vacant space compared to most other fighter jet owning countries so that means they’ll have to deal with constant complaints about sonic booms and claims for broken windows etc.

    And even if they get some action, what then? Our 10 planes are not scaring off any invaders, who’ll likely have 100’s to throw at us. Even if we had 100, we’d be sitting ducks before we’ve fired a shot at them because our population spread is kind of crazy. In fact, forget the invasion, invaders wouldn’t even have to send in a bombing fleet to soften us up: a barrage of cruise missiles to Dublin, Cork, Baldonnel & maybe Shannon and the various barracks’s around the nation and that is it pal. Job done, the invaders can pretty much stroll right up O’Connel St with little effort to clear out the rest of the Irish Government’s defenses.

    And even if we get the best case scenario, no invasions! For all of these pilots, maintenance & admin staff, you’ve got to pay them for the next 40 years plus their massive pensions. And for what? No real military benefits but plane spotters don’t need to go to Wales to hear a big boom?

    Like I said, a unionst uprising in NI should there be a united Ireland.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭BarleySweets


    Like I said, a unionst uprising in NI should there be a united Ireland.

    What good do you think F35s would do against an uprising in NI should there be a united Ireland?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    Like I said, a unionst uprising in NI should there be a united Ireland.
    Airstrikes versus urban guerila warfare inside your own country is not a good idea though is it?


  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We are a neutral country and I respect that fact, but Switzerland for example, a famously neutral state, have modern fighter jets for air defence purposes. Why don't we?
    ...
    I know that we would only use them in combat if the inevitable Loyalist conflict arises in NI should a border poll pass, but it is good to have them for defence. Our Air Corps is a joke

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/feb/19/swiss-air-force-ethiopian-airlines-hijacking-office-hours
    Even the Swiss struggle to keep jets in the air - it is a Monday to Friday, 9 to 5 air force now.

    If there is trouble in a future united Ireland I hope we have the sense to ask the UN for help rather than try to sort it ourselves.

    I'm not sure what help a supersonic jet would be against a lad with a petrol bomb.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,197 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    I was reading the other day about the RAF and how they will soon take delivery of their first batch of F-35 Lightning II multirole fighter jets. I must say, they are quite an impressive of kit.

    I have the price list here:


    F-35A - conventional takeoff and landing - $94.6M

    F-35B - short takeoff and vertical landing - $122.8M

    The F-35C is carrier-based and not relevant to my point.


    We are a neutral country and I respect that fact, but Switzerland for example, a famously neutral state, have modern fighter jets for air defence purposes. Why don't we?


    We could get Eurofighters, the above mentioned F-35 and others, we are spoiled for choice.

    I know that we would only use them in combat if the inevitable Loyalist conflict arises in NI should a border poll pass, but it is good to have them for defence. Our Air Corps is a joke.

    Costly - maybe.

    Worth it - I think yes.

    What are your thoughts on this?
    Cheap to buy, expensive to run and maintain.
    Also fighters are obsolete, UAV is where it’s at


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,127 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    https://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/feb/19/swiss-air-force-ethiopian-airlines-hijacking-office-hours

    I'm not sure what help a supersonic jet would be against a lad with a petrol bomb.

    As the jet breaks throgh the sound barrier, it creates a pressure wave that would hit and break the bottle of petrol and it would splash all over the bomb's holder resulting in one less petrol bomber without firing a single missile.... Simple!! ;-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭ectoraige


    There is a similar thread on this discussion point here in the 'Military' forum.

    I'll try to summarise the best points from that thread.

    The main need we would have would be to have quick reaction jets capable of intercepting aircraft entering our airspace. Traditionally we've assumed Britain can do this for us if required, but with Brexit, the EU will be losing this capability, and it may not be something we can rely on.

    Realistically to do this you'd 10-12 aircraft. Even if all you want is a pair of jets on standby, you'd need another two to provide cover when the first two return to allow for post-flight maintenance. Then, you would need another couple of spare aircraft to allow for larger maintenance windows. Next, you'd need some available for training, both to qualify new pilots, and to maintain skills of your pilots who probably will not have any flight time during their on-duty periods.

    Next you have to maintain the aircraft which will require facilities that we don't have. So you will need to build a large support infrastructure. You'll also need lots of pilots to cover for leave, medical absence, and to allow flight hours to maintain skills. Our air corps doesn't have enough pilots at present to provide night-time top-cover for SAR operations.


    Also, before you intercept, you have to have something to intercept. Outside of civil air control, Ireland has very little capabilities in terms of long-range radar. We woud need to be build up an infrastructure there to allow us to detect approaching aircraft.

    For me, the most realistic way to achieve this would be to work out a deal with our EU Nordic Battlegroup colleagues in Sweden and have them operate a squadron of Gripens based out of Sligo. The existing airfield points directly out to sea minimising noise pollution, and there's a SAR base there already should any pilots encounter difficulties and have to ditch. As part of the deal Irish pilots and maintenance crews would be trained up so we could eventually have the capabilities to take over operations ourselves. The Gripen would really cover all our needs, at a lower cost than many other suggested alternatives.

    We'd still have to invest a lot in our detection capabilites, and pilots would have to be well paid to keep them from drifting into commercial piloting jobs.

    Finally, this topic comes up every now and then, provoking plenty of debate, but it's notable that you've probably never once heard a politician or public figure mention it. It's simply not on the radar, so don't expect anything to ever happen until it's too late.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    A few dodgy lads in balaclavas and parka jackets with a stinger missile is surely more cost effective than an F-35.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭JohnCleary


    Does that include VRT?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭Mrcaramelchoc


    What about a nice shiny new health system instead.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,127 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    gifted wrote: »
    Ryanair looked at it but said no......something about the oul fighter pilots loading their own missiles or stuff like that....and dealing with the fighter pilot union...

    I think they also said that O'Leary wanted no competition from drones. "If there's any droning to be done around here, I'm your man", he said.


Advertisement