Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Meg

  • 10-04-2018 7:01am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭


    Jason Statham, a gigantic shark, what's not to like? :)

    Out August 10th. Pity it seems to be PG.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    That actually looks like a bit of fun. A super sized made for sci fi Movie.

    I would say the key to enjoying it is not to take it too seriously.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    IMDB estimates it at a $150 million budget, so yeah; no wonder it's PG.

    Looks like this year's GeoStorm really; could be fun in a brainless sort of way but could also just be brainless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    Is this a "Chinese" movie like the awful Matt Damon one?

    Massive budget will recoup it in China everyone else thinks it pants?

    I will still watch it expecting Statham at some point to punch a shark.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,896 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    The OP's synopsis has me sold. Will me making the effort to see this one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,872 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Still no reviews for this really....I am guessing they are embargoed?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,936 ✭✭✭nix


    gmisk wrote: »
    Still no reviews for this really....I am guessing they are embargoed?


    I'm expecting it to be terrible, but ill go see it anyway because shark


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Theboinkmaster


    gmisk wrote: »
    Still no reviews for this really....I am guessing they are embargoed?

    i don't care ill be going to see it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,872 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Ah me too :)
    Fair play to the lighthouse for showing it as well, they are also showing Deep blue sea, jaws and sharknado in the build up to its release.

    Rottentomatoes.....probably about 30/40% max im gonna guess


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,016 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    pixelburp wrote: »
    IMDB estimates it at a $150 million budget, so yeah; no wonder it's PG.

    Looks like this year's GeoStorm really; could be fun in a brainless sort of way but could also just be brainless.

    I do not think it will make that back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,036 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    pixelburp wrote: »
    IMDB estimates it at a $150 million budget, so yeah; no wonder it's PG.

    Looks like this year's GeoStorm really; could be fun in a brainless sort of way but could also just be brainless.


    'Jaws' was PG too.


    150 mil though :eek: ....smh.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    I'm surprised they'd invest that sort of blockbuster money into what's essentially a bid budget b-movie....and I can't see how it would cost that much either? There's been films made with much better/higher costed actors and higher levels of VFX demands for a lot less. I wonder is that even accurate information? Haven't seen any trailers for it (deliberately) so maybe there's tons of elaborate set pieces and lavish production...

    That said, will more than likely be seeing that one at the cinema.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭Autecher


    The reviews are out now. They are mixed which is not surprising. It's either "dumb brainless fun" or "just dumb". Of course there are some movie reviewers out there who would never give a good review to a movie like this even if they liked it :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,036 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I'm surprised they'd invest that sort of blockbuster money into what's essentially a bid budget b-movie....and I can't see how it would cost that much either? There's been films made with much better/higher costed actors and higher levels of VFX demands for a lot less. I wonder is that even accurate information? Haven't seen any trailers for it (deliberately) so maybe there's tons of elaborate set pieces and lavish production...

    That said, will more than likely be seeing that one at the cinema.

    The trailer is nothing special and to be honest, what I've seen of the CGI, it doesn't look that much more accomplished that a SYFY movie, in as much that it still looks like CGI. I don't get the impression that there are "tons of elaborate set pieces" either.

    If I'm really bored, I might pop into the pictures to have a look. More than likely, I'll wait and download it in a few months time, sit back with a couple of beers and a pizza and be thankful I didn't blow money on a full price ticket.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Tony EH wrote: »
    'Jaws' was PG too.


    150 mil though :eek: ....smh.

    Ah now, different times and the 'PG' cert was a much different beast than it is now - it famously had a great deal of wriggle room in terms of ... 'mature' themes it could show. Jaws remains a straight up horror movie, raw blood & terror, albeit neutered by the eventual appearance of Bruce :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,872 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    I'm surprised they'd invest that sort of blockbuster money into what's essentially a bid budget b-movie....and I can't see how it would cost that much either? There's been films made with much better/higher costed actors and higher levels of VFX demands for a lot less. I wonder is that even accurate information? Haven't seen any trailers for it (deliberately) so maybe there's tons of elaborate set pieces and lavish production...

    That said, will more than likely be seeing that one at the cinema.
    I think it was in production for a very long time so that probably added to cost.
    Dont they say a film needs to make 2.5 its cost to break even....cant see it doing that...but I am defo going to go see at the weekend :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,036 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Ah now, different times and the 'PG' cert was a much different beast than it is now - it famously had a great deal of wriggle room in terms of ... 'mature' themes it could show. Jaws remains a straight up horror movie, raw blood & terror, albeit neutered by the eventual appearance of Bruce :D

    I think Bruce did his job very well. In fact there's only a couple of scenes where he lets himself down. That big rubber shark still gives me a shock or two, I have to admit.

    That being said, it was still a PG film, in an age where a lot of Hollywood cinema was being made for a more mature audience. Sure, it was a "different time", but I'd still love to know how it got that cert. It had absolutely no right being a PG.

    In any case, this 'Meg' thing looks more like a comic thing, than something that takes it central thrust seriously, like 'Jaws'.

    It's probably an indication of how Speilberg's masterpiece would be made today, if it had never existed in the summer of 1975.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,896 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Perhaps the hope to rake it the cash in the Asian market?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Seen it last night in the IMAX......


    m7.jpg


    Enjoyed it but it could have done with ten minutes or so chopped off. There are parts which give the viewer way too much time to think. Scenes and dialogue clearly only there to set up an OMG! moment and so you end up guessing what's coming, which is a shame as I think if if was edited differently that wouldn't necessarily have been the case and the film would have undoubtedly been all the better for it.

    One of the better popcorn films I've seen in recent times and tbf it doesn't try to be anything else. Cheesy nonsense of course but good cheesy nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Not getting great reviews, but I'm looking forward to it. Perfect summer fare.

    I loved Empires closing line for their review:

    Shark. Weak.

    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    I wonder will Fan Bingbing's recent tax scandal affect its performance in China.

    RT has it at 50% at the moment, which is not bad for the kind of movie it is. I doubt I'll watch it in theatres though. Statham's a draw for his fight scenes mostly, so this hardly plays to his strengths; I doubt he's going to kick the shark into submission.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 3,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭ktulu123


    Going to the 4DX Screening here in Glasgow after work. First time in the 4D cinema so should be funny. Perfect film for it i'm hoping haha


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,936 ✭✭✭nix


    ktulu123 wrote: »
    Going to the 4DX Screening here in Glasgow after work. First time in the 4D cinema so should be funny. Perfect film for it i'm hoping haha

    My friends went to MI6 in 4DX, they said it was a disaster.. Have fun! :):pac:


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 3,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭ktulu123


    nix wrote: »
    My friends went to MI6 in 4DX, they said it was a disaster.. Have fun! :):pac:

    haha Cheers Nix, a disaster is what im expecting alright :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭Venom


    For those who have seen it, how close is it to the book? Are we talking adaption or just uses the main characters and premise then does its own thing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,313 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    I saw it this evening, and I thought it was very good; this shark makes Jaws look like a goldfish!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    Is there more than one shark in this? The scale looks very different in various scenes from the trailer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    good summer movie to take junior to, 4 out of 5 thumbs up. it wont be a classic like Jaws, they seem to go out of their way to make the characters as bland and forgettable as possible. the lead guy was good and the dog, otherwise the shark could have eaten the rest of them anywhere in the movie without ruining it.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,872 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Ipso wrote: »
    Is there more than one shark in this? The scale looks very different in various scenes from the trailer.
    Yep there are two....

    Saw this evening it kind of sucked but I had fun at it, the acting is shocking, the characters are paper thin, but at the time it was fun. Clearly aimed at the Asian Market and will need to do well given the whopping budgets. The statham is very stathamy lol.

    The shark size, strength etc seemed to vary a lot as well....

    Recent shark film wise not a patch on the shallows, but hey different type of film.
    5/10


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,366 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Brought the kids and Mrs Sleepy (who are all huge Jaws fans) last night and they all loved it. It's stupid, summer blockbuster, get-out-the-popcorn fare. I generally found myself picking victims I wanted the Megaladon to get
    was really hoping Pippin the dog (nice nod to Jaws btw) and the fat kid with the ice lolly were going to get eaten


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,872 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    I see the box office is better than expected as well.
    I am shocked the US opening was quite that high.
    https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=wbeventfilm2018.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,872 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Sleepy wrote: »
    Brought the kids and Mrs Sleepy (who are all huge Jaws fans) last night and they all loved it. It's stupid, summer blockbuster, get-out-the-popcorn fare. I generally found myself picking victims I wanted the Megaladon to get
    was really hoping Pippin the dog (nice nod to Jaws btw) and the fat kid with the ice lolly were going to get eaten
    YOU MONSTER!!! NOT PIPPIN!....also I dont think the statham gave the dog a lift back to the boat where the wedding was! he left the poor dog to paddle!!! GIT


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,366 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    meh...
    feeding predators is the best use I can think of for lap dogs


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 3,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭ktulu123


    The 4DX Screening was hilarious craic. Film was exactly as you would expect. Made better by the 4DX experience :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,700 ✭✭✭tricky D


    Sleepy wrote: »
    I generally found myself picking victims I wanted the Megaladon to get
    was really hoping Pippin the dog (nice nod to Jaws btw) and the fat kid with the ice lolly were going to get eaten
    There's probably a version on the cutting room floor which had this version.



    On the panels, Statham was having a right go at the way it had been cut to bits for the cert with loads of blood, gore and death removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭DoozerT6


    I saw this today. I wasn't expecting high-brow thought-provoking existentialism. I was not disappointed lol.

    Have to say, I think Jason Statham's acting has improved over the years, although I wouldn't have seen a whole lot of his work. TBH, I didn't think much of the female lead, I think the language barrier made it a little difficult to convey the dialogue convincingly. The little girl was as cute as all get out. And Pippin!!! I thought some of the other characters were extraneous and existed only to put more people in danger.

    Also
    I can't believe their surprise that there were two Megs, how did they think that only one would survive ALONE for millions of years in the Mariana Trench? They also conveniently ignored the GIANT FRICKIN' OCTOPUS that attacked the small sub near the start. There's also got to be more than one of those, right? And how could those giant predators survive for so long without wiping out all living things, and each other, in their relatively confined area? Who's to know what else escaped through that hole in the gas layer before it sealed up again? Are they going for a sequel here?

    Having said all that, the special effects were great, Rainn Wilson put in a good turn, and I did genuinely jump in my seat in a couple of places.

    Go and see it whatever day your local cinema does half-price tickets.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,036 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    This was terrible.


    Can't believe the good will this PoS is getting. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Really enjoyed it. Despite some reviews saying that special effects were SyFy quality, I thought they were great. Some of it is dumber than dumb so leave your brain at home. Just sit back with your popcorn and enjoy it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭MarkY91


    Really enjoyed this movie. Statham was great. Anyone expecting much from a movie from a giant shark movie then hating it is kind of a stupid person but whatever. Really enjoyable for what it is.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭restive


    I did not think this was great. A lot of unnessecary drama. They supporting actors were annoying, especially the little girl. As much about the technology as the shark. Needed more gore.
    Deep Blue Sea did this way better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    I saw it and mostly enjoyed it. One thing though - I can't believe the movie had a budget of about $150 million. It felt like I was watching a movie with a fraction of that.

    I thought Li Bingbing who played the Chinese scientist was adorable.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭restive


    I thought Li Bingbing who played the Chinese scientist was adorable.[/QUOTE]


    Yea, at 45 she is actually older than me. Hard to believe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,610 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    Saw this this evening. Tosh, but enjoyable tosh nevertheless. Didn't seem to quite know what to do with itself at times, and several of the more comedic scenes were very forced. I'm flabbergasted though to read here that the budget was ~€150 million!! Surely a large portion of the budget must have been siphoned off somewhere - I thought it looked pretty cheap!
    Yea, at 45 she is actually older than me. Hard to believe.
    She's 45?! Holy ****! Gotta be a crumbling painting in an attic there somewhere......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    She's 45?! Holy ****! Gotta be a crumbling painting in an attic there somewhere......
    I've met more than a few Chinese women who think she's ruined herself with surgery. Make of that what you will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ConcertKing


    Saw this tonight and thought it was fantastic.

    Statham was as great as always!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,195 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Jason Statham acts wooden and fails to save people in submarine when an "unknown presence" hammers the side of the sub.

    5 years later, another sub is hammered by an unknown presence.

    Get wooden and now drunk Jason Statham to attempt to save that sub.

    Someone else goes in a sub to save previous sub.

    Jason Statham follows in sub.

    Something hammers side of sub.

    ** looks at watch **

    IT'S BEEN THIRTY FIVE F*CKING MINUTES... AND I HAVEN'T SEEN SHARKS.. JUST A SERIES OF SUBMARINES GETTING HAMMERED BY SOMETHING!!!!!!!!!

    ** turns it off **


Advertisement