Driver using bus lane

micar

Was stopped at the traffic lights at broadstone luas station in the bus lane. Around 4.50 this evening.

Kinda felt a vehicle behind me in the bus lane. It was large silver 4x4. The traffic was built up half way down constitution hill.

When the lights went green, the 4x4 went by me and up the bus lane....caught up with the driver before the fire station as the driver got stuck behind a bus.. Tapped the bonnet of vehicle and gestured to the driver which happened to be a woman saying that she should not be in the bus lane as to move out of it.

She moved into the correct lane and went past me.

Went to speak to the driver to advise that she's not entitled to use the bus lane.

She said she was an on duty guard and was allowed to use it. The 4x4 was over 10 years old and clearly her private car.

She advised that she could have me arrested for criminal damage.....by me tapping the bonnet with my fingers.

I didn't ask for proof of ID or what station she was based in.

If she was an on duty guard.....is she entitled to use the bus lane.

Had two close calls this morning and wasn't in the mood for this type of bull sh1t* driving

Hurrache

You were probably just better off not bothering, usually nothing ever good comes out of telling others how to drive.

Plus you never know the reasons. More often than not it's people just in a hurry, but sometimes people may be rushing to hospital etc.

tomasrojo

It's usually a waste of time talking to drivers.

Also, some people go absolutely mental if you touch their car and can attack you.

I don't always stick to these two rules, but I've decided over the years that they're the better course of action. If you see a guard, maybe point out the offender to them, but, other than that, there's not a lot to be gained.

Kaisr Sose

micar wrote: »

Was stopped at the traffic lights at broadstone luas station in the bus lane. Around 4.50 this evening.

Kinda felt a vehicle behind me in the bus lane. It was large silver 4x4. The traffic was built up half way down constitution hill.

When the lights went green, the 4x4 went by me and up the bus lane....caught up with the driver before the fire station as the driver got stuck behind a bus.. Tapped the bonnet of vehicle and gestured to the driver which happened to be a woman saying that she should not be in the bus lane as to move out of it.

She moved into the correct lane and went past me.

Went to speak to the driver to advise that she's not entitled to use the bus lane.

She said she was an on duty guard and was allowed to use it. The 4x4 was over 10 years old and clearly her private car.

She advised that she could have me arrested for criminal damage.....by me tapping the bonnet with my fingers.

I didn't ask for proof of ID or what station she was based in.

If she was an on duty guard.....is she entitled to use the bus lane.

Had two close calls this morning and wasn't in the mood for this type of bull sh1t* driving

Lots of ignorant /stupid/ selfish drivers out there. That was b....x talk. She can’t use a bus lane if the car is not identified as a Garda car, marked or otherwise. She committed an offence by doing so.

I tap on cars and it generally works...it pisses off some motorists that interfere or endanger me, but that’s their problem. Its not criminal damage - where is the damage to start with?

That summed up that persons understanding of the law. Interfering or preventing a Garda in the course of their duty would be a better charge to level at you, if they were a Garda and you would have to know they were for it to stick.

...However, impersonating a Garda is a serious offence too. I wonder if they know that? If I had the time, I would have called her bluff and reported her....Garda driving their own cars while off duty are bound by the rules of the road

endacl

I file that stuff under LTS.

Wishbone Ash

micar wrote: »

.. Tapped the bonnet of vehicle and gestured to the driver which happened to be a woman saying that she should not be in the bus lane as to move out of it. ...

I'd find that a bit weird. Do you also check tax and insurance discs as you're travelling along. ....or Pay & Display tickets?

Much as we don't like any disregard for the bus lane regulations. it's not a cyclist's role to enforce them.

Kaisr Sose

Wishbone Ash wrote: »

I'd find that a bit weird. Do you also check tax and insurance discs as you're travelling along. ....or Pay & Display tickets?

Much as we don't like any disregard for the bus lane regulations. it's not a cyclist's role to enforce them.

The poster did not say they did check discs and my take on it is your comment is a red herring. It’s not ok for cars to use lanes they are not entitled to use and if they endanger me while doing so, I will tell them or report them for it. Some motorists just don’t care so why should I or we? What good comes out of relying on Garda to know the law and how to enforce ? We have crap driving because we have crap to no enforcement of the rules of the road.

ted1

The lads in work call it the late lane. 60 Euro Fine , no penalty points. For the hour they save each day using it, they are more than willing to pay 60 Euro once a month. But they never get fined.

jimmycrackcorm

micar wrote:

If she was an on duty guard.....is she entitled to use the bus lane.

Bet she didn't pull out her id because there is a garda HQ directive, that is ignored by almost all Gardai not to drive in bus lanes unless under blues.


Why is it so wrong to point out to someone breaking the law that they shouldn't be doing so?

We've enough expensive tribunals in this country because of this type of pervasive attitude, sure there's no harm done.

RobbieMD

jimmycrackcorm wrote: »

Bet she didn't pull out her id because there is a garda HQ directive, that is ignored by almost all Gardai not to drive in bus lanes unless under blues.



Why is it so wrong to point out to someone breaking the law that they shouldn't be doing so?

We've enough expensive tribunals in this country because of this type of pervasive attitude, sure there's no harm done.

Actually the training for emergency service vehicles is to not use bus lanes, instead go into the middle of the road/ face oncoming traffic.

Regarding pointing out the law to someone, if we take it she is a Garda in the course of her duties, then private car or not, she's exempt. Section 87 road traffic act applies

Ruat Caelum

micar wrote: »

Tapped the bonnet of vehicle and gestured to the driver which happened to be a woman saying that she should not be in the bus lane as to move out of it.

She moved into the correct lane and went past me.

Went to speak to the driver to advise that she's not entitled to use the bus lane.

Was it necessary to speak to the driver after she moved out of the bus lane?
All drivers know they're not supposed to be in the bus lane. That the driver moved into the correct lane after you tapped on the car should have been enough surely? It seems unnecessary to confront her again...

Someone acting like a guard questions someone impersonating a guard.

Lumen

Touching people's stuff is a really bad idea.

Nobody likes being told what to do by a stranger when they are breaking rules, regardless of the mode of transport.

Try telling a cyclist not to jump red lights or a pedestrian not to cross near a crossing and see what kind of response you get.

It's not even transport specific. Try telling a parent how to handle their child or some aggressive drunk dude how to treat his girlfriend.

These conversations requires a level of charm most of us do not possess.

The socially acceptable way to communicate this information is with a finger at worst, but preferably an exasperated arm lift, or not at all

Wishbone Ash

Kaisr Sose wrote: »

..... It’s not ok for cars to use lanes they are not entitled to use and if they endanger me while doing so, I will tell them or report them for it.....

Leaving 'entitlement' aside, I can't see how it would differ from being endangered on an ordinary road.

99.9% of roads do not have a bus lane. How do you manage on those roads or how did you manage before we had any bus lanes?

micar

doolox wrote: »

I suspect that you got jealous of a car being in the bus lane ........ There are enough police, traffic wardens etc

.

Jealous.... no.....annoyed that this woman decided she had a entitlement over all other road users who were stuck in traffic......yes.

I rarely see any guard from the traffic corps any my 45km daily commute.

In my years of cycling in dublin.....I've only spoken to drives a few times. A other times were due to a shocking close calls.

boombang

I agree with the sentiment of the OP's actions, but I would agree with others that the tapping on the bonnet is only likely to get the back up of the greedy driver. I give the blackest looks I can to drivers in the bus lane, cyclists on the pavement etc. A guesture calling their attention to ask the people they skipped would be more guilt inducing in my estimation.

magicbastarder

several posts deleted, several posts edited to remove quotes.
it's not rocket science - attack the post, not the poster.

any questions, PM me.

magicbastarder

funny enough, the hardest thump i think i ever gave a car resulted in the driver claiming to be a garda.
it wasn't a case of her using a bus lane though, she decided to overtake me on martin's row in chapelizod (a bloody narrow road, if you don't know it) into oncoming traffic, and then squeezed me up against the kerb. she ended up driving alongside me shouting out the window at me.

RebelButtMunch

micar wrote: »

Was stopped at the traffic lights at broadstone luas station in the bus lane. Around 4.50 this evening.

Kinda felt a vehicle behind me in the bus lane. It was large silver 4x4. The traffic was built up half way down constitution hill.

When the lights went green, the 4x4 went by me and up the bus lane....caught up with the driver before the fire station as the driver got stuck behind a bus.. Tapped the bonnet of vehicle and gestured to the driver which happened to be a woman saying that she should not be in the bus lane as to move out of it.

She moved into the correct lane and went past me.

Went to speak to the driver to advise that she's not entitled to use the bus lane.

She said she was an on duty guard and was allowed to use it. The 4x4 was over 10 years old and clearly her private car.

She advised that she could have me arrested for criminal damage.....by me tapping the bonnet with my fingers.

I didn't ask for proof of ID or what station she was based in.

If she was an on duty guard.....is she entitled to use the bus lane.

Had two close calls this morning and wasn't in the mood for this type of bull sh1t* driving

So she did as you asked, and then you followed up with a lecture. Cut her a break.

Bubbaclaus

Section 87 Road Traffic Act.

Maybe next time just keep to yourself. Nothing more insufferable than road users that lecture other road users like they are some form of higher authority.

greenspurs

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

Section 87 Road Traffic Act.

Maybe next time just keep to yourself. Nothing more insufferable than road users that lecture other road users like they are some form of higher authority.

Thanks garda.


Why get involved though ? She moved out, leave it at that, and cycle on :rolleyes:

AndrewJRenko

greenspurs wrote: »

Why get involved though ?

To make it less likely that she'll do the same thing the next day, and the next day, and the next day - endangering the safety of cyclists every time.

Tapping the car probably isn't a great idea, but making visual contact with the driver, and making sure they understand that they're not supposed to be there is a great idea.

Even if you get a hostile or dismissive response from the driver, it all adds up.

greenspurs

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

To make it less likely that she'll do the same thing the next day, and the next day, and the next day - endangering the safety of cyclists every time.

Tapping the car probably isn't a great idea, but making visual contact with the driver, and making sure they understand that they're not supposed to be there is a great idea.

Even if you get a hostile or dismissive response from the driver, it all adds up.

He gestured, she moved - point made.

He taps on car, and gestures more - and trying to be a member of the Road Traffic Corps, is needless and imo is over reacting..

doozerie

Between the extremes of "just ignore antisocial behaviour" and "hang the misbehaving feckers for being antisocial" there is plenty of scope for a rational response to the behaviour of others, whether that behaviour is a road user clearly breaking the rules of the road, someone committing assault, someone using a hose to water their grass during water shortages, someone jumping the queue at the supermarket, or whatever.

We bang on often enough about the lack of garda enforcement of various laws, as if that is the only route to tackling antisocial behaviour. But what about peer pressure? That's something we can all feed into, not just by behaving responsibly ourselves, but also by taking issue with those that choose to not behave responsibly. Taking issue with someone is not always appropriate of course, some scenarios are fairly innocuous and "safe", others clearly are not.

So you pick and choose those situations where you feel it is appropriate to do or say something. You may choose differently from the OP but that's no reason to criticise them as if they were the culprit here. Would I do what they did? Maybe, maybe not. Were they right to take issue with someone who was breaking the rules of the road? I would say yes.

Would it have been better that they looked at the driver, tutted loudly but said nothing, and then complained later about the behaviour of others as if it's the role of someone/everyone else to try to influence peoples' behaviour for the better? What happens if all of us do exactly that?

AndrewJRenko

greenspurs wrote: »

He taps on car, and gestures more - and trying to be a member of the Road Traffic Corps, is needless and imo is over reacting..

I don't get the connection between talking to another adult and 'trying to be a member of the Road Traffic Corps'. How is talking to another person trying to be a Garda?

greenspurs

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

I don't get the connection between talking to another adult and 'trying to be a member of the Road Traffic Corps'. How is talking to another person trying to be a Garda?

Its not just talking , though is it?
Its more or less instructing another adult to drive their car (albeit where they should be) and then to then further 'advise' the driver that they shouldn't be in the bus lane ? That is doing the work of the Traffic Corps.

People nowadays don't like being told what to do, nevermind by a cyclist.
So, in my opinion, the OP acted a bit foolishly, and overstepped his entitlement (ie Cycle, and not direct traffic)
If the roles were reversed, a motorist telling a cyclist that they were in a lane they weren't supposed to be cycling in, and then when they met further up the road, tapped the cyclist on the handelbars, and 'advised' him/her ... :rolleyes:

tomasrojo

I was waiting to go straight ahead at a large crossroads (for traffic going east: cycletrack, lane A, lane B ), when a driver went up lane B, turned hard left over the pedestrian crossing, across lane A and waited for the lights to change, splayed across the pedestrian crossing, lane A and lane B, blocking two lanes of waiting traffic.

I did a Tina-Fey-strength eye roll when he looked in my direction. Then the window rolled down and he started 'story-budding me. The lights changed and he was still demanding to know what the eye roll was for.

doozerie

greenspurs wrote: »

People nowadays don't like being told what to do, nevermind by a cyclist.

Nowadays? When have been ever liked being told what to do? By a cyclist or anyone else?

And does that mean we should all just turn a blind eye to everything everyone else does?

tomasrojo

greenspurs wrote: »

If the roles were reversed, a motorist telling a cyclist that they were in a lane they weren't supposed to be cycling in, and then when they met further up the road, tapped the cyclist on the handelbars, and 'advised' him/her ... :rolleyes:

It used to annoy me beyond distraction when drivers told me, directly or indirectly to get off the road and use the cycle track ... and they were in terms of the law correct for quite a few years.

ignorance is strength

Wishbone Ash wrote: »

I'd find that a bit weird. Do you also check tax and insurance discs as you're travelling along. ....or Pay & Display tickets?

Much as we don't like any disregard for the bus lane regulations. it's not a cyclist's role to enforce them.

Ruat Caelum wrote: »

Was it necessary to speak to the driver after she moved out of the bus lane?
All drivers know they're not supposed to be in the bus lane. That the driver moved into the correct lane after you tapped on the car should have been enough surely? It seems unnecessary to confront her again...

Deleted User wrote: »

Someone acting like a guard questions someone impersonating a guard.

Lumen wrote: »

Touching people's stuff is a really bad idea.

Nobody likes being told what to do by a stranger when they are breaking rules, regardless of the mode of transport.

Try telling a cyclist not to jump red lights or a pedestrian not to cross near a crossing and see what kind of response you get.

It's not even transport specific. Try telling a parent how to handle their child or some aggressive drunk dude how to treat his girlfriend.

These conversations requires a level of charm most of us do not possess.

The socially acceptable way to communicate this information is with a finger at worst, but preferably an exasperated arm lift, or not at all

boombang wrote: »

I agree with the sentiment of the OP's actions, but I would agree with others that the tapping on the bonnet is only likely to get the back up of the greedy driver. I give the blackest looks I can to drivers in the bus lane, cyclists on the pavement etc. A guesture calling their attention to ask the people they skipped would be more guilt inducing in my estimation.

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

Section 87 Road Traffic Act.

Maybe next time just keep to yourself. Nothing more insufferable than road users that lecture other road users like they are some form of higher authority.

greenspurs wrote: »

Thanks garda.


Why get involved though ? She moved out, leave it at that, and cycle on :rolleyes:

greenspurs wrote: »

He gestured, she moved - point made.

He taps on car, and gestures more - and trying to be a member of the Road Traffic Corps, is needless and imo is over reacting..

I fcuking hate this mentality.

jimd2

micar wrote: »

Was stopped at the traffic lights at broadstone luas station in the bus lane. Around 4.50 this evening.

Kinda felt a vehicle behind me in the bus lane. It was large silver 4x4. The traffic was built up half way down constitution hill.

When the lights went green, the 4x4 went by me and up the bus lane....caught up with the driver before the fire station as the driver got stuck behind a bus.. Tapped the bonnet of vehicle and gestured to the driver which happened to be a woman saying that she should not be in the bus lane as to move out of it.

She moved into the correct lane and went past me.

Went to speak to the driver to advise that she's not entitled to use the bus lane.

She said she was an on duty guard and was allowed to use it. The 4x4 was over 10 years old and clearly her private car.

She advised that she could have me arrested for criminal damage.....by me tapping the bonnet with my fingers.

I didn't ask for proof of ID or what station she was based in.

If she was an on duty guard.....is she entitled to use the bus lane.

Had two close calls this morning and wasn't in the mood for this type of bull sh1t* driving

Just one question, do you follow your fellow cyclists after they break red lights? Not all do break lights but such a high percentage do break lights that you will almost certainly see other cyclists break lights on a daily basis.

With your sense of zeal and being a fellow cyclist you might be just what the road safety authority need to get people to change their ways.

draiochtanois

This post has been deleted.

ignorance is strength

jimd2 wrote: »

Just one question, do you follow your fellow cyclists after they break red lights? Not all do break lights but such a high percentage do break lights that you will almost certainly see other cyclists break lights on a daily basis.

With your sense of zeal and being a fellow cyclist you might be just what the road safety authority need to get people to change their ways.

Surely - surely - you can see that the illegal actions of cars are far more disruptive than those of cyclists? And why must the OP enforce all laws? Are they not entitled to rebuke rule-breakers that particularly annoy them without also having to tell someone walking by to pick up their litter? When you break a rule, it’s not the police or the state you are affecting, it’s your fellow citizens; therefore, this attitude of “stay out of this” is idiotic.

draiochtanois wrote: »

Based on your post history you seem to be getting into these situations a lot ...

I genuinely hate your attitude. Why, from that, do you disparage the OP rather than the road users whose behaviour is the cause?

AndrewJRenko

jimd2 wrote: »

Just one question, do you follow your fellow cyclists after they break red lights? Not all do break lights but such a high percentage do break lights that you will almost certainly see other cyclists break lights on a daily basis.

If YOU have a problem with cyclists breaking red lights, why don't YOU do something (legal) about it to address this problem, like talking to cyclists. Why do you expect OTHER people to take action to address the problem that concerns YOU, instead of sneering at those who do choose to take action themselves?

greenspurs wrote: »

Its not just talking , though is it?
Its more or less instructing another adult to drive their car (albeit where they should be) and then to then further 'advise' the driver that they shouldn't be in the bus lane ? That is doing the work of the Traffic Corps.

People nowadays don't like being told what to do, nevermind by a cyclist.

Except that it is LITERALLY just talking. It is one adult talking to another adult. The cyclist has now power to instruct the driver to do anything, so it is just talking. He can persuade, convince, influence, maybe even threaten Garda reporting - but it is LITERALLY all talk - nothing else.

The work of the Garda Traffic Corps is to issue fines and prosecute people in Court, so the cyclist is not doing their work.

Bubbaclaus

Speaking of cyclists breaking red lights, on my way to work yesterday I saw 2 cyclists coming from different directions both break red lights and crash into each other.

I didn't stick around to see if the OP went over and tapped on their bikes and did their duties of a volunteer Traffic Corp member.

AndrewJRenko

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

Speaking of cyclists breaking red lights, on my way to work yesterday I saw 2 cyclists coming from different directions both break red lights and crash into each other.

I didn't stick around to see if the OP went over and tapped on their bikes and did their duties of a volunteer Traffic Corp member.

So the lights were red for traffic coming from different directions? Interesting...

AndrewJRenko

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

So the lights were red for traffic coming from different directions? Interesting...

Not familiar with the pedestrian light at junction, I take it?

AndrewJRenko

Deleted User wrote: »

Not familiar with the pedestrian light at junction, I take it?

I've seen them once or twice all right, and they're usually in synch with the traffic lights, which generally work so that when traffic is coming from two different directions, one has red and one has green.

Kaisr Sose

Wishbone Ash wrote: »

Leaving 'entitlement' aside, I can't see how it would differ from being endangered on an ordinary road.

99.9% of roads do not have a bus lane. How do you manage on those roads or how did you manage before we had any bus lanes?

I don’t get why you always try to bring up irrelevant poiints. It does not matter how long bus lanes are in existence or if there is one at all. Normal rules of the road existed before bus lanes and will stil exist if they were scrapped right now.

If a motorist pulls into a bus lane or passes a cyclist without regard to their presence or safety on any other lane, and by doing so impedes or endangers them, that cyclist is entitled to be pissed off by their poor driving and breach of the RTA. If they can take that up with the motorist, that’s their choice. Motorists are quite capable of using their car horns to intimidate and impose their thoughts on other road users, including cyclists. We don’t have a horn to sound and a bell is ineffective in most cases. Please bear in mind, this is motorist behaviour led...if there is no issue with their driving there is no reason to confront. If you don’t do that, fine, but it’s not wrong to challenge a driver if their driving is substandard. It’s not policing to do either. It should be a conversation between two civil adults but many motorist just use it to further make a point that cyclists are some form of low life that should not be on the roads.

I have a question for you:
Have you ever beeped another road user and if so, was that just to say ‘hello’ or advise that motorist of something, possibly their poor driving ? And before you say it, I know the rules about sounding a car horn, but many motorists don’t, and use it to vent and intimidate.

tomasrojo

In a period when I went back to college, and my weekly commute expanded hugely, and I was cycling through much busier streets, I did go through a brief phase of talking to drivers about their wrongdoings, only where it affected me. It was a horrible experience of hostility, scorn and abuse, and I was much happier when I stopped doing it.


I can see why this looks like tacit condoning of such behaviour, but, honestly, it was a waste of time, and if I were in some way required to keep confronting drivers, I'd probably stop cycling.

Bubbaclaus

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

I've seen them once or twice all right, and they're usually in synch with the traffic lights, which generally work so that when traffic is coming from two different directions, one has red and one has green.

And at what point in this scenario do pedestrians go? Lights were red for all traffic lanes as pedestrian lights were green.

AndrewJRenko

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

And at what point in this scenario do pedestrians go? Lights were red for all traffic lanes as pedestrian lights were green.

What junction was this?

jimd2

ignorance is strength wrote: »

Surely - surely - you can see that the illegal actions of cars are far more disruptive than those of cyclists? And why must the OP enforce all laws? Are they not entitled to rebuke rule-breakers that particularly annoy them without also having to tell someone walking by to pick up their litter? When you break a rule, it’s not the police or the state you are affecting, it’s your fellow citizens; therefore, this attitude of “stay out of this” is idiotic.

Surely - surely - you can see that the illegal actions of cyclists in breaking the red lights are more frequent and potentially as dangerous (if not more so) than drivers driving in the bus lane?

Neither should be happening but I am rightly pointing out both issues that our zealous cyclist should be aware of.

That said I am well aware of the very very dangerous actions of some people in cars as I was almost in a very serious accident yesterday due to a lunatic overtaking movement.

AndrewJRenko

tomasrojo wrote: »

In a period when I went back to college, and my weekly commute expanded hugely, and I was cycling through much busier streets, I did go through a brief phase of talking to drivers about their wrongdoings, only where it affected me but, honestly, it was a waste of time, and if I were in some way required to keep confronting drivers, I'd probably stop cycling.

How do you know that it was a waste of time?

I don't think anyone is suggesting that confronting drivers should be mandatory or expected, but I don't see the rationale for sneering at those who do confront either.

jimd2

Bubbaclaus wrote: »

Speaking of cyclists breaking red lights, on my way to work yesterday I saw 2 cyclists coming from different directions both break red lights and crash into each other.

I didn't stick around to see if the OP went over and tapped on their bikes and did their duties of a volunteer Traffic Corp member.

Wow, my point summarised completely.

The frequency of breaking of red lights by cyclists is so high that our zealous cyclist must be seeing it happening every day and probably cringing (but maybe joining them on occasions perhaps?)

micar

draiochtanois wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

How many posts are you taking about. I've been cycling to work 4 days per week for the 8 years.....each week 180km.

I have 4 close calls in 2 days. Of those 2 really shook me.

I had two close calls on Monday morning and two again yesterday morning.

I explained all 4.....please explain how am i "getting into these situaions"....these were a result of dangerous driving and not dangerous cycling

All this in the backdrop of 2 cyclists dying on Irish roads in the last 10 days.

As a result of these I've just bought a cycle camera.

micar

jimd2 wrote: »

Just one question, do you follow your fellow cyclists after they break red lights? Not all do break lights but such a high percentage do break lights that you will almost certainly see other cyclists break lights on a daily basis.

With your sense of zeal and being a fellow cyclist you might be just what the road safety authority need to get people to change their ways.

I spoke to one cyclist who almost killed himself going through a red light. He didn't appreciate it.

I had to shout at one to stop who went up the inside of a left turning lorry.

Spoke to another cycling in the cycle lane without their hands on the handlebar.

jimd2

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

If YOU have a problem with cyclists breaking red lights, why don't YOU do something (legal) about it to address this problem, like talking to cyclists. Why do you expect OTHER people to take action to address the problem that concerns YOU, instead of sneering at those who do choose to take action themselves?

Ha ha Andrew you are a little sensitive to my comments.

If I was to go after every cyclist that breaks a red light in Dublin I would be causing much more potential danger to my fellow road users as I would be most likely stopped at said red light while said cyclist is weaving in and out of traffic way in front.

I did take a drivers details yesterday to report to gardai.

jimd2

micar wrote: »

I spoke to one cyclist who almost killed himself going through a red light. He didn't appreciate it.

I had to shout at one to stop who went up the inside of a left turning lorry.

Spoke to another cycling in the cycle lane without their hands on the handlebar.

I have to say fair play to you. Well done.

Bubbaclaus

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

What junction was this?

Weird question. Why would the specific junction be relevant?

If you mean type, it was a crossroads.

ignorance is strength

jimd2 wrote: »

Surely - surely - you can see that the illegal actions of cyclists in breaking the red lights are more frequent and potentially as dangerous (if not more so) than drivers driving in the bus lane?

Neither should be happening but I am rightly pointing out both issues that our zealous cyclist should be aware of.

“Surely” is used in that way when it is self-evident. It is not self-evident that cyclists breaking a red light is significantly dangerous to anyone but themselves. (This is not to defend rule-breaking cyclists; it annoys me no end, as a pedestrian, when they cut in front of me when I’m crossing on a green light.) You might notice that I called it disruptive, not dangerous. It’s hardly dangerous that a car is in a bus lane. But the disruption it causes and the indirect effect in corrupting “road morals” is significant.

I can’t even be bothered to respond to the second paragraph.