Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Discovery 1x05 – "Choose Your Pain" [** SPOILERS **]

  • 16-10-2017 12:31am
    #1
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭


    Warning: This thread will contain spoilers for the episode "Choose Your Pain". Spoiler tags will not be used, so if you don't want to be spoiled read no further.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,403 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    I am really loving this all swearing, violence Star Trek.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Loved it, again.

    Spore drive still seems silly, I think that was the only let down.

    Good character episode and I'd be looking forward to that. Didn't disappoint. Mudd was well played by Rainn Wilson and not overused. Enjoyable and didn't feel like fan service.

    Stamets and the doctor look like such a cute couple :-D. Lovely little button on the episode there, and the final mirror shot! Ohhh.. looking forward to that.

    I think that prisoner who Lorca picked up is sticking around, too. Recognise him from promos and things during the summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,297 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Goodshape wrote: »
    Loved it, again.

    Spore drive still seems silly, I think that was the only let down.

    Good character episode and I'd be looking forward to that. Didn't disappoint. Mudd was well played by Rainn Wilson and not overused. Enjoyable and didn't feel like fan service.

    Stamets and the doctor look like such a cute couple :-D. Lovely little button on the episode there, and the final mirror shot! Ohhh.. looking forward to that.

    I think that prisoner who Lorca picked up is sticking around, too. Recognise him from promos and things during the summer.

    Spore drive still seems silly.

    I don't mind the spore drive so much now that I have seen it working,how it works and that Discovery also has a normal warp core too.

    I think Red matter from the JJ films was worse.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭LionelNashe


    Goodshape wrote: »
    Loved it, again.

    Spore drive still seems silly, .......

    and Star Trek is still a bit too fond of the "DNA is magic" trope


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Stronger episode than last weeks, with some good character work for the various non-Burnham / Lorca characters. I wasn't expecting Saru to step up and take command, and the little piece with Burnham at the end felt like the first steps towards mending fences between the two; their sniping and antagonism was beginning to wear a little thin, but Saru's open honesty about a chance missed to learn from Georghiou was a good moment between them (and speaking of Captain Saru, the little easter egg mention of Jonathan Archer & Captain Pike was nice).

    I was wondering how on earth they'd approach Harry Mudd, and to the writers credit they really struck a neat balance in maintaining his breezy, roguish charm against the obviously grimier, darker hues of this time in the Federation. I don't imagine it'll be too long before we see him again, seeking revenge against Lorca - and that's a good thing; the show still needs those inflections of humour and adventure, despite how strong all the harder edged drama has been.

    On Lorca, hmmm. Well, I still maintain the course for this series is going to pit Burnham & the science / engineering staff against Lorca & his obvious Ahab-esque approach to captaining, and this episode did nothing to change my opinion. To the point where I think I might straight-up hate the guy; he's clearly a total, unrepentant dick - and going by his meeting with the top brass, is not informing them of just how damaging the Spore Drive is shaping out to be.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,928 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Oh so now we're adding swearing to show how edgy and mature this show is?

    Spore drive is just nonsense, the "Klingon" designs are shockingly poor, the Tardigrade did a Wesley Crusher and wtf is with the (no doubt) evil mirror afterimage?

    This get's further away from Star Trek every week. It's GoT in space.. more reliant on fantasy and shock value every episode, and it's not getting any better IMO


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Whatever else it is or isn't, it's definitely NOT game of thrones in space. The Expanse is game of thrones in space, given its about the same kind of faction drama that's the stalwart of that genre. Discovery is Star Trek at War, but still very Trek in its outlook. It's clear nobody wanted to harm the tardigrade, and immediately backed saving it once it's pain and suffering was established. Not trek enough I take it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Oh so now we're adding swearing to show how edgy and mature this show is?

    Was a nice touch that they wrapped it in such an immature exclamation from Tilly :D – and it's not often we get to see a character on Star Trek so excited about their extraordinary job.

    It was a 'shock' moment, but it was well handled and I think it worked. I chuckled.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,928 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Whatever else it is or isn't, it's definitely NOT game of thrones in space. The Expanse is game of thrones in space, given its about the same kind of faction drama that's the stalwart of that genre. Discovery is Star Trek at War, but still very Trek in its outlook. It's clear nobody wanted to harm the tardigrade, and immediately backed saving it once it's pain and suffering was established. Not trek enough I take it?

    Ah here we go again. Don't like the direction - you must not like Trek :rolleyes:

    We've had Star Trek at war.. it was called DS9 and it handled the subject very well while still maintaining a (generally) positive outlook and bond between the characters, and consistent within it's own universe (for the most part).

    This relies on magic spores, gore and violence, and random shock value (character deaths, now swearing etc) to sell its premise which is based on... what? Character conflict, almost entirely unlikable main characters, 'splosions and lens flare, and rewriting characters/situations/designs just coz..

    I just cannot accept this as set in the same universe and era as TOS given the massively different tone (forget the effects) of this series and its characters. If it turns out now that it IS all Mirror/JJ Universe then that negates most of the above I suppose, but for me anyway it only really works if I mentally disassociate it from the "Star Trek" tag when I watch it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,928 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Goodshape wrote: »
    Was a nice touch that they wrapped it in such an immature exclamation from Tilly :D – and it's not often we get to see a character on Star Trek so excited about their extraordinary job.

    It was a 'shock' moment, but it was well handled and I think it worked. I chuckled.

    Again, on any other show yes it probably would work but for me it comes down to..

    What IS Star Trek and does Discovery FIT that definition?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Also Starring LeVar Burton


    This was my favourite episode so far - it did a good job developing the core characters a bit more and finally introduced the final series regular in Ash Tyler, who I think will be a good addition. I enjoyed Rainn Wilson's Mudd too and look forward to seeing him again.

    My only gripe at the moment (and it's very much a minor one), is the way the Klingon's speak sounds very awkward and stilted, and hopefully going forward they'll phase that out a bit and have them sound a bit more natural - I'm not sure if it's the teeth they have in or if its more the direction they've been given, but it takes away from their scenes a bit.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,504 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    Anyone else reckon Ash Tyler is a setup and a double agent?

    Potential future episode spoiler:
    Edit: seems my cynicism is confirmed by some casting info.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Ah here we go again. Don't like the direction - you must not like Trek :rolleyes:

    Quit the eye rolling, I wasn't having a go, but you're comparing apples and oranges. 'GoT in space' isn't even reductionist. Discovery may have ocassional gore and that is a shock - as was the brief f-bomb - but structurally, narratively, it ain't anything like Game of Thrones. As I said, The Expanse is much more overtly cut from the same cloth being as it is about scheming factions :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    I can't wait til we get a Star Trek show about discovering new planets and new civilisations.... So 5 episodes in and my initial fears about this show seem to be correct, a gritty war-time show, now with swearing!

    Before someone mentions the spores, yeah the main point of interest there is what problem there is with them that's in keeping with canon and never having them mention again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    What IS Star Trek and does Discovery FIT that definition?

    It's many things, and yeah it does – or at least I can't see why not.

    Spear wrote: »
    Anyone else reckon Ash Tyler is a setup and a double agent?

    Potential future episode spoiler:
    Edit: seems my cynicism is confirmed by some casting info.

    Reddit thread titles are pretty much giving this one away today. Seems incredibly likely, and interesting enough if true. I just hope they don't drag out an obvious reveal now.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,504 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    Goodshape wrote: »

    Reddit thread titles are pretty much giving this one away today. Seems incredibly likely, and interesting enough if true. I just hope they don't drag out an obvious reveal now.

    They already telegraphed the next episode with the last few seconds. They really do like their forewshadowing in this show.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


    AMKC wrote: »
    Spore drive still seems silly.

    I don't mind the spore drive so much now that I have seen it working,how it works and that Discovery also has a normal warp core too.

    I think Red matter from the JJ films was worse.

    The spore drive thing has never bothered me either from a canon perspective or the way they've explained it , I know it's got something to do with quantum entanglement and that's good enough for me. I don't need Geordie La Forge spouting technobabble nonsense to get me on board every new bit of technology.

    You do realise they have used the Discovery's warp drive at least once before this episode (possibly more , I'd have to rewatch them), they warped away after the Spore drive had dropped them too close to a star in the last episode.

    On the episode itself , I really liked it , unlike previous episodes all the, presumably, core group got some good scenes . I like that they jumped ahead a few weeks to reveal the Discovery had been busy putting Klingons on the defensive with their hit n run tactics and that this had pushed the Tardigrade to its limit . I had thought that they would drag out the concerns for the Tardigrades welfare till the mid season break but I'm glad it came to a head in this episode, if only so people stop moaning about how uncaring and unstarfleet the crew are. With the Tardigrade freed will Stamets be used as the navigator or is that a line that even Lorca won't cross (he's been ordered to stand down at any rate so maybe it won't be an issue ). On Lorca, it was quite the revelation to me that the Discovery is his second command since the Battle of the Binaries and that he sacrificed his crew rather then allow to them to be tortured , eaten or used for propaganda, but I guess it's what has him so driven to bring the battle to the enemy . On a side note was great to hear the klingon captain speaking english , hopefully we'll be seeing more of her and Klingons speaking English in general.

    Wasn't overly bothered by the cursing so long as they don't overdo it and have them dropping f-bombs left and right .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Really enjoyed this one, definitely improved upon last week's one. The one complaint I have about it, and it might seem a bit prudish, but the swearing took me right out of the world of Star Trek for a few minutes, and instead I kinda felt this was like watching todays humans with space ships. I don't think it added anything to the scene, and personally felt it wasn't warranted. Everything else though, more please! :)

    One random thought I had during the show was, what if spore-drive tech works as intended, and has been kept classified at the highest levels for Section 31 only?

    Secondly, the ending confused me a little bit...when the character walked away from the mirror, his reflection remained, and walked away separately. What does that signify? Given this was the first spore-jump using a human, does it signify they've crossed over to a mirror universe or something? Or, was the timing of the scene retroactive, and it wasn't him that walked away from the mirror, it was his partner?


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,504 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    Inviere wrote: »

    Secondly, the ending confused me a little bit...when the character walked away from the mirror, his reflection remained, and walked away separately. What does that signify? Given this was the first spore-jump using a human, does it signify they've crossed over to a mirror universe or something? Or, was the timing of the scene retroactive, and it wasn't him that walked away from the mirror, it was his partner?

    If you really want the answer:

    spoiler for upcoming episode:
    they've said there's a mirror universe episode, again they're foreshadowing the next episode.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    I liked it,

    Felt really like a Trek episode, the morals of the Spore drive. I also liked Harry Mudd, could be his slow path to madness!

    The one thing that annoyed me, and I know its a stupid thing.....

    but....

    That was not a Klingon D7 Cruiser!!!!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭server down


    c_man wrote: »
    I can't wait til we get a Star Trek show about discovering new planets and new civilisations.... So 5 episodes in and my initial fears about this show seem to be correct, a gritty war-time show, now with swearing!

    Before someone mentions the spores, yeah the main point of interest there is what problem there is with them that's in keeping with canon and never having them mention again.

    We had voyager but lots of Trekkies didn’t like it.

    We can’t have a Star Trek trekking in this era because the biggest fans will denounce every new alien life form found and later on the federation is too powerful (as Seamus said).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    and later on the federation is too powerful (as Seamus said).

    There are countless interesting ways to resolve that, though I can't see it ever being tried.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This might explain why the Spore drive wasn't really a thing and why we don't really hear about it - if the creature is sentient, then the Federation probably doesn't want it known that they were abusing something like it for their own gain.

    I'm just curious though - Kaiser, are you going to continue watching the show week in, week out, despite the fact you seemingly hate it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭hal9550


    The Good!

    Really enjoyed the Klingon scenes in this episode! We have been told for many years and through many series that the Klingons treat their prisoners pretty crappy! I have no issue with anything of this episodes demonstration of Klingon methods! Again rather than talk about it, we got to see how ruthless these guys are!

    Mudd was decent, smarter than the original series but we will see where he goes!

    Im not a fan of Saru but he was decentin this episode!

    Generally Starfleet seemed more real in this one and i liked Lorca's back story. Before anyone attacks him destroying his previous ship, remember Picard once had the Enterprise D on auto destruct because an omnipotent being was threatening to kill between a third and a half of the crew

    The MYSTERIOUS!

    The last scene.. very curious.. Discussions on Genes Vision, New vs Old Trek, and all that aside! That scene was freaky. What did people think?
    I know the mirror universe was mentioned by Frakes as supposedly being present in at least 1 episode - Do we think the Spores may be present and interconnected over the Multi Verse? And what does it mean? The fact the engineer used the spores, could it be that he know has the ability to see the other universe? Kinda like Man in the high Castle?

    The Bad!

    I will judge the D7 as some sort of battle variant although we didnt really get a good view of the ship so its impossible to say.. Strange but i am finding myself very forgiving of these subtle canon variations. Still they could have just called it a D6 or something - i like D7s (Id own a few if i could as pleasure boats)

    The UGLY

    Johnathan Archer is highly decorated??? I really believed/had-faith-in the idea that the reason Archer or his NX1 was not mentioned in the 23rd and 24th century was that starfleet had erased him from history. Genuinely!!! Had visions of starfleet admirals discussing it and one exclaiming, 'Archer is dead to us, dont ever mention him or his crappy ship again.. THATS AN ORDER'

    Good episode happy to discuss. Perhaps a separate thread could be set up for the 'Its Not Trek VS it IS TREK' parties to fight it out!?? That we we can discuss theories and potential plot arks here!!!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭hal9550


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Again, on any other show yes it probably would work but for me it comes down to..

    What IS Star Trek and does Discovery FIT that definition?

    Think we have interacted before on previous threads! id be genuinely interested in debating this with you.. genuinely.. not at all mocking your position. I was very vocal in attacking JJ Trek for example, but im more forgiving of Discovery because.. well I dont know lets discuss?

    But maybe (and no im not FLEET ADMIRAL HAL, CnC of the UNIVERSE).. maybe we could have a seperate thread? TREK vs its NOT TREK!?

    Im just REALLY excited by this show and would love a more 'WOW WHERE IS THAT GOING' chat.. as opposed to a

    ITS TREK!
    >NO ITS NOT
    YES IT IS!!!!
    >NOT
    IS.... :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    hal9550 wrote: »
    maybe we could have a seperate thread? TREK vs its NOT TREK!?

    Discovery - Timeline, continuity and other canonical issues [** SPOILERS **]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,536 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    Thought it was a very good episode and found it to be the most 'trekkie' yet.

    I was really shocked by the f-bomb. I'm not a prude or offended by cursing in anyway. I just didn't expect it as I don't associate it with Star Trek and it really seemed a bit contrived to me to show how gritty and modern they are.

    I'm not sure yet how I feel about the whole series following one story arc rather then self contained stories per episode but I wonder how that will change as the show goes on.

    Not bothered by the spore travel thing, how can people find ideas in science fiction ridiculous? Anything is possible and it's just a means to an end. Find character development and story line more important and thought it was strong in this episode.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 5,390 Mod ✭✭✭✭Optimus Prime


    I enjoyed it too, but it really bothers me that the first officer and star fleet admirals don’t see that torturing an animal to travel through space is wrong. I felt like shouting at the screen. It’s so stupid and opposing to pretty much everything we’ve learned from Star Trek in 60 years.

    Also the cursing was weird. It was a bit out of place though it was handled well. When it happened it just took me out of the episode.

    Could the delay at the end with the mirror indicate a time displacement. I know a few have speculated that discovery will travel to the future at the end of the series.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I enjoyed it too, but it really bothers me that the first officer and star fleet admirals don’t see that torturing an animal to travel through space is wrong. I felt like shouting at the screen. It’s so stupid and opposing to pretty much everything we’ve learned from Star Trek in 60 years.

    I don't think it's clear the top brass even know the drive involved hurting the animal. I got the impression they were only given what Lorca told them, and that was that the shiny experimental drive worked, second time of asking. Lorca himself seems willfully intent on ignoring the hows and whys of these things, and I daresay couldn't care less the creature is suffering. This is a true 'ends justifies the means' kinda guy after all. The scene was definitely muddled and needed more detail, but I didn't immediately presume the admirals were immediately ignoring the plight of the animal, it just required more exposition..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    This one is pretty good ,There's still a lot of dumb stuff but it's growing on me. I didn't notice before this episode how xenomorphic the back of the klingons skulls are.

    The cursing seems really out of place.

    I think this whole episode could have been avoided by using holocommunications, I thought that was what we were seeing for the first few minutes. Speaking of holograms, having a huge mirror when they use holograms as mirrors seems odd.

    Another week and another list of people with an odd choice. A nicer touch might have been having Reed or Travis on that list or someone who wasn't human like T'Pol or Shran.

    One thing I will say about the Disco, it looks great from the right angle with the right light.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,297 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    The spore drive thing has never bothered me either from a canon perspective or the way they've explained it , I know it's got something to do with quantum entanglement and that's good enough for me. I don't need Geordie La Forge spouting technobabble nonsense to get me on board every new bit of technology.

    You do realise they have used the Discovery's warp drive at least once before this episode (possibly more , I'd have to rewatch them), they warped away after the Spore drive had dropped them too close to a star in the last episode.

    On the episode itself , I really liked it , unlike previous episodes all the, presumably, core group got some good scenes . I like that they jumped ahead a few weeks to reveal the Discovery had been busy putting Klingons on the defensive with their hit n run tactics and that this had pushed the Tardigrade to its limit . I had thought that they would drag out the concerns for the Tardigrades welfare till the mid season break but I'm glad it came to a head in this episode, if only so people stop moaning about how uncaring and unstarfleet the crew are. With the Tardigrade freed will Stamets be used as the navigator or is that a line that even Lorca won't cross (he's been ordered to stand down at any rate so maybe it won't be an issue ). On Lorca, it was quite the revelation to me that the Discovery is his second command since the Battle of the Binaries and that he sacrificed his crew rather then allow to them to be tortured , eaten or used for propaganda, but I guess it's what has him so driven to bring the battle to the enemy . On a side note was great to hear the klingon captain speaking english , hopefully we'll be seeing more of her and Klingons speaking English in general.

    Wasn't overly bothered by the cursing so long as they don't overdo it and have them dropping f-bombs left and right .

    You do realise they have used the Discovery's warp drive at least once before this episode (possibly more , I'd have to rewatch them), they warped away after the Spore drive had dropped them too close to a star in the last episode.

    Yes I do know that and have watched all them episodes so have seen that.

    I also liked this episode. I am not a fan of Saru because of how he thinks Micheal is dangerous. How is she dangerous? she tried to stop the war from happening but her captain who was supposed to have served with her for 7 years was ignorant and would not listen to her.
    I was not a fan of LT Stamets either but that has changed after what he did in this episode he showed he was not afraid to put his life on the line to save his crew very Spock like in his actions.
    Not a fan of the coursing in it we are supposed to be over things like that by that time.
    I like Lorca's back storey no wonder he is so angry and determined and nice to have a new character in the show.
    I was also a little confused at the end and looked at it a few times but think it either has something to do with the mirror universe or the future.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    It’s so stupid and opposing to pretty much everything we’ve learned from Star Trek in 60 years.

    I thought the same originally, but then....

    latest?cb=20070316222615&path-prefix=en


  • Registered Users Posts: 151 ✭✭ancuncha


    AMKC wrote: »
    I also liked this episode. I am not a fan of Saru because of how he thinks Micheal is dangerous. How is she dangerous? she tried to stop the war from happening but her captain who was supposed to have served with her for 7 years was ignorant and would not listen to her.
    I was not a fan of LT Stamets either but that has changed after what he did in this episode he showed he was not afraid to put his life on the line to save his crew very Spock like in his actions.
    Not a fan of the coursing in it we are supposed to be over things like that by that time.
    I like Lorca's back storey no wonder he is so angry and determined and nice to have a new character in the show.
    I was also a little confused at the end and looked at it a few times but think it either has something to do with the mirror universe or the future.

    I don't like Saru that much, but he is right that Michael is dangerous.
    She is full of the starfleet arrogance the Klingons hate. (i don't like the character and thats cool, just you tend to feel more for the main character in a series)
    She brought up her concerns with her old captain and when she didn't get the answer she wanted, she knocks her out and tries to do what she thought anyways.
    The relationship was very close between them, yet she knocks her out, who does that to someone their supposed to respect?

    What would happen if she fired first?
    IMO
    If Klingon ship destroyed/disabled, starfleet attacked a relgious type figure = War

    If starfleet ship destroyed/disabled, Klingons would see starfleet as weak = War

    (mabey i overthink this lol)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 873 ✭✭✭somuj


    O'Brien said 'bollox' in DS9 and nobody had a problem with it . . .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    Inviere wrote: »
    I thought the same originally, but then....

    latest?cb=20070316222615&path-prefix=en
    But they're the villains.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Evade wrote: »
    But they're the villains.

    It's a Starfleet crew who believe the ends justify the means, some had an issue with it, some didn't, exactly the same here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    Inviere wrote: »
    It's a Starfleet crew who believe the ends justify the means, some had an issue with it, some didn't, exactly the same here.
    Yes, and that's why they're the bad guys. Having the main cast believing the ends justify the means is pretty antithetical to Star Treks usual message.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Evade wrote: »
    Yes, and that's why they're the bad guys. Having the main cast believing the ends justify the means is pretty antithetical to Star Treks usual message.

    I think TV has matured way past having basic good guys & bad guys at this stage. Even Voyager was touching on that years ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    ^^ Heck even TNG touched upon this 25 years ago with I Borg.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    Inviere wrote: »
    I think TV has matured way past having basic good guys & bad guys at this stage. Even Voyager was touching on that years ago.
    Shades of grey and moral questions are fine but "how much torture is acceptable?" is going a little to dark for Star Trek.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Evade wrote: »
    Shades of grey and moral questions are fine but "how much torture is acceptable?" is going a little to dark for Star Trek.

    Its been done before

    DS9: The Pale Moonlight. Trick the Romulans into war, leading to the deaths of millions


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


    Evade wrote: »
    Shades of grey and moral questions are fine but "how much torture is acceptable?" is going a little to dark for Star Trek.

    Is that in itself not a moral question worth asking ? Tbh I think people's main issue is it may turn out to be a season long question and not neatly resolved in one episode.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    Its been done before

    DS9: The Pale Moonlighy. Trick the Romulans into war, leading to the deaths of millions
    To prevent the deaths of hundreds of billions, including Romulans, and that nearly broke Sisko. I said before that STD is trying to jump into the war parts of DS9 without previously having shown the characters being regular Starfleet officers and I think that's why it doesn't work as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    Is that in itself not a moral question worth asking ? Tbh I think people's main issue is it may turn out to be a season long question and not neatly resolved in one episode.
    I'm pretty sure none is a good answer. We could ask how much slavery, which it could be argued the tardigrade was, is acceptable too. You might find the answer is the same as the torture one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 544 ✭✭✭Greyjoy


    A decent episode but felt too much like a rehash of the previous episode - the race against time to get the spore drive working only this time it was to rescue the captain and not the mining colony.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    It's been my impression that the crew are following orders, with stated reservations in most cases, and Lorca is the one with the questionable morals and ethics.

    It's not a situation people (i.e. the crew of Discovery) are happy with. Given any hint of an option they do refuse orders where it conflicts with their ethics, e.g. the doctor refusing to cause further harm to the tardigrade; as a doctor that is his privilege (and Lorca does not even attempt to argue), with Stamets it's a case of follow orders or be dismissed.


    Lorca is dangerous. I don't think that's sustainable (I think we'll see more push-back from the crew) and I don't see it as a reflection of the entire federation. The rarity of mutiny or even insubordination on a Starfleet ship has been made very clear to us. That doesn't mean Lorca's actions are normal or accepted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Evade wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure none is a good answer. We could ask how much slavery, which it could be argued the tardigrade was, is acceptable too. You might find the answer is the same as the torture one.

    What about the Mk 1 EMH's being used to mine ore? None of this is new to Star Trek, and I'd consider myself fairly well appraised of canon having been watching Star Trek for 20 years. You make out like it's a mirror universe ship & crew, with them all complicit torturing a sentient being. They weren't all complicit. Some went to extreme lengths to change the order of things, which is, by definition, Star Trek.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Evade wrote: »
    Yes, and that's why they're the bad guys. Having the main cast believing the ends justify the means is pretty antithetical to Star Treks usual message.

    But is it the main cast? The only callousness came from Saru really, and I think that was over compensation in his part while trying to play captain for a spell. Everyone else in the cast were on Burnham's side once the animals sentience was confirmed. Lorca is obviously an other matter, but that seems to be the point - never once has he been made appear the hero, or sympathetic antihero even.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 916 ✭✭✭1hnr79jr65


    Spear wrote: »
    Anyone else reckon Ash Tyler is a setup and a double agent?

    Potential future episode spoiler:
    Edit: seems my cynicism is confirmed by some casting info.

    The Klingon captain bleed green when Lorca shot bulkhead beside her, i reckon she is part romulan based on what she said about spies.

    Also in previous episode Voq was tolk he would have to give up everything to get into position of power. What if Tyler is Voq who is genetically reconstructed to appear human and given Tylers "life" to inflitrate Discovery to learn about the spore drive and potentially steal it ? Ala Arne Darvin from original series.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,465 ✭✭✭MOH


    This was my favourite episode so far - it did a good job developing the core characters a bit more and finally introduced the final series regular in Ash Tyler

    "Hello? This is Clem Fandango. Can you hear me, Lorca?"


    Thought it was solid enough, although it did occur to me that launching the tardigrade into space was based on an assumption that might have backfired massively, and led to an awkward conversation:

    "Your job is to find a way to end the tardigrade's suffering."
    - "No problem, Saru. I fired it out an airlock. It's not suffering any more."
    *Saru's threat ganglia go into overdrive*


  • Advertisement
Advertisement