Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How would YOU get more EVs on the road

  • 12-03-2017 11:13pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 507 ✭✭✭


    I'm a newbie, I have my Leaf for just under a month,heading for 1500 kms a great experience but mine is mostly driving around Cork City we have been as as far as Clonakilty and Fermoy but mostly its around the city.
    I was wondering, given the powers what would you folk who have been on the EV game a lot long change to get more EVs on the road
    Now you cant change cars or technology the type of things I am interested in is what could say a Government or a Local authority do...and why dont they do them
    So for example should all EVs NOT pay toll charges, (Including the m50) should ESB give a commitment that all charging will be free for the next X years.
    I got my card giving free parking in the Park and Ride in COrk the other day do other local authories do the same, is this applicable to the Luas

    Any other ideas


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Great idea for a thread! Some stuff that could easily be implemented and won't cost much (for now while there are few EVs)

    - free motor tax
    - free tolls
    - free parking in designated charging / parking spots nationwide
    - only grant planning for any housing if EV chargers for all units are included
    - more public charging points (really on every single National road and motorway every 50km a dual / quadruple station)
    - existing subsidies of €5k + €5k VRT discount are more than generous already
    - extend free home charge point for another 5,000 new EV buyers

    I don't feel the free public charging is such a big deal. Sure, keep it going for a bit if that gets more people to buy EVs, but personally I'd prefer more charge points with paid for charging than the existing setup.

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭Evd-Burner


    Free tolls and on street parking for EV's for a defined amount of time.

    Massive uptake in charger locations along motorways and multiple chargers at each location. With a cost per minute when the car starts to charge below a certain kwh rate. Eliminating the infrastructure being under utilised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,035 ✭✭✭goz83


    *Keep the existing subsidies in place.
    *Rollout a better CP network.
    -charge small fee for charging on motorway laybys (€1 for 30 mins).
    -make it mandatory for petrol stations to have 1 CP for every 5 fuel pumps.
    -make it mandatory for Management Companies to supply a certain number of CPs per unit and have reviewed every 3 years.
    -give employers tax credits and subsidies for providing free/reduced fee CPs.
    -subsidy for one home CP, where buying new, or used.
    *No motor tax for first 3 years.



    I know the following would encourage more EV purchases, but I disagree with them.

    *No motor tax.
    -I think it's ok for a while, but I do think some motortax should be paid and I also think motor tax should be spent on roads.
    *Free parking at public CPs where ICE cars must pay.
    -this encourages people to block CPs when they don't need a charge.
    *Bus lane use.
    -Should only be used by public transport and emergency vehicles.
    -difficult to police as more EVs look like regular ICE cars.
    -Sheep factor. EVs drive in bus lane. ICE cars follow, thinking its ok to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Auto bollard protection for public CPs. eCars users get a fob they press, bollard drops giving access to the charge space. ICEing gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,547 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    • Punishment and fines for people selfishly using charge points to charge their car
    • No motor tax until market penetration reaches 20% of the fleet and then a flat €100
    • All new car parks to have enough charge points to cover 10% of the number of cars parked in them.
    • Allowed use the bus lanes
    • Bring in clear policy on when or if public charging points will be fee paying
    • Free tolls
    • Free parking on all onstreet parking
    • Have an app designed to analyse an ICE users driving to tell them what % of their driving could be done in an electric car


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,155 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    Treat PHEV and hybrids like ICE cars for road tax.

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,708 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Looking for everything here!

    Already a very generous €5k + €5k Gov Subsidy.

    The infrastructure is decent, it will improve with time so I'd let commercial lead the way there.

    All I'd ask is..

    EV's to get a low tax rate, say €30/year
    Free parking WHILST CHARGING
    Use of bus/taxi lanes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,184 ✭✭✭SteM


    slave1 wrote: »
    Looking for everything here!

    Already a very generous €5k + €5k Gov Subsidy.

    The infrastructure is decent, it will improve with time so I'd let commercial lead the way there.

    All I'd ask is..

    EV's to get a low tax rate, say €30/year
    Free parking WHILST CHARGING
    Use of bus/taxi lanes

    Would be totally against this. Buses crawl in the city centre as it is, the last thing we need is more vehicles in bus lanes. It might encourage EV uptake but it will discourage public transport use.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    I think the biggest issue affecting low take up is lack of vehicle choice and range.
    More vehicle types mpv's, estates etc longer range and a lot more would be driving them. If you need to carry two buggies in the booth then your unlikely to get an electric vehicle.

    With anything so different most people want the reassurance of actually knowing someone with the car so as they slowly become more common there should be a tipping point, at the moment given how people are so much more vocal with bad experiences you are as likely to hear a friend of a friend had awful problems as something positive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,184 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Mandatory charge points in all new builds.
    Has to be on the list.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,990 ✭✭✭stesaurus


    It's not just about getting new users on the road. It's about having a positive experience and keeping them in an EV also. We're at the tipping point now in regards infrastructure IMO. They are a lot busier lately and a lot of queuing on weekends. With a number of new Ioniqs due and nicer weather there's going to be a huge strain. Something needs to be brought in to discourage users unless they need it. It's so frustrating waiting at an FCP for a local to finish up getting their free juice when you are actually in need to get home.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 226 ✭✭PAKNET


    Subsidy or grant for installing a 32A home charger and associated required electrical upgrades (advanced ESB supply, electrical shower priority switch, etc.).

    Special electricity night rate - perhaps a separate e-car meter - for those charging their eCar.
    I don't think there should be free or subsidised on-street parking, at least at peak time.
    The electrical grid is relatively quiet at night versus during the day yet all of the baseload power stations must still stay online and generating through the night. Make use of that unused power that would otherwise end up burnt needlessly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,795 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    I don't think government should be over subsidising ev use.
    What is in place in terms of grants etc is fair. perhaps bring certainty to long teem charge costs for on street charging and some more charge points but other than that I believe the main issue is range. This is not the subject this thread so no point saying any more.
    I do believe that promoting phev may do more for the cause than anything else. You will easily get drivers into a phev as it has none of the range issues. Those drivers may then find that most of their driving is in electric mode and be happy to go full electric next time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,035 ✭✭✭goz83


    PAKNET wrote: »
    Subsidy or grant for installing a 32A home charger and associated required electrical upgrades (advanced ESB supply, electrical shower priority switch, etc.).

    Special electricity night rate - perhaps a separate e-car meter - for those charging their eCar.
    I don't think there should be free or subsidised on-street parking, at least at peak time.
    The electrical grid is relatively quiet at night versus during the day yet all of the baseload power stations must still stay online and generating through the night. Make use of that unused power that would otherwise end up burnt needlessly.

    Brilliant idea. Won't happen though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,795 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    It might but it will be special as in about 5 times the price.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭grogi


    discostu1 wrote: »
    Any other ideas

    The easiest and with the biggest environment impact free parking in the centres in designated spots.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,771 ✭✭✭niallb


    Change in conditions for renewing an "Auto-Fuel Trader’s Licence".

    The Auto Fuel trader must make available for use at the premises where fuel is sold Electric Charge points conforming to standards.

    The cost of the installation and upkeep of these units will be reclaimable 100% from the duty paid on fuel vended.

    If every garage in the country had charge points in 18 months, there'd be a lot less need to worry about range.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,808 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    To get people into the cars, I would have free road tax for 5 years and then a reduced fee long term.

    To keep them on the roads there needs to be investment in the infrastructure and unfortunately the only way that is likely to be possible is to introduce charges. If charges are to come in, they must be fair and reasonable, i.e. not the nonsense proposal from the other year.

    For every driver who is encouraged into an EV because of a more reliable infrastructure, more will be out off by outlandish charges like an €18 monthly subscription.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,277 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    I think the free charging, free parking, free tolls, cheaper tax etc wont help enough to make any serious impact on the number of EV sales!

    We already have very generous incentives for EV (€5k grant, €5k VRT exemption, free home charge point, free charging) and the uptake is dismal. Free parking, tolls and motor tax would have only a minor effect.

    What is needed is more stick than carrot. Average Joe cares about his pocket ALOT more than any free charging or home charger point and they simply don’t understand/trust the savings. What Average Joe needs is the motor tax and VRT on his new ICE to go up progressively over the next 5 budgets. This sends a clear signal from the government that diesel is dead and will become more and more expensive to run and THEN Average Joe will look around and see what the alternatives are.

    Its basically the same as the 2008 tax rate changes. That “immediately” changed behaviour and that’s whats required again.

    All the other things like free tolls, use of bus lanes etc are just icing on the cake. They wont cause mass change. You have to make ICE “unaffordable”.

    I don’t think we should allow EV’s into bus lanes. Its for public transport, leave it for that as that is what the government should be encouraging even before EV’s.

    The only other thing that needs to change, which is somewhat outside the governments control, is to have more affordable EV’s with range of 200km+.



    The top two that I would implement if I had the power is:
    - Increase motor tax and VRT for new ICE. Possibly reduce motor tax for EV’s, but not absolutely required. The main thing is to increase it for ICE to create a gap between them.
    - A government sponsored media campaign to debunk the myths and highlight the positives. Not sure if that would be considered interfering in the market and favouring one set of manufacturers to another?!

    I'm hoping that the Low Emission Vehicle Taskforce will recommend the above two. The "Alternative Fuels for Transport" consultation suggested it also so hopefully it will happen.


    I’d also support continuing with the current incentives and add free charging, free tolls, free parking, free charge point and, of course, more charge points but that’s a big ask while its still free. These incentives should remain in place until X% of the car fleet is EV. Not sure what X should be… budget dependent I suppose but surely 10% anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    This is from a person who is not a Electric Vehicle owner yet, what I would like to see

    * Subsidized charge point installation for new owner, so not 2000 free, loads free but only 50% of cost
    * Option to pay off charge point installation over set period 12-24 months. Whatever makes sense
    * Lower toll charges at government tolls, not all tolls run by government but the ones they do have a lower fee(they will not go free)
    * For older people more explanation of Electric Cars and free electricity option. So they could use instead of petrol/diesel when they cannot afford. Most journey by older/retired are less than 50km and they have bus pass for longer distance
    * BIK for company vehicles should be changed to reflect greener cars. I think this is in UK. The stupid system is now out dated. If I wanted to go for electric car as new company car it would cost me more. First off they take the list price as BIK. Then you get diesel/petrol car so the more you use the more you get off BIK. Nuts.....

    Before all of this there needs to be a better choice of electric cars.

    You cant just blanket kill everyone on diesel/petrol. Some people need 7 seaters etc and there is no electric versions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭zilog_jones


    There need to be better rights for charging installations for tenants and those with only street parking.

    I also think there should be more effort from commercial entities to install public chargers, even if they're not free, e.g. at car parks, petrol stations, etc. Obviously the budget isn't there for the ESB, and we're not going to get very far if we rely solely on them.

    Free motor tax would also help - even if it doesn't make that much difference financially, it's always something people are looking at when buying cars and would be a significant incentive.
    Treat PHEV and hybrids like ICE cars for road tax.

    I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but all passenger cars (post 2008) pay motor tax based on CO2 emissions - hybrids are not treated any differently, they just have lower emissions based on the standard tests, and they're not cheating on them like diesels are ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,277 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    You cant just blanket kill everyone on diesel/petrol. Some people need 7 seaters etc and there is no electric versions.

    I agree, which is why it should be done gradually over successive budgets. I'm in the 7-seater brigade so Im cutting my own throat there.

    I'd also target diesel more than petrol and push the petrol PHEV agenda. That might get some 7-seater petrol PHEV's to appear on the market. I think we are a long way off(5-10yrs) having affordable BEV 7-seaters that have decent range.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 262 ✭✭boobycharlton


    Ridiculous that people are actually looking for bus lane use, free tolls and free city centre parking. Just because your car is less environmentally​ damaging doesn't give you divine right to clog up already overburdened urban areas. If people really gave a fcuk about the environment they'd use PT.

    Everything possible should be done to discourage private car use in cities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    Using Bus lanes, free tolls and parking I'd disagree with as they are congestion issues which will always be there with personal transport otherwise as stated above its about making the gap in cost significant between electric and ice. Would prefer if electric would be cheaper but of course the route taken would be to make ice dearer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,990 ✭✭✭stesaurus


    Nobody feels we have a divine right to anything. It's about encouraging users to a 'better' alternative and unfortunately a mix of incentives is needed for Joe Public to take interest. The point of the topic is to encourage users into EV's rather than locally polluting diesel and petrol cars. You can't remove private use vehicles from cities. That's just not possible. So the next best solution are EV's which don't pollute our cities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,184 ✭✭✭SteM


    s.welstead wrote: »
    Nobody feels we have a divine right to anything. It's about encouraging users to a 'better' alternative and unfortunately a mix of incentives is needed for Joe Public to take interest. The point of the topic is to encourage users into EV's rather than locally polluting diesel and petrol cars. You can't remove private use vehicles from cities. That's just not possible. So the next best solution are EV's which don't pollute our cities.

    Surely the next best is promoting public transport and ensuring it can move within the city?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,990 ✭✭✭stesaurus


    SteM wrote: »
    Surely the next best is promoting public transport and ensuring it can move within the city?

    Public transport that suits everyone is pie in the sky stuff. Well until they invent matter transporters :D
    To get a working PT network that served everyone's needs would cost billions and that's just for Dublin. What about outside of that?
    Private vehicle ownership isn't disappearing anytime soon.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,708 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Actually, I think we're missing a beat here, based on my experience with dealers here they are brutal.
    They openly admitted to my wife that if she had been researching on the internet then she'd know more than them.

    How much confidence would this inspire, I did not do a Leaf test drive but asked my better half to ask some questions and they had not got a clue, not a clue. I don't think they were the slightest bit interested in selling her a Leaf, when she asked what trade in our Avensis would get they said €2.5k to €3k even though it's €4k/€5k for a Leaf, I often wondered if she asked about an ICE would the figure have gone up to €4k.

    So, the dealers are part of the problem, I don't know if it's their mindset (no on-going maintenance at the same level so less long term revenue stream) or just lack of investment in training but they are brutal.
    UK no better, the guys don't know the difference between a 3.3 or 6.6 Leaf...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,184 ✭✭✭SteM


    s.welstead wrote: »
    Public transport that suits everyone is pie in the sky stuff. Well until they invent matter transporters :D
    To get a working PT network that served everyone's needs would cost billions and that's just for Dublin. What about outside of that?
    Private vehicle ownership isn't disappearing anytime soon.

    Who said a public transport system that suited everyone? They're your words. I just suggest having a public transport system that is usable.

    So you're suggesting essentially killing the public transport system in Dublin in order to increase EV uptake? It's as unrealistic a proposal as me proposing a 95% subsidy for new EV sales imo. We should be trying to get taxis out of bus lanes, not trying to get more vehicles into them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,751 ✭✭✭pawrick


    The main reason I probably wont switch to EV soon is:
    lack of vehicle choice - I need a large enough boot for my dog and carrying boxes in an average estate/suv form factor

    Other than that some things which would help imo is:
    Employers having to provide charge points on site - I'm sure something could be swung to make installation cost neutral by the gov if they wanted.
    All new homes/apartment blocks to have a charge point or charge station
    Maybe a similar scheme to the bike to work one offered there could be one for upgrading to EV from an ICE
    More readily available for test drives at main dealers around the country.

    Things i dont think will help:
    Reducing tax - it's already very low compared to what most pay for diesel or petrol vehicles
    Bus lanes access - means nothing to me living outside of the city + when I was living in Dublin I used public transport every day and this would have p*ssed me off if it caused me additional delays.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,990 ✭✭✭stesaurus


    SteM wrote: »
    Who said a public transport system that suited everyone? They're your words. I just suggest having a public transport system that is usable.

    So you're suggesting essentially killing the public transport system in Dublin in order to increase EV uptake? It's as unrealistic a proposal as me proposing a 95% subsidy for new EV sales imo. We should be trying to get taxis out of bus lanes, not trying to get more vehicles into them.

    Look we're going around in circles here of missing each other's point. I don't want to kill off public transport.
    All I'm saying is it is a hell of a lot easier to move the vast majority of motorists from ice to EV rather than public transport.
    Allowing EV's to use bus lanes would encourage uptake no doubt about it. Numbers are still tiny and there wouldn't be any real impact for the short term. After EVs reach critical mass then remove that privilege.

    In an ideal world there would be a mixed approach with private vehicles nowhere near city centres but we are a few generations away from that possibility.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,155 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    There need to be better rights for charging installations for tenants and those with only street parking.

    I also think there should be more effort from commercial entities to install public chargers, even if they're not free, e.g. at car parks, petrol stations, etc. Obviously the budget isn't there for the ESB, and we're not going to get very far if we rely solely on them.

    Free motor tax would also help - even if it doesn't make that much difference financially, it's always something people are looking at when buying cars and would be a significant incentive.



    I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but all passenger cars (post 2008) pay motor tax based on CO2 emissions - hybrids are not treated any differently, they just have lower emissions based on the standard tests, and they're not cheating on them like diesels are ;)

    They are occupying charging spots all day for the free parking and not even charging: 50% of the charging spots in Malahide are occupied Monday to Friday by two PHEVs: one a Volvo T8 [161 D 29500] with a e-range of 11 miles in the dart station. the other a 330e BMW [162 D 16564] with an e-range of 40km in the village.

    That is complete bo$$ox, especially since the e cars app say the spaces are available.


    As for not cheating/standard tests.... more oxo

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    s.welstead wrote: »
    All I'm saying is it is a hell of a lot easier to move the vast majority of motorists from ice to EV rather than public transport.

    Actually 81% of shoppers in Dublin City Center get their by walking, cycling and public transport.

    Along the quays, buses carry almost 10 times as many people per hour as cars do and in fact there are now almost as many cyclists on the quays per hour as there are cars!

    Many people have already made the shift from cars to public transport as shown by the canal counts which have shown a steady decline in the number of cars entering the canals over the last 20 years, with walking, cycling and public transport trending up every year.

    This trend will get even stronger with the plans (quays car ban and College Green car ban) to greatly reduce cars in the city center due to the Luas Cross City.

    Given the medieval nature of Dublin City streets and the massively growing population, there simply isn't the space on our streets for cars of any type. Instead the space needs to be given over to more efficient means of transport.

    EV's are great and all, but they simply aren't a solution to the horrible congestion of Dublin City Center.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭newacc2015


    I don't think the Government should be aggressively subsidising car ownership. If they want an uptake in EV, make ICE less attractive. Slap a massive tax on new ICE cars, more heavily tax fuels ie diesel and petrol, higher road tax, ban diesels from cities etc( I think owning a dirty diesel should be banned anyway, most people with modern Diesels dont need them).

    Instead of making EV as attractive as a ICE with giveaways, just make ICE less attractive


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭pwurple


    I think incentives for ev in city center is a great idea. Zero emissions, less noise. Would make cities more pleasant for everyone. Is there such thing as an ev bin lorry? So noisy!

    The market loves a bit of certainty. Firm up how long the charging will be free, so that people won't feel like eejits buying a car and then the public charging being removed. Say 5 years free, then under review.

    Company incentives for chargers. Where i work currently has heaps of chargers, and the ev's followed. We now have to call eachother to get a charge slot. (And the power is provided by their wind turbine... warm fussy feeling) Those chargers were provided by nissan though. A tax rebate on the install would be nice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,184 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    pwurple wrote: »
    I think incentives for ev in city center is a great idea. Zero emissions, less noise. Would make cities more pleasant for everyone. Is there such thing as an ev bin lorry? So noisy!

    The market loves a bit of certainty. Firm up how long the charging will be free, so that people won't feel like eejits buying a car and then the public charging being removed. Say 5 years free, then under review.

    Company incentives for chargers. Where i work currently has heaps of chargers, and the ev's followed. We now have to call eachother to get a charge slot. (And the power is provided by their wind turbine... warm fussy feeling) Those chargers were provided by nissan though. A tax rebate on the install would be nice.

    Even if Charging isn't free.

    How many people on the street know it's 120 to tax and 4 euro to fill it....

    ..

    ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    €2 to fill it!

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,795 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    newacc2015 wrote: »
    I don't think the Government should be aggressively subsidising car ownership. If they want an uptake in EV, make ICE less attractive. Slap a massive tax on new ICE cars, more heavily tax fuels ie diesel and petrol, higher road tax, ban diesels from cities etc( I think owning a dirty diesel should be banned anyway, most people with modern Diesels dont need them).

    Instead of making EV as attractive as a ICE with giveaways, just make ICE less attractive

    That's idiotic. I don't like diesels but there are a large portion of drivers who absolutely need one. You think motoring isn't expensive enough?
    Personally a phev will suit me and I plan I getting one but full electric is years away for most given range issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    mickdw wrote: »
    That's idiotic. I don't like diesels but there are a large portion of drivers who absolutely need one. You think motoring isn't expensive enough?
    Personally a phev will suit me and I plan I getting one but full electric is years away for most given range issues.

    Close to getting one for a 60km each way commute. I think they are far more attractive for people with a commute who can make fuel savings. I have a fast charger enroute and work open to allow me get a charger there if needs be.

    Obviously many do need a longer journey and diesel is a necessity but for the majority of diesel drivers they are completely not needed. I cant see the motor tax not going up for them.
    What kind of range do you think would suit most? Even on a 24kw leaf with a 6.6kw charger you get about 120km range and can charge about 40km an hour at home. Cant see that not suiting most people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,277 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    mickdw wrote: »
    That's idiotic. I don't like diesels but there are a large portion of drivers who absolutely need one. You think motoring isn't expensive enough?
    Personally a phev will suit me and I plan I getting one but full electric is years away for most given range issues.

    The higher taxes should be on diesel. Petrol PHEV should get an exemption for those where BEV doesnt suit.

    The problem with that is the lack of choice but by the time the government here do anything hopefully there will be alot more available including more BEV where 200+ km is possible all year round.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,611 ✭✭✭✭josip


    1. Find out all the TDs who have children/grandchildren in creches or school.
    2. Measure the PM 2.5/10 and NOx outside those creche/school gates during drop off and collection.
    3. Sit back and wait for the legislation to be passed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,808 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    josip wrote: »
    1. Find out all the TDs who have children/grandchildren in creches or school.
    2. Measure the PM 2.5/10 and NOx outside those creche/school gates during drop off and collection.
    3. Sit back and wait for the legislation to be passed.

    I reckon you'd have a visit by some burly men in suits once stage 1 was complete, lol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,611 ✭✭✭✭josip


    DrPhilG wrote: »
    I reckon you'd have a visit by some burly men in suits once stage 1 was complete, lol.

    They don't wear leather jackets any more?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,087 ✭✭✭isnottheword


    - An official change in the tax code to ensure that BIK doesn't come into play for the provision of EV chargepoints in the workplace - to encourage employers to offer free charging or charging at industrial rates (in the cases of large employers as they don't pay the residential prices we pay for electricity).
    - For major employers above a certain scale, planning permission to be subject to the provision of EV chargepoints.
    - A very sympathetic fee paying regime to be implemented.....ONLY to encourage more efficient use of the existing infrastructure. It can be increased (and you can be sure it will!) once there is significant EV take-up.
    - Tax free until 20% market penetration. I appreciate that we're not going to stop .gov gathering up taxes. If they don't take it in motor tax, then they will implement in some other way. However, a stay can be placed on it - until the numbers of EV's on the road go up.
    - The additional 'nightrate' ground rent to be abolished. This shouldn't be in place regardless of EV's in any event.
    - Shore up the integrity of the existing infrastructure by ensuring that ecars map is updated in real time - so that users can have faith in the mapping/reporting....removing the uncertainty when it comes to trip planning.
    - Better siting of EV chargepoints.
    - All chargepoints to be marked out properly - painted and signed.
    - Chargepoints to be positioned in places where fines can be imposed for those that abandon EV's (i.e No longer charging at all) OR for those that 'ICE' charging bays.
    - All new builds to have wiring in place for charging points.
    - All new shopping centres to have a planning stipulation that insists on provision of charging points.
    - More public charging points. At this embryonic stage, .gov have to take a hit on the cost of that. When the sea-change happens, then economies of scale will kick in. I don't think any private entity will ever make a fortune from chargepoints. There will always be a level of state-subvention required.
    - A far higher standard of Service Level Agreement (SLA) to be put in place with regard to the repair and servicing of public charging points. I think everyone appreciates that there's no standard at all right now. Whilst I appreciate that Ecars are taking the approach that they don't have the finances, .gov have to step in and finance.
    - existing subsidies of €5k + €5k VRT discount are perfectly adequate. Leave as is.
    - gently increase the tax on new diesel vehicles year on year. Someone suggested this is 'idiotic' - I don't agree. The reality is that there are far more people who could drive EV right now than is accepted.
    - 'chargebump' functionality to be built into the ecars app - in order to promote greater cooperation between EV drivers in their use of the public infrastructure without their being any data protection/privacy issue (i.e. without them having to disclose their phone number).



    Things not to do ....
    - Allow EVs on bus lanes. Buses need to be given every opportunity to run more efficiently. Secondly, if you go down this road, you have to re-educate drivers as to what's possible. Before you know it, there will then have to be a re-education process when they ban EV's from bus lanes again (as ultimately there WILL be greater EV take-up - it's just a matter of when).
    - Provide a 'grant' or 'free' install for home chargepoints. If ever there's a grant provided in Ireland for the installation of something, contractors simply tack it on to the price of the install. Chargepoints should be purchased in bulk by some state body and sold at a reasonable cost onwards to consumers - with them taking responsibility for install using their local RECI registered sparks. Chargepoint install is not a specialist operation - any registered competent electrician can install. Furthermore, there is no earthly way an install costs anywhere near the claimed €1000.


    Lastly, technological development in terms of increased range at an affordable level is not a policy decision. Notwithstanding that, it's clear as night and day that it's in the works - given the uplifts we've already seen year-on-year in achievable range - and launches imminent over the next 24 months for greater range still.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,277 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    - The additional 'nightrate' ground rent to be abolished. This shouldn't be in place regardless of EV's in any event.

    I agree with most of what you've written. A good wish list.

    What is the above one though? I dont understand that one!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,808 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    KCross wrote: »
    I agree with most of what you've written. A good wish list.

    What is the above one though? I dont understand that one!

    The higher standing charge applied for those who use night rate electric? That's what I guessed he/she meant, may be wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,087 ✭✭✭isnottheword


    DrPhilG wrote: »
    The higher standing charge applied for those who use night rate electric? That's what I guessed he/she meant, may be wrong.

    Yes, that's what I'm referring to. It's in the esb's interests (even before the advent of EV's) to encourage offsetting electricity use to off-peak times. Why disincentivise people from going that direction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭zilog_jones


    They are occupying charging spots all day for the free parking and not even charging: 50% of the charging spots in Malahide are occupied Monday to Friday by two PHEVs: one a Volvo T8 [161 D 29500] with a e-range of 11 miles in the dart station. the other a 330e BMW [162 D 16564] with an e-range of 40km in the village.

    That is a failure of the owners of these cars, and a failure of the public charging infrastructure in that there are no repercussions for people who abuse the system. PHEVs are not the problem here. Someone could do a 10km commute with a BEV and do the same.

    Also there is the expectation that charging points at train stations are for commuters, i.e. people who are going to be parked there for the day. It's not a great situation considering the lack of infrastructure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,035 ✭✭✭goz83


    Ridiculous that people are actually looking for bus lane use, free tolls and free city centre parking. Just because your car is less environmentally​ damaging doesn't give you divine right to clog up already overburdened urban areas. If people really gave a fcuk about the environment they'd use PT.

    Everything possible should be done to discourage private car use in cities.

    I agree with the sentiment of your post. EVs should not be allowed in bus lanes. But there are numerous issue with our PT network.

    If PT was cheap, clean, reliable and properly connected, more would use it. Instead, it's often cheaper for me to drive a large petrol car 10 klms into the city and pay for 2 hours of parking if more than myself and the wife are going in. Then you have to put up with noisy school kids, scrotes smoking hash, or generally vandalising the bus (route dependant) or the constant threat of strikes and closures. The whole leap card thing is a complete disincentive for occasional bus users too.

    The powers that be are already discouraging private cars in the city. It's not a pleasant experience to drive in DCC because of all the one way streets, no turn right/left, buses or taxis only, which add huge amounts of time onto a journey if you're trying to get from one side of the city to the other.
    slave1 wrote: »

    So, the dealers are part of the problem, I don't know if it's their mindset (no on-going maintenance at the same level so less long term revenue stream) or just lack of investment in training but they are brutal.
    UK no better, the guys don't know the difference between a 3.3 or 6.6 Leaf...

    They're not great in the UK, but they are miles ahead of the Irish dealers. :D

    The dealers I contacted actually made an effort to contact me back.

    Hyundai in Swords still haven't called me. At the time I took a short test drive, I was an enthusiastic person, very likely to buy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,671 ✭✭✭GarIT


    100% free electric cars. I read that is was trialled in India and planned for a wider rollout. The state pays for the car completely and a large tax is added onto the electricity that you use to charge the car to pay the value back. e.g you'd get a totally free car and would be paying €0.40-0.50 per unit of electricity until the car is paid off.

    BMW have announced they will cease all petrol car production in 2030. Some countries have considered banning the sale of new petrol or diesel cars in 2025. We should follow their lead and ban the sale of new fossil fuel based private vehicles by 2030.

    In the meantime, we should have increasing targets, dealers must pay something like €5k on every vehicle being sold if more than 95% of their sales to private customers have used fossil fuels. That 95% should be decreased by 5% per year.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement