Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Volkswagen recall letter relating to emissions scandal

  • 25-08-2016 9:27am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭


    So we got a letter from VW Ireland saying that our car (2011 Passat Estate) needs a Software Update. The letter refers to previous correspondence but we did not receive any previous letters.

    I understand that this has something to do with the emissions issue. I have phoned them and the guy I spoke to on the phone really couldn't explain to me what this update does and has said that this update will have no effect on the car.

    Maybe I am missing something here (I would not be knowledgeable at all about cars) but if it will have no effect at all then what is the point of doing it ?

    Should we have this done or not ? V confused here.

    Thanks in advance.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    Maybe I am missing something here (I would not be knowledgeable at all about cars) but if it will have no effect at all then what is the point of doing it ?
    .

    That, as they say, is the $10,000 question. Well, if you were in the states it would be worth $10k to you.

    In Europe it's your fuel and time off work in exchange for ... :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    I suppose the update is to correct the cheating computer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,268 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    Ask can it be reversed if you are not happy with the results, slower, more mpg, etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Ask can it be reversed if you are not happy with the results, slower, more mpg, etc.

    I'd want that in writing from anyone saying "it has no effect" over the phone!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    biko wrote: »
    I suppose the update is to correct the cheating computer.

    I actually asked the guy on the phone was the Update to correct how the emissions were recorded on the car and he said No. At one point he said that it was to delete Software already installed and then said that it was to install software not installed and when I questioned this he said that it would have no effect whatsoever on the car so I gave up at that point !

    I suppose I am wondering from a practical day-to-day use of the car what differences will I see myself ? Has anyone had it done already ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,505 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    As far as I know what it does is turns off the cheat mechanism so that if the EU tester restested the car for emissions they would be anything up to 4 times what they were originally recorded at. The cheat mechanism only kicked in when it detected conditions that were used for testing, your car should continuing emitting the same levels of emissions as it currently does for driving the car.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭zilog_jones


    Sounds like he doesn't have a clue what he's on about.

    If it is the update to remove the "defeat device" software, there is no way it will have "no effect" on the performance of the engine and magically reduce emissions. However I have not seen any real feedback from European VW owners who've had the update to see how it does affect the car.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭zilog_jones


    As far as I know what it does is turns off the cheat mechanism so that if the EU tester restested the car for emissions they would be anything up to 4 times what they were originally recorded at. The cheat mechanism only kicked in when it detected conditions that were used for testing, your car should continuing emitting the same levels of emissions as it currently does for driving the car.

    They can't just do that because then it wouldn't be compliant with the EU emissions requirements. It has to be able to perform within EU specs during normal driving without having specific code to cheat the tests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,794 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    The way I see it, either the update has no effect making this a total fudge and a disgrace from vw or
    It does have an effect and it makes the car less powerful or less fuel efficient. VW knew this when building the cars. To suggest that a bit of software can now make everything ok and have no unwanted effects is crazy.
    I wouldnt bother going in for the update.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    mickdw wrote: »
    I wouldnt bother going in for the update.
    It's your choice but not doing so could affect warranty and resale value.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,505 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    They can't just do that because then it wouldn't be compliant with the EU emissions requirements. It has to be able to perform within EU specs during normal driving without having specific code to cheat the tests.

    It would be compliant at time of original test when car was first sold and defeat device was functioning, there's no facility for retorspective testing of cars after the defeat device is turned off so the EU are taking VW's word as gospel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    biko wrote: »
    It's your choice but not doing so could affect warranty and resale value.

    For a 2011 isn't the car out of Warranty ? Am not too worried about re-sale value tbh as we will keep this car until it is fit for the scrap-heap !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,339 ✭✭✭✭LoLth


    2 thoughts:

    1. could this software update be to do with the security certificate leak that needs to be replaced?

    2. while the cheating software did alter the performance of the VW cars , was this not only under test conditions (and unsustainable in real world use). In which case the car should functional as normal with the only difference being when it detects a test being performed it doesn't hold in its farts anymore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    LoLth wrote: »
    2 thoughts:

    1. could this software update be to do with the security certificate leak that needs to be replaced?

    2. while the cheating software did alter the performance of the VW cars , was this not only under test conditions (and unsustainable in real world use). In which case the car should functional as normal with the only difference being when it detects a test being performed it doesn't hold in its farts anymore.

    1) Do you mean the cracking of the rolling code for the remote unlocking? No, I don't think that can be fixed with a "flash"

    2) I don't think that's how it works tbh. It must now run in a less efficient mode all the time to reign in the NOX emissions, afaik


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭George Dalton


    mickdw wrote: »
    The way I see it, either the update has no effect making this a total fudge and a disgrace from vw or
    It does have an effect and it makes the car less powerful or less fuel efficient. VW knew this when building the cars. To suggest that a bit of software can now make everything ok and have no unwanted effects is crazy.
    I wouldnt bother going in for the update.

    Exactly.

    The absolute best case scenario is that after the update power and fuel economy are unaffected. So there is no possible benefit to getting it done and plenty of probable disadvantages.

    So why anyone would bother getting it done at all is beyond me. It makes no sense whatsoever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭darragh o meara


    I had my passat (2008 2.0 TDI PD170 )in a main dealers recently for a new key and they did a software update while it was there, not sure what it was for only that it was outstanding for the car. Afterwards it certainly wasn't as quick as it was going in, however I havent noticed a drop in mpg or anything else for that matter.

    I'm heading back to them this evening for key no 2 so will find out if it was the emissions recall they did.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    So why anyone would bother getting it done at all is beyond me. It makes no sense whatsoever.

    You'd do it if Winterkorn was firing the benjamins at you though!

    giphy.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭3rdDegree


    Exactly.

    The absolute best case scenario is that after the update power and fuel economy are unaffected. So there is no possible benefit to getting it done and plenty of probable disadvantages.

    So why anyone would bother getting it done at all is beyond me. It makes no sense whatsoever.

    Will it have any affect on future NCT's?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭George Dalton


    Of course not. Why would it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭coastwatch


    I had the software update done on a 2011 skoda yeti 2.0tdi last week. It was in a main dealer for a service and I got a call during the day to say it was due the update, but they had to ask for permission first. They confirmed there would be no performance / fuel economy impact so I said go ahead.

    Haven't noticed any change in performance and I wouldn't expect it if the update is just disabling the software that only kicked in during certain testing. Apparently some people are declining the update in the hope of a european vw payout similar to the US. Dont think it will ever happen.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭3rdDegree


    Of course not. Why would it?

    The car cheats on emissions and now they know. Why wouldn't it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Truckermal


    I got it done on a A4 and no difference in power or MPG.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,505 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    3rdDegree wrote: »
    The car cheats on emissions and now they know. Why wouldn't it?

    NCT doesn't test emissions contents on any diesel cars, only petrol.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    coastwatch wrote: »
    Haven't noticed any change in performance and I wouldn't expect it if the update is just disabling the software that only kicked in during certain testing.

    lol. Vw left themselves open to this debacle for no gain????yeah right


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭9935452


    I had my passat (2008 2.0 TDI PD170 )in a main dealers recently for a new key and they did a software update while it was there, not sure what it was for only that it was outstanding for the car. Afterwards it certainly wasn't as quick as it was going in, however I havent noticed a drop in mpg or anything else for that matter.

    I'm heading back to them this evening for key no 2 so will find out if it was the emissions recall they did.

    Was the carr remapped by any chance?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 57 ✭✭White Ninja


    biko wrote: »
    It's your choice but not doing so could affect warranty and resale value.

    Unless of course it turns out that it does affect power, or fuel consumption, then I would imagine not having it done would help the resale value. I won't be bringing mine in, what they're saying makes no sense at all.
    If somebody buys the car from me and wants it done, VW will probably oblige anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭darragh o meara


    9935452 wrote: »
    Was the carr remapped by any chance?

    No. Not remapped. I've since found out that the car didn't have the emissions update yet. Could well be mind games :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,268 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    I don't believe this 'fix' has no effect on performance of fuel consumption with out effecting emissions. If they can do this why did they cheat in the first place? Something has to give.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    I don't believe this 'fix' has no effect on performance of fuel consumption with out effecting emissions. If they can do this why did they cheat in the first place? Something has to give.

    Indeed, if their emissions control tech can reduce nox to 5% of the output with no emissions control tech in place, and with no impact on fuel consumption or power and driveability.... wouldn't they leave it on all the time?

    Wouldn't they be jumping around the place with pride at this amazing feat of engineering, rather than turning it off after 22 minutes, or outside very specific temperature values corresponding to specified test conditions? Wouldn't they be telling everyone about how good their emissions tech is for air quality ALL the time, and not just enabling it for very very specific scenarios?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭zilog_jones


    NCT doesn't test emissions contents on any diesel cars, only petrol.
    The NCT tests for smoke on diesels, although it's not clear specifically what type of particulates. It's not CO2 or NOx but they are still emissions.
    Truckermal wrote: »
    I got it done on a A4 and no difference in power or MPG.
    Have you been measuring fuel consumption manually before and after? Of course the software updates could easily make "adjustments" to the trip computer to give the impression there is no difference. And would you really be able to tell by feel if it lost, say 10-20 bhp?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 SeamusHollahan


    Hi folks, got a letter last week from volkswagen last week informing me that they need to implement a "technical measure" on my car which involves a software update to the engine. Of course nowhere on the letter do they actually mention that it relates to the emissions scandal! I'm just worried about putting the car in for this update as it might affect fuel consumption etc. They do specify that it it shouldn't affect the fuel consumption or performance but don't believe them! Has anyone had this implemented on their car and if so can you let me know how it went? Would appreciate if anyone could advise if i should go ahead with this update.

    http://campaigncheck.ie/customer-faq/

    Thanks
    S.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭George Dalton


    What year is your car?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 SeamusHollahan


    Its 2012 Golf 1.6 TDI


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭Kevin!


    Hi folks, got a letter last week from volkswagen last week informing me that they need to implement a "technical measure" on my car which involves a software update to the engine. Of course nowhere on the letter do they actually mention that it relates to the emissions scandal! I'm just worried about putting the car in for this update as it might affect fuel consumption etc. They do specify that it it shouldn't affect the fuel consumption or performance but don't believe them! Has anyone had this implemented on their car and if so can you let me know how it went? Would appreciate if anyone could advise if i should go ahead with this update.

    http://campaigncheck.ie/customer-faq/

    Thanks
    S.

    It's beyond me how they can implement a fix that will not sacrifice any of the performance gains acquired from the emissions scandal in return for reducing the emissions levels. Surely they would have just created this software in the first instance if it was possible?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭George Dalton


    I don't see one possible reason why you should get the update done. Why take the risk? There is no upside whatsoever.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 SeamusHollahan


    Hey George, that's my gut reaction also. In addition, they are compensating customers in the US to the tune of $7.5K for the inconvenience of the update as it will affect fuel consumption. How can they say it WILL affection fuel consumption for US cars but not European ones??? Anyway mind definitely made up, there are no positive gains to getting this update done!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭Teddington Cuddlesworth


    Would it ever be likely that revenue would fix the figures for the affected VW's and start charging the relevant tax based on the actual emissions, rather than the assumed emissions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,505 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    Hey George, that's my gut reaction also. In addition, they are compensating customers in the US to the tune of $7.5K for the inconvenience of the update as it will affect fuel consumption. How can they say it WILL affection fuel consumption for US cars but not European ones??? Anyway mind definitely made up, there are no positive gains to getting this update done!!

    An Audi Q5 buyer in Spain did get a ruling of €5000 compensation in their favour, I think that's the only EU case of it, VAG are appealing the ruling though...

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-volkswagen-emissions-spain-idUSKCN12Q24U


    Would it ever be likely that revenue would fix the figures for the affected VW's and start charging the relevant tax based on the actual emissions, rather than the assumed emissions?

    The software fix does not get measured or certified to the new emissions figures by VW nor is it tested by any EU or Irish body so there's no new official figures to confirm or deny the emissions have decreased or increased from what was originally declared by VW that Revenue could use.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,847 ✭✭✭Armchair Andy


    Got the same letter last week am hesitant to get the upgrade done. Biggest concern is the potential rise in fuel consumption. 2010 A6.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,544 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    I don't see one possible reason why you should get the update done. Why take the risk? There is no upside whatsoever.

    This.


    The only argument you could make is an environmental one. But to be fair, driving a car isn't very environmentally friendly either way.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Volkswagen has been tasked with finding fixes in all the affected cars which don’t cause any reduction in fuel consumption.
    As a result, when your car has had the fix applied, you shouldn’t notice any change in fuel economy, and VW has even said the fix may well make its cars even more efficient than they were before.

    src


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭rex-x


    biko wrote: »
    Volkswagen has been tasked with finding fixes in all the affected cars which don’t cause any reduction in fuel consumption.
    As a result, when your car has had the fix applied, you shouldn’t notice any change in fuel economy, and VW has even said the fix may well make its cars even more efficient than they were before.

    src

    The problem is something has to give! You cant keep the same hardware and reduce emissions while maintaining power and effeciency only through software, egr and injection tweaks are really all they have at their disposal to help with this issue and whatever they are doing wont be good news....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,878 ✭✭✭heroics


    biko wrote: »
    Volkswagen has been tasked with finding fixes in all the affected cars which don’t cause any reduction in fuel consumption.
    As a result, when your car has had the fix applied, you shouldn’t notice any change in fuel economy, and VW has even said the fix may well make its cars even more efficient than they were before.

    src

    Does it effect the way it drives though responsiveness etc? Mate in work had the fix done at the recent service without asking for it. He said the car feels different. (2011 A5). He was looking to the it removed but was told they wouldn't do it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,544 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    biko wrote: »
    Volkswagen has been tasked with finding fixes in all the affected cars which don’t cause any reduction in fuel consumption.
    As a result, when your car has had the fix applied, you shouldn’t notice any change in fuel economy, and VW has even said the fix may well make its cars even more efficient than they were before.

    src

    You don't actually believe that though do you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,260 ✭✭✭lau1247


    I drop my car in for service at the start of january due to timing belt change. I think they did the update without asking me (Cannot verify yet, I have yet to check with them).

    Felt grand for the first 2 days.. after that it didn't feel as good and sluggish when it comes to acceleration.. MPG definitely dropped as I used to be able to get close to 400 miles on half tank. Weather isn't even that cold this year. Now I'm getting only about 350 miles on half tank. my driving habit didn't change..

    but i do have a letter at home received a while ago stating that I'm due the recall and that there is no effect on the car. It will be very useful if there is ever a lawsuit on them.

    The only thing I cannot tie it down is whether it is because of timing belt change etc, but if anything it should be more efficient. I need to collect more MPG data before getting back to them about it.

    To sum it up, I still have reservation about it. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if there is no performance related issue after the fix, wouldn't VW have sold the car as is without the bad code in the first place.


    Edit: My car is an Audi A4 B8 2.0 TDI (2009)

    West Dublin, ☀️ 7.83kWp ⚡5.66 kWp South West, ⚡2.18 kWp North East



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭9935452


    lau1247 wrote: »
    I drop my car in for service at the start of january due to timing belt change. I think they did the update without asking me (Cannot verify yet, I have yet to check with them).

    Felt grand for the first 2 days.. after that it didn't feel as good and sluggish when it comes to acceleration.. MPG definitely dropped as I used to be able to get close to 400 miles on half tank. Weather isn't even that cold this year. Now I'm getting only about 350 miles on half tank. my driving habit didn't change..

    but i do have a letter at home received a while ago stating that I'm due the recall and that there is no effect on the car. It will be very useful if there is ever a lawsuit on them.

    The only thing I cannot tie it down is whether it is because of timing belt change etc, but if anything it should be more efficient. I need to collect more MPG data before getting back to them about it.

    To sum it up, I still have reservation about it. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if there is no performance related issue after the fix, wouldn't VW have sold the car as is without the bad code in the first place.


    Edit: My car is an Audi A4 B8 2.0 TDI (2009)

    Out of curiosity how do you measure the half tank.
    400 miles to half tank 800 to full tank?
    I have the same car 09 A4 120bhp.
    When i fill the car with diesel it indicates 670miles can be got from the tank.
    The car is doing 550/600 miles to the tank.
    Chipped the car does 600/650 to the tank.

    A friend has a 08 A4 B8 143bhp which is doing 600 to the tank.

    That said i believe something has to give with their fix , eithre power or economy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 663 ✭✭✭selfbuilder1


    My advice is not to get it done. I got my 1.6TDI Golf done in January and my fuel consumption has gone up since. I was getting an average 4.7l/100km for the last 2 years and since the update I'm getting around 5.4l to 5.2l/100km.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,260 ✭✭✭lau1247


    9935452 wrote: »
    Out of curiosity how do you measure the half tank.
    400 miles to half tank 800 to full tank?
    I have the same car 09 A4 120bhp.
    When i fill the car with diesel it indicates 670miles can be got from the tank.
    The car is doing 550/600 miles to the tank.
    Chipped the car does 600/650 to the tank.

    A friend has a 08 A4 B8 143bhp which is doing 600 to the tank.

    That said i believe something has to give with their fix , eithre power or economy

    Sorry I should have been clearer, the 400 at half tank is just through the tank gauge (Visual). They were consistent over the last two years. Only for the past few weeks since the service that I start to get around 350 miles at half tank so it is very much noticeable.

    Normally (before the last service) from full tank to the first quarter I will get around 220-230 miles, come half tank I get around 400 miles from the odometer. While consumption normally drop again to about 580 miles at three quarter.

    Other than visual, I also track through Road Trip App and fill every time to full so it is not just a guesswork.

    You say your car indicate 670 miles range when you fill to full. On mine, it normally does the same showing 670/675 miles range when filled to full but I get about 100 miles out of it and it will still say 670/675 miles before it start dropping on par with the actual miles traveled (i.e. after 100 miles or so, the trip computer drop rate is matching closely with distance traveled)

    Looking at the Road Trip App records, I can consistently get close to 600 miles at around 54 liters (Out of 60 liters tank). Just for comparison/reference info, I do mixture of driving. 7 days to and from work/shop, on average each trip don't last more than 10 mins. On Friday/Sunday it is long distance driving primarily ranging between 100 to 120 km/hr at 150 miles each way. I'd reckon I'd get more if I have the patience to drive at 80 to 100 km/hr most of the way. Obviously if I'm doing Dublin city driving, the MPG will drop quite a bit again but that was expected anyway.

    Seems like your car is performing quite badly relative to mine (120 bhp, non modified). What is your driving style like? Do you do a lot of short trips?

    Not sure if it make any difference but I always filled at Texaco religiously unless I don't have a choice.

    West Dublin, ☀️ 7.83kWp ⚡5.66 kWp South West, ⚡2.18 kWp North East



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭9935452


    lau1247 wrote: »

    Seems like your car is performing quite badly relative to mine (120 bhp, non modified). What is your driving style like? Do you do a lot of short trips?

    Not sure if it make any difference but I always filled at Texaco religiously unless I don't have a choice.

    I wouldnt say the car is performing badly compared to yours .
    It never does less than 600 miles to the tank which seems to be what you are getting too.
    Thanks 50/50 short and long trips

    Btw the tank on the A4 is actually 65 litres


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement