Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Do you need fish as an option?

2»

Comments

  • #32
    Electric Sheep
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭Electric Sheep


    Mrs OBumble wrote: »
    What would vegetarians eat otherwise?

    Not fish, that is for sure.


  • #33
    PhoenixParker
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,680 ✭✭✭PhoenixParker


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Just out of interest why are vegetarian options always off menu so to speak? Is it more expensive to offer a vegetarian option as part of the main meal or is it the thought that people won't feel happy with their food unless they are given a meat?

    For me the hotel was willing to offer a silent vegetarian option at no extra cost so it would have felt like a waste to use up one of the two main meal choices on the vegetarian dish.

    I have a few relatives who wouldn't eat much meat but knew they'd just ask about a veggie option anyway. It's not like the hotel we're going to check for vegetarian credentials.


  • #34
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 17,735 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We had bacon & cabbage, chicken, or a veggie ravioli.


  • #35
    StripedBoxers
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭StripedBoxers


    Beef and fish definitely.


  • #36
    Second Toughest in_the Freshers
    Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    How much is the fish?


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    Citygirl1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭Citygirl1


    Definitely, have the seabass - certainly, as a guest, that's what I would go for. :)

    Having the beef and turkey/ham just gives two choices of meat, and people not wanting one may not want the other - also, both of these dishes are likely to be quite dry and possibly tasteless. A choice of meat and fish opens things up much more.


  • #38
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 24,774 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Personally I'd much prefer a second meat choice rather than a fish option. I don't mind fish but at a wedding I want a good big feed and plenty of soakage and fish just ain't for that. I love beef but that basically my choice at every wedding bar one that had lamb so I'd be very happy to see a turkey and ham option on the menu.


  • #39
    GingerLily
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,766 ✭✭✭GingerLily


    Yehuda Savory Chinchilla wrote: »
    Personally I'd much prefer a second meat choice rather than a fish option. I don't mind fish but at a wedding I want a good big feed and plenty of soakage and fish just ain't for that. I love beef but that basically my choice at every wedding bar one that had lamb so I'd be very happy to see a turkey and ham option on the menu.

    BUT the beef has you covered, so you don't need to eat the fish!!


Advertisement