Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Did Ulster Bank actual sell their mortgages to Promontoria ( Aran ) Ltd ?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    Sarenco,
    I haven't a clue what that means :confused:
    ultimately even the demands of precedent must yield to the supremacy of European Law.
    You realise that doesn't make sense right?


  • Registered Users Posts: 88 ✭✭Forbearance


    It means you condescending sophist.



    High Court Justice Max Barret must be mixed up then. Bless him.


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,710 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    OP site-banned. Thread closed.

    If anyone wants this thread re-opened, PM me with your reasons and I will take them under advisement.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    It appears, with a bit of investigation, that on the 16/12/2014, Ulster Bank Ireland Limited actually assigned all it' rights, title, interest and benefit to a tranche of it's mortgages to Promontoria Holding 128 B.V. and not Promontoria Aran Ltd as alleged by the bank. Is this fraudulent misrepresentation on behalf of Ulster Bank ? Just what is actually going on ?
    Moderator Post-Script:

    On appeal, it's been found that the loan transfer was in order. The OPs thread title can be answered in the affirmative.
    62. The Court is therefore satisfied that the defendant/applicant has discharged the burden on the balance of probabilities of showing that Promontoria (Aran) Limited has duly acquired Ulster Bank Ireland Limited’s interests in the plaintiff’s loans, facilities and mortgage.

    63. The Court therefore proposes to lift the stay previously imposed on the receivership on the grounds that the defendant has now shown to the plaintiff that it has duly acquired Ulster Bank Ireland Limited’s interests in his loans, facilities and mortgage.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement