Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

'Mary and John's' or 'Mary's and John's'

  • 05-12-2016 8:32pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 603 ✭✭✭


    A grammatical thing I've been wondering about for a while that maybe people can help me with. It's not of great importance, it's just something that been niggling for a while now.

    If you were at the wedding of Mary and John, and you wanted to, say, pop some photos of the day up on Facebook, would you entitle the album 'Mary's and John's Wedding' or 'Mary and John's wedding'. I used to always go with the former. But I then started to doubt myself on it because pretty much everyone I know seems to go with the latter. So I've started going with that. It just seems like the latter way is treating them like a compound! :)

    Can anyone shed light on it for me? I've tried to search Google but don't seem to be phrasing it correctly to find the answer. I'm sure it has been discussed online in many places, I just can't find those places. :)

    Mods, was not sure where to put this so feel free to move it if there is somewhere better suited.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,731 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Mary and John's cats = they jointly own the same cats.

    Mary's and John's cats = they individually own different cats.

    Mary and John's wedding = one wedding - they married each other.

    Mary's and John's weddings = they married different people.

    Mary's and John's wedding = ugly sound.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭maudgonner


    Ant and Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway -> so the second option is correct.


    All life's lessons can be learned from Ant & Dec. :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Eamondomc


    _Jamie_ wrote: »
    A grammatical thing I've been wondering about for a while that maybe people can help me with. It's not of great importance, it's just something that been niggling for a while now.

    If you were at the wedding of Mary and John, and you wanted to, say, pop some photos of the day up on Facebook, would you entitle the album 'Mary's and John's Wedding' or 'Mary and John's wedding'. I used to always go with the former. But I then started to doubt myself on it because pretty much everyone I know seems to go with the latter. So I've started going with that. It just seems like the latter way is treating them like a compound! :)

    Can anyone shed light on it for me? I've tried to search Google but don't seem to be phrasing it correctly to find the answer. I'm sure it has been discussed online in many places, I just can't find those places. :)

    Mods, was not sure where to put this so feel free to move it if there is somewhere better suited.

    Not an English expert, but I would think either would be correct, English is complicated and many versions of texts and phrasing of the same thing are correct I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭maudgonner


    osarusan wrote: »
    Mary and John's cats = the jointly own the same cats.

    Mary's and John's cats = they individually own different cats.

    The correct phrasing here is: Cats' Mary and John. Cats have slaves, not owners.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    One wedding so for me it's Mary and John's.

    Just don't invite me. I don't need the expense.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 985 ✭✭✭Atari Jaguar


    Eamondomc wrote: »
    Not an English expert, but I would think either would be correct, English is complicated and many versions of texts and phrasing of the same thing are correct I think.

    No. Mary and John's is correct.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,681 ✭✭✭Fleawuss


    The patriarchy would give possession to the male ownership and put the apostrophe after the male name. The age of equality would give it to both. The current age of post truth misandry would simply call it Mary's wedding.

    The scary thing is the above bollixology makes sense.

    PS call it The Wedding of my friends Mary and John.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Eamondomc


    Another way to put it without the 's would be to say, some pictures from the wedding of Mary and John, also correct I'd say.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 314 ✭✭Dr Jakub


    'Mary's and John's Wedding' doesn't sound right at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 603 ✭✭✭_Jamie_


    osarusan wrote: »
    Mary and John's wedding = one wedding - they married each other.

    I think this is the confusion. It's one wedding but it belongs to both of them. They both possess it. Even being married, they are two. :pac: But the consensus is very much the latter, here and everywhere, so I think I need to adopt if fully and not doubt it any more.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,415 ✭✭✭✭Collie D


    Weren't John and Mary the couple who were always fighting in Father Ted? The marriage is doomed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭NickNickleby


    Here's my take on it. There's a couple I know. Jim and Mary. I sometimes call down to Jim and Mary's place for a visit. To me 'Jim and Mary' is like some sort of collective noun. So the apostrophe is at the end of the collective noun. My other acquaintances, Eileen and Peter live up the road from me. Sometimes I call up to Eileen and Peter's place for a cuppa. So why do I put Jim first in that example and Eileen in the second. Well, I knew Jim before he met Mary and Eileen before she met Peter.

    Funnily enough, I know another couple, Walter and Amy. In conversation with my wife, we refer to them as Walter and Amy, but if either of us is going across the road to them, we both say we're heading over to Amy's house, eg to see if the water is gone. But that's probably because we see her more than him. Although if I'm specifically going to speak to Walter, I'd say 'heading over to Walter'.

    So, there you have it. couples lose their individuality , same as parents (Jamies' dad).

    Nick (not Jamies' dad)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭Shannon757


    One I've always wondered was what's the plural of "date of birth"

    Is it;

    "Dates of birth"
    "Dates of births"
    "Date of births"

    For referring to a group mind, not one person with multiple birthdays


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,915 ✭✭✭The flying mouse


    Correct punctuation.

    Difference between helping your uncle, Jack, off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭maudgonner


    Shannon757 wrote: »
    One I've always wondered was what's the plural of "date of birth"

    Is it;

    "Dates of birth"
    "Dates of births"
    "Date of births"

    For referring to a group mind, not one person with multiple birthdays


    I'd say dates of birth for that one.

    The ones I hate are Trades Union and Courts Martial. Just sound so wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Eamondomc


    Shannon757 wrote: »
    One I've always wondered was what's the plural of "date of birth"

    Is it;

    "Dates of birth"
    "Dates of births"
    "Date of births"

    For referring to a group mind, not one person with multiple birthdays

    I told you somewhere you needed to be studying, the days your teachers were on strike, do you remember that, was I right or what?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭Shannon757


    Eamondomc wrote: »
    I told you somewhere you needed to be studying, the days your teachers were on strike, do you remember that, was I right or what?

    This stuff doesn't come up when learning Shakespeare


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,549 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Johnnys always running around, trying to find certainty.

    Mary counts the walls; she says he tires instantly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    Johnnys always running around

    Condoms can run?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    osarusan wrote: »
    Mary and John's cats = they jointly own the same cats.

    Mary's and John's cats = they individually own different cats.

    Mary and John's wedding = one wedding - they married each other.

    Mary's and John's weddings = they married different people.

    Mary's and John's wedding = ugly sound.

    Holy shíte, first response in an After Hours thread is not only relevant to OP's question, but the best answer possible.

    Today is a good day.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 603 ✭✭✭_Jamie_


    Shannon757 wrote: »
    One I've always wondered was what's the plural of "date of birth"

    Is it;

    "Dates of birth"
    "Dates of births"
    "Date of births"

    For referring to a group mind, not one person with multiple birthdays

    Dates of birth, I think!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 603 ✭✭✭_Jamie_


    Johnnys always running around, trying to find certainty.

    Mary counts the walls; she says he tires instantly.

    Forget osarusan's response, THIS is the post of the thread. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Eamondomc


    crosstownk wrote: »
    Condoms can run?

    Some of us found that out years ago, to our cost!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,731 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    stankratz wrote: »
    Holy shíte, first response in an After Hours thread is not only relevant to OP's question, but the best answer possible.

    Today is a good day.
    :)
    _Jamie_ wrote: »
    Forget osarusan's response, THIS is the post of the thread.
    :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    English teacher/pedant here.

    Both are correct, though "Mary and John's wedding" is more common and considered more "standard" because

    a) it sounds better to most pairs of ears and,

    b) it's clear it's the wedding of both of them, so it's not necessary to add 's to "Mary."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    A thought:

    Why not take the third option and go all Latin with "the wedding of John and Mary?"

    That construction is normally overly-formal in modern English, but I think it's appropriate for such grand an occasion as a wedding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    Shannon757 wrote: »
    One I've always wondered was what's the plural of "date of birth"

    Is it;

    "Dates of birth"
    "Dates of births"
    "Date of births"

    For referring to a group mind, not one person with multiple birthdays

    Definitely "dates of birth."
    When you pluralise a noun+of+noun phrase, you generally pluralise the first noun, as generally that's the thing there's more than one of, and the second noun is generally just defining that first noun, which is the main one.

    For example, if you wanted to refer to multiple Catholic churches, you could call them "houses of worship" (though of course you'd do the same to refer to different churches of different religions/denominations).
    "House of worships" would sound like a single church of many faiths. Equally "date of births" would sound like a day which featured multiple births which were important to you.

    By the way, I usually multiquote in these situations, but I'm a little distracted.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    One of my bugbears is Sister/Brother in Laws, when it should be Sisters/Brothers in Law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    It's actually John and Mary's.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    You can buy tin's of bean's in my local shop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    Also, what if it's the wedding of someone called James. How do you go about writing that? There's a stop on the red Luas line called James's (as in the hospital). Doesn't look right but then when I looked it up before, James's Street is the given location and the hospital is called St. James's, even on their website, which is curiously www.stjames.ie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Also, what if it's the wedding of someone called James. How do you go about writing that? There's a stop on the red Luas line called James's (as in the hospital). Doesn't look right but then when I looked it up before, James's Street is the given location and the hospital is called St. James's, even on their website, which is curiously www.stjames.ie

    Both "James' wedding" and "James's wedding" are considered correct, but the consensus is leaning towards the latter as being preferable, due to its greater clarity. Personally, I prefer the former as it looks more elegant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭maudgonner


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Also, what if it's the wedding of someone called James. How do you go about writing that?

    That's why Jesus never got married. They didn't know how to write the invitations. True story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    maudgonner wrote: »
    That's why Jesus never got married. They didn't know how to write the invitations. True story.

    "Have you found Judas's seat at the table?"

    "Jesus, I haven't found Judas's, but I have found James's!"

    "Jesus! Judas's just after arriving, and he's brought the two Jameses!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,201 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Has anyone mentioned Stephenses'eses Day yet?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭evolving_doors


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Has anyone mentioned Stephenses'eses Day yet?

    He was brought into St. James' Hospital.. no wait He was brought into St. James's Hospital... no wait St. James Hospital..

    ahh shur just go with the colloquial "St. James'es'es Hospital"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,156 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Also, what if it's the wedding of someone called James. How do you go about writing that? There's a stop on the red Luas line called James's (as in the hospital). Doesn't look right but then when I looked it up before, James's Street is the given location and the hospital is called St. James's, even on their website, which is curiously www.stjames.ie

    Sure it's like St Stephens's Day

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 603 ✭✭✭_Jamie_


    Yeah, I can totally see that even though either way is technically correct, 'Mary and John's wedding' is far nicer on the tongue. 'Mary's and John's weddings' from the second post doesn't sound much better but I suppose there is no way around thart one. TBH, I could still see people saying it as 'Mary and John's weddings' even if talking about their separate weddings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?


Advertisement