MATCH THREAD: Ireland vs New Zealand on Tour

kmart6

Clareman wrote: »

Earls got 2 weeks for less than that

Oh come on, Earls was a lot worse than that and you know it. Don't be blinded.

fitz

Should be a red.

mansize

That should be red

TICKLE_ME_ELMO

That looked worse than Earls' tackle the other week.

corny

Lucky. Inch or two more and he was on his head.

captbarnacles

should be red

molloyjh

Murrays passing hasn't been great so far. We need to go after them here, but I'm not sure we have the ability to.

ThisRegard

Only a yellow.

super_furry

That's the wrong decision there, a red card all day long.

matthew8

Never red in a million years. Landed on his back/shoulder.

kmart6

Cathalthesmart wrote: »

Read gets a warning and earls gets a red.

The warning to Read was nothing to do with the tackle.

Clareman

Lifted him and drove him down, only thing that saved him was that it was on the back not the head.

Eir is terrible by the way

Swan Curry

if a canadian player does that to one of ours next week he's getting a red

corny

Head didn't hit the ground. Never a red.

wp_rathead

Clareman wrote: »

Earls got 2 weeks for less than that

No, Earls dropped him head first - was worse than what happened Henshaws

BunkMoreland

Good management of threads mods, stellar job.

molloyjh

No it should not be a red. It's a red if he lands on his head or neck. He landed on his shoulder. It's a yellow.

Adbrowne

that last view YC is correct

KevIRL

If he was playing in any other colour than black that would be a red card

Cathalthesmart

Cathalthesmart wrote: »

Read gets a warning and earls gets a red.

Imagine that. A warning for something you didn't even do.

ScrubsfanChris

It was a yellow lads, on the back.

Clareman

Ahhhh lads ye had it

corny

Kick to the corner. These are ****e in the tight.

Nift

Great start by Kearney

wp_rathead

super_furry wrote: »

That's the wrong decision there, a red card all day long.

It's not

mansize

He looked speared to me

Clareman

Come on lads, maul it over

Good maul but our backs are looking rusty.

fitz

I thought it didn't matter where he landed, he's above the horizontal and driven down. Poor luck it was down on his back.

LuckyGent88

Maul is working very well anyway.

Clareman

If the ref can't see it how can a camera see it. F**k it knock on, then again they'll have to make a sub

molloyjh

KevIRL wrote: »

If he was playing in any other colour than black that would be a red card

Garbage. Yellow was the right call. We don't need stuff like this.

Clareman

Reason not to give a try, COME ON

Landed basically flat on his back, yellow is fine, though obviously I would be happy for him to be sent off.

Earls landed the guy on his shoulder/neck, hence his red card and ban.

Rainman16

TMO can't see that

kmart6

Clareman wrote: »

If the ref can't see it how can a camera see it. F**k it knock on, then again they'll have to make a sub

How about you listen to the question he asked!

molloyjh

No reason as the question. That should work for us.......

corny

How many New Zealanders joined from the side there?

wp_rathead

Mods please change the thread title - not way of knowing it's match thread

fitz

corny wrote: »

How many New Zealanders joined from the side there?

At least three.

Adbrowne

that should be a penalty try the NZ lads all in the side

AbusesToilets

Penalty try there? NZ massively illegal defending

Clareman

First 10 minutes of the match, landing on the back and it was slow, so it was a yellow, would have been an extremely harsh red but they've been given before

captbarnacles

4 nz in from the side

Peregrine

How many penalties there? :mad:

LuckyGent88

Who to **** had the ball?? Murphy

Should be a try. Can't even see a ball never mind a knock on

molloyjh

Cameras can't see anything here. Try will be given I reckon.

Adbrowne

Kieran Read is a great ref btw !!!

TICKLE_ME_ELMO

How could there be a knock on in the maul when it's wrapped up the whole time?

whatawaster

Hate the welsh guy on the touch line