Took in a cat, landlord's wife causing trouble

Mcnaggins

I've been living in my flat for about a year and a half now, and we took in a very ill kitten recently, my landlord has seen this kitten and even commented on how cute she was, however three days ago his wife cornered my boyfriend and asked if we had a cat, he obviously answered yes, and very matter of factly said "yeah well no, you can't have it get rid of it". The whole atmosphere has changed here now, it's awkward and uncomfortable, they expect us to just let her wander off into the streets and my cat is like my baby so there is no way that is happening. All the wife does now though is sit outside our bathroom window (our flat is at the back of their property) and listen to us and make smug noises at the heartbreak trying to find a temporary home for cat is causing.. What should I do?

Paulw

There may be rules forbidding pets. The landlady may simply be informing you that they are enforcing that, and you must get rid of the pet.

The fact that her husband thinks it's cute is not the point.

Check what your lease says about pets, and also check if there are "House Rules" that forbid pets.

You may have no right to keep the pet.

ongarite

What does your lease say?
Is there a no pets clause?

Mcnaggins

Paulw wrote: »

There may be rules forbidding pets. The landlady may simply be informing you that they are enforcing that, and you must get rid of the pet.

The fact that her husband thinks it's cute is not the point.

Check what your lease says about pets, and also check if there are "House Rules" that forbid pets.

You may have no right to keep the pet.

When we moved in there was no rules against pets, when we confirmed after the one year mark that we were staying there was still no rules against it.

HanaleiJ5N

Mcnaggins wrote: »

When we moved in there was no rules against pets, when we confirmed after the one year mark that we were staying there was still no rules against it.

Do you have that on writing on a lease though? Makes your case much stronger if you do.

Otherwise, I think the odds are against you here...

Mcnaggins

HanaleiJ5N wrote: »

Do you have that on writing on a lease though? Makes your case much stronger if you do.

We didn't do a lease, it was a verbal thing since the beginning and its always been pleasant up until now

newacc2015

Nearly all landlords use the exact same leases and all those leases strictly forbid pets. I imagine the management company forbids pets too. I have yet to hear of a management company allowing pets in a complex

syklops

Youve got a bit of a casual relationship with your landlord(s). I see mine twice a year. Two encounters a year too often in my opinion, but anyway.

OP, why do you see so much of your landlord that the husband saw the kitten and then that the wife cornered your boyfriend?

Mcnaggins

syklops wrote: »

Youve got a bit of a casual relationship with your landlord(s). I see mine twice a year. Two encounters a year too often in my opinion, but anyway.

OP, why do you see so much of your landlord that the husband saw the kitten and then that the wife cornered your boyfriend?

I see the landlord often as both my boyfriend and I do because they have to pass our front door to get to the bins, that and my boyfriend runs into him almost every morning on his way to work

OU812

You've been living in your place for a year and a half, so presumably you like it. You took in a cat three days ago & all of a sudden it's your "baby" ? WTF???

You've two options as far as I see it.

1. Get rid of the cat & stay where you are
2. Find a new place where you, the boyfriend & the cat can be.


Seriously, get rid of the cat.

RossieMan

Bit of cop on OP. It's not your house, you've to live by the rules of the landlord.


You've no legal recourse here, if that's what you're looking for

eager tortoise

OP as a fellow cat lover I feel your pain. We moved in to our current place with our cat but asked the landlord's permission when we came to the viewing. Since you have found the cat after the fact perhaps you just need to be a bit humble with the landlord and try and negotiate keeping the cat. You could perhaps offer an extra security deposit to allay their fears that the cat could cause damage (I know this is unlikely, but it might reassure them). If you go this route then be sure to get something in writing. Alternatively perhaps you could offer to keep the cat outdoors, as soon as it grows a bit? Most cats will happily live outdoors if they have some safe space to roam and a nice shelter. Ours is seldom inside even though she has the option and much prefers to sleep in a little outdoor shelter we constructed for her. Best of luck with it, I really think talking about it with them rationally is the way to go.

Sad Professor

Cats are very clean and will spend most of their time outdoors. They'll also keep mice away. Maybe try talking to your landlord and explaining this. We've had a cat in all the houses we've rented and never had a problem. But then we weren't living under the landlord's nose.

Mrs OBumble

OP, you f*ced up by not asking for the LL's permission before moving the cat in - or at very least the next day if it was taken in an emergency situation.

There's a slight chance that they might change their minds if you now go to them and offer to pay a higher deposit to cover any potential damage that the cat does.

Other than that, happy house hunting. In future remember that new babies (of all species) can only be moved into rental properties with the LL's permission.

Gumbo

Sounds like the OP is in a garden shed to the rear of a normal house.
So if assume no formal lease, RTB Registration etc

You may be living as a "room renter" per say.

percy212

If you had a mouse problem, a cat would be very useful. Think about it.

Lantus

kceire wrote: »

Sounds like the OP is in a garden shed to the rear of a normal house.
So if assume no formal lease, RTB Registration etc

You may be living as a "room renter" per say.

Very unusual you don't have a lease and you are in such close proximity to ll. What is the legal situation with your rental? Is it a separate house, flat, or room? Shed in garden.

Pets are generally a no for most ll's. I would emotionally detach yourself from this animal. If you have zero contract you could be given 7 days or less to vacate if the ll gets annoyed for no reason. Why risk that?

I'd then buy the ll a bottle wine and say thanks for being understanding it won't happen again. Put yourself first.

Landlord's wife isn't causing trouble. The tenants that took in a pet are.

Sapphire

It's your home, but its not your house. If you have no lease then they can dictate whatever they like. They own it, and presumably the furniture too.

And like it or not, animals add significantly to wear and tear - that kitten will sharpen its claws on the carpet, sofa and other soft furnishings that don't belong to you no matter what fancy scratch posts you buy. It's just what kittens do. Then there are toilet training accidents, pet hair and marking territory.

Your reaction is disproportionate for someone who has had a cat for only three days. I love cats but you should have checked with the landlord first, and now you've got a choice - move out with cat or rehome it. No amount of discussing it in the bathroom so your landlady can hear your distress will change that.

intheclouds

The OP did not say she only had the cat 3 days, she said she took it in recently and 3 days ago the landlords wife spoke to them about it.

OP can you see about either rehoming the cat or asking the landlord to allow you to keep the cat.

As to sitting outside your bathroom window making smug noises and listening to you - thats just weird.

What is the legality of the living situation, are you licensees or tenants?

Smondie

Landlord is right here. You can't just take in cats without prior permission. Have you brought the cat to the vet to check for a chip?

CruelCoin

Landlord is in the right.

It is their property, and it is up to them to set the rules for you to rent it.

You really should have asked first before bringing in a kitten off the street which could be infested with fleas, etc.

Try talk to the Ll, and if that fails, put the cat up for rehoming.

percy212

People seem to really hate cats on this thread. OP, this is a rotten situation for you. You have become attached to the kitten but <snip> you would try to make a deal with the landlord i.e offer an additional deposit, assure the landlord that the situation is hygenic etc.

You could also contact threshold for advice. I am sure that your living situation is non compliant in many ways...e.g. are you registered on the PRTB, is the LL paying tax on your rent, is that "apartment" you live in up to scratch (meow) as regards fire regulations. It sounds like a strange set up. Two can play hard ball.

I would ask threshold that since X amount of time has passed, during which the landlord was aware that you had a cat, does that amount to his consent? Since you have no lease who can say what you both verbally agreed to when he saw the cat....maybe he said "I love cats, of course you can keep one. Consider it written into the non existent lease."

Another resolution would be for you to contact a local rescue and ask them for help with rehoming the kitten.

Personally I wouldn't just buckle at the first request to remove the cat. Animals are family too. Best of luck.

Mod: please refrain from us vs them type posting.

Lantus

percy212 wrote: »

People seem to really hate cats on this thread. OP, this is a rotten situation for you. You have become attached to the kitten but <snip> you would try to make a deal with the landlord i.e offer an additional deposit, assure the landlord that the situation is hygenic etc.

You could also contact threshold for advice. I am sure that your living situation is non compliant in many ways...e.g. are you registered on the PRTB, is the LL paying tax on your rent, is that "apartment" you live in up to scratch (meow) as regards fire regulations. It sounds like a strange set up. Two can play hard ball.

I would ask threshold that since X amount of time has passed, during which the landlord was aware that you had a cat, does that amount to his consent? Since you have no lease who can say what you both verbally agreed to when he saw the cat....maybe he said "I love cats, of course you can keep one. Consider it written into the non existent lease."

Another resolution would be for you to contact a local rescue and ask them for help with rehoming the kitten.

Personally I wouldn't just buckle at the first request to remove the cat. Animals are family too.

Poor advice. The op should clarify his legal position first. With no lease he may be a licensee. That means he could be turfed out at little or no notice. A wayward kitten seems like a bad way to make yourself homeless.

This is not an animal rights issue.

SB_Part2

percy212 wrote: »

People seem to really hate cats on this thread. OP, this is a rotten situation for you. You have become attached to the kitten but <snip> you would try to make a deal with the landlord i.e offer an additional deposit, assure the landlord that the situation is hygenic etc.

You could also contact threshold for advice. I am sure that your living situation is non compliant in many ways...e.g. are you registered on the PRTB, is the LL paying tax on your rent, is that "apartment" you live in up to scratch (meow) as regards fire regulations. It sounds like a strange set up. Two can play hard ball.

I would ask threshold that since X amount of time has passed, during which the landlord was aware that you had a cat, does that amount to his consent? Since you have no lease who can say what you both verbally agreed to when he saw the cat....maybe he said "I love cats, of course you can keep one. Consider it written into the non existent lease."

Another resolution would be for you to contact a local rescue and ask them for help with rehoming the kitten.

Personally I wouldn't just buckle at the first request to remove the cat. Animals are family too. Best of luck.

Mod: please refrain from us vs them type posting.

And what is she going to do with all this information about the house maybe not being compliant? Hold the landlord to ransom?

the_syco

Mcnaggins wrote: »

my landlord has seen this kitten and even commented on how cute she was, however three days ago his wife cornered my boyfriend and asked if we had a cat, he obviously answered yes, and very matter of factly said "yeah well no, you can't have it get rid of it".

Highlighted the part, as it seems most posters so far have missed the part where the landlord is totally okay with the cat, but his wife isn't.

Also, for anyone that thinks there are any issues with pets, see the below;

Mcnaggins wrote: »

When we moved in there was no rules against pets, when we confirmed after the one year mark that we were staying there was still no rules against it.

SB_Part2

the_syco wrote: »

Highlighted the part, as it seems most posters so far have missed the part where the landlord is totally okay with the cat, but his wife isn't.

Also, for anyone that thinks there are any issues with pets, see the below;

The landlord might be ok with the cat but not ok with it being in his property.

DivingDuck

the_syco wrote: »

Highlighted the part, as it seems most posters so far have missed the part where the landlord is totally okay with the cat, but his wife isn't.

Also, for anyone that thinks there are any issues with pets, see the below;

You can think cats are the cutest creatures on the planet and still not want to deal with the consequences of their habitation in a rental property you own once the cat's owners have moved out. I recently viewed a property where the carpets smelled and had been shredded to bits in the corners by the previous occupant's cat's claws and marking. The carpet in two of the three carpeted rooms needed replacement immediately as a result— a cost which will be passed on to the landlord once the tenants move on unless there is a higher deposit on hand for it. The furniture may have suffered the same fate (there was none in the one I was viewing), which is another cost.

There are legitimate, valid reasons people don't want pets in their rented properties, and it has nothing to do with hating animals or not finding them cute. It has to do with damaged property and lack of personal supervision of the animal and how well it might be handled and trained, and how well and promptly its behaviour and messes will be dealt with.

If the landlord's wife has a problem, the landlord has a problem, as the property is almost certainly jointly owned. Furthermore, she might be the one who does the cleaning between lets and is understandably bothered by the prospect of increased work owing to cat hair, scratches, marking, etc.

I'm personally unsure of the legal standpoint here as there is no written lease in place so it's a he said/she said situation, but I would not want to live beside my landlord if I were on bad terms with them because of a lease agreement argument. OP, you seem understandably determined to hold onto your pet, so honestly it might be better to tell your landlord that you'll start looking for somewhere else to live.

Tiddlypeeps

Can someone please point out in the law where it states the default position on pets is that they are not allowed?

I would have thought if the landlord was too lazy and/or cheap to put a lease in place then it's though luck for them if they want to enforce any rules that aren't explicitly stated in law. Obviously if the cat is visibly damaging the property then that is a different story and is covered by the law, but the OP hasn't stated this so no reason to assume it. If it's just a regular cat and there is no lease in place then I would have thought the landlord cannot enforce a no pets rule.

I'm assuming there is a law I've not heard of tho, given the overwhelming number of people telling the OP they need to get rid of the cat, so if someone could quote it then that would be very helpful in clarifying the situation for the OP. Either that or this board really is just an echo chamber for disgruntled landlords to shout about how they would like things to be instead of actual facts.

athtrasna

Tiddlypeeps wrote: »

Can someone please point out in the law where it states the default position on pets is that they are not allowed?

I would have thought if the landlord was too lazy and/or cheap to put a lease in place then it's though luck for them if they want to enforce any rules that aren't explicitly stated in law. Obviously if the cat is visibly damaging the property then that is a different story and is covered by the law, but the OP hasn't stated this so no reason to assume it. If it's just a regular cat and there is no lease in place then I would have thought the landlord cannot enforce a no pets rule.

I'm assuming there is a law I've not heard of tho, given the overwhelming number of people telling the OP they need to get rid of the cat, so if someone could quote it then that would be very helpful in clarifying the situation for the OP. Either that or this board really is just an echo chamber for disgruntled landlords to shout about how they would like things to be instead of actual facts.

There is no law that says pets are allowed in rented properties either. They had no pets when they moved in and the OP does not have it in writing that pets are allowed. It's the landlord's property so he has the final call in the absence of a written agreement stating otherwise

the_syco

OP; has the landlord said anything regarding the cat, since his wife started getting annoyed by it?

Meeoow

I got 2 kittens a month ago. So far they have my leather couch and kitchen chairs scraped. And my blinds in tatters. They have toys and scratching posts galore. No way your kitten hasn't done some damage to landlords property. It's what they do.

Eric Cartman

Sad Professor wrote: »

Cats are very clean and will spend most of their time outdoors. They'll also keep mice away. Maybe try talking to your landlord and explaining this. We've had a cat in all the houses we've rented and never had a problem. But then we weren't living under the landlord's nose.

Regardless, the landlord owns the property and him and his wife are entitled to say the cat should not be there. Regardless of what people think of cats, you can always smell cat in a house where a cat lives, always. Cat owners can't smell it but the rest of us can. A house where a cat lives will at minimum require a professional clean afterwards, usually curtains and other fabrics replaced too.

Sad Professor

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Regardless, the landlord owns the property and him and his wife are entitled to say the cat should not be there. Regardless of what people think of cats, you can always smell cat in a house where a cat lives, always. Cat owners can't smell it but the rest of us can. A house where a cat lives will at minimum require a professional clean afterwards, usually curtains and other fabrics replaced too.

Nonsense. I've been in houses that stunk to high heaven despite its former occupant having no pets. If you clean and air your home there won't be any bad smells, be they from cats, dogs or humans. I think you are talking about people with 20 cats that never leave the house and piss all over the place. That's different. We're talking about one cat here, which will presumedly be allowed come and go as it pleases.

OP, I would talk to you landlord and tell them that once the kitten is big enough and feeling better it will be an outdoor cat. You'll feed it but won't let it into the house/shed/flat/whatever. Offer them an extra deposit as already suggested if they are still concerned. If they still want it gone, you'll have to decide whether your new pet is worth moving over.

Grolschevik

^^^
Agree with the above broadly, but it sort of depends if it's an 'indoors only' cat that uses a litter tray inside, or a 'come and go, nature is my toilet' sort of cat.

Most of the 'cat smell' people notice is urine, which can easily be controlled for. However, some people can be allergic to pet dander, so it gets more complex and a deep clean (but not necessarily a professional job) may be called for.

As a pet owner and a tenant I understand how enormously important (and indeed sometimes difficult) it is to have landlord acceptance of the pet.

I have additional clauses in my lease specifically describing my dog (which is the only pet allowed), specifics regarding end-of-tenancy cleaning and an additional deposit requirement to cover the additional risk posed by the pet.

As I know personally that the pet will be zero hassle, cause no damage etc I am more than happy to take on this additional cost and guarantee personally.

I would be impressed to the point of disbelief if a landlord would do this without any knowledge of the pet's characteristics etc.

That is what you appear to be looking for them to do in this case without any discussion whatsoever. Bear the additional risk of the pet and bear the additional costs of the pet's tenancy without even a moment's thought.

Speak to the landlord, see if they are willing to have their fears assuaged, and these risks and costs mitigated with additional deposit guarantees / cleaning expenses added to the lease etc. If they are not, then I am afraid that's a show stopper.

Michael D Not Higgins

Tiddlypeeps wrote: »

Can someone please point out in the law where it states the default position on pets is that they are not allowed?

I would have thought if the landlord was too lazy and/or cheap to put a lease in place then it's though luck for them if they want to enforce any rules that aren't explicitly stated in law. Obviously if the cat is visibly damaging the property then that is a different story and is covered by the law, but the OP hasn't stated this so no reason to assume it. If it's just a regular cat and there is no lease in place then I would have thought the landlord cannot enforce a no pets rule.

I'm assuming there is a law I've not heard of tho, given the overwhelming number of people telling the OP they need to get rid of the cat, so if someone could quote it then that would be very helpful in clarifying the situation for the OP. Either that or this board really is just an echo chamber for disgruntled landlords to shout about how they would like things to be instead of actual facts.

De minimis non curat lex.

The law is silent on the matter as it needn't be legislated. For these areas outside the law, there needs to be a common sense approach. This is particularly true in a case like this without a written lease.

You wouldn't say the tenant can paint the walls black without the landlord's permission, for example. It's not against the law or the rules since there's nothing written down, but it does cause an issue for the landlord.

Ragnar Lothbrok

I have always lived with cats, I'm a cat lover, but some people on here seem to be forgetting something: If the landlord doesn't want the cat in his house, and the tenant persists in keeping the cat, the tenant will eventually be kicked out. At the very least it will turn what was apparently a good relationship between LL and tenant into a very bad one.

To the OP: Much as I love cats, I wouldn't think it would be worth losing the roof over your head just so you could keep the kitten. Animal Care Society Cork https://www.animalcaresociety.ie/cats.htm could probably give you some ideas about finding a new family for the kitten (I assume there will be something similar in your own area).

Hopefully, this issue ends with the kitten in a loving new home and the landlord and tenants getting back to a friendly relationship.

Ms Doubtfire1

Common sense approach or not, tenant is now part of part4 tenancy act, as in the property , paying rent and having no lease.tenancy is secure.Don't let anyone convince you otherwise. Only the simple law applies - if nothing is in writing, it is mutually exclusive.You can keep the cat as there is nothing in writing stopping you from it. There is indeed no legislation on what the default is on keeping pets or not, but common sense prevails is a non running argument in this case.Who's common sense? The Common Sense of the person wanting to help an injured kitten or the common sense of someone else who couldn't care less. I would agree with the posters stating offer some additional guarantees to LL and keep it amical. Kitty is only tiny...

Ms Doubtfire1

Ms Doubtfire1 wrote: »

Common sense approach or not, tenant is now part of part4 tenancy act, as in the property , paying rent and having no lease.tenancy is secure.Don't let anyone convince you otherwise. Only the simple law applies - if nothing is in writing, it is mutually exclusive.You can keep the cat as there is nothing in writing stopping you from it. There is indeed no legislation on what the default is on keeping pets or not, but common sense prevails is a non running argument in this case.Who's common sense? The Common Sense of the person wanting to help an injured kitten or the common sense of someone else who couldn't care less. I would agree with the posters stating offer some additional guarantees to LL and keep it amical. Kitty is only tiny...

we do not know this!

intheclouds wrote: »

...What is the legality of the living situation, are you licensees or tenants?

Lantus wrote: »

Poor advice. The op should clarify his legal position first. With no lease he may be a licensee. That means he could be turfed out at little or no notice. A wayward kitten seems like a bad way to make yourself homeless.

This is not an animal rights issue.

Ms Doubtfire1

Deleted User wrote: »

we do not know this!

Yes we do if you read the whole thread. tenant in in property for over 6 month (part 4 comes into effect) and is paying rent. Makes them a tenant.Licensees don't pay rent or only have a room living UNDER the landlords roof, which they are not.They apartment is adjoining the LL property, but has its own frontdoor..;-)

Ms Doubtfire1

Ms Doubtfire1 wrote: »

Common sense approach or not, tenant is now part of part4 tenancy act, as in the property , paying rent and having no lease.tenancy is secure.Don't let anyone convince you otherwise. Only the simple law applies - if nothing is in writing, it is mutually exclusive.You can keep the cat as there is nothing in writing stopping you from it. There is indeed no legislation on what the default is on keeping pets or not, but common sense prevails is a non running argument in this case.Who's common sense? The Common Sense of the person wanting to help an injured kitten or the common sense of someone else who couldn't care less. I would agree with the posters stating offer some additional guarantees to LL and keep it amical. Kitty is only tiny...

It the LL's house he makes the rules, I wouldn't allow a cat to look in the door of my own house never mind one I was renting out. Just because there is nothing in writing does not meant the LL cannot enforce a rule.

It really amuses me how people appear to think its acceptable to bring an animal into someone else's house. The LL is fully within his rights to start the eviction process if the op does not remove the cat or if the OP is a licensee he the op can be asked to move out immediately. Why someone would want all this hassle over a cat is beyond me, just get rid of it.

Ms Doubtfire1 wrote: »

Yes we do if you read the whole thread. tenant in in property for over 6 month (part 4 comes into effect) and is paying rent. Makes them a tenant.Licensees don't pay rent or only have a room living UNDER the landlords roof, which they are not.They apartment is adjoining the LL property, but has its own frontdoor..;-)

If there is direct access between where the op lives and where the LL lives (such as a locked door) then the op is a licensee regardless of having his own entrance.

Sad Professor

Ms Doubtfire1 wrote: »

Yes we do if you read the whole thread. tenant in in property for over 6 month (part 4 comes into effect) and is paying rent. Makes them a tenant.

I think there's still a question mark over whether they are a tenant or a licensee. If it's the latter then they basically have no rights.

Ms Doubtfire1

Santana Orange Photography wrote: »

It the LL's house he makes the rules, I wouldn't allow a cat to look in the door of my own house never mind one I was renting out. Just because there is nothing in writing does not meant the LL cannot enforce a rule.

It really amuses me how people appear to think its acceptable to bring an animal into someone else's house. The LL is fully within his rights to start the eviction process if the op does not remove the cat or if the OP is a licensee he the op can be asked to move out immediately. Why someone would want all this hassle over a cat is beyond me, just get rid of it.



If there is direct access between where the op lives and where the LL lives (such as a locked door) then the op is a licensee regardless of having his own entrance.

wrong. read up on the law. LL cannot evict nor cancel the tenancy unless under very very specific reasons non of which apply. OP, i would get in touch with the tenancy board/threshold. If you don't have a lease the tenancy might not be registered, as such, LL loses all his rights to file a complaint, but you maintain all the right.Next to that, registering a tenancy is required by law. give them a call and get good advice on your rights as tenants. (I do agree with another OP if you are licensees you have no such rights).

Ms Doubtfire1

Ms Doubtfire1 wrote: »

wrong. read up on the law. LL cannot evict nor cancel the tenancy unless under very very specific reasons non of which apply. OP, i would get in touch with the tenancy board/threshold. If you don't have a lease the tenancy might not be registered, as such, LL loses all his rights to file a complaint, but you maintain all the right. give them a call and get good advice on your rights as tenants. (I do agree with another OP if you are licensees you have no such rights).

But the tenant is totally in the wrong, you are basically encouraging them to be a bad tenant and try to use the system against the LL.

The absence of a written lease does not mean the LL cannot make rules like no pets. If the LL makes this rule and the op won't comply then the LL can use it as a reason to begin the eviction process for breach of the lease (verbal), a cat will stink the place out and destroy the furniture, carpets etc and the LL is fully entitled to protect his property.

The op should never have taken in the cat in the first place this was the major mistake.

Ms Doubtfire1

Santana Orange Photography wrote: »

But the tenant is totally in the wrong, you are basically encouraging them to be a bad tenant and try to use the system against the LL.

The absence of a written lease does not mean the LL cannot make rules like no pets. If the LL makes this rule and the op won't comply then the LL can use it as a reason to begin the eviction process for breach of the lease (verbal), a cat will stink the place out and destroy the furniture, carpets etc and the LL is fully entitled to protect his property.

I'm not encouraging anything (except maybe trying to save a life) ,I am simply pointing out the legalities in this case and they are in favor of the tenant. Next to that,cats are very clean creatures and the only thing you might smell is the catlitter if it isn't kept clean. Cats are also very trainable.I own numerous cats and they all use a scratching post. Again, in the absence of a lease the basic law applies and a such, no additional rules can be made unless MUTUAL agreed upon.And saving an innocent life might make them bad tenants ina LL eyes, in mine it makes them applaudable human beings.Which I will always try and help.Give threshold or the tenancyboard a ring OP, get full advise on your legal rights and take it from there.

alpha13

i am not being devils advocate saying this..but there is another point people seem to not possibly consider...
clearly the landlord likes the kitten.. BUT.. maybe the landlady is afraid of cats OR allergic to them.. maybe it is not just an issue of her not liking the kitten.
first thing to do is talk to the landord and land lady and find out WHY they are making the issue..then you can begin to see about solving the problem instead of creating ones that dont exist.. aybe it is a cleaning issue..if so.. higher deposit or assurances might work.. maybe it is not..
we can deal with the knows..not with the unknowns...

Ms Doubtfire1

alpha13 wrote: »

i am not being devils advocate saying this..but there is another point people seem to not possibly consider...
clearly the landlord likes the kitten.. BUT.. maybe the landlady is afraid of cats OR allergic to them.. maybe it is not just an issue of her not liking the kitten.
first thing to do is talk to the landord and land lady and find out WHY they are making the issue..then you can begin to see about solving the problem instead of creating ones that dont exist.. aybe it is a cleaning issue..if so.. higher deposit or assurances might work.. maybe it is not..
we can deal with the knows..not with the unknowns...

Very considerate. I would go down that road as well but not without knowing where exactly where I stood legally.After all, there is a life on the line here.

Bubbaclaus

Either get rid of the cat or move out. Simples.

intheclouds

Santana Orange Photography wrote: »

But the tenant is totally in the wrong, you are basically encouraging them to be a bad tenant and try to use the system against the LL.

The absence of a written lease does not mean the LL cannot make rules like no pets. If the LL makes this rule and the op won't comply then the LL can use it as a reason to begin the eviction process for breach of the lease (verbal), a cat will stink the place out and destroy the furniture, carpets etc and the LL is fully entitled to protect his property.

The op should never have taken in the cat in the first place this was the major mistake.

Wrong - the mistake was the landlords - not providing a lease that states no pets.

Ms Doubtfire1

Ms Doubtfire1 wrote: »

Yes we do if you read the whole thread. tenant in in property for over 6 month (part 4 comes into effect) and is paying rent. Makes them a tenant.Licensees don't pay rent or only have a room living UNDER the landlords roof, which they are not.They apartment is adjoining the LL property, but has its own frontdoor..;-)

There have been countless examples of people believing that they are tenants when in fact they are licencees on this forum.

http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/housing/renting_a_home/sharing_accommodation_with_your_landlord.html

Paying rent doesn't preclude someone from being a Licencee.

We don't know the situation with regards their accommodation either.

It would be terribly prudent to wait for the OP to clarify their situation before you give advice regarding Part V tenure which could be absolutely inapplicable to their situation and could actually serve to inflame the situation to be so misinformed.