Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Bus drivers' boycott because not being allowed to use radio?

Options
  • 01-03-2016 2:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 430 ✭✭


    Bus drivers' boycott of tunnel set to cause delays for passengers -
    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/bus-drivers-boycott-of-tunnel-set-to-cause-delays-for-passengers-34500929.html
    Dublin Bus passengers could face major delays as drivers will refuse to use the Port Tunnel next week.

    They have reacted angrily after being banned from listening to the radio while driving as part of a new "zero tolerance" policy.

    The move - to start next Tuesday - will affect routes, including the 747, 41x, 33x and 142, and could lead to major traffic congestion on routes to the airport.

    The tunnel ban will take place on the same day as the next Luas strike.

    The National Bus and Railworkers Union has written to Dublin Bus to inform the company that it has advised its members not to use the tunnel for health and safety reasons.
    ...

    Control
    Drivers have already refused to cooperate with central control after the ban began yesterday.
    ...

    Policy
    General Secretary of the NBRU Dermot O'Leary described the policy as "stupidity of the highest order".
    ...
    He said the union could not argue against national legislation around the use of mobile phones while driving but "totally and utterly refuses" to accept the inclusion of radios on the list.
    ...
    Dublin Bus said it had a long-standing policy prohibiting the use of mobile phones and electronic devices while driving.


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Peppa Pig


    Not a fan of the NBRU, but they are right to do it.
    Isn't there a sign at the entrances to the tunnel saying safety instructions are relayed through all FM stations?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭Devilman40k


    Peppa Pig wrote: »
    Not a fan of the NBRU, but they are right to do it.
    Isn't there a sign at the entrances to the tunnel saying safety instructions are relayed through all FM stations?

    http://www.dublintunnel.ie/safety/

    And this part in particular
    FM Radio Break-in Facility
    Tune into FM radio stations to hear safety instructions, in case of incident.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Funny it's ok for them to be on their phones while driving a bus


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Peppa Pig


    Gatling wrote: »
    Funny it's ok for them to be on their phones while driving a bus
    From the link
    He said the union could not argue against national legislation around the use of mobile phones while driving but "totally and utterly refuses" to accept the inclusion of radios on the list.
    Seems the union accept the zero tolerance policy on phones and presumably enforcement, but they are being asked to take a bus load of passengers into a tunnel and not have a safety feature available to them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    But of a silly policy alright, but the drivers' response is worse. It only takes 10 mins to go through the tunnel, they'll still get in over an hour of Joe Duffy.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 22,294 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    n97 mini wrote: »
    But of a silly policy alright, but the driver's response is worse. It only takes 10 mins to go through the tunnel, they'll still get in over an hour of Joe Duffy.

    Think you missed the point. They can't listen to radio at all now. Seems like a silly policy to me. Anyone know the thinking behind it other than another bogus 'health and safety' reason.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    Pawwed Rig wrote: »
    Think you missed the point. They can't listen to radio at all now. Seems like a silly policy to me. Anyone know the thinking behind it other than another bogus 'health and safety' reason.

    You're right I did, sorry. Refusing to use a particular piece of road infrastructure as retaliation for not being allowed listen to Joe Duffy is even more idiotic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭mahoganygas


    While I have sympathy for the bus drivers, this childish stunt is just ridiculous.

    Of course they should be allowed to listen to the radio. But the union are making a show of themselves by pressing this loophole to somehow prove a point.
    Is this the sort of "poor conditions" people expect their unions to fight against?

    It makes a mockery of the right to industrial action and the public who rely on buses to get to work.

    Shameful.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Peppa Pig


    Mind you, from the bylaws
    52. No person while on the vehicle shall sing, perform on any musical or other instruments or use any audible radio, television, record player, tape recorder or portable apparatus.
    I presume the drivers are not using headphones to listen to the radio.

    Still seems fairly unreasonable to deprive a driver of a bit of radio. Does anyone else drive in silence?

    I've never heard of a radio being a contributory factor in an accident.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Peppa Pig wrote: »
    Still seems fairly unreasonable to deprive a driver of a bit of radio.
    Not really.

    If it's not OK for a passenger to get on and have music playing, why is it OK for the driver?

    While I can understand the upset, going on strike about it is completely over the top. Many people work in jobs where having a radio playing isn't acceptable, and a bus driver is doing a job, same as. Especially jobs in which you have to interact with the public - exceptionally rare that you'd be allowed have a radio playing.
    I've never heard of a radio being a contributory factor in an accident.
    How many accident reports have you read though? :)

    There was a famous video on one of the early police camera shows where a small car driving in front of a police cars suddenly veers off the road, hits a kerb and a wall before slowing down and coming to a stop. It was a nurse on her way to work who leaned over to change radio stations.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭Bazzy


    seamus wrote: »
    Not really.

    If it's not OK for a passenger to get on and have music playing, why is it OK for the driver?

    While I can understand the upset, going on strike about it is completely over the top. Many people work in jobs where having a radio playing isn't acceptable, and a bus driver is doing a job, same as. Especially jobs in which you have to interact with the public - exceptionally rare that you'd be allowed have a radio playing.

    How many accident reports have you read though? :)

    There was a famous video on one of the early police camera shows where a small car driving in front of a police cars suddenly veers off the road, hits a kerb and a wall before slowing down and coming to a stop. It was a nurse on her way to work who leaned over to change radio stations.

    She was driving a mini and she was changing the tape not radio channels BIG difference.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭Infini


    The whole thing is a bit silly but at the same time were talking about a normal radio and plenty of people use them while driving. Anyone of BD management hear the term if it aint broke dont fix it? Seems to be someone going out of their way to annoy their own staff.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,546 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Infini2 wrote: »
    The whole thing is a bit silly but at the same time were talking about a normal radio and plenty of people use them while driving. Anyone of BD management hear the term if it aint broke dont fix it? Seems to be someone going out of their way to annoy their own staff.

    To be fair - there are generally two sides to every dispute and the public rarely hear both in detail.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,986 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    n97 mini wrote: »
    But of a silly policy alright, but the drivers' response is worse. It only takes 10 mins to go through the tunnel, they'll still get in over an hour of Joe Duffy.

    but not the safety instructions should there be an incident, which it seems are given out via radio. the responce is perfectly justified. if the company wants to bann the use of radios, it needs to find a viable replacement so that the safety instructions can still be received

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    but not the safety instructions should there be an incident, which it seems are given out via radio. the responce is perfectly justified. if the company wants to bann the use of radios, it needs to find a viable replacement so that the safety instructions can still be received

    Don't they have 2 way comms on every bus


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    Indeed.
    but not the safety instructions should there be an incident, which it seems are given out via radio. the responce is perfectly justified. if the company wants to bann the use of radios, it needs to find a viable replacement so that the safety instructions can still be received

    If you read the link above, FM radio is only one of several communication methods used by the tunnel operator. They do not rely on FM radio. Their primary methods of communication are displays and loudspeakers.

    As it is state-owned/CIE/Dubin Bus your support of their actions, regardless of how idiotic they are, was expected.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,492 ✭✭✭stoplooklisten


    if there is an incident in the tunnel, they can turn it on, problem solved.

    i just see above that fm radio is not the only way to check whats happening. If they have signs and loudspeakers I definitely can't see what the issue is


  • Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭bigar


    I use the bus for about two hours a day. Thank god that there is no radio blurting out horrible music and commercials that whole time. I support the ban completely.


  • Registered Users Posts: 309 ✭✭LastStop


    lxflyer wrote: »
    To be fair - there are generally two sides to every dispute and the public rarely hear both in detail.

    Drivers have NEVER been allowed to use radios while driving. Supervisors just turned a blind eye to the practice. Management had to act if reported. I got a slap on the wrist years ago.

    The only thing that is new is the zero tolerance. Supervisors will not be able to turn a blind eye anymore.

    As for the NBRU. Don't get me started there. Still waiting for some conclusion to the incident when the wheel came off the bus. NBRU advised drivers not to complete the first use check sheet or sign it and that has been forgotten about as far as I can see.

    So I expect this to rumble on for a couple of weeks and be swept under the carpet. The Port tunnel argument is embarrassing. Just so embarrassed that my money goes towards stupidity like that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,785 ✭✭✭thomasj


    Could you imagine the reaction of the government were to bring in laws banning radios in cars for health and safety reasons.

    I'm sure db management would have something else to say if they couldn't listen to radio in their own cars.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,492 ✭✭✭stoplooklisten


    thomasj wrote: »
    Could you imagine the reaction of the government were to bring in laws banning radios in cars for health and safety reasons.

    I'm sure db management would have something else to say if they couldn't listen to radio in their own cars.

    I reckon they'd have a lot to say if a load of passengers jumped in the back seat too!


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,569 ✭✭✭✭ProudDUB


    bigar wrote: »
    I use the bus for about two hours a day. Thank god that there is no radio blurting out horrible music and commercials that whole time. I support the ban completely.

    +1

    Took the Dublin Coach bus to Limerick a few weeks ago. Joe Duffy was BLARING out for the whole two hours. God, it was painful. If I want to listen to music, or our National Whinger in Chief, I'll bring my own radio and headset, thanks very much.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭ronn


    ProudDUB wrote: »
    +1

    Took the Dublin Coach bus to Limerick a few weeks ago. Joe Duffy was BLARING out for the whole two hours. God, it was painful. If I want to listen to music, or our National Whinger in Chief, I'll bring my own radio and headset, thanks very much.

    There on about the drivers playing a radio in the cab, not playing music through the speakers on the bus.


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭Punkyblip


    Well I can't watch porn at work, you don't hear me moaning and groaning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,569 ✭✭✭✭ProudDUB


    ronn wrote: »
    There on about the drivers playing a radio in the cab, not playing music through the speakers on the bus.

    I know. I was sitting two rows from the driver & I was hearing his radio. I couldn't move to a seat further back, as the bus was full. He had it on full blast and it was annoying as hell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭SuperS54


    I'd imagine there may also be licensing issues, if the radio is being played in a workplace open to the public then they likely need both an IMRO and PPI license, all of which costs.

    From IMRO
    Under Sec 37 (2) of the Act ‘the copyright in a work is infringed by a person who without the licence of the copyright owner undertakes, or authorises another to undertake’, the public performance of the work. Therefore in effect by allowing staff use their own radio in the workplace, you are, as their employer, authorising the use of IMRO copyright music on your premises and you must hold a licence to allow you and them to do so.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,888 ✭✭✭Terrontress


    As I understand it, just having a radio will leave you open to disciplinary procedures.

    If a driver has a wait at a terminus before going back into service, surely a radio is justifiable in that instance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,389 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Crinklewood


    My friendly driver has the radio on.

    which got me thinking. ...which song will I request for him?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,133 ✭✭✭plodder


    What's the story with taxis? Can you tell the driver to switch off the radio? I know in a lot of cities you can, but I can't find anything official about it here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    Are these portable radios or built into the bus? (Apologies if already asked/answered).


Advertisement