Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Most Evil Modern day (post WW1) Regimes .. Ever

  • 02-09-2015 9:53pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,378 ✭✭✭


    With all this ISIS/ISIL stuff, we all know that this organisation is truly evil. But is it one of the worst regimes to come about in modern times? What would you consider the top most evil regimes of modern times (1918 to date)?

    Along with ISIS/ISIL, I have to say the Khmer Rouge, the Nazis, the Taliban and - when in a certain frame of mind - Ceaucescu's Romania, Milosevic's Yugoslavia and North Korea.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,775 ✭✭✭✭kfallon


    Crystal Swing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭Sheep Lover


    The Iron Rule of Kenny shall go down as one of the bloodiest and brutal in Irelands history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,828 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    The Hutu lead government that carried out the Rwandan genocide deserve a mention. For the absolute brutality of how it was carried out alone.

    Glazers Out!



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Er Nazi Germany, then again Communist China, Stalin era Soviet Union and Cambodia/Kampuchea under the Kamer Rouge, Uganda under Idi Amin, South Africa under Apartheid rule all in with a shout.

    If measured by scale Stalin or Mao would probably win rather than Nazi Germany.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Arsemageddon


    Carlow County Council


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Stojkovic


    Haughey/Ahern Fianna Fail


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,973 ✭✭✭Sh1tbag OToole


    Definitely North Korea. There are concentration camps in that country similar or worse to Hitler's ones with 100,000+ people inside in them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Duvalier father and son in Haiti right up there.


    Saparmurat Niyazov in Turkmenistan also deserves a mention.

    Totalitarian, repressive, corrupt, generally evil.

    But also a touch of class at times, such as naming months after aspects of his own life.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    AH mods '07 - '09.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Kardashians.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 392 ✭✭j80ezgvc3p92xu


    Communist Sweeden.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭bop1977


    Western culture taking offence to anything at all no matter how small.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,762 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Louis Walsh and Simon COwell's unrelenting destruction of the music industry.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41 slangamerican


    Dr Evil, even had the cheek to look for a million dollars...pure evil


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭newmug


    I wonder if the Nazi's won in WW2, how would things have panned out?
      Germany holds all the ground it conquered Hitler dies eventually Another dictator would take over, probably a little bit less evil Eventually, we would have one currency, we would all learn German, and be answerable to Germany The holocaust would be written into history as a fair warfare tactic Eventually Germany would lose its power (just like the british empire and the USSR) and the different autonomous countries would break away, albeit with strong links to their former oppressor

    So basically no change, except the Holocaust and mass genocide would be totally acceptable as a fair act of war. IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 592 ✭✭✭JC01


    newmug wrote: »
    I wonder if the Nazi's won in WW2, how would things have panned out?
      Germany holds all the ground it conquered Hitler dies eventually Another dictator would take over, probably a little bit less evil Eventually, we would have one currency, we would all learn German, and be answerable to Germany The holocaust would be written into history as a fair warfare tactic Eventually Germany would lose its power (just like the british empire and the USSR) and the different autonomous countries would break away, albeit with strong links to their former oppressor

    So basically no change, except the Holocaust and mass genocide would be totally acceptable as a fair act of war. IMO.

    The nazis had there eyes on proper movie-style world domination, The Americas and all so honestly god knows how it would have worked out.

    To the OP I'd say Stalins Russia, nazi Germany or North Korea. I'v a sneaking suspicion that North Korea is magnitudes worse than we think. Looking at history and what happened in similar situations and then at how closed off the North is I shudder to think of what actually happens to the human beings unfortunate enough to be born there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭Infini


    Dunno about "Best Korea" its probably as bad as Nazi Germany in the sickness meter on par with DarwinAward State in the crazy east.

    As it stands Stalin Probably holds the all time High Score for mass murder and genocide in the world. Aint noone gonna break that score unless theyre stupid enough to start World War 3 along with a nuclear exchange.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Cold War Kid


    Stojkovic wrote: »
    Haughey/Ahern Fianna Fail
    Communist Sweeden.
    bop1977 wrote: »
    Western culture taking offence to anything at all no matter how small.
    Most evil regimes since first world war? 'k.

    Pleasantly surprised at lack of "America" so far...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,128 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Roman Catholic church. Cliché answer now, but they did some truly horrific and evil things.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭newmug


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Roman Catholic church. Cliché answer now, but they did some truly horrific and evil things.

    http://www.robshep.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/jesus_facepalm.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,807 ✭✭✭speedboatchase


    Someone's bound to say Israel soon and then this entire thread will be derailed and eventually locked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,336 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    AH mods '07 - '09.
    Join date: Jan 2015
    Reported for being a re-reg troll.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,554 ✭✭✭valoren


    newmug wrote: »
    I wonder if the Nazi's won in WW2, how would things have panned out?

    • Germany holds all the ground it conquered
      Hitler dies eventually
      Another dictator would take over, probably a little bit less evil
      Eventually, we would have one currency, we would all learn German, and be answerable to Germany
      The holocaust would be written into history as a fair warfare tactic
      Eventually Germany would lose its power (just like the british empire and the USSR) and the different autonomous countries would break away, albeit with strong links to their former oppressor
    So basically no change, except the Holocaust and mass genocide would be totally acceptable as a fair act of war. IMO.

    He would have been killed along with hundreds of thousands of miliatary and civilians when an atomic bomb was dropped on Berlin sometime in 1945/46


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭arayess


    valoren wrote: »
    He would have been killed along with hundreds of thousands of miliatary and civilians when an atomic bomb was dropped on Berlin sometime in 1945/46

    bombing japan with a nuke would have been politically different to dropping on on berlin.
    Given the power in the states is of european decent that would have never happened , imo of course.


    I often wonder if Hitler ever realised that he'd rule the internet one day.
    The 4th Reich is his


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,034 ✭✭✭griffin100


    The Japanese in China before and during WW2. Estimates of civilian deaths of over 20 million by some authors. Biological warfare experimentation on civilians. In fact pretty much Japan in WW2 anywhere it occupied.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,903 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    griffin100 wrote: »
    The Japanese in China before and during WW2. Estimates of civilian deaths of over 20 million by some authors. Biological warfare experimentation on civilians. In fact pretty much Japan in WW2 anywhere it occupied.
    Good point, Imperial Japan's crimes are sometimes neglected. Unit 731 and Nanjing being two that immediately come to mind.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,969 ✭✭✭Mesrine65


    Pol Pot, Idi Amin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭fleet_admiral


    The catholic cult. Pure and utter evil


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,038 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    arayess wrote: »
    bombing japan with a nuke would have been politically different to dropping on on berlin.
    Given the power in the states is of european decent that would have never happened , imo of course.


    I often wonder if Hitler ever realised that he'd rule the internet one day.
    The 4th Reich is his

    I remember reading an article (I think it was on the BBC) of how the Americans found it easier to bring themselves to nuke the Japanese than the Nazis, because they weren't white.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    I remember reading an article (I think it was on the BBC) of how the Americans found it easier to bring themselves to nuke the Japanese than the Nazis, because they weren't white.
    I've read elsewhere that the Americans were somewhat concerned that the bomb would be a dud and fail to go off, and they were less concerned about the Japanese ability to analyse and replicate the failed bomb than the German ability to do so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭electrobanana


    The FCA and their totalitarian regime in the 80s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    I remember reading an article (I think it was on the BBC) of how the Americans found it easier to bring themselves to nuke the Japanese than the Nazis, because they weren't white.

    Or, more likely, that the war in europe was all but over..... while Japan was much further from defeat.

    My vote goes to Stalin, with honourable mention for The Congo/Zaire regimes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Cold War Kid


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Roman Catholic church. Cliché answer now, but they did some truly horrific and evil things.
    It's utterly dishonest to say they were the most evil, considering the other regimes that were in power. Plus, many within the Catholic Church did very good things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭davmol


    Someone's bound to say Israel soon and then this entire thread will be derailed and eventually locked.

    Without turning it into an Israel /Palestinian debate,i would have to say Israel/IDF/Netanyahu are definitely one of the most evil modern day regimes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭5rtytry56


    • El Salvadore regime - 1980's.
    • Chile - under General Pinochet utter little príck


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,378 ✭✭✭BuilderPlumber


    A lot of interesting ones brought up here ....

    When one looks at evil in a regime, it can manifest itself in different ways. For example: most stifling to live under (the warped Islam of Taliban or ISIS or the warped socialism of Pol Pot), the most invasive of other countries (Bush, Netanyahu), the most racist (Nazis, ISIS, Apartheid South Africa), the biggest killers (Stalin, Mao), or the ones who left their countries totally poor/isolated (North Korea especially under the last 2 Kims, Albania under Enver Hoxha).

    Other, mostly military, regimes seemed to be ok for some and not for others (esp. suspected communists). Interestingly enough, the Catholic church was up to all kinds of brutalities at a government level in the older eras. While some of their clergy were involved in abuse and it was covered up in recent times, there was no brutal dictatorship akin to the Spanish Inquisition in place in recent times though.

    As regards Irish governments and county councils, they certainly are no saints and they act in their own interests. But they hardly have anything on Pol Pot or Kim Jong Un.

    Bad music managers like certain reality TV people who also manage boybands have also been mentioned and there is no doubt that these are dictators in their own way. The media do promote certain people and not others. This clearly is kind of like the personality cults of dictators in its own way.

    Crystal Swing are not the worst and are hardly dictators! Unless you mean that this is what happened under the new ISIS rulers in Syria, Iraq and Libya when they hung members of the Gadafi, Saddam and Assad governments on crystal chandeliers that is! Otherwise, I would go for the overhype cult of boyfolk music (Mike Denver, etc.) as being another media created dictatorship.

    I also would need to add Eritrea to the list too. They are a very brutal regime too. I included the parts of Somalia, Nigeria, and other areas of Africa controlled by the likes of Boko Haram and al Shabaab under the general ISIS/ISIL umbrella. One needs to add Kony and his Lords Resistance Army too. Perhaps, this is the closest to a Catholic terror group we have although they have no support from any Catholic officials whatsoever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Stojkovic


    I remember reading an article (I think it was on the BBC) of how the Americans found it easier to bring themselves to nuke the Japanese than the Nazis, because they weren't white.
    Nothing to do with the 40m Americans of German descent ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Stojkovic


    I remember reading an article (I think it was on the BBC) of how the Americans found it easier to bring themselves to nuke the Japanese than the Nazis, because they weren't white.
    Nothing to do with the 40m Americans of German descent ?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭newmug


    I remember reading an article (I think it was on the BBC) of how the Americans found it easier to bring themselves to nuke the Japanese than the Nazis, because they weren't white.

    Germany surrendered on 8th May 1945. The first atomic bomb wasnt dropped until 6th August 1945, nearly 3 months after Germany were out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    newmug wrote: »
    Germany surrendered on 8th May 1945. The first atomic bomb wasnt dropped until 6th August 1945, nearly 3 months after Germany were out.

    ..and final testing was conducted on 16th July 45. I'd believe that about earlier worries concerning German scientific analysis of a potential dud - the Atom bomb scientists considered themselves in a race against Heisenberg and co. on the Nazi side.

    Nazis were the most nihilistic and expansionist of all the regimes. Stalin wins on bodycount and his influence over acolytes like Mao and North Korea.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,378 ✭✭✭BuilderPlumber


    ..and final testing was conducted on 16th July 45. I'd believe that about earlier worries concerning German scientific analysis of a potential dud - the Atom bomb scientists considered themselves in a race against Heisenberg and co. on the Nazi side.

    Nazis were the most nihilistic and expansionist of all the regimes. Stalin wins on bodycount and his influence over acolytes like Mao and North Korea.

    North Korea in many ways would be the worst of all. The regime is so paranoid it kills some of its members. There are concentration camps so bad prisoners are forced to work impossible amounts and are not fed unless they complete it. They often get injured and starve to death. Prison guards are often violent and drunk and enjoy watching prisoners die.

    Now, reality check! North Korea IS NOT a warzone. Whatever excuses the Middle East's ISIS, al Qaeda, Taliban, etc. have is not here. Or the Nazis or the Khmer Rouge or Stalin or Mao. Yeah, all of these also engaged in brutal behaviour but there was a war going on.

    North Korea has not been involved in a war since 1953!!!!!! Yet, its regime remains in a wartime footing, commits wartime-style attrocities, and has not moderated at all. Other previously brutal regimes that emerged during war moderated over the years. But North Korea is the world's worst non-wartime country and this makes it much worse as one cannot blame the chaos of war and out of control Mad Max style marauders for the worst of the excesses. The excesses of this place are controlled and Kim and his cronies are 100% guilty here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Indonesia under Suharto, not that they're all smiles and chuckles these days.

    (West) Pakistan in the early 1970's.

    Both responsible for two massive but not well known genocides in the 20th century.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,902 ✭✭✭RayCon


    Anybody involved in the creation of The Big Bang Theory (the TV show ,..... not the actual science thingy)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    RayCon wrote: »
    Anybody involved in the creation of The Big Bang Theory (the TV show ,..... not the actual science thingy)

    I watched 20 minutes of the first episode and thought "this is shite" and turned it off. Ye'd think at my age I'd have remembered that quality and success are not a nessecary pairing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 255 ✭✭Mother Brain


    America hands down.

    (Sorry cold war kid!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    The likes of ISIS and Boko Haram scare the bejaysis out of me. I miss when Al Qaeda were the bogeyman.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Cold War Kid


    America hands down.

    (Sorry cold war kid!)
    :)

    But, while I understand criticism of US foreign policy/its meddling in the internal affairs of other countries, I just can't see how it is the most evil regime since WWI when you look at what you're comparing it to. Obviously America any time would be a preferable place to live by miles too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 255 ✭✭Mother Brain


    :)

    But, while I understand criticism of US foreign policy/its meddling in the internal affairs of other countries, I just can't see how it is the most evil regime since WWI when you look at what you're comparing it to. Obviously America any time would be a preferable place to live by miles too.

    That's 100% true alright (though they still jail their population at an unprecedented rate), but my argument would be that america is directly responsible for a large portion of the other 'worst regimes' that people have mentioned here for example.

    If any single one of those regimes is a contender for 'the worst' then shouldn't the country who made all of them happen bear more responsibility than the regime itself? Especially when in many cases these have been democratically elected governments they have overthrown.

    Also, other stuff like being the only one to have ever used WMD's on a civilian population. Mass torture and surveillance programs. Many many unilateral (and completely illegal) military actions against sovereign nations. Testing biological weapons on their own populations, and possible deployments against foreign governments in cuba and korea.

    It all adds up in my mind.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,116 ✭✭✭RDM_83 again


    Interestingly enough, the Catholic church was up to all kinds of brutalities at a government level in the older eras. While some of their clergy were involved in abuse and it was covered up in recent times, there was no brutal dictatorship akin to the Spanish Inquisition in place in recent times though.

    The Spanish Inquisition is interesting (no monty python quotes :mad: ), was it as bad as many think or thought is it more due to the "Black Legend".
    Like according to research an inquisition ended in execution only 1-3% of the time, now that obviously bad since it was meant to be enforcing Christian beliefs (the Whole thou Shall't not kill thing and all that forgiving jazz) but compared to the nastiness of life in general at the time


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,906 ✭✭✭Streetwalker


    Has to be the USA when you look at the misery and destruction they have brought down on people worldwide.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement