What's with insurance.

JamboMac

so my policy is due to be renewed from last year was 1,500 on provisional licence.

Now I have a full licence and would expect it to decrease yes, not go astronomical. Car is an 01 1.4 golf 75hp.

Aviva no quote and 123.ie 3,200.
Last week the AA where sub 1,000 which I hope they still will be in a weeks time as I'm quite within the 30days.

At this rate I'd be better off trying to insure 300hp golf gti, I wouldn't mind but I actually have my car running well, but would nearly become UN-sellable at that quotes.

I know some won't insure a car 15 years old but mine technically ain't.

Special Circumstances

Apparently there have been "losses". Now in a normal company in a normal market that usually involves cost cutting but I think it's fair to say no insurance shirts are struggling to put food on the table.

Of course we are legally obliged to purchase insurance so it's not a normal market situation, which is usually countered with "its a business duh it's not illegal to make as much as a profit as we possibly can". The banning of 15yr old cars is certainly not illegal but I would consider it immoral to put that many people under extra financial strain out of pure laziness or inability to examine the data correctly. Not to mind another nail in the coffin of owning anything other than a soulless A to B box in ireland.


But behind all these "justifications" is what really drives these people ... "because we're worth it and you're not"

umop apisdn

Instead of clamping down on abusers and fraudsters, the insurance companies and government have for years decided to gouge the law abiding drivers. It's much more profitable to gouge law abiding people than deal effectively with those who flaunt the law. Quite typical of the approach the authorities and golden circle companies have to most things in Ireland - instead of dealing harshly with the problem people, just use it instead as a convenient cover excuse to gouge law abiding people. You get used to it after living here for years, you just have to pay up and pretend to look happy / oblivious about it, as anyone who cops on to it is marked out as a problem.

JamboMac

If I pretend to be transgender do you think it's for women will insure me?

It is a piss take making all that effort to get a full licence and it's like ah well who cares if your a safe driver as loads of people made claims and we can't increase their insurance.

zl1whqvjs75cdy

Have a policy to renew on a 15 year old car in September. Absolutely dreading it.

umop apisdn

JamboMac wrote: »

If I pretend to be transgender do you think it's for women will insure me?

It is a piss take making all that effort to get a full licence and it's like ah well who cares if your a safe driver as loads of people made claims and we can't increase their insurance.

I think under equality legislation, legally they have to provide you with a quote. I've got quotes off them in the past. You won't find them any cheaper though, its a gimmick hangover from the past, as a few years ago, the Irish insurance companies closed the loophole of cheaper insurance for women. The excuse was "EU equality legislation" and we were promised at the time that although it would mean women's premiums would go up a bit and mens would come down a bit to keep them the same, and it would all level out. What they did in reality was raise women's premiums to the same cost as mens and kept the nice fat profit.

mallowgarry

donkeyoaty0099 wrote: »

Have a policy to renew on a 15 year old car in September. Absolutely dreading it.

I had to insure a 19 year old Corolla in March. Several firms wouldn't quote, it was up to €800 for Third Party with others. Brokers were a waste of time.
Met a young fella with a Corolla, he told me 123.ie. I paid around €340 fully comp, age of the car wasn't an issue for them.
That may have changed since, but they're worth a try.

umop apisdn

mallowgarry wrote: »

I had to insure a 19 year old Corolla in March. Several firms wouldn't quote, it was up to €800 for Third Party with others. Brokers were a waste of time.
Met a young fella with a Corolla, he told me 123.ie. I paid around €340 fully comp, age of the car wasn't an issue for them.
That may have changed since, but they're worth a try.

That sounds like an older quote. It's gone nuts recently, I paid about 290 fully comp with 123.ie last year for a 15 year old Almera with very low miles and in absolutely perfect condition, "best he'd ever seen" said one NCT tester.

This week, I went to renew and 123.ie wanted over 440, and even at that price they were still the cheapest when I shopped around. It's gangsterism pure and simple. I've never even had one penalty point or speeding fine in 20 + years of driving.

Special Circumstances

From the look of the websites 25plus ARE its4women but without the terrible ads.


Herself is going through quotes here, almost 950 from 123.ie for a first gen BMW mini cooper, full NCB, female driver over 30. A lot of the others coming in around 550-750.

We're to expect another 20% shafting next year apparently, according to industry mouthpiece the Indo

TallGlass

And the government couldn't give a balls once the public transport agenda is pushed on every motorist in the country.

Special Circumstances

TallGlass wrote: »

And the government couldn't give a balls once the public transport agenda is pushed on every motorist in the country.

Couldn't give a balls full stop really as long as Angela is happy I'd say.

A government of industry lobby groups, for industry lobby groups.

umop apisdn

TallGlass wrote: »

And the government couldn't give a balls once the public transport agenda is pushed on every motorist in the country.

What public transport ? Most of the county and the population are abysmally served with so called public transport. Besides there's too much money to be made fleecing motorists in Ireland for the connected to sort out public transport.

power pants

the other day someone suggested someone on here get a massive quote from a garage and go back to their insurance company

treat themselves to a holiday and go to a cheaper garage

**** like this is one reason why we pay more each year :rolleyes:

power pants

power pants wrote: »

the other day someone suggested someone on here get a massive quote from a garage and go back to their insurance company

treat themselves to a holiday and go to a cheaper garage

**** like this is one reason why we pay more each year :rolleyes:

Spot on........... but that's laziness from the companies. Why should you or I have to fork out increased premiums because insurance companies don't do their homework, although I suspect that particular suggestion was useless. They would be looking for the invoices ect. ect. and sending out assessors etc. It's mainly the organised "crash's" where groups and individuals are defrauding the insurance companies that we are paying for I suspect..... and a few other scams that I can't even begin to imagine, no doubt.

umop apisdn

power pants wrote: »

the other day someone suggested someone on here get a massive quote from a garage and go back to their insurance company

treat themselves to a holiday and go to a cheaper garage

**** like this is one reason why we pay more each year :rolleyes:

**** exist in all things.
If this was really a problem for Irish insurance companies, they could easily clamp down on such practices. Instead they prefer to use the "pass the costs on excuse" and extort the vast majority of law abiding Irish motorists tenfold. It's much more profitable for them to do so, than deal with the odd scanger that provides a useful cover story/excuse for the industry.

Christine LaDuchesse

Edit: emptied post as it is being ignored

Liam McPoyle

umop apisdn wrote: »

**** exist in all things.
If this was really a problem for Irish insurance companies, they could easily clamp down on such practices. Instead they prefer to use the "pass the costs on excuse" and extort the vast majority of law abiding Irish motorists tenfold. It's much more profitable for them to do so, than deal with the odd scanger that provides a useful cover story/excuse for the industry.

Despite what alot of people think, the "skangers" engineering claims themselves is not the issue in the grand scheme of things, if it was then it would be relatively easy to address it.

Its Mary down the road that wants a new kitchen.

Or Tom from the town that fancies a motor upgrade and a holiday.

Its every day, ordinary, non "skanger" people that are as much to blame (probably more given there are alot more of them than there are "skangers") for the rising cost of insurance in this country because they get hit from behind and get blinded by euro signs.

If motor insurance is so profitable how come Setanta went bust?

Or how come 123/RSA had a €200 million gap in their claims reserves?

Or how come FBD may be forced to sell off some of their property assets to ensure they have enough money in their coffers to comply with the Solvency II directive from the EU?

Its very easy to lay the blame at the foot of insurers but its not them that are giving out hundreds of thousands of quid every week for the craic, its ridiculous court awarded payments by an inept judicial system to gougers like Tom and Mary, they are the ones that are screwing you over, the insurance companies are a) trying to ensure they dont go bust and b) comply with a directive from the European Union.

Graham

Special Circumstances wrote: »

Apparently there have been "losses". Now in a normal company in a normal market that usually involves cost cutting but I think it's fair to say no insurance shirts are struggling to put food on the table.

are you sure?

Liberty Insurance to make loss in coming years
Group expects 135 redundancies in Dublin, with 115 planned in Cavan
http://www.irishtimes.com/business/financial-services/liberty-insurance-to-make-loss-in-coming-years-1.2262648

umop apisdn

Business Cat wrote: »

Despite what alot of people think, the "skangers" engineering claims themselves is not the issue in the grand scheme of things, if it was then it would be relatively easy to address it.

Its Mary down the road that wants a new kitchen.

Or Tom from the town that fancies a motor upgrade and a holiday.

Its every day, ordinary, non "skanger" people that are as much to blame (probably more given there are alot more of them than there are "skangers") for the rising cost of insurance in this country because they get hit from behind and get blinded by euro signs.

If motor insurance is so profitable how come Setanta went bust?

Or how come 123/RSA had a €200 million gap in their claims reserves?

Or how come FBD may be forced to sell off some of their property assets to ensure they have enough money in their coffers to comply with the Solvency II directive from the EU?

Its very easy to lay the blame at the foot of insurers but its not them that are giving out hundreds of thousands of quid every week for the craic, its ridiculous court awarded payments by an inept judicial system to gougers like Tom and Mary, they are the ones that are screwing you over, the insurance companies are a) trying to ensure they dont go bust and b) comply with a directive from the European Union.

Ah the industry fat cat has arrived to claim all their Irish customers are really crooks, hence the high rates in Ireland. Next you'll be asking how did poor old Quinn go bust, the poor lad, maybe we should have a collection for him, a bit of a whip round and for PMPA as well. Oh that's right we already did for both. The Irish judicial system, the Irish insurance industry, the SIMI and politicians have been scratching each others backs for years, don't make us laugh. We're not as easily fooled as you'd like to believe fat cat. As if the Irish insurance industry ever pays for their own incompetence and mismanagement. lol

Graham

umop apisdn wrote: »

Ah the industry fat cat has arrived to claim all their Irish customers are really crooks, hence the high rates in Ireland. Next you'll be asking how did poor old Quinn go bust, the poor lad, maybe we should have a collection for him, a bit of a whip round and for PMPA as well. Oh that's right we already did for both. The Irish judicial system, the Irish insurance industry, the SIMI and politicians have been scratching each others backs for years, don't make us laugh. We're not as easily fooled as you'd like to believe fat cat. As if the Irish insurance industry ever pays for their own incompetence and mismanagement. lol

That rant would be much more effective if only Business Cat were wrong.

umop apisdn

Graham wrote: »

That rant would be much more effective if only Business Cat were wrong.

Yes, us plebs really should believe vested interest industry representative types that flock to such threads, claiming their Irish customers such as Mary and Tom, all are crooks, on the other hand fat cat insurance lads are so trustworthy. They've been proven time and time again to be so trustworthy in Ireland.

Graham

umop apisdn wrote: »

Yes, us plebs

I don't know which 'plebs' you're speaking on behalf of.

I pay for my own insurance at normal rates and I don't work in an area remotely connected to the insurance industry.

umop apisdn

Graham wrote: »

I don't know which 'plebs' you're speaking on behalf of.

I pay for my own insurance at normal rates and I don't work in an area remotely connected to the insurance industry.

What are you 'connected to' then ?

Liam McPoyle

umop apisdn wrote: »

Ah the industry fat cat has arrived to claim all their Irish customers are really crooks, hence the high rates in Ireland. Next you'll be asking how did poor old Quinn go bust, the poor lad, maybe we should have a collection for him, a bit of a whip round and for PMPA as well. Oh that's right we already did for both. The Irish judicial system, the Irish insurance industry, the SIMI and politicians have been scratching each others backs for years, don't make us laugh. We're not as easily fooled as you'd like to believe fat cat. As if the Irish insurance industry ever pays for their own incompetence and mismanagement. lol

Quality.

I find the use of the old reliable straw man a pretty good indicator of the myopic and ill informed, thanks for saving me the time of actually trying to engage with you.

Also, you are very reminiscent of a poster that was banned a couple of months ago. That guy also had a major issue with the insurance industry and fat cats. Thats some coincidence, eh.

Graham

umop apisdn wrote: »

What are you 'connected to' then ?

Read through my 14 years of posts and you can probably work it out.

It's impressive that you're able to make such accusations after just 6 days on the site.

umop apisdn

Business Cat wrote: »

Quality.

I find the use of the old reliable straw man a pretty good indicator of the myopic and ill informed, thanks for saving me the time of actually trying to engage with you.

Also, you are very reminiscent of a poster that was banned a couple of months ago. That guy also had a major issue with the insurance industry and fat cats. Thats some coincidence, eh.

Ah I see, all this from the guy who also had to resort to accusing all the ordinary insurance customers, Tom and Mary, of being crooks as well. Yep we believe you all right. You are right about it being better not to engage with people who see your bull for what it is.

Liam McPoyle

umop apisdn wrote: »

Ah I see, all this from the guy who calls all his ordinary customers, Tom and Mary, crooks as well. Yep we believe you all right.

Well umop apisdn, or would you prefer I called you browniepoints, or Jed I wonder, if you actually read my post, nowhere, I repeat, nowhere, did I say all of the ordinary customers were crooks.

The majority of insurance customers are honest, decent and want a fair price for a good product, nothing wrong with that.

But the fact remains there are alot of people that even though they may be honest and decent in most ways, they still have no problem exaggerating injuries to get a few quid.

Anyway, its painfully obvious that you are either trolling or just do not have a clue, either way, Im done wasting band width with you.


Good day to you Sir!

umop apisdn

Business Cat wrote: »

Well umop apisdn, or would you prefer I called you browniepoints, or Jed I wonder, if you actually read my post, nowhere, I repeat, nowhere, did I say all of the ordinary customers were crooks.

The majority of insurance customers are honest, decent and want a fair price for a good product, nothing wrong with that.

But the fact remains there are alot of people that even though they may be honest and decent in most ways, they still have no problem exaggerating injuries to get a few quid.

Anyway, its painfully obvious that you are either trolling or just do not have a clue, either way, Im done wasting band width with you.


Good day to you Sir!

Yep, Tom, Mary, me, all the ordinary honest decent people of Ireland, when it comes to insurance, we all become dishonest, in order to rob the poor self contradictory fat cats, who, poor fellows, can't do a thing to manage it except charge extortionate rates and then go bust and get a taxpayers bailout and another levy. You'll have to practice a bit more 25. Seanie Quinn eat your heart out. lol

Graham

Business Cat wrote: »

nowhere, I repeat, nowhere, did I say all of the ordinary customers were crooks.

umop apisdn wrote: »

Yep, Tom, Mary, me, all the ordinary honest decent people of Ireland, when it comes to insurance, we all become dishonest

You really do have a bit of a bee in your bonnet about insurance companies don't you?

Great to hear your Almera is still on the go though do you have to re-register the car each time you change identity?

Valetta

umop apisdn wrote: »

Yep, Tom, Mary, me, all the ordinary honest decent people of Ireland, when it comes to insurance, we all become dishonest, in order to rob the poor self contradictory fat cats,l

Where did anyone say that?

It's clear you know nothing about the way the insurance industry works.

umop apisdn

Valetta wrote: »

Where did anyone say that?

It's clear you know nothing about the way the insurance industry works.

Or rather the real problem for the cats, are the mice that are not as easily fooled.

Graham

umop apisdn wrote: »

Or rather the real problem for the cats, are the mice that are not as easily fooled.

I'm guessing that's some kind of conspiracy theory thing but I must admit I'm struggling to work out what you're trying to say.

Have you discovered a way to make insurance cheaper?

Liam McPoyle

umop apisdn wrote: »

Yep, Tom, Mary, me, all the ordinary honest decent people of Ireland, when it comes to insurance, we all become dishonest, in order to rob the poor self contradictory fat cats, who, poor fellows, can't do a thing to manage it except charge extortionate rates and then go bust and get a taxpayers bailout and another levy. You'll have to practice a bit more 25. Seanie Quinn eat your heart out. lol

umop apisdn wrote: »

Or rather the real problem for the cats, are the mice that are not as easily fooled.

Liam McPoyle

Graham wrote: »

I'm guessing that's some kind of conspiracy theory thing but I must admit I'm struggling to work out what you're trying to say.

Have you discovered a way to make insurance cheaper?

You should ask him about blue shirts and politicians too.

Another bug bear of his.

:pac:

Bongalongherb

Well after trying for the last week for quotes on my small mitsubishi colt 1.4 and only receiving crazy prices I have decided to give up, as my car is almost 16 years old. My insurance ran out at 23:59 pm 14th August, so now at this time No insurance company is receiving my hard cash because of the huge hike to insure it. I have the cash to pay it now for the price I was on last year but not the extra they want now.

6 years no claims
No penalty points

It seems that every year I gain a no claims bonus, my insurance goes up instead of the logical way of down

Thinking of getting a motorbike now and selling this dangerous un-roadworthy vehicle even though it has new NCT.

umop apisdn

Graham wrote: »

I'm guessing that's some kind of conspiracy theory thing but I must admit I'm struggling to work out what you're trying to say.

Have you discovered a way to make insurance cheaper?

How about you deal with all the alleged corruption of all your customers, while lowering the fat profits you make from increasing premiums by 50% for starters ? Oh wait, that's not in your interest is it.

umop apisdn

Business Cat wrote: »

thanks for saving me the time of actually trying to engage with you.

Business Cat wrote: »

either way, Im done wasting band width with you.

Business Cat wrote: »

You should ask him about blue shirts and politicians too.

Another bug bear of his.

:pac:

Cat caught lying again . . .find one quote from me about blue shirts. What's the Enda / FG connection exactly . . interesting slip. Looks like the cat is well out of spin school quotes now, I'd ask for your spin school money back if I were you.

Graham

umop apisdn wrote: »

How about you deal with all the alleged corruption of all your customers, while lowering the fat profits you make from increasing premiums by 50% for starters ? Oh wait, that's not in your interest is it.

You're obviously finding this difficult to understand so let me spell this our for you.

I don't work for an insurance company or for any company remotely connected to an insurance company.

I joined boards 14 years ago and I challenge you to find anything that suggets I work for an insurance company or I joined to act as a shill for the insurance industry.

Thanks for listening, please feel free to resume your random ranting.

Graham

Bongalongherb wrote: »

selling this dangerous un-roadworthy vehicle even though it has new NCT.

Who told you your vehicle was dangerous and unroadworthy? If that's true you probably should keep it off the road.

umop apisdn

Graham wrote: »

You're obviously finding this difficult to understand so let me spell this our for you.

I don't work for an insurance company or for any company remotely connected to an insurance company.

I joined boards 14 years ago and I challenge you to find anything that suggets I work for an insurance company or I joined to act as a shill for the insurance industry.

Thanks for listening, please feel free to resume your random ranting.

You were asked earlier what you were 'connected to' and refused to answer . . . at least the cat tried some spin at the start.

Bongalongherb

Graham wrote: »

Who told you your vehicle was dangerous and unroadworthy? If that's true you probably should keep it off the road.

I cannot believe you didn't notice that that part of the comment was justified sarcasm. It was a joke regarding these insurance companies saying that my 15 year old car is dangerous even though it has a certificate of road-worthyness.


Face palm.

umop apisdn

Bongalongherb wrote: »

I cannot believe you didn't notice that that part of the comment was justified sarcasm. It was a joke regarding these insurance companies saying that my 15 year old car is dangerous even though it has a certificate of road-worthyness.

Expect more abuse soon, because with a 15 year old car in great condition, what you're really dangerous to is the SIMI and the other vested interests. Apparently because you have an older well kept and very roadworthy car, overnight you're just about to turn into a crazed kamikaze master criminal who will stop at nothing to defraud and bankrupt the poor honest powerless insurance industry cats of Ireland.

Liam McPoyle

umop apisdn wrote: »

Cat caught lying again . . .find one quote from me about blue shirts. What's the Enda / FG connection exactly . . interesting slip. Looks like the cat is well out of spin school quotes now, I'd ask for your spin school money back if I were you.

Ok.

How about this?

Or this?

Or this?

Feck it, heres a link to your last meltdown.

Top Top Banter.

umop apisdn

Business Cat wrote: »

thanks for saving me the time of actually trying to engage with you.

Business Cat wrote: »

either way, Im done wasting band width with you.

Business Cat wrote: »

You should ask him about blue shirts and politicians too.

Another bug bear of his.

:pac:

Business Cat wrote: »

Ok.

How about

Feck it, heres a link to your last meltdown.

In other words you are caught lying again and can't link to a single post of mine that references blue shirts. But your blue shirt reference and paranoia is an interesting Freudian slip to me. You see the mistake you've made is that I don't care if you are FG/FF/SF/LAB or otherwise wannabe fat cat, spinners and bullshyters are all the same to me. It's against the forum charter to re-reg, so report it to a moderator as you are supposed to, it's also against the forum charter to repeatedly accuse posters of being a re-reg or troll, never mind being a piss poor distraction attempt. My you are becoming one very desperate cat now. Why is that ?

Bongalongherb

This advanced capitalism is making my tummy hurt.

Liam McPoyle

umop apisdn wrote: »

In other words you are caught lying again and can't link to a single post of mine that references blue shirts. But your blue shirt reference and paranoia is an interesting Freudian slip to me. You see the mistake you've made is that I don't care if you are FG/FF/SF/LAB or otherwise wannabe fat cat, spinners and bullshyters are all the same to me. It's against the forum charter to re-reg, so report it to a moderator as you are supposed to, it's also against the forum charter to repeatedly accuse posters of being a re-reg or troll, never mind being a piss poor distraction attempt. My you are becoming one very desperate cat now. Why is that ?

Its pretty obvious you are the same poster in the links above, it doesnt bother me if you re-reg a million times but you sir are the one that has been caught out.

I will bid you fare well now but before I do.

Get yourself one of these.



1850 715 815 is the Live Line phone number.

Failing that you may want to call these guys.




They are used to dealing with crack pots so if Joe cant help you then maybe they can.


God speed anonymous lunatic, god speed.

Bongalongherb

Business Cat

Open Your Mind, Open Your Mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xO1kKemcwYk

umop apisdn

Business Cat wrote: »

thanks for saving me the time of actually trying to engage with you.

Business Cat wrote: »

either way, Im done wasting band width with you.

Business Cat wrote: »

You should ask him about blue shirts and politicians too.

Another bug bear of his.

:pac:

Business Cat wrote: »

Ok.

How about

Feck it, heres a link to your last meltdown.

Business Cat wrote: »

Its pretty obvious you are the same poster in the links above, it doesnt bother me if you re-reg a million times but you sir are the one that has been caught out.

I will bid you fare well now but before I do.

Hello again.
So you were caught lying yet again.
Report it to moderators as the forum charter requires.

Business Cat wrote: »

Get yourself one of these.

1850 715 815 is the Live Line phone number.

Failing that you may want to call these guys.

They are used to dealing with crack pots so if Joe cant help you then maybe they can.

God speed anonymous lunatic, god speed.

Reduced to posting meme pictures again ? Oh dear.
So the wanna be fat business cat ran out of spin after one post, and ever since is running from the mouse.
Looks like you'll have to save up for more spin school lessons.

JamboMac

I'm guessing the 15 year old cars that are statistically more likely to be in accidents are driven by take away drivers and especially ones driven on foreign licences as most don't seem to know the rules of the road, it's very Easy to say cars of fifteen years plus are more likely to in accident.

What stops them saying somebody of 50+ is more likely to have heart attack at the wheel so let's charge them an extra 20%.

umop apisdn

JamboMac wrote: »

I'm guessing the 15 year old cars that are statistically more likely to be in accidents are driven by take away drivers and especially ones driven on foreign licences as most don't seem to know the rules of the road, it's very Easy to say cars of fifteen years plus are more likely to in accident.

What stops them saying somebody of 50+ is more likely to have heart attack at the wheel so let's charge them an extra 20%.

The NCT is the national government regulation and standard of road worthiness.
Drivers cause accidents, not well kept and maintained, NCT'd, and perfectly road legal and acceptable vehicles. OR maybe some insurance shills are going to come on here and claim the NCT inspectors are all fraudulent as well. The vast majority of Irish drivers are not making insurance claims or engaged in fraud, despite the spin from the industry fat cats here that honest Tom and Mary suddenly become pathological liars and fraudsters when it comes to car insurance. I've been accident free and haven't claimed once in 20 years plus of driving, not even for a windscreen, I have never received a single penalty point or even a single parking ticket, yet instead of dealing with the problem drivers, the insurance companies in Ireland try to create this hysteria that we're all at it, to massively ramp up the price of insurance for everyone else. Why is that I wonder ? Well I may be forced by law to buy into their protection racket insurance, but I sure don't have to buy their bullshyte.

Bongalongherb

And I thought vampires were bad. The way I see it now is that one of any particular insurance company is down money because of the loss of this one customer. I'm willing to pay for insurance, but it's unjust so I cannot allow myself to pay this huge increase.

I'll tell ye what, I'll sell my 6 years no claims bonus points to get a reduction in my insurance renewal, lets haggle ?. No claims bonuses are absolutely worthless now at this time, so what's the point in having them when they charge you more for each year you gain an extra one ?. The mind boggles.