Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Saorview - Attic Installation

  • 08-08-2015 3:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭


    Hi,

    So I've put an aerial in the attic for Saorview and used some existing cabling going to 2 rooms. Cable from the aerial is going into a splitter which goes to the 2 rooms.

    I'm still messing about with the aerial to get it in the right position but having trouble getting RTE1 in the clear without any interference. All the other channels work perfectly.

    Should I use a booster since I'm splitting the signal? Any advice?

    Cheers.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    Have you brought anything into the attic, e.g. a small TV set with signal quality display, to give an indication of what the signal is like while you're moving the aerial around? (I'm assuming you don't have access to any kind of professional signal meter.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,905 ✭✭✭steveon


    If there is silver foil installation i.e. Kingspan between the rafter you are pointing the saorview aerial through remove it this will increase signal received but as Thurston has already suggested its not easy align an aerial properly without a meter of some kind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Nope havent used any sort of signal meter. Very unprofessional approach of moving it around while I have someone downstairs shouting up if the picture is solid or not. Any suggestions for a relatively cheap signal meter?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,905 ✭✭✭steveon


    Why not get a proper OK installer around to do the job for you saving you time and grief. Your aerial might need to go outdoors and you may have the wrong type aerial for your area.

    A proper meter costs approx €500 I have seen cheap ones that light up on a signal for around 15euro but why bother if a once off job..

    What


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    mossy464 wrote: »
    Nope havent used any sort of signal meter. Very unprofessional approach of moving it around while I have someone downstairs shouting up if the picture is solid or not.

    Do you know which is the recommended transmitter for your area, its direction, polarity of signal, & the same for any alternative transmitters? And you have an aerial that covers the right frequency range?

    If you get all this right, & the signal is reasonably strong, you have a good chance if you just mount the aerial as high as possible, looking through the roof rather than walls, with no obstructions (particularly metal or watertanks in the roof, buildings or trees outside) in the path between aerial & transmitter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Thurston? wrote: »
    Do you know which is the recommended transmitter for your area, its direction, polarity of signal, & the same for any alternative transmitters? And you have an aerial that covers the right frequency range?

    If you get all this right, & the signal is reasonably strong, you have a good chance if you just mount the aerial as high as possible, looking through the roof rather than walls, with no obstructions (particularly metal or watertanks in the roof, buildings or trees outside) in the path between aerial & transmitter.

    Yep. Im very close to a transmitter. See details below. I bought the following aerial which I think should be right for my area.

    http://www.ebay.ie/itm/Wideband-UHF-Aerial-Free-Irish-TV-Saorview-Outdoor-/171099118978?hash=item27d64d5d82

    SITEINFORMATION
    Site:Glanmire
    Site On-Air:Yes
    Channels: 47, 52

    AERIALINFORMATION
    Polarization:H
    Direction to:
    point (degrees)South (171)
    Distance: 3 km


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    The aerial should be alright, yes.

    Can you find out if what you're viewing on the TV is actually carried on those 2 channels; 47 (682 MHz) for RTE2, TV3, TG4; 52 (738 MHz) for RTE1, RTE1 +1, as some receivers if they encounter other signals lower down the frequency band, before they get to these (say from Spur Hill or Collins Barracks transmitters), would just put these 'wrong' channels at the top of the list.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Thurston? wrote: »
    The aerial should be alright, yes.

    Can you find out if what you're viewing on the TV is actually carried on those 2 channels; 47 (682 MHz) for RTE2, TV3, TG4; 52 (738 MHz) for RTE1, RTE1 +1, as some receivers if they encounter other signals lower down the frequency band, before they get to these (say from Spur Hill or Collins Barracks transmitters), would just put these 'wrong' channels at the top of the list.

    So RTE 2 etc is coming from 666 Mhz. RTE 1 is coming from 698 Mhz.

    Looks like its actually Spur Hill I'm receiving from.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    See if the Glanmire channels appear as duplicates further down the list, or you could try tuning them manually. And of course, check Spur Hill with the aerial actually pointed at Spur Hill, & pick whichever transmitter is best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    No sign of Glanmire channels at all. Need to get a signal meter of some sort to get it right. I have a cheap satellite signal meter. Would that work at all for detecting the saorview signal?

    EDIT: Another thread tells me the sat meter wont work. This seems like an option.

    http://www.ebay.ie/itm/DVB-T-satellite-Finder-Digital-TV-Aerial-Terrestrial-Signal-Strength-Meter-BI018-/271942239147?hash=item3f510543ab


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    You shouldn't need a meter, the signal won't be that elusive where you are.

    So nothing shows up if you manually scan channel 47 or 52, is there a signal quality display?

    Are your receivers Saorview approved? If they are, they should only store the channels with the best signal, so that would be an endorsement for Spur Hill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Nope nothing shows up for channel 47 or 52. There is a signal quality display so I could use that I suppose. It's blank though on those channels so need to reposition the aerial.

    The receiver is a cheap Optimuss teres box. Not Saorview approved.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    Well if there's no obvious obstruction in the direction of Glanmire (remember, anything metal, like foil-backed insulation will kill the signal), then I'd be inclined to think that something isn't connected properly somewhere (maybe cable to aerial), & Spur Hill is just being weakly picked up somewhere besides the actual aerial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    I'll check everything again and see how I get on. Thanks for your help. Will post here once I've it set up properly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Not sure what's gone wrong now but I'm getting no signal at all. Pointed the aerial back towards spur hill and just used one cable to one room without the splitter to see if that was degrading the signal and now nothing when I scan for channels. Dunno could I have damaged the aerial while messing around with it

    Il have to leave it for now anyway as its in the parents house and won't be around to go at it again for a few weeks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    mossy464 wrote: »
    Not sure what's gone wrong now but I'm getting no signal at all. Pointed the aerial back towards spur hill and just used one cable to one room without the splitter to see if that was degrading the signal and now nothing when I scan for channels. Dunno could I have damaged the aerial while messing around with it

    You could have strained the connection if you don't have the cable taped to the aerial boom. Then when the aerial is in place, you can use more tape or clips to make sure the cable is properly supported along its length, & keep it tidy too.

    Or the connection you disturbed at the splitter could be the culprit.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 13 Yobnned


    I live in longford and I am 6 miles line of sight from the Cairn Hill transmitter. Could I get all channels on Saorview if I put the aeriel in the attic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    Yobnned wrote: »
    I live in longford and I am 6 miles line of sight from the Cairn Hill transmitter. Could I get all channels on Saorview if I put the aeriel in the attic?

    If you have an unobstructed view of a transmitter like Cairn Hill, at that distance, then you shouldn't have problems, unless your attic is lined with foil, or you put the aerial behind a water tank or something, as was mentioned already in the thread.

    Of course this is assuming you use the right aerial for the job, know how to align & polarise it properly (Cairn Hill uses horizontal polarity), & do the cable connections right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    So I got a cheap meter and the strength of the signal in the attic is minimal. The reading barely went up at all but the sound changed when I was pointing towards Spur Hill. Very weak though. This is the meter.

    http://www.ebay.ie/itm/DVB-T-satellite-Finder-Digital-TV-Aerial-Terrestrial-Signal-Strength-Meter-BI018-/271942239147?hash=item3f510543ab

    I guess I'll have to install it on the Chimney.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    mossy464 wrote: »
    So I got a cheap meter and the strength of the signal in the attic is minimal ...

    Do you have the adjuster on the side of the meter turned fully anti-clockwise?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Yeah well I was twisting it to see if that made any difference. Should it be turned fully clockwise to start with?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    You'd start with it fully anticlockwise: turning it clockwise apparently increases attenuation i.e. reduces the signal, so fully anticlockwise is full signal.

    Are you sure you've made all cable connections properly, especially cable to aerial? Might be worth posting a pic. of this connection in particular, if you're any way unsure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    I can't see anything wrong with the cable connection to the aerial but will post a pic of it later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Here's a pic of the cabling. Can you see anything wrong with it?

    dc593e106a0ad08ea0b555d4aa14e9f5.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    The braid should be inside the clamp with the 2 screws, & you could trim off the excess centre wire too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Thurston? wrote: »
    The braid should be inside the clamp with the 2 screws, & you could trim off the excess centre wire too.

    Thanks. Do you think that those issues could significantly affect signal quality?

    Will be another 2 weeks before I'm around to try it out but I'll give it a go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    mossy464 wrote: »
    Do you think that those issues could significantly affect signal quality?

    The unconnected outer conductor (braid) is very important, the excess center conductor far less so, though might increase the likelihood of interference pickup.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Thurston? wrote: »
    The unconnected outer conductor (braid) is very important, the excess center conductor far less so, though might increase the likelihood of interference pickup.

    Great thanks. Will post back here when I have another go at it. I'm guessing the braid not being connected is why the signal has suddenly gone when I was getting some signal in the same area when I first tried a few weeks back.

    I do remember when I first connected the cable to the aerial I did have the braid up touching off the clamp.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    The braid & centre conductor can't be touching either, so bear this in mind when you redo the connection.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Redid the connection but no joy. Getting slight peaks in the noise from the meter but nothing solid and no movement on the gauge. Might just resort to an installer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Thurston?


    I'd be willing to bet there's still a dodgy connection somewhere ...

    Advice here on wiring up different connections, including aerials like your own, & the f-connectors used on your meter.

    Basically (& obviously) with any of these cable connections, you want each conductor securely connected to its own part of the connection, & not in contact with any of the others.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Thurston? wrote: »
    I'd be willing to bet there's still a dodgy connection somewhere ...

    Advice here on wiring up different connections, including aerials like your own, & the f-connectors used on your meter.

    Basically (& obviously) with any of these cable connections, you want each conductor securely connected to its own part of the connection, & not in contact with any of the others.

    Ya I'm thinking there is more than likely a dodgy connection somewhere but getting very frustrated with it at this stage.

    Gonna give it one last go with a fresh length of cable and start from scratch.

    Given that I had a signal the very first day without any meter but it was just breaking up on RTE 1 there must be some hope.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭mossy464


    Don't wana speak too soon but I've got it working now. Rewired with a new length of cable and have the aerial pointed at spur hill and up a bit higher in the attic than it was before.

    Signal quality on the box shows 100% and no break up of picture yet. Fingers crossed.

    Only thing is that the meter gauge didn't actually move up. Just the beep noise heightened when I pointed the aerial at the transmitter.

    Let's see if theres any issues over the coming weeks.


Advertisement