Not sure whether to be scared or satisfied

Reiver

Well I've posted stuff like this before and been ridiculed for it but even the most hardened skeptic has to accept this and pull their head out of the sand.

NASA cut live feed of footage from the ISS. The footage has to be seen to be believed. Three craft leave the earth's atmosphere and proceed into deep space.

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/nasa-cuts-live-feed-as-ufos-spotted-leaving-earth-31338252.html

How does this make people feel? I'm not sure whether to be happy at the vindication or appalled by the realisation we're no longer alone.

Timberrrrrrrr

Reiver wrote: »

Well I've posted stuff like this before and been ridiculed for it but even the most hardened skeptic has to accept this and pull their head out of the sand.

NASA cut live feed of footage from the ISS. The footage has to be seen to be believed. Three craft leave the earth's atmosphere and proceed into deep space.

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/nasa-cuts-live-feed-as-ufos-spotted-leaving-earth-31338252.html

How does this make people feel? I'm not sure whether to be happy at the vindication or appalled by the realisation we're no longer alone.

Yet it never made the news?

humanji

I've a sneaking suspicion you're going to be ridiculed for this as well.

Reiver

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Yet it never made the news?

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/nasa-cuts-live-feed-as-ufos-spotted-leaving-earth-31338252.html

If you see my above post you'll notice that the Independent ran a story on it. No sweeping this under the rug.

ThinkProgress

Where's my tin hat gone...

Oryx

Some twinkly pixels? I feel like I fell for clickbait.

wp_rathead

Probably just the Illuminati going for a spin

Reiver

humanji wrote: »

I've a sneaking suspicion you're going to be ridiculed for this as well.

Can you explain please?

Captain Chaos

More than likely DARPA related than ET.

conorh91

The Independent has turned into quite the clickbait rag.

In generations to come, small children sitting around firesides will marvel at tales of that time Ireland had two national broadsheets.

Ruu

You are not alone, I am here with you..

Stheno

SO a few blurry objects that could be space rubbish such as ex satellites now qualify as potential UFOs?

You do know there is a conspiracy forum?

Away with you

youtube!

Ah Cmon man that could literally be anything, from a glitch on the camera to an optical illusion, its a bit soon to say were not alone!!

Reiver

Stheno wrote: »

SO a few blurry objects that could be space rubbish such as ex satellites now qualify as potential UFOs?

You do know there is a conspiracy forum?

Away with you

It's not a conspiracy theory. I'm wondering how people feel after this relevation.

ThinkProgress

"could quite easily be satellites".

humanji

Reiver wrote: »

Can you explain please?

Do I really need to? You already said you were ridiculed for posting similar stuff before, and now you post an article from the Independent, of all places, and claim to have been vindicated despite having no proof whatsoever. So chances are pretty high that you'll get the same reaction that you got before. And from the posts here, it seems I was correct.

Reiver

humanji wrote: »

Do I really need to? You already said you were ridiculed for posting similar stuff before, and now you post an article from the Independent, of all places, and claim to have been vindicated despite having no proof whatsoever. So chances are pretty high that you'll get the same reaction that you got before. And from the posts here, it seems I was correct.

Whats wrong with the Independent? I read it and the Times every week.

Stop making me sound like a sun or daily mail reader.

El_Duderino 09

Oryx wrote: »

Some twinkly pixels? I feel like I fell for clickbait.

I feel like we're really missing something.

All I saw was dim sparkles but OP seems to be sure it's proof of... something. It even zoomed in and confirmed dim sparkles of a few pixles.

Conclusion:
Clickbait

Reiver

El_Duderino 09 wrote: »

I feel like we're really missing something.

All I saw was dim sparkles but OP seems to be sure it's proof of... something. It even zoomed in and confirmed dim sparkles of a few pixles.

Conclusion:
Clickbait

If you follow the Independent link it is a better quality video.

Timberrrrrrrr

Reiver wrote: »

It's not a conspiracy theory. I'm wondering how people feel after this relevation.

What revelation.

You said in the op

Reiver wrote: »

How does this make people feel? I'm not sure whether to be happy at the vindication or appalled by the realisation we're no longer alone.

Where is the evidence of this? Don't get me wrong, I believe the universe is way too big for us to be the only living things in it but what you posted cannot in any way be claimed as proof of alien life.

One eyed Jack

Reiver wrote: »

Whats wrong with the Independent? I read it and the Times every week.

Stop making me sound like a sun or daily mail reader.

Two cheeks of the same arse really tbh.

Reiver

Why did Nasa cut the video feed

GLaDOS

>NASA cuts live feed due to technical reasons

>People search desperately for any conspiracy

ThinkProgress

@Reiver - Are you directly employed or indirectly employed by the independent?

Junkyard Tom

Chinese lantern.

Peregrine

Reiver wrote: »

Why did Nasa cut the video feed

You'll have to ask NASA.

Three blurry sparkles and "Why did Nasa cut the video feed" isn't conclusive evidence of alien life.

moc moc a moc

Reiver wrote: »

Why did Nasa cut the video feed

Why didn't they cut the whole feed if there was something untoward going on? Why did they allow us to observe these "craft" for almost a minute before jumping in with the censor scissors?

Maybe it was to lull us into a false sense of security. "Aha!", people like me would say. "Why didn't they cut the feed earlier?", we'd say. Thus casting doubt on the tin-foil hatters such as yourself; a double bluff, if you will.

A cunning plan, NASA! And you would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for the tenacious Detective Reiver.

GLaDOS

Has anyone consulted the chart? http://i.imgur.com/KaRau.jpg

The Backwards Man

Weather balloons.It's always weather balloons!

catallus

Reiver wrote: »

Whats wrong with the Independent? I read it and the Times every week.

Stop making me sound like a sun or daily mail reader.

Without wanting to drag this thread away from its noble topic, what, may I ask, precisely, is wrong with being a "sun or daily mail reader"?

Both are august tribunes.

catallus

The Backwards Man wrote: »

Weather balloons.It's always weather balloons!

That's it backwardsman, use your words.

Bongalongherb

They look like ice crystals to me. Now don't get me wrong here but I have seen 3 very strange unusual aerial objects in the past, one in the early 80's and two in the summer daylight in 2011. But regarding these objects from NASA, I'd put my money on ice-crystals. I saw these many times before on sts missions.

c_man

Swamp gas.

kneemos

A hoax,like ninety percent of UFO pictures.

GreatDefector

Junkyard Tom wrote: »

Chinese lantern.

A great bunch of lads

PizzamanIRL

Who cares if we're "alone" or not? We've come this far and we've been grand.

It was probably that auld fella that was caught on camera yesterday dancing like a mad man after Westmeath won. He was probably out with his glow sticks, bouncing around.

El_Duderino 09

Reiver wrote: »

Why did Nasa cut the video feed

If I say 'I don't know' will you take it as evidence of aliens?

I'd love to know if there are aliens. This isn't evidence of aliens any more than rustling in the bushes is evidence of Bigfoot. You do your cause no favours with this.

Xaracatz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0f-2P3luxU

ThinkProgress

"It's the damn robot aliens!" lol

fleet_admiral

Swamp gas reflecting off of Venus

Badly Drunk Boy

conorh91 wrote: »

In generations to come, small children sitting around firesides will marvel at tales of that time Ireland had two national broadsheets.

Remember when there were 3? The Irish Press closed down in 1995.

Bongalongherb

There is a possibility that seeing that we humans send space-craft to other planets and the outer solar system, who is to say that these UFO's are not some sort of advanced unmanned craft of some kind sent from other distant star systems or of possible inter-dimensional travel ?. We're doing it, (except for the dimensional travel) so if there is another civilisation more advanced than we are out there then I'm sure they would be sending along their probes to other planets.

Who knows until we catch one and study it.

Mightydrumming

ROSWELL ROSWELL!!!!

Mightydrumming

Bongalongherb wrote: »

Who knows until we catch one and study it.

Maybe we already have :rolleyes:

Magnate

kneemos wrote: »

A hoax,like ninety percent of UFO pictures.

So 10 percent are actually UFOs?? :P

Hitchens

that looks like it was filmed near the Tannhäuser Gate

ThinkProgress

Why do we always depict aliens as being smarter and more advanced than us?

How much of an anti-climax would it be, if we found aliens on a distant planet... but they were all less advanced than us? lol

brandnewaward

The Backwards Man wrote: »

Weather balloons.It's always weather balloons!

weather balloons my hole , its clearly swamp gas

Bongalongherb

ThinkProgress wrote: »

Why do we always depict aliens as being smarter and more advanced than us?

How much of an anti-climax would it be, if we found aliens on a distant planet... but they were all less advanced than us? lol

There's quite possibly both. How many earth-like planets have we found already, and that's in one tiny part of the universe. An alien civilisation could be thousands if not millions of years more advanced than us. It's something to think about, as well as their own technology structure. It's a very valid point.

GLaDOS

ThinkProgress wrote: »

Why do we always depict aliens as being smarter and more advanced than us?

How much of an anti-climax would it be, if we found aliens on a distant planet... but they were all less advanced than us? lol

If we ever do find life on another planet, i fully expect it to be something similar to our bacteria.

Massimo Cassagrande

UFO now. Good lad.