Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Heinz 57 Lab/retriever type puppy - where to get one?

  • 26-02-2015 3:45pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭


    Hi all,

    I've a wonderful Heinz 57 Labrador/German Shepard/Other type cross bitch who was spayed as soon as she reached maturity. She has German Shepard colouring and hair but a Labrador shape body and a Labrador type character.

    She was an unwanted/rescue pup from a farm in early 2005 and is now 10 and slowing down. I'd like to get a similar make up young pup just weaned off it's mother who my current dog can "mother" and show to ropes to and I'm also hoping that the injection of a younger dog into the mix will also give my current dog a new lease of life.

    Is this a good/bad plan? Should I wait another year or two before introducing a pup?

    If it's a good plan where is a good place to pick up a a genuine unwanted/rescue pup just weaned off it's mother?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Toulouse


    How is your dog with other dogs?

    I know my 9 year old would hate for me to bring home a pup so before you do make sure it's in the best interests of your existing dog.

    Other than that, these kinds of pups are ten a penny in Irish pounds although you never really know what you're getting with a pound puppy - they could turn into anything! If you are going down this route then make sure your own dogs vaccinations, etc. are all up to date.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    Toulouse wrote: »
    How is your dog with other dogs?

    I know my 9 year old would hate for me to bring home a pup so before you do make sure it's in the best interests of your existing dog.

    Other than that, these kinds of pups are ten a penny in Irish pounds although you never really know what you're getting with a pound puppy - they could turn into anything! If you are going down this route then make sure your own dogs vaccinations, etc. are all up to date.

    My dog is bang up to date with her vaccinations etc and has a super temperament with kids and adults etc but can be a bit territorial with other dogs. I spoke to the vet at her recent annual checkup and he thinks it's a good idea to transition a young pup into the house but it has to be a very young pup who will immediately acknowledge that the existing dog is the boss in the hierarchy. That's absolutely key otherwise it could be a disaster and totally counter productive. The older the pup is the more it will have established it's own identity and will be more likely to challenge rather than defer to the older dog.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,062 ✭✭✭✭tk123


    My dog is great with other dogs but he was NOT impressed when his baby sister arrived - he was 4 at the time. It took a good while for him to accept her and almost 2 years on I still have to separate them at times because she torments him and pushes him around. She even bosses my friend's dog who's the same age as my guy!!

    Could you foster maybe and see how she gets on with another dog in the house?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,528 ✭✭✭ShaShaBear


    BenEadir wrote: »
    My dog is bang up to date with her vaccinations etc and has a super temperament with kids and adults etc but can be a bit territorial with other dogs. I spoke to the vet at her recent annual checkup and he thinks it's a good idea to transition a young pup into the house but it has to be a very young pup who will immediately acknowledge that the existing dog is the boss in the hierarchy. That's absolutely key otherwise it could be a disaster and totally counter productive. The older the pup is the more it will have established it's own identity and will be more likely to challenge rather than defer to the older dog.

    This sounds a bit too much like alpha dog mumbo jumbo for my liking.
    A young pup barely weaned off its mother will be nothing but a plague and will absolutely not "defer" to your dog. It will jump, pull at, nip, scratch and generally plague your dog, until she is forced to put manners on the pup. Be that a growl, snap or full-blown attack. If your dog is territorial, I definitely wouldn't recommend throwing something with that much energy on top of a poor dog that could be achy, sore and tired on a daily basis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    ShaShaBear wrote: »
    A young pup barely weaned off its mother will be nothing but a plague and will absolutely not "defer" to your dog. It will jump, pull at, nip, scratch and generally plague your dog, until she is forced to put manners on the pup. Be that a growl, snap or full-blown attack.

    I wouldn't have any problem with an older dog putting manners on the young pup, that's one of the reasons the the vet thinks it would be a good idea i.e. pass my current dog's good habits and behaviour down to a young pup.
    ShaShaBear wrote: »
    I definitely wouldn't recommend throwing something with that much energy on top of a poor dog that could be achy, sore and tired on a daily basis.
    Well a couple of times a year we look after a friends pure bred Cairn Terrier who is an annoying hyper little yoke. He lives with us and our current dog for up to two weeks at a time and although there has been the odd snap and growl from our lad it usually was enough to make clear to the visitor where the boundaries are. There has never been any fighting or bites etc which I'll take as a positive sign that whilst she might get a bit grumpy with a new arrival she won't tear it to pieces!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    We brought a 13 week old pup home to three dogs aged 13, 11 and 10.
    All of the old dogs are healthy and pain free but nonetheless very set in their ways and routines.

    The new pup tried his luck with annoying all of them in succession, received one strong rebuke each (a quick corrective bite over the muzzle) and to this day he respects them (more than us:D) even though by now he's between twice and four times their size and weight.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=94382905&postcount=9634

    With an older dog and a pup I wouldn't expect too much in the line of cameraderie and playful friendship (never mind "mothering") but a respectful together should be achievable without too much hassle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Toulouse


    No offence OP but I would not be listening to a vets advice on this matter, they are not usually known for their expertise in behavioural quarters.

    There are many more qualified people who post on this forum who will be able to advise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    Toulouse wrote: »
    No offence OP but I would not be listening to a vets advice on this matter, they are not usually known for their expertise in behavioural quarters.

    There are many more qualified people who post on this forum who will be able to advise.

    Exactly what qualifications would trump a veterinary degree when it comes to animal welfare?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭VonVix


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Exactly what qualifications would trump a veterinary degree when it comes to animal welfare?

    Vets study the body more than the mind. They are two completely separate areas. It's like posing a doctor with a psychology question.

    I do think fostering would be a fab idea for you. You could test run having a puppy in your house and how you dog feels about it without making a lifelong commitment.

    [Dog Training + Behaviour Nerd]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,062 ✭✭✭✭tk123


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Exactly what qualifications would trump a veterinary degree when it comes to animal welfare?

    A masters in animal behaviour would be enough for me to trump a short module in vet school.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    VonVix wrote: »
    Vets study the body more than the mind. They are two completely separate areas. It's like posing a doctor with a psychology question.

    Vets may study animal bodies more so than animal minds as you suggest but they do study animal behaviour as part of their training.

    What is the qualification which provides more comprehensive animal behaviour training than a veterinary degree?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    tk123 wrote: »
    A masters in animal behaviour would be enough for me to trump a short module in vet school.

    Can you link to such a degree?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,062 ✭✭✭✭tk123




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Vets may study animal bodies more so than animal minds as you suggest but they do study animal behaviour as part of their training.

    Animal behaviour is not a compulsory part of the veterinary degree: the lectures are not examined upon. In short, vets receive practically no behavioural training.

    BenEadir wrote: »
    Can you link to such a degree?

    There are a number of universities (none in the Republic of Ireland yet) which offer honours degrees in animal behaviour, and a few that offer Master's degrees too. The three most popular universities offering Master's in applied companion animal behaviour are Southampton, Newcastle, and Lincoln. I'm sure there are more, but they're the big three for companion animal behaviour.:) There are quite a few others but they don't specialise in companion animals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,189 ✭✭✭boomerang


    As someone who lost their very, very precious doglet to cancer when she just turned eleven - and who was a Shepherd cross, like your girl...

    Postpone the puppy. She will only torment your existing dog. Let the dog you have (and who you clearly love) live out her golden years without competition for your attention. Savour every precious minute with her. Plenty of time down the road to get a puppy, when you are ready. Meanwhile I don't think a puppy would be a welcome development in your oldie's life. It sounds as though she has always been an only dog? Then why introduce another now, when she slowing down in her old age and settled in her ways? Concentrate on her now, when she will need you most. For me, taking on a puppy when my dog was in her teens would have been a total distraction just when our time together felt more and more precious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭borderlinemeath


    My oldest dog hates jumpy puppies, and she's only 7. She's very accepting of older dogs though, and by older I mean adult dogs. She has a couple of favourites, sighthounds are one and black mongrels/lab crosses are another :D. We introduced her companion to her when she was 4, who was a year old dog, initially as a foster, now they can't be separated. But I'm mindful that she's not fond of pups and rarely leave her alone with one as she just gets frustrated.

    OP if you're determined to get another dog, fostering for a local rescue is the ideal option. Particularly as you're fairly open minded breed wise, and they always find it hardest to rehome the larger mongrels (there's always a lot of fosterers for the cute fluffy ones!) The rescue is always on hand for advice and support and if the dogs don't bond well then you've got back up and the dog can go to another foster. If they do bond then you can always make it a permanent arrangement by adoption.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    DBB wrote: »
    Animal behaviour is not a compulsory part of the veterinary degree: the lectures are not examined upon. In short, vets receive practically no behavioural training.




    There are a number of universities (none in the Republic of Ireland yet) which offer honours degrees in animal behaviour, and a few that offer Master's degrees too. The three most popular universities offering Master's in applied companion animal behaviour are Southampton, Newcastle, and Lincoln. I'm sure there are more, but they're the big three for companion animal behaviour.:) There are quite a few others but they don't specialise in companion animals.

    Thanks DBB, that's interesting info and good to know.

    I guess in the absence of having access to someone who has acquired a degree in animal behaviour (apparently there are a few on this forum??) the next best qualified person to take advice from is a vet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    boomerang wrote: »
    As someone who lost their very, very precious doglet to cancer when she just turned eleven - and who was a Shepherd cross, like your girl...

    Postpone the puppy. She will only torment your existing dog. Let the dog you have (and who you clearly love) live out her golden years without competition for your attention. Savour every precious minute with her. Plenty of time down the road to get a puppy, when you are ready. Meanwhile I don't think a puppy would be a welcome development in your oldie's life. It sounds as though she has always been an only dog? Then why introduce another now, when she slowing down in her old age and settled in her ways? Concentrate on her now, when she will need you most. For me, taking on a puppy when my dog was in her teens would have been a total distraction just when our time together felt more and more precious.

    Hi Boomerang, thanks for sharing your story. I'm sorry to hear of the distress you went through with your dog, it must have been quite upsetting.

    I'm on the fence over this. One part of me says let my ageing lady enjoy her dotage (she's just turning 10 in a few weeks so not THAT old yet) but another part of me thinks she'd be a great mentor for a young pup and it would give her a new focus shot of energy. I honestly don't think introducing a new pup will in any way reduce the affection or care the older dog will receive. Yes there will be a bit of fuss over the puppy but we can pro actively manage that situation by always making more of an initial fuss over the older dog and I really would like the fantastic habits and behaviour from the older dog to be transitioned as much as possible to a young pup.

    The "adopt a dog" charity/rescue sites I've been researching pretty much all request that very young pups (6-10 weeks old) are paired with older dogs for companionship and mentoring rather than placed with familes where they will be the only dog and good animal welfare is the entire reason these organisations exist.

    I do understand your argument but I don't accept that continuing to love and care for an older dog whilst loving and taking care of a young pup are mutually exclusive or that the latter will be a negative experience for the older dog.

    I may be totally wrong but I'm leaning towards getting the pup!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    OP if you're determined to get another dog, fostering for a local rescue is the ideal option. Particularly as you're fairly open minded breed wise, and they always find it hardest to rehome the larger mongrels (there's always a lot of fosterers for the cute fluffy ones!) The rescue is always on hand for advice and support and if the dogs don't bond well then you've got back up and the dog can go to another foster. If they do bond then you can always make it a permanent arrangement by adoption.

    Yes, that might indeed be a good idea. I'll check it out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Hi Boomerang, thanks for sharing your story. I'm sorry to hear of the distress you went through with your dog, it must have been quite upsetting.

    I'm on the fence over this. One part of me says let my ageing lady enjoy her dotage (she's just turning 10 in a few weeks so not THAT old yet) but another part of me thinks she'd be a great mentor for a young pup and it would give her a new focus shot of energy. I honestly don't think introducing a new pup will in any way reduce the affection or care the older dog will receive. Yes there will be a bit of fuss over the puppy but we can pro actively manage that situation by always making more of an initial fuss over the older dog and I really would like the fantastic habits and behaviour from the older dog to be transitioned as much as possible to a young pup.

    The "adopt a dog" charity/rescue sites I've been researching pretty much all request that very young pups (6-10 weeks old) are paired with older dogs for companionship and mentoring rather than placed with familes where they will be the only dog and good animal welfare is the entire reason these organisations exist.

    I do understand your argument but I don't accept that continuing to love and care for an older dog whilst loving and taking care of a young pup are mutually exclusive or that the latter will be a negative experience for the older dog.

    I may be totally wrong but I'm leaning towards getting the pup!!

    I would run away screaming from any charity or rescue that rehomes pups at 6 weeks. I am intrigued that they pretty much all request the pups are paired, its against the forum charter to post names of rescues, but would you mind pming me with the names of some of them. I and a lot of posters on here are or have been involved in rescue, and its not something I've come across.

    I think you're right, 10 isn't a great age, my 11 year old girl is still very playful with other dogs and flirtatious with some ;) I also have a bitch that will be 10 in May that is very tolerant, until she isn't, but I wouldn't have an issue with introducing a young dog to her.

    Best of luck in your search :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭FlowerGarden


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Thanks DBB, that's interesting info and good to know.

    I guess in the absence of having access to someone who has acquired a degree in animal behaviour (apparently there are a few on this forum??) the next best qualified person to take advice from is a vet?

    In fairness OP you are the one that came to this forum to ask for advice. The majority of people responded to you in good faith to say that in general older dogs to do not like puppies and it would not be in the best interest of your dog to get one, its not what you wanted to hear and you have been borderline sarcastic in your replies. If you are a follower of this forum you would know that the regular posters always have the best interest of the animals at heart and are not trying to rain on your parade, they are giving you the benefit of their vast experience as you asked them to do in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭doubter


    I would go with Muddypaws here, i have 7 dogs, in the ages between 1 and 8 - introducing another dog has never been a problem. OP, fostering is probably a very very good idea before going all the way..if it works out, you may become a ' failed foster' , and if not, the puppy will be rehomed at the appropriate time and you know where you stand. Win-win really in my opinion...


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Thanks DBB, that's interesting info and good to know.

    I guess in the absence of having access to someone who has acquired a degree in animal behaviour (apparently there are a few on this forum??) the next best qualified person to take advice from is a vet?

    I'll be pretty blunt with you on this one. Some vets take a bit of an interest in behaviour, and work alongside qualified behaviourists to establish whether there are medical interactions affecting a dog's behaviour, and if necessary prescribing appropriate psychoactive medication.
    But they are in the minority.
    Many vets have no more expertise than your average dog owner. There are certain things that owners and vets say about why dogs do x, y and z that exposes their lack of knowledge. I'm afraid your vet is one of them. His talk of your pup finding its place in the pack means that he's working off some very outdated and disproven ideas.

    For what it's worth, I would tread carefully about getting a young pup, particularly because your dog has demonstrated that she could take or leave other dogs. Puppies are a pain in the arse for older dogs, there are quite a few threads on this forum from owners who are lamenting the same decision.
    I think, on balance, that the proportion of older dogs that become rejuvenated by having a pup around is quite a lot smaller than the proportion who'd thank you not to foist a puppy on them.
    You don't know until you try, but your description of how she feels about other dogs makes her more likely to belong to the second category. For this reason, fostering is,a win-win situation.
    One thing I will strongly advise if you decide to go ahead (I think you've already made up your mind though!).. Do not get a female pup. The chances of running into trouble with two females when the younger one reaches sexual maturity, spayed or not, is significantly higher than when you introduce a dog of the opposite sex.
    For what it's worth, this advice is from one of those qualified behaviourists ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    In fairness OP you are the one that came to this forum to ask for advice. The majority of people responded to you in good faith to say that in general older dogs to do not like puppies and it would not be in the best interest of your dog to get one, its not what you wanted to hear and you have been borderline sarcastic in your replies. If you are a follower of this forum you would know that the regular posters always have the best interest of the animals at heart and are not trying to rain on your parade, they are giving you the benefit of their vast experience as you asked them to do in the first place.

    Hi FlowerGarden,

    Apologies if my replies are coming across to you as sarcastic, that is not my intention.

    I challenged the following statement from ShaShaBear "No offence OP but I would not be listening to a vets advice on this matter, they are not usually known for their expertise in behavioural quarters.

    There are many more qualified people who post on this forum who will be able to advise."

    I thought totally dismissing the input of a vet was a strange attitude to have but was interested to engage with the "many more qualified" people on here. I'm more than happy to take input from people with experience as many of the posters who have been kind enough to share their own experience have but "more qualified" than a vet is a different matter and so far, unless I'm missing something, I haven't seen any input whatsoever from anyone more qualified than a vet.

    It's easy for people to dismiss someone who actually has a high level of relevant qualifications but to do so in favour of many more qualified people who don't seem to even exist in Ireland (if there's no such training here) needs to questioned and that's what I was doing.

    I don't want to derail the thread with this but I find it really annoying when people make uninformed claims they can't stand over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    DBB wrote: »
    For what it's worth, I would tread carefully about getting a young pup, particularly because your dog has demonstrated that she could take or leave other dogs. Puppies are a pain in the arse for older dogs, there are quite a few threads on this forum from owners who are lamenting the same decision.
    I think, on balance, that the proportion of older dogs that become rejuvenated by having a pup around is quite a lot smaller than the proportion who'd thank you not to foist a puppy on them.
    You don't know until you try, but your description of how she feels about other dogs makes her more likely to belong to the second category. For this reason, fostering is,a win-win situation.
    One thing I will strongly advise if you decide to go ahead (I think you've already made up your mind though!).. Do not get a female pup. The chances of running into trouble with two females when the younger one reaches sexual maturity, spayed or not, is significantly higher than when you introduce a dog of the opposite sex.
    For what it's worth, this advice is from one of those qualified behaviourists ;)

    Thanks DBB, I appreciate your well made argument and (qualified ;) ) advice. I am leaning towards introducing the pup and your point ref making sure it's a male is valuable. Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    muddypaws wrote: »
    I would run away screaming from any charity or rescue that rehomes pups at 6 weeks.
    Link from charity seeking to rehome a 7 week old pup ideally suited to a home with another dog will be sent to you in a moment but the pup has been homed and the link is now dead. It was live last night be now gone, I promise!! In my research I saw a number of similar comments where the rescue/charity recommended the pup (usually older than 6 weeks in fairness but often in the 8-12 week range) would be best adopted into a home with another dog. I'll see if I can find a couple of the examples for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭borderlinemeath


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Hi FlowerGarden,

    Apologies if my replies are coming across to you as sarcastic, that is not my intention.

    I challenged the following statement from ShaShaBear "No offence OP but I would not be listening to a vets advice on this matter, they are not usually known for their expertise in behavioural quarters.

    There are many more qualified people who post on this forum who will be able to advise."

    I thought totally dismissing the input of a vet was a strange attitude to have but was interested to engage with the "many more qualified" people on here. I'm more than happy to take input from people with experience as many of the posters who have been kind enough to share their own experience have but "more qualified" than a vet is a different matter and so far, unless I'm missing something, I haven't seen any input whatsoever from anyone more qualified than a vet.

    It's easy for people to dismiss someone who actually has a high level of relevant qualifications but to do so in favour of many more qualified people who don't seem to even exist in Ireland (if there's no such training here) needs to questioned and that's what I was doing.

    I don't want to derail the thread with this but I find it really annoying when people make uninformed claims they can't stand over.

    In defence of the poster - you have really quoted her out of context.

    ShashaBear recognised the language used by the vet by talking about hierarchy and place in the pack was outdated and this is what was pointed out. When a vet starts talking about pack leaders, places in hierarchy etc, it clearly shows they've been watching a bit too much Cesar Milan (a completely unqualified quack who got lucky with a tv show) rather than doing any extra curricular studies in companion animal behaviour, because that type of "hierarchy" that the vet spoke of is completely irrelevant to domesticated dogs. It was based on wolf behaviour and has since been disproven, but unfortunately the theory lives on in print and media.

    And in fairness the doctor V psychologist comparison is very relevant. If I needed an operation I wouldn't be heading to a psychologist and vice versa if I needed therapy I wouldn't be heading to a surgeon! Vets are qualified in medical procedures and anatomy. They've little or no training in behaviour, or in nutrition, in fact most of their nutritional training comes from the food reps of the foods they stock. Yet people will blindly take advice of the vet that the food that they sell is "the best" when the brands that they usually stock are regularly described as adequate and overpriced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 286 ✭✭fathead82


    I got a terrier pup (by accident!) a few months ago. I have 3 dogs over the age of 10,2 of them ignore her & 1 of them has taken her under her wing. She sleeps, cleans & plays with the pup, it has defiantly given her a new lease of life.unfortunately she didn't manage to pass any of her good manners onto the pup but she will put her in her place if play gets too rough.
    The other dogs ignore the pup & pup has learned to ignore them, they all hang around together but there is very little interaction between them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Link from charity seeking to rehome a 7 week old pup ideally suited to a home with another dog will be sent to you in a moment but the pup has been homed and the link is now dead. It was live last night be now gone, I promise!! In my research I saw a number of similar comments where the rescue/charity recommended the pup (usually older than 6 weeks in fairness but often in the 8-12 week range) would be best adopted into a home with another dog. I'll see if I can find a couple of the examples for you.

    They may have had a 7 week old pup, but I doubt they would have rehomed him/her at that age. When someone applies, and then homechecks are done etc, it usually takes a couple of weeks at least.

    8-12 weeks is grand for a pup to be adopted. Thanks for the examples by pm :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    In defence of the poster - you have really quoted her out of context.

    ShashaBear recognised the language used by the vet by talking about hierarchy and place in the pack was outdated and this is what was pointed out.
    This may be my faux pas, I wasn't quoting the vet directly and I don't think he used the term "hierarchy" but the message I got was that introducing a very young pup (8-12 weeks) will help the older dog accept the younger dog as it isn't a threat (perceived or otherwise) when it is so young. As it happens the vet in question is in his early 30's so his knowledge and training should be bang up to date.
    When a vet starts talking about pack leaders, places in hierarchy etc, it clearly shows they've been watching a bit too much Cesar Milan (a completely unqualified quack who got lucky with a tv show)
    That's an interesting point. Are you suggesting the results he (at least appears) to achieve are somehow related to the fact there is a camera crew present? Did the TV show not get offered to him because of what he was already doing?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    Just to clear one thing up op. There are a fair few people in Ireland who are significantly more qualified in animal behaviour than most vets are (some vets have formally studied the area post grad, some haven't but have boned up on it, often having learned what they know through working with behaviourists!). I cannot emphasise enough to you... The veterinary science degree does not qualify the vet as an animal behaviourist in any way. No more than a medical degree qualifies a doctor to be a psychiatrist. I have a science degree, but that doesn't make me a physicist... I didn't do physics. Similarly, vet students don't do behaviour unless they volunteer to go to the non-compulsory lectures. And we're only talking a handful of lectures here.

    Also, I will add a caveat, because people are posting that their older dogs are great with younger dogs etc. When your dogs like other dogs, and are used to other dogs joining the group (as are all of the above examples, they all have multi-dog households), it is an entirely different scenario to yours, where you have a dog who has lived as an only dog all her life (save for brief visits from the terrier) and she has shown she's not that mad about other dogs.
    So, I'm just saying to be careful because you're not comparing like with like.
    Now, I'm not saying it won't work, not at all. I'm just trying to encourage you to go in with eyes wide open :)


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    BenEadir wrote: »
    That's an interesting point. Are you suggesting the results he (at least appears) to achieve are somehow related to the fact there is a camera crew present? Did the TV show not get offered to him because of what he was already doing?

    I'll just leave these here, links to articles and sites by people who, unlike Milan, have actually studied dog behaviour properly.
    The first link is to a site that was created especially to educate people about the dangers of using Milan's ideology, which is hocus-pocus.
    I'm leaving it there now. Have a read of the below, I hope it helps you to understand where you're going wrong.

    http://www.dogwelfarecampaign.org/

    http://www.apbc.org.uk/articles/caninedominance

    http://www.apbc.org.uk/articles/why-wont-dominance-die


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Toulouse


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Hi FlowerGarden,

    Apologies if my replies are coming across to you as sarcastic, that is not my intention.

    I challenged the following statement from ShaShaBear "No offence OP but I would not be listening to a vets advice on this matter, they are not usually known for their expertise in behavioural quarters.

    There are many more qualified people who post on this forum who will be able to advise."

    I thought totally dismissing the input of a vet was a strange attitude to have but was interested to engage with the "many more qualified" people on here. I'm more than happy to take input from people with experience as many of the posters who have been kind enough to share their own experience have but "more qualified" than a vet is a different matter and so far, unless I'm missing something, I haven't seen any input whatsoever from anyone more qualified than a vet.

    It's easy for people to dismiss someone who actually has a high level of relevant qualifications but to do so in favour of many more qualified people who don't seem to even exist in Ireland (if there's no such training here) needs to questioned and that's what I was doing.

    I don't want to derail the thread with this but I find it really annoying when people make uninformed claims they can't stand over.

    I'll think you'll find that was my post that you've incorrectly attributed to ShaShaBear.

    I also think you'll find that on the behavioural front DBB is more qualified than the vast majority of vets so I was not making an uninformed claim and apologies if you were annoyed :)

    That coupled with your outdated references to pack hierarchy inclined me to point out that your vet and indeed your opinion based on your own research might not be leading you to make the best decision for your own dog. Despite your vets age you have already been told the the behaviour segment of the veterinary course is non-examinable or are you just choosing to ignore that?

    I also told you where you would find a pup should you choose to go ahead with it but really I wanted you to consider your own dogs welfare first before you jump in!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    DBB wrote: »
    So, I'm just saying to be careful because you're not comparing like with like.
    Now, I'm not saying it won't work, not at all. I'm just trying to encourage you to go in with eyes wide open :)

    Thanks DBB, I really appreciate your input.

    Many years ago I had two Yorkies (a brother and sister) and they were a psychological nightmare. They thought they were a hunting pack. I couldn't walk them together as they'd attack anything and everything, the bigger the better. Ended up having to walk them separately. People thought I was great for taking "the dog" for a one hour walk before work. I rarely had the heart to tell them I was actually walking two dog's one after the other. I lost a lot of weight at that time so there's always an upside ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    DBB wrote: »
    I'll just leave these here, links to articles and sites by people who, unlike Milan, have actually studied dog behaviour properly.
    The first link is to a site that was created especially to educate people about the dangers of using Milan's ideology, which is hocus-pocus.
    I'm leaving it there now, as I too am getting a bit of a sarky tone from your replies to other posters. Have a read of the below, I hope it helps you to understand where you're going wrong.

    http://www.dogwelfarecampaign.org/

    http://www.apbc.org.uk/articles/caninedominance

    http://www.apbc.org.uk/articles/why-wont-dominance-die

    I can understand the professional ridicule for yer man Milan, he's self taught/has a 'natural' talent and gets huge popular media kudos without having earned any official credentials but from the small number of times I've seen him in action (which I assume is edited highlights) he does seem to produce results owners and their dog's are happy with. I don't know if it's all smoke and mirrors or if the results last but what he does seems to work even if the methodology employed is outdated or unorthodox.

    Thanks for the links. I'll read up on the info over the weekend.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭borderlinemeath


    BenEadir wrote: »

    That's an interesting point. Are you suggesting the results he (at least appears) to achieve are somehow related to the fact there is a camera crew present? Did the TV show not get offered to him because of what he was already doing?

    The results he gets are by force. He will bully, hit, kick and "alpha roll" the dogs into a position where they're so fearful they just shut down and give in. This gives the impression that he's won the battle, but all he's actually done is scare the bejesus out of the dog. The dog doesn't forget the behaviour that Milan is trying to modify and eventually if the forceful methods and tones are continually used, the dog can snap and do real damage. Look closely at Milan, he's covered in dog bites. Properly qualified behaviourists use what's called a "hands off" approach, there's no force used, and the contact is usually when a treat is handed over or a reassuring ear rub.

    Don't forget the shows are heavily edited, and throughout all the shows the message flashes up on screen "Don't try this at home" because it's so dangerous.

    Here's another link that might explain it better than I can.

    http://drsophiayin.com/philosophy/dominance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    Toulouse wrote: »
    I'll think you'll find that was my post that you've incorrectly attributed to ShaShaBear.
    Apologies ShaShaBear :o
    Toulouse wrote: »
    I also think you'll find that on the behavioural front DBB is more qualified than the vast majority of vets so I was not making an uninformed claim and apologies if you were annoyed :)
    DBB certainly projects authority on the matter and I'm delighted with the steer he's given me. His input is thought provoking and will help me make the most informed decision I can.

    I'm not annoyed with you any more, all is forgiven :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭borderlinemeath


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Thanks DBB, I really appreciate your input.

    Many years ago I had two Yorkies (a brother and sister) and they were a psychological nightmare. They thought they were a hunting pack. I couldn't walk them together as they'd attack anything and everything, the bigger the better. Ended up having to walk them separately. People thought I was great for taking "the dog" for a one hour walk before work. I rarely had the heart to tell them I was actually walking two dog's one after the other. I lost a lot of weight at that time so there's always an upside ;)

    That would be littermate syndrome at it's finest. Another bit of weekend reading for you!

    http://thehappypuppysite.com/puppy-search-13-one-puppy-or-two/


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    BenEadir wrote: »
    I can understand the professional ridicule for yer man Milan, he's self taught/has a 'natural' talent and gets huge popular media kudos without having earned any official credentials but from the small number of times I've seen him in action (which I assume is edited highlights) he does seem to produce results owners and their dog's are happy with. I don't know if it's all smoke and mirrors or if the results last but what he does seems to work even if the methodology employed is outdated or unorthodox.

    Thanks for the links. I'll read up on the info over the weekend.

    I'm sorry, I'm not going to say any more than this as it's been done time and again here. Suffice to say you have answered your own questions with talk of editing, smoke and mirrors, and "appears to work". The cases that make it to tv are just that... The cases that appeared to work. I can 100% assure you that whatever about the owners, the dogs are most certainly not happy. Funny how he never does follow-up shows.
    He has been called out on it many, many times. You tube has plenty of videos showing the off-camera abuse.
    Luckily, many owners are getting wise to him now that the science has caught up with his jiggery pokery :)


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    BenEadir wrote: »
    Apologies ShaShaBear :o

    DBB certainly projects authority on the matter and I'm delighted with the steer he's given me. His input is thought provoking and will help me make the most informed decision I can.

    I'm not annoyed with you any more, all is forgiven :o

    *she :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    Properly qualified behaviourists use what's called a "hands off" approach, there's no force used, and the contact is usually when a treat is handed over or a reassuring ear rub.
    I have to say I too don't believe there is any role for the "stick" to play when it comes to training my own dogs over the years. Slowly encouraging and rewarding good behaviour with treats and physical attention (rubbing the ears, patting the ribs or playing fetch with their favourite ball/toy) in my opinion produces the right attitude in the dog and they then behave well because they want to. If you force any animal (or person for that matter) to behave in a particular way out of fear of being hit/abused if they don't behave as required it will eventually backfire on you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    DBB wrote: »
    *she :)

    Even more :o now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    That would be littermate syndrome at it's finest. Another bit of weekend reading for you!

    http://thehappypuppysite.com/puppy-search-13-one-puppy-or-two/

    Why oh why wasn't I on Boards back in 2000? That article is like a short bio of exactly what I went through. My wife went to collect a Yorkie X pup from a litter the owners wanted rid of (I've always had and always will have rescued/unwanted dogs, it's just my preference) and ended up bringing home the last two. Little did she know how it would turn out!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    I think that between vets and behaviourists we have a few crossed wires here :D

    If an older dog and a pup have to be brought together (to live together ever after) it is advantageous if the pup is as young as possible (2-4 months).

    At that age young dogs are most susceptible to being "educated" by other dogs. They will be submissive, open to directions and will pick up the house rules in no time at all. They are hard-wired for doing so at that age.
    An older pup (or even worse a "teenager") might already have pre-formed ideas on how things are supposed to work and might clash more or less violently with the established dog.
    So in the ideal situation you either introduce a very young pup that can easily be moulded by the established dog or an adult dog that has been tried and tested to get along with the established dog.
    A rowdy (and potentially badly socialised) pup of 6 - 18 months (depending on breed) would be the worst choice.

    As for the age of the established dog ...as long as the dog isn't infirm, in pain or otherwise handicapped, age really doesn't matter. The younger the established dog the higher the chances that it will revert to near puppy behaviour for some time or at least be playful with the new arrival. The older the established dog the higher the likelihood of just quiet tolerance without much play.
    An old dog might still surprise you by getting a new lease of life and becoming all young and playful again or a younger adult dog by all of a sudden wanting a quiet life ...but that's down to the individual personality of the dogs and hard to predict beforehand.


    But in no case do you introduce a young pup to an established dog that has "issues" and is difficult to handle and control ...because by adding a pup you will instantly have two difficult dogs and four times the trouble :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    peasant wrote: »
    I think that between vets and behaviourists we have a few crossed wires here :D

    If an older dog and a pup have to be brought together (to live together ever after) it is advantageous if the pup is as young as possible (2-4 months).

    At that age young dogs are most susceptible to being "educated" by other dogs. They will be submissive, open to directions and will pick up the house rules in no time at all. They are hard-wired for doing so at that age.
    An older pup (or even worse a "teenager") might already have pre-formed ideas on how things are supposed to work and might clash more or less violently with the established dog.
    So in the ideal situation you either introduce a very young pup that can easily be moulded by the established dog or an adult dog that has been tried and tested to get along with the established dog.
    A rowdy (and potentially badly socialised) pup of 6 - 18 months (depending on breed) would be the worst choice.

    As for the age of the established dog ...as long as the dog isn't infirm, in pain or otherwise handicapped, age really doesn't matter. The younger the established dog the higher the chances that it will revert to near puppy behaviour for some time or at least be playful with the new arrival. The older the established dog the higher the likelihood of just quiet tolerance without much play.
    An old dog might still surprise you by getting a new lease of life and becoming all young and playful again or a younger adult dog by all of a sudden wanting a quiet life ...but that's down to the individual personality of the dogs and hard to predict beforehand.


    But in no case do you introduce a young pup to an established dog that has "issues" and is difficult to handle and control ...because by adding a pup you will instantly have two difficult dogs and four times the trouble :D

    ^^^^ This is EXACTLY the outcome I'm hoping for. Introduce a very young (8-10 week) old pup to my 10 year old very well behaved dog who isn't a pushover and will assert itself if it has to but has never attacked or bitten any other dog including adult dogs brought into the house which could have been seen as threatening her territory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭cjf


    As mentioned loads here if unsure how your existing dog will feel about a new pup please foster first to make sure. While a rescue will take back a dog or pup that does not work out in a new home for an unforeseen reason this sometimes encourages people to just 'give it a try' as they know if it doesn't work they can give the dog back. This scenario is so unfair on the adopted dog as having already ending up in rescue they have to undergo another huge change going to a new home only to have to go through all that change again when being returned. This boomerang trend with rescue dogs is so upsetting to see and really can have a negative effect on the dog.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    cjf wrote: »
    As mentioned loads here if unsure how your existing dog will feel about a new pup please foster first to make sure. While a rescue will take back a dog or pup that does not work out in a new home for an unforeseen reason this sometimes encourages people to just 'give it a try' as they know if it doesn't work they can give the dog back. This scenario is so unfair on the adopted dog as having already ending up in rescue they have to undergo another huge change going to a new home only to have to go through all that change again when being returned. This boomerang trend with rescue dogs is so upsetting to see and really can have a negative effect on the dog.

    I actually agree with you and I'm considering going the fostering route but if you work through the logic of my situation it really doesn't matter whether I formally "Foster" and give the pup back if it doesn't work out or "Adopt" and then give it back if it doesn't work out does it? Same end result of the pup having to return to the rescue centre after a few days/weeks of settling in to what could/should be it's new home.

    Believe me, handing back the pup (whether I've initially fostered it or formally adopted it) is the last thing I'd like to do, it would be bad for the pup, bad for my dog and bad for my family.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Toulouse


    BenEadir wrote: »
    I actually agree with you and I'm considering going the fostering route but if you work through the logic of my situation it really doesn't matter whether I formally "Foster" and give the pup back if it doesn't work out or "Adopt" and then give it back if it doesn't work out does it? Same end result of the pup having to return to the rescue centre after a few days/weeks of settling in to what could/should be it's new home.

    Believe me, handing back the pup (whether I've initially fostered it or formally adopted it) is the last thing I'd like to do, it would be bad for the pup, bad for my dog and bad for my family.

    Actually, it kinda does!

    If you foster then the pup continues to be advertised as needing a home with the rescue and potential homes can be vetted.

    If you adopt then the pup is marked as rehomed. If you then return that pup you may not think it but when potential adopters see a pup being returned, for whatever reason, it can make it much harder to rehome that pup.

    In your situation, where you have to take your existing dogs welfare into account, fostering is a much better avenue, it saves you messing the rescue around and the pup missing out on a potential home when you are really trying to suck it and see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    Toulouse wrote: »
    Actually, it kinda does!

    If you foster then the pup continues to be advertised as needing a home with the rescue and potential homes can be vetted.

    If you adopt then the pup is marked as rehomed. If you then return that pup you may not think it but when potential adopters see a pup being returned, for whatever reason, it can make it much harder to rehome that pup.

    In your situation, where you have to take your existing dogs welfare into account, fostering is a much better avenue, it saves you messing the rescue around and the pup missing out on a potential home when you are really trying to suck it and see.

    Thanks Toulouse, I hadn't thought through that level of detail. I was thinking that the pup wouldn't be able to tell the difference!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭cjf


    If you do decide to foster and then end up adopting the pup it's one less move for the pup which is great for puppy -Most fosterers will take in another dog when their foster finds what they are hoping is their forever home and they may not be available to take the puppy back which could mean another strange foster home until a new family can be found. Great you are considering the foster route as your own girl might essentially be the one who decides if a puppy going to work! I have fostered young puppies and found that my two adult dogs are much happier with pups 5/6 months + . I wouldn't have known that without fostering :-)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement