Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Suns Page 3 - 1970-2015

Options
13

Comments

  • Options
    #62
    who the fug
    Registered Users Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭who the fug


    twin_beacon wrote: »
    exactly, we need hardcore porn on page 3!


    Don' t put your yogurt adverts on page two or four


  • Options
    #63
    RobYourBuilder
    Registered Users Posts: 1,541 ✭✭✭RobYourBuilder


    Some of the headlines in the sun are great - http://i.imgur.com/p5jjMDr.png


  • Options
    #64
    BlaasForRafa
    Registered Users Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    If only it was the last issue of The Scum and not just the last page 3 it'd be great.


  • Options
    #65
    Kermit.de.frog
    Registered Users Posts: 23,571 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Isn't it a bit demeaning of the Sun and Rupert Murdoch to think that the lower socio-economic groups ever wanted page 3?


  • Options
    #66
    Kermit.de.frog
    Registered Users Posts: 23,571 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Dave! wrote: »
    Fine Gael Cllr Keith Redmond is getting dogs abuse over this tweet

    https://twitter.com/DrKeithRedmond/status/557505267546722305

    Has that page been taken down? What did he say?

    *EDIT* he deleted his tweet.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #67
    Cienciano
    Registered Users Posts: 14,255 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Seriously? wrote: »
    They made other females feel uncomfortable and that is enough these days to justify their removal.

    Anyway doubt many (if any) people bought the paper for the page 3 these days. Like others have said if that's your thing the internet has an abundance of it.
    It's nothing to do with females feeling uncomfortable, the sun expect to sell more copies with their removal, simple as that.


  • Options
    #68
    jimgoose
    Registered Users Posts: 20,176 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    Kermit.de.frog wrote: »
    Isn't it a bit demeaning of the Sun and Rupert Murdoch to think that the lower socio-economic groups ever wanted page 3?

    It is unconscionably racialist of you to suggest that only the lower socio-economic demographs like the boobies.


  • Options
    #69
    catallus
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    God damn it. I love boobs.


  • Options
    #70
    AllGunsBlazing
    Registered Users Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭AllGunsBlazing


    Getting your arse out is the new getting your tits out. Worked for Kim Kardashian.


  • Options
    #71
    Kermit.de.frog
    Registered Users Posts: 23,571 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    jimgoose wrote: »
    It is unconscionably racialist of you to suggest that only the lower socio-economic demographs like the boobies.

    But only the lower socio economic groups tend to buy the Sun. That is who it is aimed at.

    You are in a shop and two blokes have two papers - one has the Sunday Independent Irish Times you think "sophisticated", "suave", "intelligent", at least moderately successful.

    The other has The Sun - you think "scum" :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #72
    jimgoose
    Registered Users Posts: 20,176 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    Kermit.de.frog wrote: »
    ...The other has The Sun - you think "scum" :pac:

    I used to think that. Now I think the people who control the Times are making a tit of me, and at least the Sun provides actual free-range tits. :)


  • Options
    #73
    strobe
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

    You are in a shop and two blokes have two papers - one has the Sunday Independent Irish Times you think "sophisticated", "suave", "intelligent", at least moderately successful.

    Heh.


  • Options
    #74
    Cienciano
    Registered Users Posts: 14,255 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Kermit.de.frog wrote: »
    But only the lower socio economic groups tend to buy the Sun. That is who it is aimed at.

    You are in a shop and two blokes have two papers - one has the Sunday Independent Irish Times you think "sophisticated", "suave", "intelligent", at least moderately successful.

    The other has The Sun - you think "scum" :pac:
    The Mail is the real scum. At least the sun doesn't take itself too seriously. But yeah, it's still scum


  • Options
    #75
    fryup
    Registered Users Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    as a young lad growing up in pre-porn ireland....page 3 was a godsend for me

    i used to **** myself silly to....sam fox, linda lusardi, kathy lloyd, maria whitaker, suzanne mizzi etc etc

    aaahhhhhhhhhhh those were the days


  • Options
    #76
    catallus
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    Rhiann Sugden :)


  • Options
    #77
    Shrap
    Registered Users Posts: 3,163 ✭✭✭Shrap


    jimgoose wrote: »
    I used to think that. Now I think the people who control the Times are making a tit of me, and at least the Sun provides actual free-range tits. :)

    Free-range tits?! What are they? I was intrigued by an earlier post that said pg3 didn't allow implants. I quite like their ethical stance on body modification, if so.

    And ALL the papers make a tit out of everybody. The Sun at least has fewer words and a smaller vocabulary with which to make one a tit. Never had a problem with it myself, although as an utter waste of money it can't be beat.


  • Options
    #78
    kowloon
    Registered Users Posts: 13,389 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    The thing I do find backwards here is nipples still being considered offensive. It's something I've never understood.


  • Options
    #79
    AlanS181824
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭AlanS181824


    I think my favourite Page 3 was the one from when the PS4 launched.

    Sorry [model] but this is for the players!


  • Options
    #80
    jimgoose
    Registered Users Posts: 20,176 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    Shrap wrote: »
    Free-range tits?! What are they?...

    Normal, natural, non-enhanced boobs, be they champagne-glass shaped titlets or great pendulous garbonzas. Nature usually gets it right! :)


  • Options
    #81
    The Th!ng
    Registered Users Posts: 464 ✭✭The Th!ng


    If I were Murdoch I'd just move the pictures from page 3 to page 4 and each issue feature two topless models instead of just one. Anybody who didn't like the new arrangement could just fcuk off and die.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #82
    Shrap
    Registered Users Posts: 3,163 ✭✭✭Shrap


    jimgoose wrote: »
    Normal, natural, non-enhanced boobs, be they champagne-glass shaped titlets or great pendulous garbonzas. Nature usually gets it right! :)

    I have to say that I didn't realise Sun readers had such good taste. I'm quite impressed, and now I am horrified, HORRIFIED that this worthy arbiter of moral standards has been silenced. :confused: I'm with whatever campaign is started about the return of free range boobs.


  • Options
    #83
    somesoldiers
    Registered Users Posts: 13,845 ✭✭✭✭somesoldiers


    Protest tomorrow 3pm outside the Dail?


  • Options
    #84
    Yurt2
    Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Bewbs


  • Options
    #85
    BBDBB
    Registered Users Posts: 26,899 ✭✭✭✭BBDBB


    somesoldiers wrote: »
    Protest tomorrow 3pm outside the Dail?



    One out, All out


  • Options
    #86
    shruikan2553
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    Meh, the only people who paid attention was teenage boys before the internet. Any reason why they removed it?


  • Options
    #87
    Yurt2
    Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    shruikan2553 wrote: »
    Meh, the only people who paid attention was teenage boys before the internet. Any reason why they removed it?

    The bewbage was found to be too awesome, and was having a detrimental effect on society....



  • Options
    #88
    Paramite Pie
    Registered Users Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Paramite Pie


    The Th!ng wrote: »
    If I were Murdoch I'd just move the pictures from page 3 to page 4 and each issue feature two topless models instead of just one. Anybody who didn't like the new arrangement could just fcuk off and die.

    Why not show some cock too while we're at it? Something for the ladies...:D


  • Options
    #89
    Shrap
    Registered Users Posts: 3,163 ✭✭✭Shrap


    Paramite Pie wrote: »
    Why not show some cock too while we're at it? Something for the ladies...:D

    Cock would be nice......


    Probably too late now they banned the boobs from the paper, but still. I approve of your question.


  • Options
    #90
    somesoldiers
    Registered Users Posts: 13,845 ✭✭✭✭somesoldiers


    Paramite Pie wrote: »
    Why not show some cock too while we're at it? Something for the ladies...:D

    Or keep everyone happy & have some she-males on, boobs & cock...or maybe not


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #91
    catallus
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    They keep us mesmerised with the drugs and the porn to steal our precious bodily fluids!


Advertisement