Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How could the Train journey time to Dublin from Sligo be cut these days?

  • 14-12-2014 11:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭


    It takes a good 3hrs to get from Sligo Station to Dublin Connelly (on a good day if it dont get delayed) what things could be done to cut down this journey time? - Cut out some stations it stops at along the way? (but what stations?) - upgrade the track for the trains to go faster? - the 22000 class top speed gets up to a max of 160 km/h but i dont know what the maximum speed it reaches to on the sligo to Dublin Line.... Im predicting 80-100km/h at the most? should it cut out all stations after Longford maybe and just let a commuter train/service run from Dublin to Longford? - Divert some of the track so the intersections that the rail go over the road goes over a bridge instead? - replace single track areas with 2 track areas?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,939 ✭✭✭ballsymchugh


    a second track


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,973 ✭✭✭Sh1tbag OToole


    You could have one fast one that really only goes from Dublin to Sligo and stops nowhere else but would enough people use it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    spend billions upgrading it to a TGV line


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭Kevin McCloud


    Shovel more coal into the boiler.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    Put it on wheels and drive it to Dublin in two hours.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Monorail is the obvious solution


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    my son just sent me this video - the rollercoaster travels faster than our trains! :)





    https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10154948512780112


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,939 ✭✭✭ballsymchugh


    You could have one fast one that really only goes from Dublin to Sligo and stops nowhere else but would enough people use it?

    it'll still have to stop at stations along the way to let trains coming the other way pass. all the friggin trains are timed to meet at stations because it's only one track.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 603 ✭✭✭Yellowblackbird


    If both Dublin and Sligo are travelling in the same direction and Sligo is moving at .9c and Dublin at .1c, then without turning on the engine the train will reach Dublin quicker than you could pull out the tables for firewood. Or thereabouts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    it'll still have to stop at stations along the way to let trains coming the other way pass. all the friggin trains are timed to meet at stations because it's only one track.

    some boffin (if there is any in IR) must be able to come up with a solution of sharing the one track areas so they dont have to wait for another train surely??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    It takes a good 3hrs to get from Sligo Station to Dublin Connelly (on a good day if it dont get delayed) what things could be done to cut down this journey time? ...
    Seriously: why bother? The cost of making any big change would be enormous, out of proportion to any benefit.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭Kevin McCloud


    A quick flight from Knock to Dublin would be a better option.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭Whosthis


    Go faster, imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,590 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Whosthis wrote: »
    Go faster, imo.

    Is that an honest opinion or just a ordinary opinion?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭Whosthis


    Its a general purpose opinion, should have been more precise, imgpo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Whosthis wrote: »
    Go faster, imo.
    If both trains went faster, they'd probably just end up stopping for longer periods.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭hfallada


    Just dont go to Sligo. There is literally nothing good in it.

    Stay in Dublin (close thread)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    When the the 22000 class were being introduced on the Sligo to Dublin line they had an 'open day' at Sligo station to let people view, somebody asked the driver about travel times and im pretty sure the driver said that in the 70's it took 2 and a half hours to get to Dublin station on the train and these days it takes 3hrs so it actually takes longer now if that is true!

    Quite a few years back there was loads of sections of track 'upgraded' causing lots of disruptions and cost millions and I think at the time they promised that with the upgraded track the trains would be able to travel faster and cut journey times - that never ever seemed to have materialised!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,590 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Is Dublin to Sligo faster than Sligo to Dublin?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,797 ✭✭✭Kevin McCloud


    kneemos wrote: »
    Is Dublin to Sligo faster than Sligo to Dublin?

    Sligo to Dublin is quicker as its all down hill.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,717 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    When the the 22000 class were being introduced on the Sligo to Dublin line they had an 'open day' at Sligo station to let people view, somebody asked the driver about travel times and im pretty sure the driver said that in the 70's it took 2 and a half hours to get to Dublin station on the train and these days it takes 3hrs so it actually takes longer now if that is true!

    Quite a few years back there was loads of sections of track 'upgraded' causing lots of disruptions and cost millions and I think at the time they promised that with the upgraded track the trains would be able to travel faster and cut journey times - that never ever seemed to have materialised!

    When the Belfast to Dublin Enterprise service first began in the 1990's it did the Drogheda to Connolly leg in a very quick 24 minutes iirc. Then the DART got extended to Malahide and the same journey time went up to something like 42 minutes. The thing to do would have been to build a spur off the mainline so the Enterprise had its own dedicated line into and out of the city and could maintain delivering commuters to the city in express times. The opportunity was there to do it during the Celtic Tiger but the powers that be decided to piss our booming economy against the wall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    When the Belfast to Dublin Enterprise service first began in the 1990's it did the Drogheda to Connolly leg in a very quick 24 minutes iirc. Then the DART got extended to Malahide and the same journey time went up to something like 42 minutes. The thing to do would have been to build a spur off the mainline so the Enterprise had its own dedicated line into and out of the city and could maintain delivering commuters to the city in express times. The opportunity was there to do it during the Celtic Tiger but the powers that be decided to piss our booming economy against the wall.

    yep if anything major was to be done it should have all been during the Celtic Tiger i agree with you there . they should have put in an extra line on the sligo to dublin line ... long gone are the days when a single line sufficed on a service like this


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    Why on earth would you want to go to Sligo? We should just help people move away from there and get rid of the train station there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    Why on earth would you want to go to Sligo? We should just help people move away from there and get rid of the train station there.

    now, now - we will have none of that, we all know that people from the smoke retreat to sligo when they want to get away from the rat race once in a while :D

    But anyway what about the people who wanna get away from Sligo to get to Dublin in the quickest possible time these days especially now the local airport has ceased - 3hrs on the train just dont cut the mustard!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    Are you really from Sligo, Andy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    You could have one fast one that really only goes from Dublin to Sligo and stops nowhere else but would enough people use it?

    when i lived in uk years ago there was trains from luton to london that stopped at every station and took an hour, then alternated with what we called 'fast train' which stopped at a few stations at first and then didnt stop at the rest of the stations and that took 30-40 mins.

    Im just trying to think where the single track is on this line, its not single all the way to Dublin - I think it might go 2 lines after Edgworthstown. _ would be fascinating to see how much it would cut off the total journey time if say longford was the last station it stopped at and the next station it stopped at would be Dublin Connolly


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Rename Blanchardstown Sligo. It's an ideal bureaucratic solution from the Sir Humphrey school of public transport reform.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 13,098 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    Simple. Double the track from Maynooth to Sligo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    catallus wrote: »
    Are you really from Sligo, Andy?

    it depends what you mean from Sligo - ive been living in Sligo 20 odd years so yeah I guess im from sligo :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    Really?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    catallus wrote: »
    Really?

    naw - Im a blow-in really , always will be :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    When the the 22000 class were being introduced on the Sligo to Dublin line they had an 'open day' at Sligo station to let people view, somebody asked the driver about travel times and im pretty sure the driver said that in the 70's it took 2 and a half hours to get to Dublin station on the train and these days it takes 3hrs so it actually takes longer now if that is true!

    I'm pretty sure the same can be said about journey times between all major cities by rail.


    edit: piece from 2008 showing that is the case
    http://www.railusers.ie/forum/showthread.php?t=4214


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    I knew it! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    I'm pretty sure the same can be said about journey times between all major cities by rail.


    why though? - shouldnt modernisation and changing times depict a faster travel time, not the same travel time or slower as time goes on? or is it because there is more trains on the lines these days that it has got slower?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,590 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    when i lived in uk years ago there was trains from luton to london that stopped at every station and took an hour, then alternated with what we called 'fast train' which stopped at a few stations at first and then didnt stop at the rest of the stations and that took 30-40 mins.

    Im just trying to think where the single track is on this line, its not single all the way to Dublin - I think it might go 2 lines after Edgworthstown. _ would be fascinating to see how much it would cut off the total journey time if say longford was the last station it stopped at and the next station it stopped at would be Dublin Connolly


    You'd need another train to service Longford to Dublin...as if.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭braddun


    jet propulsion pack




    or play the ryan air jingle

    another ontime arrival


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    kneemos wrote: »
    You'd need another train to service Longford to Dublin...as if.

    would not the IE 29000 Class Commuter trains suffice?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,879 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    the UK Intercity 125 trains got you fast from one place to another in uk they were like lightening - ran faster than the Intercity ones over here.

    To be honest we havent got any decent motorway from sligo to dublin (a proper motorway i mean not the N4) so really there should be more pumped into the mainline railway and speed that journey up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    why though? - shouldnt modernisation and changing times depict a faster travel time, not the same travel time or slower as time goes on? or is it because there is more trains on the lines these days that it has got slower?

    extra trains using the lines, more crossing conflicts and more suburban services clogging the lines.
    extra padding built into the timetables to enable better on time statistics
    increased number of speed restrictions as maintenance is put off and H&S requirements increase incessantly.
    Stock not specced properly for high speed running and track incapable of supporting it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,622 ✭✭✭Ruu


    Have the train built by Acme.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭Tail Docker


    It's Sligo. They ought to be stunned, amazed and grateful that anyone even bothered laying a track to there. Never mind running actual trains on it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,925 ✭✭✭✭anncoates


    Cut the price of drink on it and nobody will care about the journey time


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,472 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    JupiterKid wrote: »
    Simple. Double the track from Maynooth to Sligo.

    there's still huge stretches of the track where the train slows to a crawl


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,627 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    some boffin (if there is any in IR) must be able to come up with a solution of sharing the one track areas so they dont have to wait for another train surely??

    Uh, does the world have any boffins who can allow two trains to share a single rack when travelling in opposite directions? Basically this is the problem with Irish regional rail. Single tracks over long distances preclude operating the rolling stock at anywhere near peak efficiency. However, the cost of laying dual track is an inhabitant when compared with, say, dual carriage/motorways as there is higher usage.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 31,117 ✭✭✭✭snubbleste


    How could the Train journey time to Dublin from Sligo be cut these days?
    With a sharp scissors


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,297 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    Monorail is the obvious solution

    What are we? Shelbyville??

    Remove IE from the equation and hand the running of the line over to a proper train company.

    It's doubtful they can speed things up - you probably need to straighten and improve the track - but they might improve the quality and customer experience.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    take the bus - faster and cheaper and a more frequent service.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭oppenheimer1


    The reason the new trains cannot reach their top speed is because of the curves on the line. This is due to the line following the route of the royal canal for most of the way.

    To improve journey times would require the entire track relaid along a brand new alignment. If you were doing that you may as well double track and electrify it as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,309 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    In fairness the line only follows the canal to Mullingar. Overall it was cheaply built originally. However since investment, curves have been banked to allow higher speeds, the Shannon bridge was rebuilt, the line and signalling have been brought up to standard and yet its still plugging a 3 hour trip, like it was many years ago. Extra trains on the route were introduced and this does actually slow stuff down. Return it to its original timetable and increase the speed. Then its better. Unfortunately IE thought more trains at the same journey time was progress. Eh....no.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    The reason the new trains cannot reach their top speed is because of the curves on the line. This is due to the line following the route of the royal canal for most of the way.

    To improve journey times would require the entire track relaid along a brand new alignment. If you were doing that you may as well double track and electrify it as well.

    or simply bank the corners or invest in tilting trains


  • Advertisement
Advertisement