Dublin bus with double buggy?

Flippyfloppy

Just wondering what people's experiences are with Dublin bus & buggies?


I have had a c section, and cannot drive for 6 weeks! So to keep from going mad Id love to use the bus service right near my house to travel to Dublin the odd day.

I have a Phil & Teds double buggy and am concerned about getting it on to the bus after a section. Also wondering will I be allowed keep the buggy upright for the journey? With an exhuberant 2 yr old and a newborn Id prefer to keep them both buckled in!!

RentDayBlues

Flippyfloppy wrote: »

Just wondering what people's experiences are with Dublin bus & buggies?


I have had a c section, and cannot drive for 6 weeks! So to keep from going mad Id love to use the bus service right near my house to travel to Dublin the odd day.

I have a Phil & Teds double buggy and am concerned about getting it on to the bus after a section. Also wondering will I be allowed keep the buggy upright for the journey? With an exhuberant 2 yr old and a newborn Id prefer to keep them both buckled in!!

I've used mine a few times no issues, but it wasn't peak time and no one else needed the space. I think the rule is that if a wheelchair user got on you would be expected to fold up the buggy which you can't obviously so I was prepared to get off if needed. Other than than that it's not an overly large buggy so you shouldn't have too much trouble.

Moonbeam

I have used mine too with no issue and if it is a wheel chair bus they can lower the step for you. I would not attempt it during rush hour but should be fine otherwise,I used to bring a sling too just in case.

January

With a Phil & Teds you should be fine, I know the Bugaboo Donkey cannot fit on the bus.

There's no rule that you have to fold the buggy for a wheelchair... the driver can ask but you don't have to. (And before anyone jumps down my throat I'm not saying it's right but it's the rule)

So as long as you're on first you're ok (or you can get off or fold it if a wheelchair user does need it).

2xj3hplqgsbkym

Sorry but my experience has been the opposite.

I am on a busy route from north side of Dublin. Also had c section and felt bad keeping 2 year old in the house all the time.
A couple of times 5 or 6 buses have gone by, and didn't even stop or acknowledge me because i had a buggy, presumably as they already had one on board.
When I eventually got on, several drivers just drive of before you even position buggy, put on breaks etc... So you have to have full strength and often lift it in to place.
I have asked drivers to lower the wheel chair ramp for getting off , as they didn't do it but it was often 'broken'.
I know a lady who decided like you to go in with new born and 2 year old, and ended up ringing her sister in tears as she couldn't get a bus home from town to finglas at 4.00.

Sorry I am not trying to scare you, but after a section you really need to take it easy, and lifting a double buggy could certainly tear stitches internally.

Flippyfloppy

Thanks to everyone who has replied! I'll certainly take all your experiences on 'board'

I hadn't thought of disembarking if a wheelchair user gets on, that would certainly be an option as several buses serve my route later on in the journey. I'll also look into getting a sling!

Was hoping to do a mid morning trip during the week, so it wouldn't be too busy. To rosebush, all those things you've said is what I'm worried about; stitche being damaged due to ramp not being lowered, getting stranded etc! Think I'll do a trial run with my husband soon and see how it goes!

Gyalist

January wrote: »

There's no rule that you have to fold the buggy for a wheelchair... the driver can ask but you don't have to. (And before anyone jumps down my throat I'm not saying it's right but it's the rule)

So as long as you're on first you're ok (or you can get off or fold it if a wheelchair user does need it).

Interestingly, just last week I came across a long-running case on this issue that has now gone as far as the UK Court of Appeal.

A woman’s refusal to move a pushchair with a sleeping baby from a bay on a bus used by wheelchair passengers – causing a disabled man to have to leave the vehicle – is at the centre of a test-case legal battle in the court of appeal.

Three appeal judges are being asked by a bus operator to decide whether wheelchair passengers should have priority over all other passengers to use the space as a matter of law.

The judges heard that First Bus Group had a policy of “requesting but not requiring” non-disabled travellers, including those with babies and pushchairs, to vacate the space if it was needed by a wheelchair user.

LINK

lazygal

There is no six week rule against driving after a c section, unless there is a medical reason for your doctor to advise against it. I asked about this second time and was told it is a myth-there is no 'medical rule' or insurance rule about it whatsoever. I was told to drive when I felt confident to do so. I did a trial run with my husband after three weeks and drove myself after three and a half weeks. Once you are able to do an emergency stop with the brake you're good to go.

RainyDay

January wrote: »

With a Phil & Teds you should be fine, I know the Bugaboo Donkey cannot fit on the bus.

There's no rule that you have to fold the buggy for a wheelchair... the driver can ask but you don't have to. (And before anyone jumps down my throat I'm not saying it's right but it's the rule)

So as long as you're on first you're ok (or you can get off or fold it if a wheelchair user does need it).

From http://www.dublinbus.ie/en/your-journey1/How-to-use-the-bus/Step-3/

Every accessible bus has one priority space for a wheelchair user, which may also be used for a baby buggy. Only one wheelchair or buggy may occupy this space at any time.

Wheelchair users have priority over everyone else for use of the wheelchair space, since this is the only place in which thy can travel safely.

For safety reasons customers using wheelchairs must reverse into the allocated space and face the rear of the bus. Wheelchair brakes should then be applied.

Gatling

RainyDay wrote: »

From http://www.dublinbus.ie/en/your-journey1/How-to-use-the-bus/Step-3/

Actually that's not 100% correct .

Several years ago a young lady with a buggy was asked to fold her buggy on a dublin bus to allow a wheelchair user to board ,
Completely horrified at the experience they young lady took dublin bus to court and won her case .
A person pushing a buggy suffers from reduced mobility and is just as entitled to the space and somebody in a wheelchair .
It's basically a case of first come first served , yes the driver can request you fold down a buggy but are they under no obligation to do so .

January

lazygal wrote: »

There is no six week rule against driving after a c section, unless there is a medical reason for your doctor to advise against it. I asked about this second time and was told it is a myth-there is no 'medical rule' or insurance rule about it whatsoever. I was told to drive when I felt confident to do so. I did a trial run with my husband after three weeks and drove myself after three and a half weeks. Once you are able to do an emergency stop with the brake you're good to go.

When I worked in insurance you were required to get clearance from a doctor if you wanted to drive before the 6 weeks were up. Now, this could have been this particular insurance company but if you were in an accident and didn't have this clearance you were buggered basically.

lazygal

January wrote: »

When I worked in insurance you were required to get clearance from a doctor if you wanted to drive before the 6 weeks were up. Now, this could have been this particular insurance company but if you were in an accident and didn't have this clearance you were buggered basically.

I have checked, as have other women I know who had sections, and not one insurance company said there was any such rule for c sections or any other abdominal surgery, for that matter. My doctor said it is one of the myths that is trotted out for women but there is no medical reason why one can't drive when one feels up to it. If the medical advice was not to drive for six weeks, I would have followed it, or if the insurance would have been void, I wouldn't have driven. But as neither were in any way an impediment to my driving, I drove when I was ready.
TL/DR check before putting yourself under six week house arrest.

lazygal

Gatling wrote: »

Actually that's not 100% correct .

Several years ago a young lady with a buggy was asked to fold her buggy on a dublin bus to allow a wheelchair user to board ,
Completely horrified at the experience they young lady took dublin bus to court and won her case .
A person pushing a buggy suffers from reduced mobility and is just as entitled to the space and somebody in a wheelchair .
It's basically a case of first come first served , yes the driver can request you fold down a buggy but are they under no obligation to do so .

Do you have a link to this case? I'm skeptical that a court would rule that someone pushing a buggy is the same as someone in a wheelchair. I had a quick look on Google and nothing came up.

Gatling

lazygal wrote: »

Do you have a link to this case? I'm skeptical that a court would rule that someone pushing a buggy is the same as someone in a wheelchair. I had a quick look on Google and nothing came up.

It's covered by an interpation of the equal status act of 2000.

This is a copy of a post from 2 years back from

The Space meets the requirements of the ESA 2000,in that it can accomodate a Wheelchair bound person (Note that it is Wheelchair specific,and does NOT include "Scooter Type" mobility aids).

The company,having provided the required wheelchair specific space,the means of access to it (ramp),and the trained Driver has therefore met its legal obligations.

The Company (Driver) has no Legal Right to reserve or otherwise interfere with a person with an occupied buggy who has prior possession of the space.

An unfolded/unoccupied buggy is a different case,and a Driver can demand that it be folded and stowed.

This can also be problematic,if a person removes a child from the buggy en-route,and leaves the empty buggy in the space.

The Driver may be totally oblivious to the altered situation and requests subsequent Buggy users to fold and stow,a request not always well recieved...cue a selection of barbed pleasanteries when Buggy Pusher 

dori_dormer

A friend of mine had a c section 5 yrs ago and her insurance company had this rule unless she got a medical note clearing her. Obviously don't remember the company as so long ago.

Moonbeam

http://www.rsa.ie/Documents/Licensed%20Drivers/Medical_Issues/Sl%C3%A1inte_agus_Tiom%C3%A1int_Medical_Fitness_to_Drive_Guidelines.pdf
Most insurance companies will need to be notified though.
It is the same in the UK no legal obligation not to drive but you may need to inform your insurance company.

RainyDay

Gatling wrote: »

Actually that's not 100% correct .

Several years ago a young lady with a buggy was asked to fold her buggy on a dublin bus to allow a wheelchair user to board ,
Completely horrified at the experience they young lady took dublin bus to court and won her case .
A person pushing a buggy suffers from reduced mobility and is just as entitled to the space and somebody in a wheelchair .
It's basically a case of first come first served , yes the driver can request you fold down a buggy but are they under no obligation to do so .

Which bit of "Wheelchair users have priority over everyone else for use of the wheelchair space" are you have trouble understanding?

Gatling wrote: »

It's covered by an interpation of the equal status act of 2000.

This is a copy of a post from 2 years back from

The Space meets the requirements of the ESA 2000,in that it can accomodate a Wheelchair bound person (Note that it is Wheelchair specific,and does NOT include "Scooter Type" mobility aids).

The company,having provided the required wheelchair specific space,the means of access to it (ramp),and the trained Driver has therefore met its legal obligations.

The Company (Driver) has no Legal Right to reserve or otherwise interfere with a person with an occupied buggy who has prior possession of the space.

An unfolded/unoccupied buggy is a different case,and a Driver can demand that it be folded and stowed.

This can also be problematic,if a person removes a child from the buggy en-route,and leaves the empty buggy in the space.

The Driver may be totally oblivious to the altered situation and requests subsequent Buggy users to fold and stow,a request not always well recieved...cue a selection of barbed pleasanteries when Buggy Pusher 

Could you provide a link to the post, or better still, a link to the Equality Tribunal ruling?

lazygal

Moonbeam wrote: »

http://www.rsa.ie/Documents/Licensed%20Drivers/Medical_Issues/Sl%C3%A1inte_agus_Tiom%C3%A1int_Medical_Fitness_to_Drive_Guidelines.pdf
Most insurance companies will need to be notified though.
It is the same in the UK no legal obligation not to drive but you may need to inform your insurance company.

All that refers to are general guidelines from medical practitioners in regard to post section driving. I checked with my insurer, who told me they don't know why women post section are under the impression there is a 'rule' about six weeks, and that once a doctor had issued advice, the woman was to follow it. There was no need to send in written confirmation or anything of that nature. Before I was discharged, I asked about driving, consultant advised to wait until I was ready, which I did, and then I drove. No big deal.
I don't think women should be under the illusion that there is a six week rule set in stone because they have had a section. I know women who had vaginal stiches who had a far longer recovery than I did, and there's no 'rule' about driving bandied about for them. First time around I just followed that 'rule', but second time I knew better and did my research rather than just believing in the 'rule' that isn't actually a rule at all, according to the professionals I dealt with.

lazygal

RainyDay wrote: »

Which bit of "Wheelchair users have priority over everyone else for use of the wheelchair space" are you have trouble understanding?


Could you provide a link to the post, or better still, a link to the Equality Tribunal ruling?

+1. This could easily just be someone's interpretation of the scenario presented, not the actual ruling.

Flippyfloppy

Hmmm, about the 6 week rule. The last time I had a section I asked my insurance company whether it was true. They didn't give me a yes or no answer, they just said whatever advice doctor gave to follow. However, when being discharged this time my consultant was very clear about not driving for six weeks....am seeing my GP soon for a check, I'll clarify with him!!

lazygal

Gatling wrote: »

It's covered by an interpation of the equal status act of 2000.

This is a copy of a post from 2 years back from

The Space meets the requirements of the ESA 2000,in that it can accomodate a Wheelchair bound person (Note that it is Wheelchair specific,and does NOT include "Scooter Type" mobility aids).

The company,having provided the required wheelchair specific space,the means of access to it (ramp),and the trained Driver has therefore met its legal obligations.

The Company (Driver) has no Legal Right to reserve or otherwise interfere with a person with an occupied buggy who has prior possession of the space.

An unfolded/unoccupied buggy is a different case,and a Driver can demand that it be folded and stowed.

This can also be problematic,if a person removes a child from the buggy en-route,and leaves the empty buggy in the space.

The Driver may be totally oblivious to the altered situation and requests subsequent Buggy users to fold and stow,a request not always well recieved...cue a selection of barbed pleasanteries when Buggy Pusher

Ok I've just checked this and its just a boards post, not a legal ruling. I see no actual ruling in a google search. What case, exactly, resulted in a ruling that a buggy doesn't have to be folded if the space is required by a wheelchair user?

lazygal

Flippyfloppy wrote: »

Hmmm, about the 6 week rule. The last time I had a section I asked my insurance company whether it was true. They didn't give me a yes or no answer, they just said whatever advice doctor gave to follow. However, when being discharged this time my consultant was very clear about not driving for six weeks....am seeing my GP soon for a check, I'll clarify with him!!

My consultant said my recovery was excellent, I was very mobile and didn't need pain relief on discharge, and said to wait a week or two and see how I went. GP said at the two week check to take it easy but if I felt up to it to drive with someone else on a short spin, and take it from there. Insurance said to follow medical advice, which I did, and didn't need to hear anything more from me. I was confident after three/three and a half weeks to drive.

Big Bag of Chips

It would be best to clear it with your doctor and insurance company. Because guaranteed if you have an accident and haven't specifically cleared it your insurance company will be only too happy to use it as a loophole!

How long is it since your section? Even though you might be feeling up to it, remember you have 5 layers of stitches to heal. So dragging a 2 year old, a new born and a double buggy on and off buses and in around the city centre mightn't be the cleverest of ideas!

Is there any local shopping centres that might be a slightly easier trip? It's only a few weeks. Better to be cautious.

Gatling

lazygal wrote: »

Ok I've just checked this and its just a boards post, not a legal ruling. I see no actual ruling in a google search. What case, exactly, resulted in a ruling that a buggy doesn't have to be folded if the space is required by a wheelchair user?

It's only a courtesy for a driver a parent with a buggy to fold there buggy to allow a wheelchair on .
Wheelchair users has zero priority on a bus it's first come first served .
The legal argument comes under the equal status act of 2000 .
there's no byelaws no nothing that gives wheelchair users priority over a person with a child in a buggy .
I've witnessed plenty of times where a friend in a wheelchair wasn't able to board a bus because the person sitting with a buggy refused the drivers request to fold there buggy .

Flippyfloppy

Hey lazy gal I was the same both times regarding pain relief.

Big bag of chips it will be two weeks in a couple of days. There is a shopping centre enroute to the city centre, that might be the best option. The more I think about it the more I go off the idea of town! Too many variables in there, plus according to Dublin bus my journey into town will take an hour! It's been so long since I've taken a bus. Plus I'm the kind of person who will encounter a wheelchair user at every stop...that's the kind of luck I usually have!

Big Bag of Chips

Ah Jaysus!!! 2 weeks??! Give yourself a chance!!!

I know after my section once I hit the 2 week mark I felt like I was grand.. But really you are better off allowing yourself the time to recover.

lazygal

Gatling wrote: »

It's only a courtesy for a driver a parent with a buggy to fold there buggy to allow a wheelchair on .
Wheelchair users has zero priority on a bus it's first come first served .
The legal argument comes under the equal status act of 2000 .
there's no byelaws no nothing that gives wheelchair users priority over a person with a child in a buggy .
I've witnessed plenty of times where a friend in a wheelchair wasn't able to board a bus because the person sitting with a buggy refused the drivers request to fold there buggy .

You said there was a case/ruling. Is that true? Or is it the supposition of the post to which you referred? Courtesy is not the same as law. There can be legal arguments for all sorts of things-but that doesn't mean a thing unless there is a ruling.

ETA you said a young woman won a case on this. Can you link to the ruling itself?

Gatling

lazygal wrote: »

You said there was a case/ruling. Is that true? Or is it the supposition of the post to which you referred? Courtesy is not the same as law. There can be legal arguments for all sorts of things-but that doesn't mean a thing unless there is a ruling.

ETA you said a young woman won a case on this. Can you link to the ruling itself?

Yes there was a case back over 10 years ago

When I get time I'll Google it

RainyDay

Gatling wrote: »

Yes there was a case back over 10 years ago

If it was over 10 years ago, there were very few accessible buses around. It certainly predates the specific instructions from Dublin Bus that I linked to.

lazygal

RainyDay wrote: »

If it was over 10 years ago, there were very few accessible buses around. It certainly predates the specific instructions from Dublin Bus that I linked to.

Exactly. Guidelines from a case ten years ago might be irrelevant today. I gather almost all Dublin Buses in the fleet are now wheelchair accessible, and I cannot see, from a commonsense perspective at least, why an able bodied person with a buggy would be seen as the same as a wheelchair user.

Gatling

lazygal wrote: »

Exactly. Guidelines from a case ten years ago might be irrelevant today. I gather almost all Dublin Buses in the fleet are now wheelchair accessible, and I cannot see, from a commonsense perspective at least, why an able bodied person with a buggy would be seen as the same as a wheelchair user.

Because it's equal status , somebody in a wheelchair cannot be given priority over another user able bodied or pushing a buggy .

eviltwin

That 6 week rule doesn't apply to other forms of surgery so why would it apply to sections? My mum in law had abdominal surgery last year and was cleared after 3 weeks to drive by her doctor and that was enough for her insurance company. Just checked the small print of my own policy and it doesn't mention anything about sections at all.

lazygal

Gatling wrote: »

Because it's equal status , somebody in a wheelchair cannot be give priority over another user able bodied or pushing a buggy .

That is not how the ESA works. An able bodied person can fold up a buggy and stand. A wheelchair bound person cannot. I have googled this case with the information you provided and there is no ruling about a young woman who won a case against Dublin Bus because she was asked to fold up her buggy.

If, indeed, there was a ruling to the effect that when pushing a buggy I deserve to be treated the same as someone who cannot stand and fold their wheelchair, I would doubt that would stand up in court and would have been challenged by disability groups, and rightly so.

I think most people can see the difference between an able bodied person pushing a buggy and a person who has no choice but to use a wheelchair.

Gatling

lazygal wrote: »

That is not how the ESA works. An able bodied person can fold up a buggy and stand. A wheelchair bound person cannot. I have googled this case with the information you provided and there is no ruling about a young woman who won a case against Dublin Bus because she was asked to fold up her buggy.

If, indeed, there was a ruling to the effect that when pushing a buggy I deserve to be treated the same as someone who cannot stand and fold their wheelchair, I would doubt that would stand up in court and would have been challenged by disability groups, and rightly so.

I think most people can see the difference between an able bodied person pushing a buggy and a person who has no choice but to use a wheelchair.

Ask then why a bus driver can only ask a buggy user to fold .
It cannot be demanded and there absolutely no obligation to do so .

The only priority is first come first served.

As much as we don't like it this is how it is

lazygal

Gatling wrote: »

Ask then why a bus driver can only ask a buggy user to fold .
It cannot be demanded and there absolutely no obligation to do so .

The only priority is first come first served

You made the claim that there was a ruling, regarding a young woman who was asked to fold her buggy on a bus, and that this set a precedence whereby a person pushing a buggy is treated the same as a person in a wheelchair.
This is not true. There is no such case. There is a boards post from a few years ago about a woman who wondered what the rules were. There is no ESA ruling about this.
There is information on the Dublin Bus website that the driver cannot force people to move, that is true. But this is not because of a ruling under the ESA. And I think, as I said, most people can distinguish between an able bodied person pushing a buggy and a wheelchair user who cannot fold up her or his chair and sit elsewhere.

Gatling

lazygal wrote: »

You made the claim that there was a ruling, regarding a young woman who was asked to fold her buggy on a bus, and that this set a precedence whereby a person pushing a buggy is treated the same as a person in a wheelchair.
This is not true. There is no such case. There is a boards post from a few years ago about a woman who wondered what the rules were. There is no ESA ruling about this.
There is information on the Dublin Bus website that the driver cannot force people to move, that is true. But this is not because of a ruling under the ESA. And I think, as I said, most people can distinguish between an able bodied person pushing a buggy and a wheelchair user who cannot fold up her or his chair and sit elsewhere.

Think what you like .We can all distinguish between able and disabled bodied users that does not make a blind bit of difference .
There is Zero priority

lazygal

Gatling wrote: »

Think what you like .We can all distinguish between able and disabled bodied users that does not make a blind bit of difference .
There is Zero priority

So there is no case in which it was ruled that a young women who was asked to fold up her buggy was wronged, and that is why a driver cannot force anyone to fold a buggy?
I am not disputing that there is zero priority. I am disputing that the reason there is zero priority is because there is a ruling under the Equal Status Act. There is no such case. If there is, I think you should link to it.

Moonbeam

Can we keep this thread on topic please ?

Suucee

I worked in insurance for 7 yrs and recently just left after having my second child. The section question was so common and out reply was always the same. If your doc saus your ok, your ok. We didnt require proof or anything as we could just go back to the doc if needed.

Mine 2 are now 2.5yrs and 7.5mnths and i think getting on a bus with a double buggy would be pretty difficult and stressful never mind recovering from major surgery. . I think try stick to something a bit more local . You be back driving in no time im sure.v

RainyDay

Gatling wrote: »

Because it's equal status , somebody in a wheelchair cannot be given priority over another user able bodied or pushing a buggy .

You don't seem to understand how the Equal Status Acts work. Equal Status does not mean equal treatment. A fundamental principle of Equality and Equality legislation is that you may need to treat people differently to get equal outcomes. The concept of 'reasonable accomodation' is set out in legislation, which allows people with disabilities to require different treatment to ensure they have equal access to services.

Gatling wrote: »

The only priority is first come first served.

As much as we don't like it this is how it is

You can keep restating your view on this as often as you like, but it doesn't really move the issue forward. The Dublin Bus website sets out a clear priority for wheelchair users.

Gatling wrote: »

Think what you like .We can all distinguish between able and disabled bodied users that does not make a blind bit of difference .
There is Zero priority

Not true - the Dublin Bus website sets out a clear priority for wheelchair users. And btw, you can't always distinguish disabilities of other bus passengers. Have you ever heard of hidden disabilities? Or intermittent conditions?

dubstarr

Op like you i had a double buggy and found the bus very hard at first.Its just so sore after your section.I wouldnt risk undoing your stitches for teh sake of going in to town.

I did venture into town but i had my eldest son with me for getting the buggy on and off the bus.He was 16.Just go somewhere local for the time being.

Sligo1

The dart is really good and lots of space if you don't go during rush hour. I have a side by side buggy. My 2 year old loves the novelty of "going on the big train". I've never used the bus with a buggy. Tbh I think if find it too stressful even with only a single buggy. But that could be because I haven't used the bus in years and years. Perhaps they have better services now....

Sligo1

Also... Just for arguments sake about that buggy versus disability debate.... Would OP not be considered "temporarily disabled" and not really be able to be folding a double buggy and carrying 2 babies on a bus? Just because someone has a wheelchair... OP could possibly have one of these "hidden disabilities" previously talked about in this thread. Obviously if the parent were completely able bodied I think they should move. But a mother who has just had abdominal surgery and stitches that could tear... Well I would say they are just as entitled to the "disabled spot" as a person with a wheelchair or with anyother possible hidden disability?

Detached Retina

I drove 3 weeks after my second section, though I heard the "6 week rule" from others, but insurance company didn't have it on their radar - in the US i believe they give you the go ahead after 3 weeks as you should be off the heavy painkillers by then (I guess like here painkiller wise).
Maybe less physical than getting the buggy and kiddies on and off a bus, and generally they are so limited you're waiting for one with an empty bay..in winter brrrr

Big Bag of Chips

No offense to OP, but unless you absolutely have to go on the bus then I wouldn't be bothered with the temporarily disabled argument! If going on a bus with a double buggy, 2 small kids and all the paraphernalia that you need to bring is likely to cause your stiches to tear if you have to try fold the buggy, hold the kids etc.. Then you need to weigh up is the journey worth it?!

If it's only a spin to town to get you out of the house then go for a walk locally!

Sligo1

Big Bag of Chips wrote: »

No offense to OP, but unless you absolutely have to go on the bus then I wouldn't be bothered with the temporarily disabled argument! If going on a bus with a double buggy, 2 small kids and all the paraphernalia that you need to bring is likely to cause your stiches to tear if you have to try fold the buggy, hold the kids etc.. Then you need to weigh up is the journey worth it?!

If it's only a spin to town to get you out of the house then go for a walk locally!

But why would OP be any less entitled to get out of the house and out and about than any other disabled person? She shouldn't have to worry about having to fold buggy and tearing her stitches etc etc surely she would be classed as temporarily disabled? She is not completely abled bodied. She is only a few weeks after having major abdominal surgery. But still very entitled as any other person to get out if the house and use the services avaliable to her?

Big Bag of Chips

Of course she's entitled, but that doesn't mean she has to put herself through the hardship. It's just unnecessary. Sounds like the OP hasn't even done it before, with or without kids. I just think now isn't the best time to make the maiden voyage! If she absolutely had to go into Dublin city centre that would be one thing, but surely there's easier places to go to "just get out of the house". It's only for another couple of weeks.

Dublin city centre on an hour bus journey with a new born and a two year old could turn out stressful very quickly for someone in the full of their health. I think, thinking about it less than 2 weeks after a section is madness! I put it down to the hormones, OP!!

Sligo1

I dont know where OP is from.... Just thought it may have been a quick journey into town is all . Id totally agree with you that an hour or more journey with 2 kids is an awful lot to be doing so soon. Just wanted to get opinions on whether OP (or anybody else in the same position) would be regarded as temporarily disabled and therefore entitled to use the disability services on the bus .

Dravokivich

lazygal wrote: »

Ok I've just checked this and its just a boards post, not a legal ruling. I see no actual ruling in a google search. What case, exactly, resulted in a ruling that a buggy doesn't have to be folded if the space is required by a wheelchair user?

There are drivers on the commuting and transport forum who've discussed it a lot. There is no obligation for either party to make room for the other once the space occupied. Its a heated topic as they end up with the complaints thrown at them for something they've no control over.

Big Bag of Chips

She mentioned earlier that "according to Dublin bus" the journey would take an hour, which makes me think she's looking at the time table.

Personally, if I wasn't confident that I could comfortably manage the buggy, babies and bags on and off the bus and around town then I just wouldn't bother. I don't think I'd be confident enough either to refuse to move for a wheelchair user in front of a bus full of people! So I'd just wait until I was up to driving.

dubstarr

Depending where the op lives maybe the dart or Luas would be better.More room and no folding down the buggy.I know op you do get cabin fever being stuck in the house,the park is good just to get some fresh air.