What do you think of JobBridge?

Warper

What do you think of the current Govt's scheme that if you are out of work for a certain period of time, eg 6 months that you have to work 20 hrs a week for an extra €50 to stop you from getting your dole docked? Of course the primary reason for this is getting people off the live register which is a total underhanded way of falsifying the current state of the unemployment problem.

Personally i think its one of the worst policies the current Govt have come up with. It is basically a cheap form of slave labour enforced upon the unfortunate ones in society that have lost their job or simply can't get a job. It is utterly demeaning paying someone 50 quid a week for 20 hrs labour. Its equivalent to €2.50 an hour, well below the minimum wage. They should pay the person the minimum wage at least. Quite frankly its scandalous.

The fact that practically no one gets a full time job from it also highlights the greedy companies that avail of this form of cheap labour. All in all the whole JobBridge thing sickens me.

Meathlass

Ah, another JobBridge thread.


Carry on.

Greenmachine

Warper wrote: »

What do you think of the current Govt's scheme that if you are out of work for a certain period of time, eg 6 months that you have to work 20 hrs a week for an extra €50 to stop you from getting your dole docked? Of course the primary reason for this is getting people off the live register which is a total underhanded way of falsifying the current state of the unemployment problem.

Personally i think its one of the worst policies the current Govt have come up with. It is basically a cheap form of slave labour enforced upon the unfortunate ones in society that have lost their job or simply can't get a job. It is utterly demeaning paying someone 50 quid a week for 20 hrs labour. Its equivalent to €2.50 an hour, well below the minimum wage. They should pay the person the minimum wage at least. Quite frankly its scandalous.

The fact that practically no one gets a full time job from it also highlights the greedy companies that avail of this form of cheap labour. All in all the whole JobBridge thing sickens me.

Don't you have to work a full week, not 20hr.

Warper

Greenmachine wrote: »

Don't you have to work a full week, not 20hr.

No its 20 hrs

The Backwards Man

I was on the dole for a while a few years ago as I had to wait to get vetted.

I would have gladly signed up for such a scheme for NO extra money. There's nothing as demeaning as sitting around on your hole all day doing nothing.

ThunbergsAreGo

Warper wrote: »

What do you think of the current Govt's scheme that if you are out of work for a certain period of time, eg 6 months that you have to work 20 hrs a week for an extra €50 to stop you from getting your dole docked? Of course the primary reason for this is getting people off the live register which is a total underhanded way of falsifying the current state of the unemployment problem.

Personally i think its one of the worst policies the current Govt have come up with. It is basically a cheap form of slave labour enforced upon the unfortunate ones in society that have lost their job or simply can't get a job. It is utterly demeaning paying someone 50 quid a week for 20 hrs labour. Its equivalent to €2.50 an hour, well below the minimum wage. They should pay the person the minimum wage at least. Quite frankly its scandalous.

The fact that practically no one gets a full time job from it also highlights the greedy companies that avail of this form of cheap labour. All in all the whole JobBridge thing sickens me.

Pretty sure €188 (or whatever)+€50 isnt €2.50 an hour. The whole amount should surely be taken

For Forks Sake

Warper wrote: »

Personally i think its one of the worst policies the current Govt have come up with. It is basically a cheap form of slave labour enforced upon the unfortunate ones in society that have lost their job or simply can't get a job. It is utterly demeaning paying someone 50 quid a week for 20 hrs labour. Its equivalent to €2.50 an hour, well below the minimum wage. They should pay the person the minimum wage at least. Quite frankly its scandalous.

Technically, the govt are paying €238 p/w (188 JSA + 50 Jobridge) in exchange for 20 hours work. €11.90 p.h.

BoJack Horseman

Its a crock of poop & it does displace paid labour.

(As previous threads have discussed).

Warper

The Backwards Man wrote: »

I was on the dole for a while a few years ago as I had to wait to get vetted.

I would have gladly signed up for such a scheme for NO extra money. There's nothing as demeaning as sitting around on your hole all day doing nothing.

Well everyone is different but do you not think that people should have a choice to be involved with JobBridge? Just because some people would work for nothing doesnt mean that everyone has to? The fact is that it is forced on people is what makes it wrong. They could keep it for people like yourself who would rather work for nothing but they should not ram it down peoples throats threatening them with welfare cuts if they dont oblige.

Warper

Obviously the wealthier people in society are delighted with this as it gives them another way to exploit the poorer people in our society. I thought slave labour was banned a long time ago, obv not.

The Backwards Man

Warper wrote: »

Well everyone is different but do you not think that people should have a choice to be involved with JobBridge? Just because some people would work for nothing doesnt mean that everyone has to? The fact is that it is forced on people is what makes it wrong. They could keep it for people like yourself who would rather work for nothing but they should not ram it down peoples throats threatening them with welfare cuts if they dont oblige.

As far as I know no one has a gun held to their head saying they have to partake, maybe I'm wrong?

If they want the dole however, then I think it's fair enough.

BoJack Horseman

The Backwards Man wrote: »

As far as I know no one has a gun held to their head saying they have to partake, maybe I'm wrong?

No, there are blueshirted mobs forcing this.

ash23

Good in theory but shouldn't be used for jobs that require minimal training.

It would be good to use in connection with additional training. For example a jobsbridge in an office alongside an ECDL course or computer/payroll training.

A jobsbridge in a garage with mechanics course etc.

A job in a kitchen with HACCP training or on a building site with HSA training.

0byme75341jo28

Many employers take the piss with JobBridge, that's where the problem lies.

Stacking the shelves for tesco on an internship, I mean, ffs.

Cutie18Ireland

Jobsbridge is not 20 hours its fulltime 37-40 hours a week. CE schemes are 20 hours.

padd b1975

It's not without it's problems, but when used correctly by both employers and employees it's a good scheme.

With the economy improving all the time, it could be time to wind it down and let the business community stand on it's own too feet.

The intern system without outside interference works brilliantly in the US, and still could have a use in our economy, but only if applied correctly.

Warper

Warper wrote: »

Obviously the wealthier people in society are delighted with this as it gives them another way to exploit the poorer people in our society. I thought slave labour was banned a long time ago, obv not.

What a statement, why bother asking peoples opinion & thoughts if your mind is already made up?

johny33

I was on jobbridge for 9 months. I had diploma and a course and jobbridge gave me the experience. I got the contract with the company after those 9 months and it's 2 years now since.
jobbridge works out 6.35 ph, which is not the best, but you don't pay taxes
Actually, I was offered a job (paid 9.50 ph, but nothing I would want to do for the rest of my life) at the same time as I was offered position in jobbridge and I chose the second one. I'm happy with the job now and I'd be happy to get a career in it.

Wolf Club

Warper wrote: »

No its 20 hrs

A lot of the ones I've heard of we 30-39 hours a week and ran for 9 months. Overall the whole thing is a scam. Obviously there are the completely disgraceful positions (sandwich artist, car wash engineer, etc) but even the "successful" ones (where people get decent jobs upon completion) are pretty exploitative. I haven't yet heard of one where an intern was learning for the entirety of the internship. It's usually 2 weeks (if even) of training for the position and then 8.5 months of doing job at the same level as a paid employee but getting peanuts for it.

Foxhound38

I'm on one now. Had no office experience coming in so I hadn't a hope otherwise. Company I'm with are great, training me in with all aspects of the organization and treating me as every bit a part of the team. It's given me skills I can use anywhere even if the current crowd don't keep me on although I hope they will. The extra 50 and lack of signing on anymore is nice, as is getting the money in my bank account each week. And getting up and going to do a days work each day has an intrinsic value for me - sitting on my hole all day while I was out of work was a disaster for me psychologically etc.

Overall my experience has been great, although I'd say it very much depends on the company you end up with.

hfallada

The greatest barrier to employment is not lack of education or skills. Its long term unemployment. If you go to an interview, even if you have the right education and skills, but the employer sees you havent worked in over 5 years. She/he will be thinking can this person adjust to live in a workplace again. With job bridge you can refresh your skills and have up to date experience. NYTimes got a 1,000 CVs that were identical. Half were currently in a job and the other half were long term unemployed( 1 year). The long term unemployed were significantly less likely to get an interview, than a person with up to date experience.

Like all Government schemes, there was abuse of job bridge. With the right framework, job bridge could be a success

starlit

You could be getting interviews left right and centre and not be a match for the job even with potential and the right skills/qualifications and experience. You still up against other candidates that is a better fit and seen to be better qualified and more experienced.

I felt hard done by candidates that hadn't even finished their degree and I had a degree and a postgrad, some experience in IT and yet they bypassed me yet did a good interview!? If I didn't answer a question the way an interviewer wanted me to answer or didn't give back an example they wanted they drew me out straight away.

mikom

Warper wrote: »

What do you think of the current Govt's scheme that if you are out of work for a certain period of time, eg 6 months that you have to work 20 hrs a week for an extra €50 to stop you from getting your dole docked?

My sandwich artist down the local SUBWAY swears by it.

starlit

Basically I am not what they are looking for which annoys me why they bother to interview me.

WinnyThePoo

Warper wrote: »

No its 20 hrs

Nope its between 35 hours and 40. Speaking from someone on the scheme.

ectoraige

I don't know where this 20 hours is coming from, Jobbridge is minimum 30 hours per week, max 39 hours, with either six or nine month contracts. Most places use them for 39 hours per week, on 9 month contracts.

They can serve three purposes:
1) Provide working experience and training in a field that an applicant doesn't have direct experience or knowledge in;
2) Act as an extended interview and training process for companies considering hiring new staff;
3) Serve as cheap disposable labour for companies requiring unskilled labour.

If it were only case 1, then you can see some benefit to it. Otherwise, it's exploitation of those without an income. There is some argument for case 2, in that it encourages companies who are hesitant about hiring new staff to do so. However, six months is far too long a time for what is effectively an on-the-job interview - 6-12 weeks should be more than enough. Moreover, if a company needs the staff, they need the staff and are going to hire anyway. Assisting the employer in ensuring he has a good interview process would be of more overall benefit. The knock-on effect is people who are already have skills and experienced have to go through JobBridge to secure a job that they should have been able to walk into from day one, with huge cost to both the state and to the persons themselves.

Enough said about case 3, the sole HGV drivers and shelf-stacker positions are well documented, and are thouroughly despicable practices.

I should note that I obtained my current position through JobBridge, my manager needed more staff but the beancounters were reluctant. It was 30 hours per week, for 6 months, and they took me on full-time at the end. However there's nothing really that I gained from the Internship that rendered me any more employable than I had been, other than the fact that I was now experienced using their specific toolset.

The main positive effect is the improvement in mental health - it's far better to be doing something productive, than to be sitting idle, even when the reward is small.

My personal gripe with Jobbridge is there is no assistance provided for childcare. When I was unemployed I was able to at least take care of our children. When I started the Internship we had to pay creche fees, for which the extra €50 per week was of little help. We worked out that the net cost of the scheme to us over the six months was about €3,000 Luckily we were in a position to take the hit in the hope that I got a job in the end, but if I had not, I don't think I would have been able to participate in another internship. If we had rent to pay at the time I wouldn't have been able to do it in the first place, and so would have had to limit my job search to companies outside of JobBridge. This is a shrinking set though, so I do believe the proliferation of JobBridge internships is making it harder for those with families to secure employment. The knock-on effect is more children being raised in low-income families, which has a far more detrimental effect on society in the long-term than having too many low-income young workers.

In short, the maximum period should be reduced to 3 months, and there should be support provided for childcare. The plan as it is is short-sighted, and makes it too easy to exploit those at greatest disadvantage.

Warper

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Nope its between 35 hours and 40. Speaking from someone on the scheme.

Sorry i was getting mixed up with CE. Is JobBridge compulsory?

ash23

ash23 wrote: »

Good in theory but shouldn't be used for jobs that require minimal training.

It would be good to use in connection with additional training. For example a jobsbridge in an office alongside an ECDL course or computer/payroll training.

A jobsbridge in a garage with mechanics course etc.

A job in a kitchen with HACCP training or on a building site with HSA training.

ECDL? Anyone who has a non-arts degree will know more than what's covered by the ECDL.

lazybones32

If this is considered to be a positive, proactive step in reducing unemployment in Ireland (job creation would be better imo), it just serves to highlight how bereft of initiative, ideas and competency, those who hold Govt. actually are.

In my field of work, 2 of the largest businesses in the County are offering to hire workers via jobsbridge. I could understand if margins were razor-thin but I deal with these Companies and I know they (the Companies and the people who own and operate them) are not short of money.

Greed.

ash23

Deleted User wrote: »

ECDL? Anyone who has a non-arts degree will know more than what's covered by the ECDL.

And those who don't have degrees?
Point is that if you want to look for office work, it's a handy thing to have and I was using it as an example.

Lots of sectors have minimum competency or minimum training requirements. Someone working on a jobsbridge and getting the relevant skill set while doing so would be more employable at the end of it than someone who has just done the job but not obtained any of the required qualifications.

No point in giving someone a job in a bank and not getting them to work towards their QFA or similar because it's a minimum requirement in the sector.

Akrasia

Deleted User wrote: »

ECDL? Anyone who has a non-arts degree will know more than what's covered by the ECDL.

He's right you know. I passed my ECDL but when i broke down on the side of the road, I couldn't even find the dipstick on my Macbook Air.

There should be some night-time computer training as well as a bit of skid pan traning to avoid crashes.