Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2014 - Mod Warning in OP, 10/12

LuckyLloyd

marklazarcovic wrote: »

both barca and madrids defence is very suspect, does not stop the midfield and attack winning them titles .. we were the same last year .. we just have not fit good strikers

Barcelona and Madrid have conceded just 20 goals between them thus far this season over the course of 31 combined games. We've conceded 24 goals in 17 league games.

MD1990

marklazarcovic wrote: »

both barca and madrids defence is very suspect, does not stop the midfield and attack winning them titles .. we were the same last year .. we just have not fit good strikers

Madrids is defence is very good. Varane isn't even a regular starter. Barca's despite there stats is shaky.

PropJoe10

Rodgers ' attitude towards the defence is: throw a few players together with no organisation and hope they can limit the damage enough. if they don't, he goes out and buys another raft of defenders. it's not good enough. top teams are all built on a solid defence. the fact that we scored over 100 goals last year and still didn't manage to win the league says alot.

LuckyLloyd

MD1990 wrote: »

Madrids is defence is very good. Varane isn't even a regular starter. Barca's despite there stats is shaky.

Some good coaching to turn them around. Ancelotti is such a great manager. Pepe has barely been booked this year!!

LuckyLloyd

PropJoe10 wrote: »

Rodgers ' attitude towards the defence is: throw a few players together with no organisation and hope they can limit the damage enough. if they don't, he goes out and buys another raft of defenders. it's not good enough. top teams are all built on a solid defence. the fact that we scored over 100 goals last year and still didn't manage to win the league says alot.

Correct. And he'll be sacked from the job because of it eventually.

Agent Coulson

MD1990 wrote: »

Madrids is defence is very good. Varane isn't even a regular starter. Barca's despite there stats is shaky.

We have the player keeping Varane at times out or partnering him in the French National team but to most he is considered a joke.

The manager doesn't seem to rate him either.

Kerrigooney

LuckyLloyd wrote: »

Correct. And he'll be sacked from the job because of it eventually.

He will and he'll have nobody to blame but himself.

Agent Coulson

Kerrigooney wrote: »

He will and he'll have nobody to blame but himself.

Cough...Transfer Committee...Cough.

delaney001

BMJD wrote: »

Just download the cast extention to chrome, when you're watching your filthy illegal stream just click on the cast button and it will be on TV. Then go full screen.

Thank you kind sir. You are nothing like your liverpool-supporting comrades 😄

Kerrigooney

Agent Coulson wrote: »

Cough...Transfer Committee...Cough.

He'll probably try to blame them but I think we can all see through that at this stage.

michael999999

Kerrigooney wrote: »

He'll probably try to blame them but I think we can all see through that at this stage.

Did I hear last week that a member of the transfer committee is actually a mathematician. Specifically to assess a players pass rates etc..?

Kerrigooney

michael999999 wrote: »

Did I hear last week that a member of the transfer committee is actually a mathematician. Specifically to assess a players pass rates etc..?

Glen Johnson is on the transfer committee?

That explains a lot.

Hangballlouie

Agent Coulson wrote: »

Cough...Transfer Committee...Cough.

Cough.....Groundsman....Cough.

OwaynOTT

Cough cough phlegm cough cough chest infection

SuperTortoise

michael999999 wrote: »

Did I hear last week that a member of the transfer committee is actually a mathematician. Specifically to assess a players pass rates etc..?

Yep, it's all based on the similar situation with the Red Sox when they took over, as seen in the film Moneyball, it's loosely based on real events, i guess they tried to do the same thing at LFC.

Someone needs to tell them football does'nt work that way...

ricero

SuperTortoise wrote: »

Yep, it's all based on the similar situation with the Red Sox when they took over, as seen in the film Moneyball, it's loosely based on real events, i guess they tried to do the same thing at LFC.

Someone needs to tell them football does'nt work that way...

I'm sick of these yanks and their moneyball ****e. All I want for Xmas is a big Arab sugar daddy to buy the club

chicorytip

homolumo wrote: »

Indeed. Hindsight is great and most of us felt Mario was worth a risk but these comments from BR make him look stupid.

Serious errors of judgement in transfer dealings,going right back to the end of Dalglish's first period in charge,has been the prime reason for the decline from what was once a championship winning club to virtual perennial also-rans.

Agent Coulson

£300m for transfers given to 2 managers in 4 seasons... That is not "Moneyball"

Kerrigooney

Unchanged for the first time this season.

PropJoe10

Ojo on the bench, good to see.

atilladehun

Agent Coulson wrote: »

£300m for transfers given to 2 managers in 4 seasons... That is not "Moneyball"

When the owners arrived I remember them trying to say value for money over moneyball.

They remind me of an Irish dad refusing to pay the going rate for quality. Always looking for a bargain.

5starpool

ricero wrote: »

I'm sick of these yanks and their moneyball ****e. All I want for Xmas is a big Arab sugar daddy to buy the club

Ah now, don't go overboard. If we could spend the money we have better I'd be delighted with that. A sugardaddy these days aren't what they used to be with FFP, but even aside from that I'm not in favour of Liverpool being taken over as a fantasy football experiment.

NukaCola

5starpool wrote: »

Ah now, don't go overboard. If we could spend the money we have better I'd be delighted with that. A sugardaddy these days aren't what they used to be with FFP, but even aside from that I'm not in favour of Liverpool being taken over as a fantasy football experiment.

Somewhere in between would be nice.

Agent Coulson

atilladehun wrote: »

When the owners arrived I remember them trying to say value for money over moneyball.

They remind me of an Irish dad refusing to pay the going rate for quality. Always looking for a bargain.

You give Jose, Luis, Pep, Carlos etc etc £300m to spend in 4 seasons they will be buying quality for that.

We bought 35 players for £324m in 4 seasons maybe 2 of them could be deemed quality.( 1 is gone and the other can't keep fit.)

I feel sorry for FSG to be honest they have flashed the cash for players and the stadium but have been let down by the people they hired to run the playing side of the club.

OwaynOTT

Agent Coulson wrote: »

You give Jose, Luis, Pep, Carlos etc etc £300m to spend in 4 seasons they will be buying quality for that.

We bought 35 players for £324m in 4 seasons maybe 2 of them could be deemed quality.( 1 is gone and the other can't keep fit.)

I feel sorry for FSG to be honest they have flashed the cash for players and the stadium but have been let down by the people they hired to run the playing side of the club.

You feel sorry for FSG because their signings - Rodgers - isn't playing up to scratch in your view but have nothing but criticism for Rodgers whose signings aren't up to scratch.

Agent Coulson

OwaynOTT wrote: »

You feel sorry for FSG because their signings - Rodgers - isn't playing up to scratch in your view but have nothing but criticism for Rodgers whose signings aren't up to scratch.

Rodgers is supposed to know about football and be the future of modern management of course I am critical of him.

They hired the wrong man twice in a sport they didn't understand yes i do feel sorry for them.

They have backed both fully and neither was/is up to the job.

pmy.murphy

Agent Coulson wrote: »

I feel sorry for FSG to be honest they have flashed the cash for players and the stadium but have been let down by the people they hired to run the playing side of the club.

These people they hired have been subject to a stupid moneyball policy and wage caps by FSG in shopping for players which has meant we have been limited in the type of player we shud be buying, we have been either shopping in the bargain basement or taking huge risks potential and throwing outrageous sums of money at overperforming players at midtable clubs

MonkeyTennis

can anyone DM me a good watery way to view this

Agent Coulson

pmy.murphy wrote: »

These people they hired have been subject to a stupid moneyball policy and wage caps by FSG in shopping for players which has meant we have been limited in the type of player we shud be buying, we have been either shopping in the bargain basement or taking huge risks potential and throwing outrageous sums of money at overperforming players at midtable clubs

Spending £300m on players is not Moneyball.

Sturridge, Coutinho are really the only 2 Moneyball players the club has bought.

Having a wage structure is needed I agree with that. Not a wage cap.

Pay the players what they are worth when they sign a contract and if they improve their wages improve along with it. I am pretty sure John W said that

Throwing outrageous sums of money at overperforming players at midtable clubs is stupid whoever wanted them manager or transfer committee.



Yesil, Teixeira, Alberto, Ilori, Can & Origi are calculated risks that may or may not pay off.

The rest of the signings have been a let down price wise and playing wise but most aren't bad players.

mosstin

Jordan Ibe goal for Derby.