Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Introducing new puppy

  • 27-08-2014 11:41am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭


    Hi,
    Any advice would be much appreciated. I tried to talk to my vet today but haven't been able to get through to him yet to ask for advice. I have a 6 month old puppy. He's a complete nutter!! He loves attention, walks and other dogs. He also jumps around a lot. My partner and I work long shifts and because he can be left on his own for long periods of time and we can tell how lonely he is, we decided to get a second dog. The new puppy arrived last night. I introduced them on neutral ground and they got on great. Now, the older dog is a medium sized dog and he's heavy and strong. The new dog is going to be a lot smaller. The were doing a lot of play fighting and the little guy (who is 2 months) seemed to be kicking ass. I didn't want to leave them alone over night, just in case. Today, while I'm watching them play, the older dog seems to be very overbearing and the little fella is running away but the older fella won't leave him alone. The play thats causing me concern is, the older one keeps biting the top of the new puppies head and the back of his neck and ears. He also does a lot of paw slapping and knocking him onto his back. The little one just grabs onto whatever he can. Theres been a couple of yelps and while the older one does let go, he doesn't really give the little guy a chance to catch his breath. The play doesn't seem to be overly aggressive. Theres no growling or anything. I had a dog for 16 years who hated every animal that had 4 legs so I know what a p****d off dog looks like. I am just concerned that this behaviour could escalate and that I won't be able to leave them alone together. And advice or insight would be much appreciated. Its a long time since I've had a puppy, never mind two!!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,763 ✭✭✭Knine


    And that is your problem. One puppy on their own is hard work. Two can be a nightmare.

    It is one of many reasons it is not recommended to get 2 puppies at the same time.

    Another issue is the size difference. Adult dogs playing with puppies tend to be more careful then puppies playing together. The size difference with 2 puppies means that one of your puppies could end up accidentally injured.

    If you plan on keeping both pups then they should not be left alone together for the reasons above. You will have to supervise play sessions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭andreac


    Why u get another pup if you don't even have time for the one you have?

    Getting a second one can be a nightmare and leaving two on their own for long periods of time isn't fair either.

    You wont be able to leave these alone now together so your problem of one being on its own isn't solved now, prob just made the situation even worse.

    Can you maybe take the new pup back to the breeder and just work on keeping one dog happy? Is there daycare in your area or a dog walker that can come in and walk your dog during the day so its not on its own all day long?

    Looks like your situation isn't right for one dog let alone two...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭keno-daytrader


    When you say he can be left alone for long periods of time, can you elaborate on how long that is? Maybe the other posters are taking you up wrong.

    The way the 2 puppies are acting is normal for their age and is why for now they will need to be supervised when they are together.

    Are they in crates when ye are not there?

    ☀️ 7.8kWp ⚡3.6kWp south, ⚡4.20kWp west



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    I do think people are taking me up wrong.

    When we got our first dog, the breeder recommended that we get another dog for him to play with. We hadn't planned on getting another dog so soon but the opportunity presented itself.

    An update on their behaviour:
    I have never seen my older dog so happy! He loves his new little friend. Although I am not comfortable to leave them alone together yet, the play has become much more gentle and they're also resting together. I've noticed the bigger one looking to the little one to see what to do. Also, the bigger ones behaviour has improved. I actually can't believe how obedient he's become. Bigger one is going to be neutered next week. We have the new puppy 8 days today and I have to say that I have no regrets about getting him. They are both so happy and playful. And the new puppy is almost house trained. Going in one place all the time.

    Thank you to everyone who posted and to the first two replies, I obviously didn't put my concerns across in a concise manner. And, bringing the new puppy back now would not be an option. My other dog is so happy with the company that I think he would be very sad.

    My main concern was the way they were playing but now I know that that's just what they do.

    Once the new puppy is a bit bigger, they can stay together. They're not crated. The bigger one is an outdoor dog. He hated being inside. The new puppy was living outside when we got him and once he gets bigger, he too will probably go out.

    As I said originally, I had a dog for 16 years who lived a very long, healthy and happy life.

    So, thanks again everyone for your replies

    Ps. They're not a nightmare. One in his own was but now he's much easier to deal with!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,099 ✭✭✭maggiepip


    Thats lovely to hear they both seem happier and more content now. Your new addition may not be too pleased at being put outside as hes used to the house and his human family, even if his doggy friend is out there, but maybe now your older dog might be happier coming indoors to his friend?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    maggiepip wrote: »
    Thats lovely to hear they both seem happier and more content now. Your new addition may not be too pleased at being put outside as hes used to the house and his human family, even if his doggy friend is out there, but maybe now your older dog might be happier coming indoors to his friend?

    We're going to wait and see how it goes. At the moment, the new puppy doesn't want to come in and every time I open the door he's gone like a rocket. If the older one settles down enough we'll have them both in but at the moment he just wants to run and jump all over the place but that might change once he's used to the new puppy hopefully. Will just have to wait and see :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    HungryFish wrote: »
    We're going to wait and see how it goes. At the moment, the new puppy doesn't want to come in and every time I open the door he's gone like a rocket. If the older one settles down enough we'll have them both in but at the moment he just wants to run and jump all over the place but that might change once he's used to the new puppy hopefully. Will just have to wait and see :-)

    Have a look at the pic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    glad to hear things are getting better and they are enjoying eachothers company!

    But personally i wouldnt have them sleeping one inside and one outside... I'm sure they would prefer to live indoors.

    I have a medium sized dog and he lives / sleeps indoors... he is far happier. for me I dont see the point in having a dog if they are outdoor dogs - but thats just me. Sure you mentioned to work long shifts which i suspect means they already spend lots of time outside in the garden so in my opinion id have the both inside at night time... especially given how cold the nights can be here.

    Cute dogs BTW


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    HungryFish wrote: »
    HungryFish wrote: »
    We're going to wait and see how it goes. At the moment, the new puppy doesn't want to come in and every time I open the door he's gone like a rocket. If the older one settles down enough we'll have them both in but at the moment he just wants to run and jump all over the place but that might change once he's used to the new puppy hopefully. Will just have to wait and see :-)

    Have a look at the pic

    your older puppy is only 6 months..he wont really calm down until he is 18months or so.... so your just creating issues for yourself i think. its unfair to leave the older one outside until he calms down - you have a puppy thats what they ALL do... you need to train him to realx - not leave him out the back and hope he relax's in time.... it wont happen i can promise you that much. You need to invest time in him training him to be more realxed....

    I do feel sorry for the guy outside while one is inside... hardly fair - IMO you may create jealously issues.

    Dont seperate them... they will be fine together...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭andreac


    Def not fair to have one in and one out. How do you think the outside dog will feel when his best friend is inside? Seriously, recipe for disaster there and very unfair.

    Dogs will settle if they are both together, whether its in or out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,099 ✭✭✭maggiepip


    HungryFish wrote: »
    We're going to wait and see how it goes. At the moment, the new puppy doesn't want to come in and every time I open the door he's gone like a rocket. If the older one settles down enough we'll have them both in but at the moment he just wants to run and jump all over the place but that might change once he's used to the new puppy hopefully. Will just have to wait and see :-)

    You've enhanced their life hugely by giving them both a doggy playmate/companion, so well done! Could you go that one step further and allow them both in the house?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    The older one was always inside until he started looking to go out. He won't come in at night. My last dog always slept outside and as he got older came in. When I say settle down, I don't mean settle altogether. I know that won't happen for a few years. Ever since he was a small puppy, he runs and plays and suddenly just lies down and goes to sleep. When I say settle, I mean for him to come in to sleep. He doesn't have a getting sleepy period. I want to keep both dogs together, no question. I also think that the new puppy would rather be outside but until I'm 100% sure that the older one won't accidentally hurt him I can't leave them alone. I understand the thinking of having your pets indoors and that there's no point in having them otherwise. I personally believe that the dogs should be where ever they're happier. The older dog is definitely spending more time indoors than he was. It's only been a week. We're working on having them together all the time whether it's inside or out :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,062 ✭✭✭✭tk123


    HungryFish wrote: »
    He doesn't have a getting sleepy period.

    What do you feed him?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    tk123 wrote: »
    What do you feed him?

    Science plan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,062 ✭✭✭✭tk123


    HungryFish wrote: »
    Science plan

    Ok well that's why he's mad :P - Hills is full of cheap fillers. If you do a search you'll find tons of food threads with suggestions of much better foods which should help calm him a bit ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    tk123 wrote: »
    Ok well that's why he's mad :P - Hills is full of cheap fillers. If you do a search you'll find tons of food threads with suggestions of much better foods which should help calm him a bit ;)

    I fed my last dog husse. It seemed to do him well. Do you think that one would be better?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    HungryFish wrote: »
    I fed my last dog husse. It seemed to do him well. Do you think that one would be better?

    Husse is a pretty poor quality food also... take a look at taste of the wild puppy food:


    http://www.zooplus.ie/shop/dogs/dry_dog_food/taste_of_the_wild/puppy/409318


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    cocker5 wrote: »
    Husse is a pretty poor quality food also... take a look at taste of the wild puppy food:


    http://www.zooplus.ie/shop/dogs/dry_dog_food/taste_of_the_wild/puppy/409318

    Really? I thought husse was really good. My last dog (don't kill me) always had pedigree chum. I know now that it's not good at all. When I changed him to husse, he became more energetic and his coat became lovely and white. They're on science plan now because that was what breeder was feeding. I don't understand why vets sell food if it's so bad! I'm going to have to do some research…thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭VonVix


    HungryFish wrote: »
    I don't understand why vets sell food if it's so bad! I'm going to have to do some research…thanks

    Nutrition is often not a vets strong point, it's a whole other world of study for them. I believe they are also paid to sell certain brands as well.

    Also there's the whole argument of "no dog has died because of Pedigree chum." :P

    [Dog Training + Behaviour Nerd]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,062 ✭✭✭✭tk123


    HungryFish wrote: »
    I'm going to have to do some research…thanks

    Well apologies in advance because your head will be melted!! :pac::P


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    Personally I wouldn’t feed my dog certain food as its sold by the VET, while the may have good medical advice (you hope) they do not weigh heavily on nutrition at all.

    Like most vets sell either Royal Canin & Hills (both poor quality) and Burns (ok quality), but remember they get commission / kick back to sell the food and that’s why they do it etc.. DEF stay clear of the like of maxi zoo or supermarkets for dog food, commercial dog food is usually very poor quality

    your head will be melted once you start researching certain foods…. just some word of advice… do not even consider food that states “crude” protein, ash … or animals derivatives, or fillers, all really poor quality.

    You could also look at feeding your dogs the “raw” diet….

    I fed my dog burns for about 6 years (it was ok quality, I thought at the time it was great), with some substitutes Ie salmon oil a teaspoon daily, sardines, boiled chicken a few days a week…
    I then moved on to Taste of the wild (grain free) I found it great but in recent months I’ve moved him onto boiled chicken with carrots, parsnip, broccoli (small amount), peas, cauliflowers etc… or boiled mince beef with the same.
    Again salmon oil mixed in every second day for his joints and coat and he’s never been better. He gets fed twice a day….

    I still add taste of the wild in some days if he’s been very active etc., but he’s doing great, he adores his food, in all honesty it does cost me more each week, but he’s happy = Im happy.

    zooplus is a great site for all things animal!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    I've been reading about on gain puppy food. Does anyone know if it's any good?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    HungryFish wrote: »
    I've been reading about on gain puppy food. Does anyone know if it's any good?

    Did you look up the ingredients?

    first item = crude protein and crude ash.... that says it all really... avoid
    unless you want your dog bouncing off the walls....


    http://gainfeeds.com/pet/elite-pet-food/

    Nutritional Information

    Crude Protein29%Crude Oils & Fats16%Crude Fibre2%Crude Ash7.8%Calcium1.4%Phosphorus1%Omega-3 Fats0.9%Omega-6 Fats3.9%


    did you take a look at the link for taste of the wild i posted above? waaaay better quality


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    HungryFish wrote: »
    Really? I thought husse was really good. My last dog (don't kill me) always had pedigree chum. I know now that it's not good at all. When I changed him to husse, he became more energetic and his coat became lovely and white. They're on science plan now because that was what breeder was feeding. I don't understand why vets sell food if it's so bad! I'm going to have to do some research…thanks

    The food that vets sell isn't 'so bad', it is nutritionally sufficient for your dog. My vet sells a wide variety of food, including Burns which is a good food. If you have used a food previously, and you were happy with it, then I don't see any reason for you to change. Food is very contentious on here, I asked previously if anyone posting had any animal nutrition training, and nobody replied, so I guess not, so its basically what they prefer, and what they have learnt, usually from the interweb.
    cocker5 wrote: »
    Personally I wouldn’t feed my dog certain food as its sold by the VET, while the may have good medical advice (you hope) they do not weigh heavily on nutrition at all.

    Like most vets sell either Royal Canin & Hills (both poor quality) and Burns (ok quality), but remember they get commission / kick back to sell the food and that’s why they do it etc.. DEF stay clear of the like of maxi zoo or supermarkets for dog food, commercial dog food is usually very poor quality

    your head will be melted once you start researching certain foods…. just some word of advice… do not even consider food that states “crude” protein, ash … or animals derivatives, or fillers, all really poor quality.

    You could also look at feeding your dogs the “raw” diet….

    I fed my dog burns for about 6 years (it was ok quality, I thought at the time it was great), with some substitutes Ie salmon oil a teaspoon daily, sardines, boiled chicken a few days a week…
    I then moved on to Taste of the wild (grain free) I found it great but in recent months I’ve moved him onto boiled chicken with carrots, parsnip, broccoli (small amount), peas, cauliflowers etc… or boiled mince beef with the same.
    Again salmon oil mixed in every second day for his joints and coat and he’s never been better. He gets fed twice a day….

    I still add taste of the wild in some days if he’s been very active etc., but he’s doing great, he adores his food, in all honesty it does cost me more each week, but he’s happy = Im happy.

    zooplus is a great site for all things animal!

    Why would you advise somebody not to go to Maxi Zoo, its a pet shop, with a wide variety of dog food :confused: They sell one particular food that is around €90 for 15kg, and is sold basically on the same premise as taste of the wild etc.

    Do you know what ash means on a dog food label?

    Do you think that pet shops and websites sell food at cost? I can't understand this thing about how bad it is that vets make money on food they sell. Of course they do, just like every single vendor does, otherwise why would they do it? The salmon oil you buy, do you get it cost? Why do you not object to the person selling that making money on it? Surely if a vet can make money on food, pet products etc, it can help to keep the cost of treatment down?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    cocker5 wrote: »
    Did you look up the ingredients?

    first item = crude protein and crude ash.... that says it all really... avoid
    unless you want your dog bouncing off the walls....


    http://gainfeeds.com/pet/elite-pet-food/

    Nutritional Information

    Crude Protein29%Crude Oils & Fats16%Crude Fibre2%Crude Ash7.8%Calcium1.4%Phosphorus1%Omega-3 Fats0.9%Omega-6 Fats3.9%

    Just FYI, those are NOT the ingredients.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    muddypaws wrote: »
    Just FYI, those are NOT the ingredients.


    Apologies... nutritional breakdown... from their website


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    muddypaws wrote: »
    The food that vets sell isn't 'so bad', it is nutritionally sufficient for your dog. My vet sells a wide variety of food, including Burns which is a good food. If you have used a food previously, and you were happy with it, then I don't see any reason for you to change. Food is very contentious on here, I asked previously if anyone posting had any animal nutrition training, and nobody replied, so I guess not, so its basically what they prefer, and what they have learnt, usually from the interweb.



    Why would you advise somebody not to go to Maxi Zoo, its a pet shop, with a wide variety of dog food :confused: They sell one particular food that is around €90 for 15kg, and is sold basically on the same premise as taste of the wild etc.

    Do you know what ash means on a dog food label?

    Do you think that pet shops and websites sell food at cost? I can't understand this thing about how bad it is that vets make money on food they sell. Of course they do, just like every single vendor does, otherwise why would they do it? The salmon oil you buy, do you get it cost? Why do you not object to the person selling that making money on it? Surely if a vet can make money on food, pet products etc, it can help to keep the cost of treatment down?


    Not too sure why you’re getting a bee in your bonnet, I’m entitled to my opinion…

    I never said vet were not allowed to make money from the food the sell… I said they don’t always sell good nutritional food.

    Never in my post did I say I got my salmon oil for cost price?? infact I don’t believe I mention cost price anywhere. I did say I found zooplus very good and I stand by that….

    Also I stand by what said about pet shops and maxi zoo… a lot of the food they sell is rubbish…. the staff (99% are students) are not qualified to give advice so the recommend any brand etc… just because its pricey doesn’t mean its good (im sure you already agree with this)
    again my opinion, you are also entitled to your muddy paws democracy and all that.

    OP…. research the best brand to suit your dog and your budget…. look up ingredients and nutrituonal value… these should help you decide.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭HungryFish


    There's no need for everyone to get up in a heap!! :-) it's only dog food!!

    Dried Chicken & Turkey (min 30%), Rice (20%), Wholegrain Maize, Dehulled Oats, Poultry Fat, Maize Gluten, Sugar Beet Pulp, Chicken Gravy, Fish Meal, Egg, Linssed, Fish Oil, Potassium Chloride, Fructooligosaccharides (0.3%), TruCal Milk Mineral Complex, Products from processing plants

    Any good?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,375 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    HungryFish wrote: »
    I've been reading about on gain puppy food. Does anyone know if it's any good?

    Taste of the wild puppy
    Acana Junior & Puppy
    Lily's Kitchen
    Nutrivet Growth
    Orijen Puppy food

    All grain free which is the main thing to look for (but because they are grain free they are also going to be a tad more expensive).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭borderlinemeath


    OP, rule of thumb with dry dog food is that the main ingredient should be a meat product. The cheaper foods and supermarket brands are all full of cereal fillers and usually make up the bulk of the food. You'll always see on a bag of pedigree that it says it's "complete" and "with chicken/beef". Read the small print and there's 4% meat and the main ingredient is cereals. When a food is full of fillers such as cereals you have to feed more of it to ensure the dog gets enough of the recommended nutritional requirement so a cheap food will just goes through the dog and you'll be picking up large (probably sloppy) poos. Get a decent, usually more expensive food and the portion sizes will be smaller, and the poos should be better due to better quality ingredients. The bag will last longer too, making it better value in the long run. Although bear in mind that some dogs don't suit certain foods, even the most expensive of foods, so it's wise to try small bags of a few brands before splashing out on a big bag.

    I personally feed my dogs raw/fresh food, but look after plenty of dry fed dogs, and have to pick up plenty of poo :D. I know exactly who's done what poo going on consistency and size based on what they're fed, and the cheaper foods don't fare well in the poo stakes:o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    HungryFish wrote: »
    There's no need for everyone to get up in a heap!! :-) it's only dog food!!

    Dried Chicken & Turkey (min 30%), Rice (20%), Wholegrain Maize, Dehulled Oats, Poultry Fat, Maize Gluten, Sugar Beet Pulp, Chicken Gravy, Fish Meal, Egg, Linssed, Fish Oil, Potassium Chloride, Fructooligosaccharides (0.3%), TruCal Milk Mineral Complex, Products from processing plants

    Any good?

    Exactly :)

    That looks alright. Bear in mind that pups generally need a fattier food, as they are growing, and need the energy for that. Dogs get their energy from fat, not the protein as a lot of people think, so check the fat (may be labelled as oils) levels on the food.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    cocker5 wrote: »
    Not too sure why you’re getting a bee in your bonnet, I’m entitled to my opinion…

    I never said vet were not allowed to make money from the food the sell… I said they don’t always sell good nutritional food.

    Never in my post did I say I got my salmon oil for cost price?? infact I don’t believe I mention cost price anywhere. I did say I found zooplus very good and I stand by that….

    Also I stand by what said about pet shops and maxi zoo… a lot of the food they sell is rubbish…. the staff (99% are students) are not qualified to give advice so the recommend any brand etc… just because its pricey doesn’t mean its good (im sure you already agree with this)
    again my opinion, you are also entitled to your muddy paws democracy and all that.

    OP…. research the best brand to suit your dog and your budget…. look up ingredients and nutrituonal value… these should help you decide.

    You said that vets receive commission/kick back, which I think is a dreadful thing to say, as it implies that they are corrupt in some way. They sell products, just like other vendors, why not just see it like that?

    I know all of the staff at a few maxi-zoos, and none of them are students. The staff there also do have nutritional training, yes, they may be encouraged to sell certain brands, but they do have training, from different sources. I would guess that training would be more than the people who send out the orders and run the website of zooplus, which is a pet shop, just an online, rather than a bricks and mortar one :)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,375 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    HungryFish wrote: »
    There's no need for everyone to get up in a heap!! :-) it's only dog food!!
    It's one of the last turf wars around here along with electrical buzz necklaces; on most other topics the regulars are pretty much in agreement (well I guess you could possibly add when/if to neuter males as well but it's not really getting people that emotional).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    muddypaws wrote: »
    You said that vets receive commission/kick back, which I think is a dreadful thing to say, as it implies that they are corrupt in some way. They sell products, just like other vendors, why not just see it like that?

    I know all of the staff at a few maxi-zoos, and none of them are students. The staff there also do have nutritional training, yes, they may be encouraged to sell certain brands, but they do have training, from different sources. I would guess that training would be more than the people who send out the orders and run the website of zooplus, which is a pet shop, just an online, rather than a bricks and mortar one :)

    what are you talking about a ""dreadful thing to say" they do get comission.... corrupt??? again... what????????

    did i even say those words and no i wasnt implying anything... i said they get comission... eh and the funny thing is THEY DO!! Simple as....

    Not even getting into the Maxi zoo debate... i know of two Naas and Bray and its exactlty as i said above...

    again i know your a zooplus hater (or so you come accross).... but id rather buy my goods there...

    hmmmm looks like somebody got out of the wrong side of the bed today.... take a chill pilll... and one from Maxi zoo of course and not zooplus heaven forbid!! :pac: :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    cocker5 wrote: »
    what are you talking about a ""dreadful thing to say" they do get comission.... corrupt??? again... what????????

    did i even say those words and no i wasnt implying anything... i said they get comission... eh and the funny thing is THEY DO!! Simple as....

    Not even getting into the Maxi zoo debate... i know of two Naas and Bray and its exactlty as i said above...

    again i know your a zooplus hater (or so you come accross).... but id rather buy my goods there...

    hmmmm looks like somebody got out of the wrong side of the bed today.... take a chill pilll... and one from Maxi zoo of course and not zooplus heaven forbid!! :pac: :D

    Re-read your post, you said kick back, which does imply corruption. All vendors buy things at one price and sell at a higher, its how businesses survive. The vets will do the same with the drugs they administer, so not sure why other products within their premises should be seen in a different way.

    I'd really appreciate if you could find one example of anything I've ever said against zooplus. Weird that I would buy stuff from there if I hated it :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    muddypaws wrote: »
    Re-read your post, you said kick back, which does imply corruption. All vendors buy things at one price and sell at a higher, its how businesses survive. The vets will do the same with the drugs they administer, so not sure why other products within their premises should be seen in a different way.

    I'd really appreciate if you could find one example of anything I've ever said against zooplus. Weird that I would buy stuff from there if I hated it :confused:


    oh here we go again...

    I'm out of this thread now... muddypaws the floor is all yours....enjoy!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    muddypaws wrote: »
    They sell products, just like other vendors, why not just see it like that?

    I think, in fairness, it's not as simple as that.
    People buy certain brands from the vet because it's the vet that's selling it, and because there is a belief that it *must* be the best because the vet is selling it, even when it's really not that wonderful a food.
    No other professional in the animal industry has this level of nuanced and not-so-nuanced influence on what pet owners buy for their pets to eat... it's not a level playing field because they have a captive market.
    And I'm only talking about passive selling... having the food on display for owners to draw conclusions about how good it must be as the vet is selling it. I do not include in this the huge influence of the vet actively pushing the foods they sell to owners, despite that food not actually being the best the owner could buy for the same money.
    This effect, that people are more likely to buy from their vet because he/she's a vet, is utterly capitalised upon by some food companies that market their food as "recommended by vets", "created by vets" etc
    Vets can sell what they like for profit, of course they can, but the cynical side of me does not much like the way they use the influence they know they have, to sell products that owners believe are better than they are... because the vet sold the product to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    DBB wrote: »
    I think, in fairness, it's not as simple as that.
    People buy certain brands from the vet because it's the vet that's selling it, and because there is a belief that it *must* be the best because the vet is selling it, even when it's really not that wonderful a food.
    No other professional in the animal industry has this level of nuanced and not-so-nuanced influence on what pet owners buy for their pets to eat... it's not a level playing field because they have a captive market.
    And I'm only talking about passive selling... having the food on display for owners to draw conclusions about how good it must be as the vet is selling it. I do not include in this the huge influence of the vet actively pushing the foods they sell to owners, despite that food not actually being the best the owner could buy for the same money.
    This effect, that people are more likely to buy from their vet because he/she's a vet, is utterly capitalised upon by some food companies that market their food as "recommended by vets", "created by vets" etc
    Vets can sell what they like for profit, of course they can, but the cynical side of me does not much like the way they use the influence they know they have, to sell products that owners believe are better than they are... because the vet sold the product to them.

    My vet sells collars, leads, toys etc. A lot of the stuff, I wouldn't trust, so won't buy from them. They sell a very wide range of food, Massbrook, Burns, Hills, Propac etc, so its up to the customer to choose which is in their price range and which they want. They also have the option of different wormers, from named brands to generic, again, giving the customer the choice. They also sell electric collars :(

    But the thing is, if it says created by vets, then it was, Burns was (is?) a vet, same as the founder of Royal Canin. I just think that there is enough information out there for people to make their own mind up. Same as vaccinations now I think, some vets say annual boosters, other say not, its up to the pet owner to listen and make their own mind up. :)


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    People can make their own informed decisions, but the trouble is if their vet is encouraging them to feed x food (which he happens to sell), then they *think* they are making an informed decision already. But they're not, because if the vet also sells the food(s) he's recommending, then the information gained towards making the decision is seriously biased.
    I would say that at least half (I think I'm being conservative) of owners I talk to have their dog on the food it's on, because their vet both recommended, and sold it. The fact that the vet sells more than one brand is immaterial, my point is that vets do enjoy significant influence over what food owners select, whether the food is rubbish or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭cocker5


    DBB wrote: »
    People can make their own informed decisions, but the trouble is if their vet is encouraging them to feed x food (which he happens to sell), then they *think* they are making an informed decision already. But they're not, because if the vet also sells the food(s) he's recommending, then the information gained towards making the decision is seriously biased.
    I would say that at least half (I think I'm being conservative) of owners I talk to have their dog on the food it's on, because their vet both recommended, and sold it. The fact that the vet sells more than one brand is immaterial, my point is that vets do enjoy significant influence over what food owners select, whether the food is rubbish or not.

    My point exactly... Although put a lot better than my posts :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    DBB wrote: »
    People can make their own informed decisions, but the trouble is if their vet is encouraging them to feed x food (which he happens to sell), then they *think* they are making an informed decision already. But they're not, because if the vet also sells the food(s) he's recommending, then the information gained towards making the decision is seriously biased.
    I would say that at least half (I think I'm being conservative) of owners I talk to have their dog on the food it's on, because their vet both recommended, and sold it. The fact that the vet sells more than one brand is immaterial, my point is that vets do enjoy significant influence over what food owners select, whether the food is rubbish or not.

    But do you believe that the vet is selling a product dishonestly then, that they don't actually believe that it is a good food?

    You should spend time in a pet shop, and watch the interaction between staff and customers. So many people listen to the staff and trust that they know what they are talking about, the same as with a vet.

    Here's a question for you, do you buy the toothpaste that your dentist recommends and sells?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 9,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭DBB


    muddypaws wrote: »
    But do you believe that the vet is selling a product dishonestly then, that they don't actually believe that it is a good food?

    No, I don't believe they're being dishonest. That's making too big a leap from what I've said, which is that vets have far greater influence over the foods and products people buy than any other pet professional, because they're vets.
    I'm quite sure they believe it's a good food, based on what they've been told about that food by the company that sells it. Does that mean it is a good food? Of course not. That doesn't make the vet dishonest. Misled perhaps, but not dishonest.
    You should spend time in a pet shop, and watch the interaction between staff and customers. So many people listen to the staff and trust that they know what they are talking about, the same as with a vet.

    I have little doubt that many owners listen to pet shop staff, but I don't believe for a moment that pet shop staff have anywhere near the same degree of influence over what their customers buy than vets do.
    The standard answer I get from at least 50% of owners when asked what they feed their dogs is "it's that good food the vet sells", or they'll be able to call it by brand name, but they always qualify it by saying they bought it from their vet.
    For the record, and remembering that many have actually had a degree of training in nutrition and the interactions between diet and behaviour, dog behaviour associations forbid their members from pushing ANY product on a client.
    Personally, I feel pretty uncomfortable about selling any particular behavioural product, because I don't want to put clients into the position that many vets do.
    Here's a question for you, do you buy the toothpaste that your dentist recommends and sells?

    I do buy the product my dentist recommends specifically because it is one of few products that sufficiently treats a problem I have with my teeth.
    But, he does not sell any dental products. He does give me various free samples of mouthwash and the like that some of the reps leave with him though :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,127 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Is it something to even think about to introduce a Puppy to a much older Dog?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    ryanf1 wrote: »
    Is it something to even think about to introduce a Puppy to a much older Dog?

    As long as the older dog is fit and healthy (i.e physically able for an exuberant and naughty pup) I don't see any reason why not.

    We've just introduced a new pup to our 13, 11 and 10 year old dogs without problems.

    The only issue is that none of the oldsters really wants to play at puppy levels of intensity any more, we have to find younger "victims" for that elsewhere.
    On the other hand, some of their more sedate and sensible behaviour is indeed rubbing off on the youngfella.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,127 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    peasant wrote: »
    As long as the older dog is fit and healthy (i.e physically able for an exuberant and naughty pup) I don't see any reason why not.

    We've just introduced a new pup to our 13, 11 and 10 year old dogs without problems.

    The only issue is that none of the oldsters really wants to play at puppy levels of intensity any more, we have to find younger "victims" for that elsewhere.
    On the other hand, some of their more sedate and sensible behaviour is indeed rubbing off on the youngfella.
    Our guy will be 15 soon. He's the friendliest dog you can meet but healers most of the time and isn't that playful


Advertisement