Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Atheist Ireland vs Educate Together

  • 05-08-2014 12:49pm
    #1
    Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭


    I would be very grateful if someone with a legal mind could clear this up for me.

    Atheist Ireland have issued a statement accusing Educate Together of "undermin(ing) the duty of the Irish Government to provide secular education though new non-denominational schools, as required by the UN Human Rights Committee."
    http://www.atheist.ie/2014/08/educate-together-is-undermining-the-duty-of-the-irish-state-to-provide-non-denominational-schools/#more-6790

    The background to this is that UN has recommended that Ireland provide "non-denominational" schools.

    Educate Together claims to provide these schools,

    "The Educate Together model of schooling satisfies all the requirements envisaged by the UN Human Rights Committee. Educate Together has no affiliation to any religious organisation and is thus 'non-denominational'. In the operation of its schools Educate Together respects the background of all children equally and does not promote any particular religious or other beliefs. "
    http://www.mediahq.com/educatetogether/84995/educate-together-welcomes-un-call-for-diversity-of-school-type-in-ireland.html

    While Atheist Ireland rejects their claims hence the accusation.

    Atheist Ireland claims that the schools that are non-denominational as requested by the UN in accordance with the International Covenant on Human Rights by default should (amongst other things):

    "A non-denominational or secular school would restrict or prohibit religious symbols, and it would certainly prohibit religious practice."
    http://www.atheist.ie/2014/08/educate-together-is-undermining-the-duty-of-the-irish-state-to-provide-non-denominational-schools/#more-6790

    Which brings me to the legal question. Surely the International Covenant on Human Rights cannot be used to justify such a school which would in clear violation of it's own codified human rights?

    Article 18
    1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
    2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.
    3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.
    4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.
    http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx

    Or is there something I am missing?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,718 ✭✭✭whippet


    Atheist Ireland stance is fairly clear .. they are intolerant to all religions equally. Therefore they will choose the ignore the relevant human rights in order to further their cause.

    I am in no way religious, but groups like Atheist ireland would never attract my support.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭Beano


    What standing would Atheist ireland have in this? I would suggest none and therefore can be ignored.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,620 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    Atheist Ireland claims that the schools that are non-denominational as requested by the UN in accordance with the International Covenant on Human Rights by default should (amongst other things):

    "A non-denominational or secular school would restrict or prohibit religious symbols, and it would certainly prohibit religious practice."
    http://www.atheist.ie/2014/08/educate-together-is-undermining-the-duty-of-the-irish-state-to-provide-non-denominational-schools/#more-6790

    This is complete nonsense.

    Atheist Ireland is saying that the Irish Government is failing in it's duty to comply with the principle of non-denominational education as defined by themselves.

    AI is trying to lay down the rules and if the Government doesn't follow them, they are ipso facto in breach of the requirements laid down by the UN Human Rights Committee - what a bunch of tossers!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    Offhand ,AI are off course free under the constitution and as Educate Together have done create such a set of schools. Then rely on market forces and parental choice to choice the winners instead of having to rely on soft law from the UN to impose their particular viewpoint on the state.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Atheist Ireland aren't necessarily an atheist organisation but rather a bunch of bigots who regularly spew hate at all who believe in a religion.

    As such with no real route to get what they want they create a strawman argument.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭Bepolite


    People do realise that Ireland has a pretty crappy record in relation to human rights don't they?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 523 ✭✭✭carpejugulum


    Atheist Ireland aren't necessarily an atheist organisation but rather a bunch of bigots who regularly spew hate at all who believe in a religion.

    As such with no real route to get what they want they create a strawman argument.
    quite ironic and off topic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    Okay, I’ve just noticed this thread, in which BB is misrepresenting what Atheist Ireland is looking for.

    I’ll post a few comments over the next while, that will clarify what Atheist Ireland’s concerns are.

    I'll also stick around and answer any questions that anyone has about what it is we are actually looking for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    This is an overview of Atheist Ireland's concerns.

    It is an analysis of how Irish law effectively prohibits non-denominational secular schools based on human rights, despite the Irish Government telling the UN Human Rights Committee last month that there are no obstacles to establishing such schools in Ireland.

    The Government did outline two requirements to the UN, that the Government seemingly doesn't consider to be obstacles. These are that there must be sufficient parental demand in an area for such a school, and that the requirements of being a Patron body must be met.

    In reality, there are four obstacles to establishing non-denominational secular schools based on human rights in Ireland.

    The first obstacle is the parental demand requirement, which breaches human rights law, because the right to a neutral education cannot be denied by local majority votes. The parental demand argument would mean that you could have your human rights vindicated if you live in one part of the country, but not if you live in another part, based on the preferences of your neighbours.

    The second obstacle is that the requirements of being a Patron are such that it would be impossible in practice to provide secular non-denominational education consistently with them. Recognised schools are obliged to to promote the spiritual development of students, and to abide by Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools, which includes that a religious spirit should inform and vivify the whole work of the school.

    The third obstacle is that the very nature of our education system involves the State ceding the running of schools to private bodies. This means that, even if the parental demand and Patron requirements were changed, there would be no guarantee that secular education would actually be provided, or that if it was provided that it would continue to be provided.

    The fourth obstacle is that, even if such schools were provided by a Patron body, the Patron body would still be a private body and not an organ of the State. That means that there would be no effective remedy to vindicate the human rights of parents who are denied secular education for their children based on human rights law.

    The State has made no proposals to remove any of these obstacles, and consequently the response of the government delegation to the UN Human Rights Committee was simply not true. In effect, the State’s argument is that you can set up a secular non-denominational school, if you meet requirements that you cannot actually meet.

    The biggest obstacle is, of course, that this government, like previous governments, is simply not prepared to do anything to guarantee the human rights of minorities in the education system. Human Rights are the minimum standard required for the protection of the individual citizen and here in this Republic our standards are so low that we don’t guarantee these rights.

    Obstacle 1 - Parental demand

    During the questioning of the Irish delegation at the UN Human Rights Committee in Geneva the Irish Government acknowledged that there are no secular or non-denominational schools in Ireland. The UN asked Ireland the following questions:


    “The number of non-denominational schools in Ireland is still minuscule, and it is our understanding that most of the new schools that have been opened have been multi-denominational and not non-denominational.
    It is also our understanding that there are no current plans to create non-denominational schools by way of transfer of control in those areas where it has been deemed, following the recommendations of the Forum on Patronage and Pluralism in the Primary sector, that there is no sufficient demand for such education.
    Could you please explain to the Committee how the notion of insufficient demand would not justify the establishment of non-denominational primary schools?
    And what would be the fate of parents and children in those areas, in the no-demand areas, what would be their fate in terms of access to non-denominational education?”

    The UN Committee’s reference to insufficient demand is based on another issue raised during the session. The UN Human Rights Committee asked Ireland why it was in breach of the human right of pregnant women to an abortion in wider circumstances than allowed by Irish law. The Irish State replied that Irish abortion law reflects the will of the Irish people, as allowed under Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

    The UN Human Rights Committee said that that was a completely unacceptable reason for denying human rights, and that the very core of human rights law is a safeguard against the tyranny of the majority. After a break in the session, the Irish Justice Minister Frances FitzGerald formally withdrew the remark and accepted that “the majority will does not and can not derogate from human rights obligations.”

    Here is video of that exchange during the UN session in Geneva:



    The State is obliged to provide secular education for parents who want secular education for their children. The parental demand argument is a local manifestation of the majority vote argument that Ireland made on abortion law.

    The parental demand argument would mean that you could have your human rights vindicated if you live in one part of the country, but not if you live in another part, based on the preferences of your neighbours.

    Obstacle 2 - The requirements of being a Patron

    In practice, no Patron body dedicated to the delivered of secular education through non-Denominational schools could fulfil the requirements set by the state for the recognition of schools.

    Recognised schools are obliged by the Education Act 1998 to operate in accordance with legislation, policy and curriculum as determined by the Minister for Education and Skills (Section 9 - (b) Ed. Act 1998). The legislation, policy and curriculum oblige schools to promote the spiritual development of students (Section 9 - (d) Ed. Act 1998), while having regard to the Characteristic spirit (ethos) of the school.

    At present there are no Patron bodies that refuse on the grounds of principle to uphold the Primary School curriculum. Schools are not legally obliged to write down their ethos (characteristic spirit) or explain in writing where exactly they are integrating it into the various subjects under the curriculum and the daily life of the school.

    One of the key areas of the Primary School Curriculum is to promote the spiritual dimension of life. The concept of spirituality is not defined in the Education Act 1998 and in the Primary School Curriculum it is assumed that it based on a transcendent element within human experience. Spirituality is linked to religious education and developing spiritual and moral values and a knowledge of god.

    The Primary School Curriculum states that:
    “The spiritual dimension of life expresses itself in a search for truth and in the quest for a transcendent element within human experience. The importance that the curriculum attributes to the child’s spiritual development is expressed through the breadth of learning experiences the curriculum offers, through the inclusion of religious education as one of the areas of the curriculum, and through the child’s engagement with the aesthetic and affective domains of learning.”
    (Introduction Primary School Curriculum, page 27)

    “The spiritual dimension is a fundamental aspect of individual experience, and its religious and cultural expression is an inextricable part of Irish culture and history. Religious education specifically enables the child to develop spiritual and moral values and to come to a knowledge of God.”
    (Primary School Curriculum Page 58)

    In addition to the above Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools reads:
    “Of all parts of a school curriculum, Religious Instruction is by far the most important, as its subject matter, God’s honour and service, includes the proper use of all man’s faculties, and affords the most powerful inducements to their proper use. Religious Instruction is, therefore, a fundamental part of the school course, and a religious spirit should inform and vivify the whole work of the school.”

    It is worth noting that the Articles in the Irish Constitution that refer to education do not mention the word spiritual. It is the right of parents under Article 42 to provide a religious education for their children and it is the duty of the State under Article 42.3.2 to ensure that children receive a basic moral education. It is not the duty of the State under the Constitution to ensure that all children receive a religious education and come to a knowledge of god.

    Ireland ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 1989, but the human right to a neutral education in schools was given no consideration in the Education Act 1998 and the Primary School Curriculum 1999. This is because of the systemic discrimination that is inherent in the decision making processes of education policy in this Republic.

    As it stands now there are no Patron Bodies that guarantee the human right to a neutral education in their schools. Of course even if there was, there is still no legal means of vindicating that right in practice and in law as the State cedes control to the education system to private Patron bodies.

    Despite their Constitutional and human rights obligations regarding the rights of parents, the Irish State introduced the word ‘spiritual’ into the Education Act 1998 without actually defining it. It is obvious from the wording of the Primary School Curriculum that the Constitutional and Human Rights of secular parents and their children were completely ignored and effectively undermined.

    Community National Schools

    In April 2012, Atheist Ireland wrote to the Minister for Education and Skills about material released to RTE under the Freedom of Information Act. It was in relation to religious education in Community National Schools, which are supposed to be for all religions and none.

    Document 105 released to RTE outlined how parents in a VEC community school were told that:
    “It is true that all morality is based on love – of God and ones neighbour. This will be a central theme in the Religious Education programme. However, moral values are taught within a religious context; we cannot divorce them from that setting.”

    In June 2012, the Department of Education replied, suggesting that these comments “are probably best considered in light of the Primary School curriculum” and referred us to pages 27 and 58 of the Primary Schools Curriculum.

    You can read the details here.

    To date absolutely nothing has changed on the ground and the Dept of Education and Skills still claim that the Religious education programme in Community National Schools is suitable for all religions and none. Community National Schools are recognised schools and they, like all recognised schools in Ireland are obliged to follow the Primary School Curriculum.

    At present all recognised schools in Ireland are obliged to support and follow the Primary School Curriculum in relation to the spiritual, moral and religious development of students. They also claim they are inclusive and protect the Constitutional and human rights of all. The question of how a Patron body dedicated to providing secular education based on human rights in a non-Denominational school could fulfil these requirements remains to be answered.

    Recent Report from the Department of Education

    The recent Report from the Department of Education and Skills on Progress to date and Future Directions of the Forum on Patronage and Pluralism states that:
    “It is essential for the education system to adapt and evolve to reflect the changes in the society it serves and to uphold the rights of all pupils. There has been a growth in the provision of multi-denominational primary schools, including both Educate Together schools and Community National Schools. Between the academic years 2007/08 and 2013/14, of the 61 new primary schools which were established, 44 were multi-denominational.

    Ireland has a good record in the arena of promoting and respecting human rights. It is important that we continue to live up to the high standards set in international conventions. Ireland will continue to be the subject of international criticism if it does not move to address the concerns raised by the Monitoring Committees of the international human rights treaties to which it is a party. Ireland is also obliged to protect the constitutional rights of all its citizens and to ensure that public policy evolves and develops to promote the protection of these rights.”

    This Report was issued on the 1st of July before the State appeared before the UN Human Rights Committee. The Department of Education and Skills is aware of exactly what it needs to do in order to ensure that the human rights of minorities are protected in the Irish Education System.

    Obstacle 3 - Patrons are private bodies

    Another significant question that the UN asked Ireland was:
    “And going forward, how is the State Party planning to deal with the possibility and the demand for non-denominational education in the future? Is it considering a move away from the integrated curriculum provided by Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools? Is it considering a significant rise in the number of schools transferred to public hands?”

    The Irish delegation responded to the above question with:
    “With regard to Mr Shany’s comments about non-denominational education, as noted in the Forum report, there is no obstacle to the establishment of secular or non-denominational schools if sought by a sufficiently large number of parents, and if the requirements for Patronage are fulfilled.”

    The Irish delegation did not explain to the UN that it cedes control of the education system to the interests represented by the Patron bodies, and that the divestment process is about transferring schools from one private Patron body to another private Patron body, and not about transferring schools into public hands.

    This means that, even if you personally like the ethos of a school that you happen to be able to get your child into, that doesn’t protect other families throughout the State from having their right to a secular education vindicated.

    Obstacle 4 - The right to an effective remedy

    The Irish State also failed to deal with the question of the right to an effective remedy under Article 2.3 of the Covenant.

    In the Louise O’Keeffe case at the Supreme Court, Justice Hardiman stated that: “In my view the Constitution specifically envisages, not indeed a delegation but a ceding of the actual running of schools to the interests represented by the Patron and the Manager.” In the Louise O’Keeffe case at the European Court of Human Rights the Irish State was found to be in breach of Article 13 (the right to an effective remedy).

    To date nothing has changed on the ground and it is still legally impossible for a parent to engage the responsibility of the state for the violation of their rights under the European Convention or the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights. The recent Plan of Action submitted by the state to the Council of Europe in relation to the Louise O’Keeffe case gives no indication of how parents can in the future engage the responsibility of the state to vindicate their rights under the European Convention.

    The following is the UN Human Rights Committee in Geneva asking the Irish delegation questions on mandating the Irish Human Rights Commission to monitor ICCPR Rights.



    The reason that this is relevant to secular education is that access to an effective remedy is a human right under Article 2.3 of the Covenant and the Irish state cannot guarantee that right as it cedes control of the education system to private Patron bodies who interpret human rights according to their own ethos (characteristic spirit).

    We live in a Republic where religious discrimination in access to education is referred to by this government as ‘over-subscription criteria’, and where all schools under various Patron bodies claim to be inclusive and adhere to human rights.

    The State and existing Patron bodies in Ireland refuse to take on board the fact that there are many parents in Ireland who want access to an effective remedy to vindicate their human rights under the European Convention and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Such parents have objections on clearly philosophical grounds to sending their children to schools where there is no effective remedy to vindicate their rights under the various human rights treaties that Ireland has ratified.

    Summary

    The biggest obstacle is that this government, like previous governments, is simply not prepared to do anything to guarantee the human rights of minorities in the education system. Human Rights are the minimum standard required for the protection of the individual citizen and here in this Republic our standards are so low that we don’t guarantee these rights.

    Irish law effectively prohibits non-denominational secular schools based on human rights, despite the Irish Government telling the UN Human Rights Committee last month that there are no obstacles to establishing such schools in Ireland.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    And, in the context of the above, this is an overview of Atheist Ireland's concerns about Educate Together's response to the UN Report.

    Educate Together has made two statements recently that undermine the duty of the Irish Government to provide secular education though new non-denominational schools, as required by the UN Human Rights Committee.

    Educate Together is doing this by blurring the distinction between multi-denominational schools (which Educate Together schools are) and non-denominational schools (which the UN Human Rights Committee has told Ireland to provide access to).

    Educate Together is creating the impression that, by providing more Educate Together schools, the UN’s requirements would be satisfied. This is not correct. There would still be no non-denominational schools.

    Educate Together is also using the UN’s requirements to seek more funding for more Educate Together schools. But if this and only this happens, then there will be less money for non-denominational schools.

    Clearly Educate Together schools are good for parents who want a multi-denominational education for their children. But they do not satisfy the requirement for non-denominational education that the UN has told Ireland to also provide.

    Indeed, Educate Together cannot satisfy the requirements of the UN, because those requirements are aimed at the Irish State and not at Educate Together.

    The distinction between denominational, multi-denominational and non-denominational schools is central to the idea of secular education.

    Educate Together has up to now clearly and formally recognised this distinction, and has indeed denied requests to become non-denominational rather than multi-denominational.

    But they are now blurring the distinction by claiming that they are non-denominational, and are thus undermining the case for funding of actual non-denominational schools.

    Here is a more detailed analysis of this issue.

    Educate Together is undermining the duty of the Irish State to provide non-denominational schools

    It explains the difference between the two kinds of school, the background to Educate Together’s recent ambiguous statements, and why this must not be allowed to undermine the case for the Irish Government to fund secular education through new non-denominational schools.

    It covers:
    1. What is the difference between these types of school?
    2. What the UN Human Rights Committee told Ireland
    3. Educate Together’s recent press statement
    4. Educate Together’s recent blog post
    5. What the Educate Together model does not provide
    6. What the Educate Together model can not provide
    7. The State’s duty to provide secular education


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    Atheist Ireland claims that the schools that are non-denominational as requested by the UN in accordance with the International Covenant on Human Rights by default should (amongst other things):

    "A non-denominational or secular school would restrict or prohibit religious symbols, and it would certainly prohibit religious practice."
    http://www.atheist.ie/2014/08/educate-together-is-undermining-the-duty-of-the-irish-state-to-provide-non-denominational-schools/#more-6790
    Atheist Ireland is not making this claim. Here is what Atheist Ireland has said on this issue. For context, it is a response by Atheist Ireland to the criteria that Educate Together itself has published, in its submission to the Forum on Patronage and Pluralism, as to why Educate Together itself believes that its model of schooling is not non-denominational.

    What the Educate Together model does not provide

    Firstly, to state the obvious, the Educate Together model officially describes itself as multi-denominational. However, like RTE officially calling the Angelus ‘The Angelus’, while claiming that it is not the Angelus but a moment of reflection for everyone, Educate Together is now calling itself multi-denominational, while claiming that it is actually non-denominational. Or else it is calling itself non-denominational, while claiming that it is actually multi-denominational. Whichever way you choose to look at it, this is the type of nod-and-wink approach to public discourse that we should be trying to move away from in Ireland.

    Secondly, Educate Together itself, in its submission to the Forum on Patronage and Pluralism, describes some of the things that the Educate Together model does not provide in terms of secular education:
    “[The Educate Together] model is also distinct from the common perception of a non-denominational or secular model. In such a strictly secular model, religious symbols or practice are sometimes restricted or prohibited in a school, and there is not always an explicit moral and ethical curriculum.

    In Educate Together schools, Moral and Spiritual development is actively taught through the Learn Together curriculum. Different religious and non-religious festivals are regularly celebrated by the school community to develop understanding and respect for different traditions.”

    So how would a non-denominational or secular school differ from an Educate Together model school, based on Educate Together's own published criteria on why Educate Together is not non-denominational?

    A non-denominational or secular school would restrict or prohibit religious symbols, as well as organised religious practice, or most religious practice, or would not organise religious practice.

    A non-denominational or secular school would provide an ethics programme, but it would not combine moral and spiritual development as part of an ethics programme. A secular school would recognise that morality is independent of spirituality.

    A non-denominational or secular school would not regularly celebrate different religious festivals, in order to develop understanding and respect for different traditions. Instead, it would approach such an aim by teaching about different traditions in an objective, critical and pluralistic manner.

    A non-denominational or secular school might not make school facilities available to families wishing to organise faith formation classes, such as those which prepare children for the Catholic sacraments. If it did permit this, it would not describe such faith formation, as Educate Together does, by saying “These classes operate on an ‘opt-in’ basis outside the compulsory school day.” It would simply view them as external bodies, such as a chess club, hiring the school facilities independently of the school curriculum and nothing to do with the school day.

    A non-denominational or secular school would not integrate an ethos that includes the above elements throughout the school day, in the way that Educate Together schools do with their integrated curriculum. Just because the Educate Together ethos is more palatable than the ethos of Catholic schools, we should not forget that they are still integrating an ethos that celebrates religious festivals, and that combines morality with spirituality.

    A non-denominational or secular school would not focus on the religious beliefs of the parents of its pupils. It would not issue a press statement about one of its reports, as Educate Together did in October 2012, headed: “50% of pupils in Educate Together schools are Catholic”, which stated that “while having pupils from other religious denominations or none among the student body, multi-denominational school populations are 50 per cent Catholic. In fact, mothers in multi-denominational schools are as likely to describe themselves as very religious or spiritual as mothers in Catholic schools.”

    What the Educate Together model can not provide

    The above are some example of what the Educate Together model does not provide for parents who want a non-denominational education for their children. Now here are some examples of what the Educate Together model can not provide, because of the current state of Irish law.

    Firstly, Educate Together, like the Catholic Church, are not organs of the State. They are therefore exempted from the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights Act, and pupils or their parents do not have access to the protection of that Convention if they have complaints against Educate Together schools. For wider context, this problem would also exist even if the Irish State funded non-denominational schools under the current patronage system.

    Secondly, despite the Louise O’Keeffe case, the Irish Government has yet to put in place an effective remedy for parents whose children are denied human rights in any Irish schools, whether denominational or Educate Together. Again, for wider context, this problem would also exist even if the Irish State funded non-denominational schools under the current patronage system.

    Also related to this issue, the UN Committee had previously told Ireland to provide an independent complaints mechanism for parents in disputes with schools. Educate Together was recently questioned about this by a Seanad Committee, and replied: “On the fourth question, from Senator Zappone, Educate Together does not have a view that having an independent complaints mechanism in this area necessarily would move things forward.” So, however ambiguously it is phrased, Educate Together does not endorse this UN requirement.

    Finally, in its press statement on the day of the ICCL press conference, Educate Together said:
    “The current government led programme of parental preference surveys and proposals for re-assignment of provision in 28 areas is a welcome start.”
    But this contradicts the line of questioning by the UN Human Rights Committee, who said:
    “It is also our understanding that there are no current plans to create non-denominational schools by way of transfer of control in those areas where it has been deemed, following the recommendations of the Forum on Patronage and Pluralism in the Primary sector, that there is no sufficient demand for such education.

    Could you please explain to the the Committee how the notion of insufficient demand would not justify the establishment of non-denominational primary schools?

    And what would be the fate of parents and children in those areas, in the no-demand areas, what would be their fate in terms of access to non-denominational education?”

    So the UN Human Rights Committee rejects the idea of parental preference surveys as a justification for not providing non-denominational schools. This fits in with the UN Human Rights Committee’s firm statement to Ireland on the question of abortion law, that majority votes can not be used to justify the denial of human rights. The parental survey approach is a local manifestation of the ‘majority rule’ denial of human rights that the UN rejects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    whippet wrote: »
    Atheist Ireland stance is fairly clear .. they are intolerant to all religions equally. Therefore they will choose the ignore the relevant human rights in order to further their cause.

    I am in no way religious, but groups like Atheist ireland would never attract my support.
    I can see how you might get that impression from the OP's misrepresentation of what Atheist Ireland is looking for. In reality, Atheist Ireland bases its policies on human rights law. We don't ignore any human rights. Quite the opposite.
    Beano wrote: »
    What standing would Atheist ireland have in this? I would suggest none and therefore can be ignored.
    We are an NGO who, like other NGOs, fed into the process of the UNHRC's review of Ireland under the ICCPR. We made written submissions, and were also in Geneva to take part in formal and informal briefings of the Committee.
    This post has been deleted.
    It is an association.
    coylemj wrote: »
    This is complete nonsense.

    Atheist Ireland is saying that the Irish Government is failing in it's duty to comply with the principle of non-denominational education as defined by themselves.

    AI is trying to lay down the rules and if the Government doesn't follow them, they are ipso facto in breach of the requirements laid down by the UN Human Rights Committee - what a bunch of tossers!
    Again, I can see how you might get that impression from the OP's misrepresentation of what Atheist Ireland is looking for. In reality, Atheist Ireland is not saying or doing what you think.
    Manach wrote: »
    Offhand ,AI are off course free under the constitution and as Educate Together have done create such a set of schools. Then rely on market forces and parental choice to choice the winners instead of having to rely on soft law from the UN to impose their particular viewpoint on the state.
    Actually, Atheist Ireland is not free under the law (as opposed to the Constitution) to establish non-denominational secular schools. I have outlined why in my first response on this thread.

    Your second sentence illustrates a substantive difference between us. What you describe as "soft law from the UN" we see as human rights obligations entered into by the State.
    Atheist Ireland aren't necessarily an atheist organisation but rather a bunch of bigots who regularly spew hate at all who believe in a religion.

    As such with no real route to get what they want they create a strawman argument.
    Did you really call Atheist Ireland "a bunch of bigots who regularly spew hate at all who believe in a religion" and then follow that up with a suggestion that we are creating a straw man argument? You're very funny. :D

    If you are actually serious, can you please give me some examples of Atheist Ireland being "a bunch of bigots who regularly spew hate at all who believe in a religion"?
    Bepolite wrote: »
    People do realise that Ireland has a pretty crappy record in relation to human rights don't they?
    That is the core of the issue. We have become so desensitised to violations of human rights that many people don't see it as a significant issue.

    Vindicating basic human rights is actually the bottom-rung standard that we should automatically expect, and then start to build on, not some utopian vision of a perfect society.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    We are an NGO who, like other NGOs, fed into the process of the UNHRC's review of Ireland under the ICCPR.
    Actually, Atheist Ireland is not free under the law (as opposed to the Constitution) to establish non-denominational secular schools. I have outlined why in my first response on this thread.

    Your second sentence illustrates a substantive difference between us. What you describe as "soft law from the UN" we see as human rights obligations entered into by the State.
    Actually ye are activists seeking to drive societal change, which can be accomplished in the education arena by actually accomplishing instead of like most lobbying groups relying on others or tearing down an existing system. Ye are be capable of setting up your own schools although that might rely on sound pedagogical models such as the ability to distinguish from what are expressions of vague international law rubrics to that which courts (however reluctantly) under actual legal obligations to provide under the constitution. Thus high marks for bluster and a no grade for actual content.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    This is an overview of Atheist Ireland's concerns.

    Summary

    The biggest obstacle is that this government, like previous governments, is simply not prepared to do anything to guarantee the human rights of minorities in the education system. Human Rights are the minimum standard required for the protection of the individual citizen and here in this Republic our standards are so low that we don’t guarantee these rights.

    Irish law effectively prohibits non-denominational secular schools based on human rights, despite the Irish Government telling the UN Human Rights Committee last month that there are no obstacles to establishing such schools in Ireland.

    All I get from this is that a small group of people want their kids to have no religous education and because they either can not find enough people to set up a school together which they can legally do they are complaning to get special treatment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    All I get from this is that a small group of people want their kids to have no religous education and because they either can not find enough people to set up a school together which they can legally do they are complaning to get special treatment.
    If that is all you get from this, then you are not familiar with basic human rights principles including freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief, equality before the law, and freedom from discrimination.

    Nor have you addressed any of the points that I have made in my analysis of how Irish law effectively prohibits the establishment of non-denominational secular schools based on human rights law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    Manach wrote: »
    Actually ye are activists seeking to drive societal change, which can be accomplished in the education arena by actually accomplishing instead of like most lobbying groups relying on others or tearing down an existing system.
    We are seeking to establish an education system that respects everybody's rights equally, and that is based on respect for human rights. Would you not consider that to be an accomplishment worth bringing about?
    Manach wrote: »
    Ye are be capable of setting up your own schools although that might rely on sound pedagogical models such as the ability to distinguish from what are expressions of vague international law rubrics to that which courts (however reluctantly) under actual legal obligations to provide under the constitution. Thus high marks for bluster and a no grade for actual content.
    Like CobhGuy, you simply assert that we are capable of setting up secular non-denominational schools, without addressing any of the points that I made about how Irish law effectively prevents that from happening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    If that is all you get from this, then you are not familiar with basic human rights principles including freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief, equality before the law, and freedom from discrimination.

    Nor have you addressed any of the points that I have made in my analysis of how Irish law effectively prohibits the establishment of non-denominational secular schools based on human rights law.

    I will give you a propper reply during the week explaning why you are incorrect. I will need a bit of time however my short answer in my last post was from my experience doing an essay last year on The role of religion in Irish schools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    We are seeking to establish an education system that respects everybody's rights equally, and that is based on respect for human rights. Would you not consider that to be an accomplishment worth bringing about?
    .

    What you are saying is that the current system is not respects everybody's rights equally, I dont see that. Can you explane how Educate Together does not respects everybody's rights equally, based on respect for human rights


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    I will give you a propper reply during the week explaning why you are incorrect. I will need a bit of time however my short answer in my last post was from my experience doing an essay last year on The role of religion in Irish schools.
    Okay, I look forward to reading that. What was the title of the essay, and what was its context?
    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    What you are saying is that the current system is not respects everybody's rights equally, I dont see that.
    If we're starting the discussion at that level, we've a long discussion ahead of us. But let's begin.

    As this thread is prompted by the recent UN Human Rights Committee report on Ireland’s human rights obligations under the ICCPR, I’ll start with those violations and we discuss others later.

    On freedom of religion issues related to oaths, running the education system, and employment in the education system, the UNHRC has cited the human rights guaranteed under Articles 2, 18, 24, 25, 26 and 27 of the ICCPR.

    This is from the 2008 Concluding Observations:

    The Committee notes with concern that the vast majority of Ireland’s primary schools are privately run denominational schools that have adopted a religious integrated curriculum thus depriving many parents and children who so wish to have access to secular primary education.

    The State party should increase its efforts to ensure that non-denominational primary education is widely available in all regions of the State party, in view of the increasingly diverse and multi-ethnic composition of the population of the State party.

    This is from the 2014 Concluding Observations:

    The Committee is concerned about the slow progress in increasing access to secular education through the establishment of non denominational schools, divestment of the patronage of schools and the phasing out of integrated religious curricula in schools accommodating minority faith or non faith children. It expresses further concern that under Section 37(1) of the Employment Equality Acts, religious owned institutions, including in the fields of education and health, can discriminate against employees or prospective employees to protect the religious ethos of the institution.

    The State party should introduce legislation to prohibit discrimination in access to schools on the grounds of religion, belief or other status, and ensure that there are diverse school types and curriculum options available throughout the State party to meet the needs of minority faith or non faith children. It should also amend Section 37(1) of the Employment Equality Acts in a way that bars all forms of discrimination in employment in the fields of education and health.

    For context, these are the questions the UNHRC asked Ireland in Geneva last month:

    Finally, the final question that I have is issue number 26, which deals with the question of non-denominational schools. Again I thank the Delegation for the information that it provided our Committee.

    The information provided is encouraging at some level, in the sense that it acknowledges the need to reform the current system, but again we remain concerned about the pace of the changes that are being introduced.

    The number of nondenominational schools in Ireland is still minuscule, and it is our understanding that most of the new schools that have been opened have been multi-denominational and not non-denominational.

    It is also our understanding that there are no current plans to create non-denominational schools by way of transfer of control in those areas where it has been deemed, following the recommendations of the Forum on Patronage and Pluralism in the Primary sector, that there is no sufficient demand for such education.

    Could you please explain to the the Committee how the notion of insufficient demand would not justify the establishment of non-denominational primary schools?

    And what would be the fate of parents and children in those areas, in the no-demand areas, what would be their fate in terms of access to non-denominational education?

    This also goes to non-surveyed parents living in rural areas where there is also a likelihood of limited numbers of parents and children who would demand, in accordance with these standards, non-denominational education.

    Is it true that even under the new Draft general Scheme Bill, children of non-Christian families or atheist families may be discriminated against in admission to denominational schools if they do not fit with its ethos, provided a preference to the school’s denomination children is stated explicitly in the admissions policy of that school?

    And going forward, how is the State Party planning to deal with the possibility and the demand for non-denominational education in the future?

    Is it considering a move away from the integrated curriculum provided by Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools?

    Is it considering a significant rise in the number of schools transferred to public hands?

    How does the Delegation explain the compatibility with the Covenant of a state of affairs that allows private schools, which have a near monopoly in Ireland on a vital public service, to openly discriminate in admission policies between children on the basis of their parents’ religious convictions?

    I would appreciate, whether orally or in writing, the Delegation’s theory on this point, on this legal point. And whether the State believes or not that it is required to ensure a neutral studying environment in those schools, in denominational schools, outside the confines of religious instruction classes that can be opted out from?

    I am grateful for the Minister’s reaction to the issue of Article 37 of the Employment Equality Act from 1998, and the concerns that it allows for discrimination in hiring of teachers to denominational schools, and I appreciate the Government’s interest in reforming the law in this regard. We in the Committee have not seen the draft Bill, and we would appreciate if the Delegation would provide us with a copy.

    I would also appreciate if you could, in your response, address the concerns that have already been raised with respect to this new draft Bill, that it would protect the rights of some groups that are currently discriminated against, such as LGBTs, but would not deal with the question of discrimination on the basis of religious conviction, namely that it would not protect the rights of non-Christian teachers or atheist teachers.
    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    Can you explane how Educate Together does not respects everybody's rights equally, based on respect for human rights
    I can, and I will later, but that is not the primary focus of Atheist Ireland's concerns about the education system.

    The OP has framed this issue inaccurately as "Atheist Ireland v Educate Together."

    It is not the responsibility of Educate Together to respect everybody's rights equally. That is the responsibility of the State.

    The State can respect everybody's rights equally by providing a system that includes some schools that do not respect everybody's rights equally, as long as the overall system does.

    But we can tease that out later.

    .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    Here is an overview of the problem.

    There is one fundamental question that informs all discussion about pluralism and patronage in education. Your answer to that question will determine what conclusions that you come to, and what conclusions are unavailable to you.

    That fundamental question is this: is your aim option one, to bring about an education system that satisfies the desires of a majority of parents and children, or perhaps to satisfy the desires of those families who happened to share your personal religious beliefs; or is your aim option two, to bring about an education system that respects equally the human rights of all parents and all children, without sacrificing the human rights of a minority in order to satisfy the desires of a majority.

    It is understandable that many parents, and representatives of particular religions, would have as their priority that the education system satisfies their own desires, and the desires of those who think like them. But the role of the state should be to counteract this self-centred approach, and to ensure that the education system respects equally the human rights of all parents and all children.

    In practice, the only way to ensure this is to have a foundation of a secular state education system, that is neutral on the question of religion and non-religion, and then to allow further options on top of that foundation, but not instead of it. Religious schools or atheist schools should be an added extra, if they can be afforded, for parents who want to avail of it, but having them as the foundation of the system creates only the illusion of choice.

    A foundation of secular schools is the only way to ensure that everybody has their human rights respected with regard to education. The education policy of Atheist Ireland is based on the human right to be educated without being indoctrinated with religion and to be free from proselytism. And we would be just as opposed to children being indoctrinated with atheism as with religion. This policy is based on international human rights law.

    In considering the demand for diversity the human right to respect for the religious and philosophical convictions of all parents, and not just those of a majority, should not only be considered but guaranteed without discrimination in the Irish education system. And by ratifying the European Convention on Human Rights and the various UN Conventions the Irish State has already agreed to guarantee to respect all parents’ religious and philosophical convictions in the Irish education system, and not just those of a majority.

    In theory, it could be possible to respect everybody’s rights by having different schools for parents and pupils of every religion, plus schools for parents and pupils of no religion, and to have enough of each of these schools built and operating in every part of the country to make it possible to vindicate all parents’ rights in practice. However, in reality, this is financially and logistically impossible. In a pluralist society, the only way for an education system to vindicate everybody’s rights to freedom of conscience, religion and belief, and to respect the convictions of all parents and not just most, is to have a foundation of a state secular education system that is neutral on the question of religion.

    It is simply not feasible for the State to financially support the funding of various types of schools in every area. Delivering the education system through private bodies where the state funds education on the basis of a particular majority in a given area instead of protecting the human rights of individuals can only result in segregation, discrimination and the denial of basic human rights.

    The European Court of Human Rights has stated in Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v Denmark 1976 that: “the ‘travaux prèparatoires’ of Article II of Protocol 1 (the Right to Education) of the European Convention aims in short at safeguarding the possibility of pluralism in education which possibility is essential for the preservation of the “democratic society” as conceived by the Convention. Plurality of patronage will never achieve pluralism in education as no state can guarantee provision of education in accordance with the religious or nonreligious affiliation of every child’s parents. Therefore the patronage system cannot safeguard the preservation of the “democratic society” as conceived by the European Convention. 

    Neither can the patronage system achieve respect for the religious and philosophical convictions of all parents, because human rights are guaranteed to individuals not to the religious majority in a given area. What we have in Ireland is the abuse of a dominant position. The patronage system lends its weight to identifying members of society by their religious affiliation. The patronage system coerces parents to identity with various groups in society especially when children can be refused access to the local school in the event of a shortage of places and in order to uphold a religious ethos.

    In a report to Government on this issue, the Irish Human Rights Commission recommended the following: “The overarching recommendation of the IHRC, in order achieve human rights compliance, is that the State should ensure that there is a diversity of provision of school type within educational catchment areas throughout the State which reflects the diversity of religious and non-religious convictions now represented in the State. Diversity of provision will ensure the needs of faith (including minority faith) or non faith children in schools can be met. While the State has a choice of models in education, if it chooses to retain the current patronage mode, with a majority of patrons being religious denominations, significant modifications will be required in order to meet human rights standards.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    Okay, I look forward to reading that. What was the title of the essay, and what was its context?


    If we're starting the discussion at that level, we've a long discussion ahead of us. But let's begin.

    As this thread is prompted by the recent UN Human Rights Committee report on Ireland’s human rights obligations under the ICCPR, I’ll start with those violations and we discuss others later.

    On freedom of religion issues related to oaths, running the education system, and employment in the education system, the UNHRC has cited the human rights guaranteed under Articles 2, 18, 24, 25, 26 and 27 of the ICCPR.

    This is from the 2008 Concluding Observations:

    The Committee notes with concern that the vast majority of Ireland’s primary schools are privately run denominational schools that have adopted a religious integrated curriculum thus depriving many parents and children who so wish to have access to secular primary education.

    The State party should increase its efforts to ensure that non-denominational primary education is widely available in all regions of the State party, in view of the increasingly diverse and multi-ethnic composition of the population of the State party.

    This is from the 2014 Concluding Observations:

    The Committee is concerned about the slow progress in increasing access to secular education through the establishment of non denominational schools, divestment of the patronage of schools and the phasing out of integrated religious curricula in schools accommodating minority faith or non faith children. It expresses further concern that under Section 37(1) of the Employment Equality Acts, religious owned institutions, including in the fields of education and health, can discriminate against employees or prospective employees to protect the religious ethos of the institution.

    The State party should introduce legislation to prohibit discrimination in access to schools on the grounds of religion, belief or other status, and ensure that there are diverse school types and curriculum options available throughout the State party to meet the needs of minority faith or non faith children. It should also amend Section 37(1) of the Employment Equality Acts in a way that bars all forms of discrimination in employment in the fields of education and health.

    For context, these are the questions the UNHRC asked Ireland in Geneva last month:

    Finally, the final question that I have is issue number 26, which deals with the question of non-denominational schools. Again I thank the Delegation for the information that it provided our Committee.

    The information provided is encouraging at some level, in the sense that it acknowledges the need to reform the current system, but again we remain concerned about the pace of the changes that are being introduced.

    The number of nondenominational schools in Ireland is still minuscule, and it is our understanding that most of the new schools that have been opened have been multi-denominational and not non-denominational.

    It is also our understanding that there are no current plans to create non-denominational schools by way of transfer of control in those areas where it has been deemed, following the recommendations of the Forum on Patronage and Pluralism in the Primary sector, that there is no sufficient demand for such education.

    Could you please explain to the the Committee how the notion of insufficient demand would not justify the establishment of non-denominational primary schools?

    And what would be the fate of parents and children in those areas, in the no-demand areas, what would be their fate in terms of access to non-denominational education?

    This also goes to non-surveyed parents living in rural areas where there is also a likelihood of limited numbers of parents and children who would demand, in accordance with these standards, non-denominational education.

    Is it true that even under the new Draft general Scheme Bill, children of non-Christian families or atheist families may be discriminated against in admission to denominational schools if they do not fit with its ethos, provided a preference to the school’s denomination children is stated explicitly in the admissions policy of that school?

    And going forward, how is the State Party planning to deal with the possibility and the demand for non-denominational education in the future?

    Is it considering a move away from the integrated curriculum provided by Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools?

    Is it considering a significant rise in the number of schools transferred to public hands?

    How does the Delegation explain the compatibility with the Covenant of a state of affairs that allows private schools, which have a near monopoly in Ireland on a vital public service, to openly discriminate in admission policies between children on the basis of their parents’ religious convictions?

    I would appreciate, whether orally or in writing, the Delegation’s theory on this point, on this legal point. And whether the State believes or not that it is required to ensure a neutral studying environment in those schools, in denominational schools, outside the confines of religious instruction classes that can be opted out from?

    I am grateful for the Minister’s reaction to the issue of Article 37 of the Employment Equality Act from 1998, and the concerns that it allows for discrimination in hiring of teachers to denominational schools, and I appreciate the Government’s interest in reforming the law in this regard. We in the Committee have not seen the draft Bill, and we would appreciate if the Delegation would provide us with a copy.

    I would also appreciate if you could, in your response, address the concerns that have already been raised with respect to this new draft Bill, that it would protect the rights of some groups that are currently discriminated against, such as LGBTs, but would not deal with the question of discrimination on the basis of religious conviction, namely that it would not protect the rights of non-Christian teachers or atheist teachers.


    I can, and I will later, but that is not the primary focus of Atheist Ireland's concerns about the education system.

    The OP has framed this issue inaccurately as "Atheist Ireland v Educate Together."

    It is not the responsibility of Educate Together to respect everybody's rights equally. That is the responsibility of the State.

    The State can respect everybody's rights equally by providing a system that includes some schools that do not respect everybody's rights equally, as long as the overall system does.

    But we can tease that out later.

    .

    The state does not provide education in Ireland it provides resources so that schools can be set up. It allows theses schools to teach under their ethos and allows them to discriminate students who do not match their ethos which the UN has said is wrong and I agree, however if 99% of parents in one area whan their kids educated in that ethos, why would you force them to stop just for 1% of people. You can never make every one happy you do your best and make sure that the 1% can still attend that school without discrimination and can opt out of the religious aspects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    The state does not provide education in Ireland it provides resources so that schools can be set up.
    Yes, which it is entitled to do, as long as those schools respect the human rights of their students and staff. But they don't.

    In the recent Louise O'Keeffe case at the European Court of Human Rights, the Irish State argued that it was not responsible for protecting Louise O'Keeffe's human rights in school, because it did not run the school directly.

    The Court's judgment was that, despite not running the school directly, the State was still responsible for protecting her human rights while at school. The Court also told Ireland to provide an effective remedy for cases like this.
    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    It allows theses schools to teach under their ethos and allows them to discriminate students who do not match their ethos which the UN has said is wrong and I agree,
    Okay, that was quick.

    So we agree that the Irish education system violates human rights.
    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    however if 99% of parents in one area whan their kids educated in that ethos, why would you force them to stop just for 1% of people. You can never make every one happy you do your best and make sure that the 1% can still attend that school without discrimination and can opt out of the religious aspects.
    Several reasons.

    Firstly, human rights are the property of individuals, not of majorities.

    If a majority of parents in an area wanted a whites-only school, would you make that argument?

    The whole point of human rights law is to protect individuals from the tyranny of the majority.

    On another issue in Geneva, that of abortion, the UNHRC told Ireland that a majority vote in a referendum or parliament cannot be used to deny the individuals their human rights.

    The "local parental demand" argument is a local manifestation of the "majority vote" argument that the UN Committee strongly rejected in Geneva (in fact, they told Ireland it was "completely unacceptable") and that Ireland then formally withdrew as a reason for denying Convention rights.

    Secondly, as a matter of social policy, the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Education recently concluded that multiple patronage and ethos as a basis for policy can lead to segregation and inequality in the education system, and that the objectives of admission policy should be equality and integration.

    This reflects the arguments made by Atheist Ireland to the Committee, both in our written submission and in the presentation by Jane Donnelly to the Committee hearings last December, about the new Bill on admission to schools that the Committee was considering.

    This is a significant and strongly-worded conclusion, that contrasts the current segregation and inequality with the objective of equality and integration. This conclusion goes to the heart of the religious discrimination in the Irish education system.

    Access to a local school without religious discrimination is a human right, and Ireland is in breach of its international obligations by permitting this religious discrimination. This religious discrimination disrespects the philosophical convictions of secular parents and their children and treats them as second class citizens.

    Thirdly, the discrimination extends further than pupils. The system also discriminates against staff, because of the exemptions granted to religious schools to discriminate against teachers and potential teachers in order to protect the religious ethos of the school.

    There are other reasons, but I have an early morning appointment and need to get some sleep :)

    Edit: I forgot to add one important point.

    You cannot opt out of the religious aspects of the school, because the religious ethos is integrated throughout the school day through the integrated curriculum, and you cannot opt out of the whole school day.

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    Yes, which it is entitled to do, as long as those schools respect the human rights of their students and staff. But they don't.

    In the recent Louise O'Keeffe case at the European Court of Human Rights, the Irish State argued that it was not responsible for protecting Louise O'Keeffe's human rights in school, because it did not run the school directly.

    The Court's judgment was that, despite not running the school directly, the State was still responsible for protecting her human rights while at school. The Court also told Ireland to provide an effective remedy for cases like this.


    Okay, that was quick.

    So we agree that the Irish education system violates human rights.


    Several reasons.

    Firstly, human rights are the property of individuals, not of majorities.

    If a majority of parents in an area wanted a whites-only school, would you make that argument?

    The whole point of human rights law is to protect individuals from the tyranny of the majority.

    On another issue in Geneva, that of abortion, the UNHRC told Ireland that a majority vote in a referendum or parliament cannot be used to deny the individuals their human rights.

    The "local parental demand" argument is a local manifestation of the "majority vote" argument that the UN Committee strongly rejected in Geneva (in fact, they told Ireland it was "completely unacceptable") and that Ireland then formally withdrew as a reason for denying Convention rights.

    Secondly, as a matter of social policy, the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Education recently concluded that multiple patronage and ethos as a basis for policy can lead to segregation and inequality in the education system, and that the objectives of admission policy should be equality and integration.

    This reflects the arguments made by Atheist Ireland to the Committee, both in our written submission and in the presentation by Jane Donnelly to the Committee hearings last December, about the new Bill on admission to schools that the Committee was considering.

    This is a significant and strongly-worded conclusion, that contrasts the current segregation and inequality with the objective of equality and integration. This conclusion goes to the heart of the religious discrimination in the Irish education system.

    Access to a local school without religious discrimination is a human right, and Ireland is in breach of its international obligations by permitting this religious discrimination. This religious discrimination disrespects the philosophical convictions of secular parents and their children and treats them as second class citizens.

    Thirdly, the discrimination extends further than pupils. The system also discriminates against staff, because of the exemptions granted to religious schools to discriminate against teachers and potential teachers in order to protect the religious ethos of the school.

    There are other reasons, but I have an early morning appointment and need to get some sleep :)

    Edit: I forgot to add one important point.

    You cannot opt out of the religious aspects of the school, because the religious ethos is integrated throughout the school day through the integrated curriculum, and you cannot opt out of the whole school day.

    .

    I agree with most of what you say where it relates to faith based schools their whole design and runing going against the rights of people not of that faith to an education.

    However I come back to the issue of seeing no reason, why people can not setup no-faith based schools. In a country the size of Ireland where the population is spread out over large rural areas how can with limited resources the government can provide no-faith based schools to such a very limited minority who might want them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,035 ✭✭✭goz83


    Where's Jesus when you need him? :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    I agree with most of what you say where it relates to faith based schools their whole design and runing going against the rights of people not of that faith to an education.

    However I come back to the issue of seeing no reason, why people can not setup no-faith based schools. In a country the size of Ireland where the population is spread out over large rural areas how can with limited resources the government can provide no-faith based schools to such a very limited minority who might want them.

    I'm fairly sure the national school curriculum states schools must teach religion and about god ( singular, leaving no room for multiple or zero gods)
    Dunno if it was upthread or on the atheist forum


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    I'm fairly sure the national school curriculum states schools must teach religion and about god ( singular, leaving no room for multiple or zero gods)
    Dunno if it was upthread or on the atheist forum

    It was but Cobhguy either can't understand that or is choosing not to. It also (as has been stated in virtually every post Michael has made) requires the religious ethos to inform every part of the school's activities which is why you can't have a secular patron as the primary schools rules don't allow for that.

    I had hoped that Ruairi Quinn would have made some progress on this but he didn't do much on this area at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    I agree with most of what you say where it relates to faith based schools their whole design and runing going against the rights of people not of that faith to an education.
    Yes, and before I address your "however...", your agreement with this is more important than your "however...".

    If you agree with this, then you agree that people's human rights are being violated, and vindicating those rights is the rock-bottom minimum standard we should expect from the Government of a democratic republic.
    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    However I come back to the issue of seeing no reason, why people can not setup no-faith based schools.
    I've outlined that in an earlier comment, midway down page 1. The legal requirements of being a Patron are such that it would be impossible in practice to provide secular non-denominational education consistently with them. Recognised schools are obliged to to promote the spiritual development of students, and to abide by Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools, which includes that a religious spirit should inform and vivify the whole work of the school.
    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    In a country the size of Ireland where the population is spread out over large rural areas how can with limited resources the government can provide no-faith based schools to such a very limited minority who might want them.
    That is indeed the core of the problem of vindicating everyone's rights, but the solution is the opposite to that which you suggest.

    If resources are limited, then the priority should be funding schools that can accommodate everyone and respect everyone's beliefs equally.

    Non-denomionational secular schools are the only type of schools that can do that. They can accommodate religious and atheist families, because they take no position on religious or atheist beliefs.

    Denominational or multi-denominational schools, or hypothetical atheist schools, would all exclude some people from equality before the law.
    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    ...provide no-faith based schools to such a very limited minority who might want them.
    I've repeated this to address it separately.

    Again, this issue is not about satisfying majority preferences. It is about treating everybody equally before the law, regardless of what most of their neighbours might prefer.

    But even if you do think of it in terms of preferences, the number of people who want secular schools is far from the tiny 1% figure you are using.

    Shortly after the publication of the Forum Report, the Irish Primary Principals’ network commissioned RedC to poll 729 respondents aged between 18 and 54.

    The research showed that:
    • 30% of parents would prefer to send children to primary school run by VEC on behalf of the State
    • 27% of parents would opt for  Church-run primary schools  - current model
    • 24% of parents would choose multi-denominational primary  schools – eg. Educate Together  model
    • 20% of parents would opt for State-run primary  schools – no patron.

    I want to stress that these percentages don’t matter, any more than they would if most parents wanted an all-white school, but to show that we are not talking about tiny minorities being discriminated against.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,718 ✭✭✭whippet


    can I just ask a very simply question ... what part does 'faith' of any description play in the day to day running of a Ed Tog school?

    * I have no experience of Ed Tog schools as a caveat


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    I'm fairly sure the national school curriculum states schools must teach religion and about god ( singular, leaving no room for multiple or zero gods)

    As they should. An understanding of religion is vital when it comes to understanding world history and global politics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    I still do not see how what human right is being broken by going to an educate together school. You have a right to education. You have a Right to freedom of religion and from from religion. Where are these rights broken.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    I still do not see how what human right is being broken by going to an educate together school. You have a right to education. You have a Right to freedom of religion and from from religion. Where are these rights broken.
    The right to a non-denominationals secular education, with an effective remedy to vindicate breaches of human rights.

    Educate Together schools are multi-denominational, not non-denominational.

    They actively teach spiritual development.

    They regularly celebrate religious festivals.

    They integrate this ethos throughout the curriculum.

    They are obliged to abide by the Primary School Curriculum and the Rules for National Schools.

    One of the key areas of the Primary School Curriculum is to promote the spiritual dimension of life. The concept of spirituality is not defined in the Education Act 1998 and in the Primary School Curriculum it is assumed that it based on a transcendent element within human experience. Spirituality is linked to religious education and developing spiritual and moral values and a knowledge of god.

    The Primary School Curriculum states that:

    “The spiritual dimension of life expresses itself in a search for truth and in the quest for a transcendent element within human experience. The importance that the curriculum attributes to the child’s spiritual development is expressed through the breadth of learning experiences the curriculum offers, through the inclusion of religious education as one of the areas of the curriculum, and through the child’s engagement with the aesthetic and affective domains of learning.”
    (Introduction Primary School Curriculum, page 27)

    “The spiritual dimension is a fundamental aspect of individual experience, and its religious and cultural expression is an inextricable part of Irish culture and history. Religious education specifically enables the child to develop spiritual and moral values and to come to a knowledge of God.”
    (Primary School Curriculum Page 58)

    In addition to the above Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools reads:

    “Of all parts of a school curriculum, Religious Instruction is by far the most important, as its subject matter, God’s honour and service, includes the proper use of all man’s faculties, and affords the most powerful inducements to their proper use. Religious Instruction is, therefore, a fundamental part of the school course, and a religious spirit should inform and vivify the whole work of the school.”

    They are not subject an effective remedy for families whose rights are breached in their schools, because they are not organs of the state and hence exempted from the European Convention on Human Rights Act.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    As they should. An understanding of religion is vital when it comes to understanding world history and global politics.
    Yes, but it should be teaching about religions and beliefs in an objective, critical and pluralistic manner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    The right to a non-denominationals secular education, with an effective remedy to vindicate breaches of human rights.

    One of the key areas of the Primary School Curriculum is to promote the spiritual dimension of life.

    The concept of spirituality is not defined in the Education Act 1998

    “Of all parts of a school curriculum, Religious Instruction is by far the most important, as its subject matter, God’s honour and service, includes the proper use of all man’s faculties, and affords the most powerful inducements to their proper use. Religious Instruction is, therefore, a fundamental part of the school course, and a religious spirit should inform and vivify the whole work of the school.”
    QUOTE]

    As i understand educate together schools do not get Religious Instuctions durring class time and as you say spirituality is not defined in the Education Act 1998.

    Which ECHR or UN right is it that gives you a right to a non-denominationals secular education


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    As i understand educate together schools do not get Religious Instuctions durring class time and as you say spirituality is not defined in the Education Act 1998.
    All schools are obliged to adhere to the Primary School curriculum and the Rules for National Schools.

    In the Primary School Curriculum it is assumed that spirituality based on a transcendent element within human experience. Spirituality is linked to religious education and developing spiritual and moral values and a knowledge of god.

    The Primary School Curriculum states that:

    “The spiritual dimension of life expresses itself in a search for truth and in the quest for a transcendent element within human experience. The importance that the curriculum attributes to the child’s spiritual development is expressed through the breadth of learning experiences the curriculum offers, through the inclusion of religious education as one of the areas of the curriculum, and through the child’s engagement with the aesthetic and affective domains of learning.”
    (Introduction Primary School Curriculum, page 27)

    “The spiritual dimension is a fundamental aspect of individual experience, and its religious and cultural expression is an inextricable part of Irish culture and history. Religious education specifically enables the child to develop spiritual and moral values and to come to a knowledge of God.”
    (Primary School Curriculum Page 58)

    In addition to the above Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools reads:

    “Of all parts of a school curriculum, Religious Instruction is by far the most important, as its subject matter, God’s honour and service, includes the proper use of all man’s faculties, and affords the most powerful inducements to their proper use. Religious Instruction is, therefore, a fundamental part of the school course, and a religious spirit should inform and vivify the whole work of the school.”
    cobhguy28 wrote: »
    Which ECHR or UN right is it that gives you a right to a non-denominationals secular education
    The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, which includes the right to have your children taught in conformity with your own convictions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    By the way, don't get hung up on the problems with Educate Together schools. The OP gave a misleading impression of Atheist's Ireland's concerns.

    Educate Together has a much more palatable ethos than denominational schools.

    The main problem with Educate Together at the moment is that they are undermining the duty of the State to provide actual non-denominational schools, by saying that they are non-denominational when they are actually multi denominational.

    They are then seeking more funding for schools based on their model, which would reduce the funding available for actual non-denominational schools, just as the Government is under pressure from the UN to provide actual non-denominational schools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭Brian Lighthouse


    Atheism Ireland is proof that atheism is just another belief system.
    They proselytise - Their website has the slogan: "Promoting atheism, reason and an ethical, secular state"
    They look for donations: "Please donate to our education fund to produce our learning about atheism curriculum for schools"

    What's the difference between their ****e spouting and anybody else's ****e spouting?

    I have a connection to an Educate Together school and I do not have any complaints. All the kids that attend it are aware of all the major beliefs and guess what? Not many of them care about it. Kids go to school with people of all faiths, who practice, and people of a faith who don't practice. So what? They get on with it and learn to tolerate people that are different and wait for it....have a different belief.
    Do you know what else kids learn in school? The three R's and other such stuff like science and geography. Mad eh?

    I can understand people having a sympathy for wanting to create their own version of utopia, however in the real world people get along. As Michael Nugent says: "The main problem with Educate Together at the moment is that they are undermining the duty of the State to provide actual non-denominational schools, by saying that they are non-denominational when they are actually multi denominational."
    So do you want to corral all the atheists into one school, you know like, be with their own kind and all that sort of stuff?

    I don't like your argument, why don't Atheism Ireland set up a school? As another poster mentioned; let market forces and parental choice determine the outcome.
    If Atheism Ireland was to drop the "promoting atheism" segment from it's logo and kept the "reason, ethical and secular" segment, I might be interested in learning more about them.
    Until then, I see you only as another bunch of "...insert book/website/code of conduct/ of choice here...bashers"
    Brian


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,718 ✭✭✭whippet


    +1,000,000 to Brian's post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    By the way, don't get hung up on the problems with Educate Together schools. The OP gave a misleading impression of Atheist's Ireland's concerns.

    Educate Together has a much more palatable ethos than denominational schools.

    The main problem with Educate Together at the moment is that they are undermining the duty of the State to provide actual non-denominational schools, by saying that they are non-denominational when they are actually multi denominational.

    They are then seeking more funding for schools based on their model, which would reduce the funding available for actual non-denominational schools, just as the Government is under pressure from the UN to provide actual non-denominational schools.
    What's the difference between non-denominational and multi-denominational?

    It would seem to me that it is more contrary to Irish/EU law to prevent any religious education as opposed to providing a variety of religious education. Following that train of thought, isn't providing an athiest education technically providing a religious education in itself?

    Religious education should be: "some people believe this, some believe this, some believe this - nobody can prove their version is right, nobody can prove there is or is not a god... make up your own minds"

    Science education should be: "religion has nothing to do with this. here are the facts."

    As an agnostic, I find many athiests to be as fundamental about things they have no clue about than right wing religious fundamentalists. None of whom have a place in a truly neutral education system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,620 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    + 1,000,001 to Brian's post. The notion of 'promoting atheism' reminds me of a classic political aphorism from Willie Whitelaw (UK politician of the 1970s and 80s) who, during an election campaign, accused an opponent of 'going around the country stirring up apathy!'.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Atheism Ireland is proof that atheism is just another belief system.
    They proselytise - Their website has the slogan: "Promoting atheism, reason and an ethical, secular state"
    They look for donations: "Please donate to our education fund to produce our learning about atheism curriculum for schools"

    What's the difference between their ****e spouting and anybody else's ****e spouting?

    I have a connection to an Educate Together school and I do not have any complaints. All the kids that attend it are aware of all the major beliefs and guess what? Not many of them care about it. Kids go to school with people of all faiths, who practice, and people of a faith who don't practice. So what? They get on with it and learn to tolerate people that are different and wait for it....have a different belief.
    Do you know what else kids learn in school? The three R's and other such stuff like science and geography. Mad eh?

    I can understand people having a sympathy for wanting to create their own version of utopia, however in the real world people get along. As Michael Nugent says: "The main problem with Educate Together at the moment is that they are undermining the duty of the State to provide actual non-denominational schools, by saying that they are non-denominational when they are actually multi denominational."
    So do you want to corral all the atheists into one school, you know like, be with their own kind and all that sort of stuff?

    I don't like your argument, why don't Atheism Ireland set up a school? As another poster mentioned; let market forces and parental choice determine the outcome.
    If Atheism Ireland was to drop the "promoting atheism" segment from it's logo and kept the "reason, ethical and secular" segment, I might be interested in learning more about them.
    Until then, I see you only as another bunch of "...insert book/website/code of conduct/ of choice here...bashers"
    Brian

    Try thinking about it from the point of view of someone who isn't Catholic or Church of Ireland.

    96% !! of Irish public schools are religious and 90% are one religion : Catholic with a few percent being mostly C of I.

    If you're not Catholic, you've basically got to a Catholic school in most areas. The admission policies are still allowed to put you at the bottom of the list, the primary school syllabus integrates religion throughout the day rather than having even an opt in / opt out defined class.

    These are PUBLIC schools. No other state service is delivered like this. Can you imagine having St Joseph's Car Testing Centre where you got a priority appointment if you bring your baptismal certificate and where Sister Monica will just say a few prayers before they start.

    That's basically how we run the public schools here.

    Trying to characterise Atheist Ireland as some kind of malevolent force is both ridiculous and damn offensive tbh.

    All they're doing is calling for an open, secular school system (actually only a tiny % of it). I haven't seen them call for anything all that radical at all.

    For example the entire US Public School system is secular and its absolutely not antireligious it's just not involved in teaching religion or promoting of a particular faith. They're just schools and the American religious communities are quite capable of teaching their own communities about their faiths outside of that.

    The reason America has such a system is to cope with a multicultural, pluralist society that mostly seems to all manage to be 'American'.

    In a secular system the school is just religiously neutral.

    Many Irish institutions are also secular. Take UCC for example. It's been secular since its foundation in the 1840s specifically so that it could serve both Catholics, Protestants and other faiths in Cork and to avoid creating multiple smaller institutions along religious divisions as was the case in Dublin with Trinity and the Catholic University of Ireland.

    So, very progressively, Cork, Galway and Belfast got secular universities and that has actually served those cities very well.

    I don't see any religious communities in UCC being in anyway disenfranchised.

    I cannot see why we can't do that in schools too. What would be wrong with a secondary school run with the same kind of ethos as UCC or NUIG?! They're excellent organisations.

    The main reason Educate Together is classified as multi denominational would seem to be because of a failure of the Dept of Education to recognise them as a secular school system back in the 80s.

    For all intents and purposes they're providing secular mainstream education. It would make sense though to call themselves secular.

    Multi denominational to me should be a school with multiple religious sponsors, not one run by a not for profit NGO that would appear to be totally secular in outlook.

    Ireland's also becoming much more diverse and I think we'll have a real crisis on out hands if the system ends up with umpteen sponsors all seeking funding for schools because we have no open secular schools.

    You'll end up with demands (justifiably in the current system) for more and more different faith schools.

    How are we going to even fund that?

    Basically we've an almost unmodified Victorian British model for running education that operates almost like as if we've an established church.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    Atheism Ireland is proof that atheism is just another belief system.
    They proselytise - Their website has the slogan: "Promoting atheism, reason and an ethical, secular state"
    They look for donations: "Please donate to our education fund to produce our learning about atheism curriculum for schools"
    What's the difference between their ****e spouting and anybody else's ****e spouting?
    So do you want to corral all the atheists into one school, you know like, be with their own kind and all that sort of stuff?
    Until then, I see you only as another bunch of "...insert book/website/code of conduct/ of choice here...bashers"
    Brian
    whippet wrote: »
    +1,000,000 to Brian's post.
    coylemj wrote: »
    + 1,000,001 to Brian's post. The notion of 'promoting atheism' reminds me of a classic political aphorism from Willie Whitelaw (UK politician of the 1970s and 80s) who, during an election campaign, accused an opponent of 'going around the country stirring up apathy!'.
    These are some excellent examples of the type of uninformed hostile prejudice that makes advocacy groups like Atheist Ireland necessary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    These are some excellent examples of the type of uninformed hostile prejudice that makes advocacy groups like Atheist Ireland necessary.
    You're going to have to explain that one...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    You're going to have to explain that one...
    Okay.

    “Uninformed” means not having or showing awareness or understanding of the facts.

    “Hostile” means showing or feeling opposition or dislike; unfriendly.

    “Prejudice” means a preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    Yes, but it should be teaching about religions and beliefs in an objective, critical and pluralistic manner.

    In transition year my class learned about French cuisine by cooking some French dishes. I cooked a bouliabasse. It did not make me French. Can you explain a bit more how the Educate Together schools instruct religion in a manner which compromises the religious freedom of its students?
    These are some excellent examples of the type of uninformed hostile prejudice that makes advocacy groups like Atheist Ireland necessary.

    People are just annoyed by hypocrisy. Secularism and atheism are not one and the same thing. Secularism is the absence of religious belief. Atheism is the belief that no deity exists. The slogan of Atheist Ireland supports this notion that Atheism is a belief system like other religions. You are trying to equate atheism with secularism in order to promote your own belief system under the guise of equality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭Brian Lighthouse


    Okay.

    “Uninformed” means not having or showing awareness or understanding of the facts.

    “Hostile” means showing or feeling opposition or dislike; unfriendly.

    “Prejudice” means a preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.


    There is a quote from Addison Whithecomb that states: "When you resort to attacking the messenger and not the message, you have lost the debate."
    Could you point out to me where I was uninformed; where I was hostile and where I displayed prejudice?
    I offered my honest opinion. I did not make claims against you, I did not make statements against Atheist Ireland. I wrote how I felt on the matter.

    It appears that you are taking my post and the opinions of the persons who appeared to agree with my opinion personally.

    I am not going to continue with this discussion as I find it unreasonable and ethically questionable to bang my head repeatedly against a brick wall. I also could not guarantee that entirely secularist language would flow from my throat as my pain threshold decreases during this act.

    I will sign off by wishing you the best of luck in your endeavors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    Atheism Ireland is proof that atheism is just another belief system.
    They proselytise - Their website has the slogan: "Promoting atheism, reason and an ethical, secular state"
    They look for donations: "Please donate to our education fund to produce our learning about atheism curriculum for schools"

    What's the difference between their ****e spouting and anybody else's ****e spouting?

    I have a connection to an Educate Together school and I do not have any complaints. All the kids that attend it are aware of all the major beliefs and guess what? Not many of them care about it. Kids go to school with people of all faiths, who practice, and people of a faith who don't practice. So what? They get on with it and learn to tolerate people that are different and wait for it....have a different belief.
    Do you know what else kids learn in school? The three R's and other such stuff like science and geography. Mad eh?

    I can understand people having a sympathy for wanting to create their own version of utopia, however in the real world people get along. As Michael Nugent says: "The main problem with Educate Together at the moment is that they are undermining the duty of the State to provide actual non-denominational schools, by saying that they are non-denominational when they are actually multi denominational."
    So do you want to corral all the atheists into one school, you know like, be with their own kind and all that sort of stuff?

    I don't like your argument, why don't Atheism Ireland set up a school? As another poster mentioned; let market forces and parental choice determine the outcome.
    If Atheism Ireland was to drop the "promoting atheism" segment from it's logo and kept the "reason, ethical and secular" segment, I might be interested in learning more about them.
    Until then, I see you only as another bunch of "...insert book/website/code of conduct/ of choice here...bashers"
    Brian

    You really are mis-interpreting what he's stating.

    You also didn't understand that because of the primary school rules it's impossible to set up a non-denominational school (contrary to human rights provisions) as the rules require faith based teaching.

    You've also conveniently ignored where he stated that Educate Together are definitely better (being multi-denominational) than the religious owned and run schools.

    How can advocacy groups not promote the reasons they were set up?

    I'd much rather have many more ET schools than the current system but it's wrong to imply that ET schools are the ideal in a human rights context, they are hamstrung by the primary school rules and are not non-denominational but multi-denominational.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Michael Nugent


    Can you explain a bit more how the Educate Together schools instruct religion in a manner which compromises the religious freedom of its students?
    They say themselves that they actively teach spiritual development, in a module titled moral and spiritual development, which compromises the right of parents who do not want their children taught spiritual development as it is not in conformity with their philosophical convictions.

    They say themselves that they celebrate religious festivals, while saying that they are in conformity with the Toledo Guiding Principles on Teaching About religion and Beliefs, which says that pubic schools need to be careful to make the distinction between teaching about the holiday, and actually celebrating the holiday.

    They are legally obliged to adhere to the State Primary Curriculum and the Rules for National Schools.

    One of the key areas of the Primary School Curriculum is to promote the spiritual dimension of life. The concept of spirituality is not defined in the Education Act 1998 and in the Primary School Curriculum it is assumed that it based on a transcendent element within human experience. Spirituality is linked to religious education and developing spiritual and moral values and a knowledge of god.

    The Primary School Curriculum states that:
    “The spiritual dimension of life expresses itself in a search for truth and in the quest for a transcendent element within human experience. The importance that the curriculum attributes to the child’s spiritual development is expressed through the breadth of learning experiences the curriculum offers, through the inclusion of religious education as one of the areas of the curriculum, and through the child’s engagement with the aesthetic and affective domains of learning.”
    (Introduction Primary School Curriculum, page 27)

    “The spiritual dimension is a fundamental aspect of individual experience, and its religious and cultural expression is an inextricable part of Irish culture and history. Religious education specifically enables the child to develop spiritual and moral values and to come to a knowledge of God.”
    (Primary School Curriculum Page 58)

    In addition to the above Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools reads:
    “Of all parts of a school curriculum, Religious Instruction is by far the most important, as its subject matter, God’s honour and service, includes the proper use of all man’s faculties, and affords the most powerful inducements to their proper use. Religious Instruction is, therefore, a fundamental part of the school course, and a religious spirit should inform and vivify the whole work of the school.”
    People are just annoyed by hypocrisy.
    Can you give me some examples of Atheist Ireland being hypocritical?
    Secularism and atheism are not one and the same thing.
    I agree. One of the things that Atheist Ireland does is to educate people about that distinction.
    Secularism is the absence of religious belief. Atheism is the belief that no deity exists.
    Both of those are examples of meanings that those words have. Both words also have another meanings.

    Atheism can mean different things to different people, ranging from a belief that gods do not exist, to an absence of belief that gods do exist. A belief that gods do not exist is sometimes called positive, strong or hard atheism. An absence of belief that gods do exist is sometimes called negative, weak or soft atheism.

    Legally, the European Court of Human Rights has found that secularism is a personal conviction under the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Socially and politically, secularism is the belief that church and state should be separate, and that religious beliefs should not be the basis for civic laws.
    The slogan of Atheist Ireland supports this notion that Atheism is a belief system like other religions.
    No, it doesn't.

    Promoting something does not make it like a religion.
    You are trying to equate atheism with secularism in order to promote your own belief system under the guise of equality.
    No, we are not.

    We make a clear distinction between atheism and secularism.

    When promoting secularism, we campaign actively for the rights of minority faith members was well as atheists.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    The problem actually isn't Educate Together, it's the Department of Education's insistence on religiosity in schools.

    There's absolutely no reason why Educate Together couldn't be the foundation for a genuine Irish public school system.

    My own preference would be for a gradual fade out of sponsors entirely and just have genuine local Community Schools run by a democratic, accountable school board maybe directly elected by parents (of currently enrolled children only), teachers and I would like to see an elected county/city schools board to replace the VEC. That could take overall responsibility for big picture issues in any given area rather than the Bishop etc. That could be elected maybe 50% by the schools and 50% by the public concurrently with local elections.

    You'd give the schools autonomy and the local authorities an ability to manage services across a region for transport, support services etc. SNAs, psychological support, shared sports etc etc..

    I think something like that would be an actual education 'system' rather than just a bunch of disparate schools all working in a totally chaotic manner and all divided up by religion (and gender and social class in some cases).

    I think teachers should be employed directly by the Dept of Education too. It would normalise recruitment processes and remove the whole nonsense of local religious panels so teachers could move around much more easily.

    At present that's not the case and there's a long history of shall we say sub optimal transparency in teacher recruitment across the system.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    They say themselves that they actively teach spiritual development, in a module titled moral and spiritual development, which compromises the right of parents who do not want their children taught spiritual development as it is not in conformity with their philosophical convictions.

    They say themselves that they celebrate religious festivals, while saying that they are in conformity with the Toledo Guiding Principles on Teaching About religion and Beliefs, which says that pubic schools need to be careful to make the distinction between teaching about the holiday, and actually celebrating the holiday.

    They are legally obliged to adhere to the State Primary Curriculum and the Rules for National Schools.

    One of the key areas of the Primary School Curriculum is to promote the spiritual dimension of life. The concept of spirituality is not defined in the Education Act 1998 and in the Primary School Curriculum it is assumed that it based on a transcendent element within human experience. Spirituality is linked to religious education and developing spiritual and moral values and a knowledge of god.

    The Primary School Curriculum states that:
    “The spiritual dimension of life expresses itself in a search for truth and in the quest for a transcendent element within human experience. The importance that the curriculum attributes to the child’s spiritual development is expressed through the breadth of learning experiences the curriculum offers, through the inclusion of religious education as one of the areas of the curriculum, and through the child’s engagement with the aesthetic and affective domains of learning.”
    (Introduction Primary School Curriculum, page 27)

    “The spiritual dimension is a fundamental aspect of individual experience, and its religious and cultural expression is an inextricable part of Irish culture and history. Religious education specifically enables the child to develop spiritual and moral values and to come to a knowledge of God.”
    (Primary School Curriculum Page 58)
    In addition to the above Rule 68 of the Rules for National Schools reads:
    “Of all parts of a school curriculum, Religious Instruction is by far the most important, as its subject matter, God’s honour and service, includes the proper use of all man’s faculties, and affords the most powerful inducements to their proper use. Religious Instruction is, therefore, a fundamental part of the school course, and a religious spirit should inform and vivify the whole work of the school.”
    Can you give me some examples of Atheist Ireland being hypocritical?

    I agree. One of the things that Atheist Ireland does is to educate people about that distinction.

    Both of those are examples of meanings that those words have. Both words also have another meanings.

    Atheism can mean different things to different people, ranging from a belief that gods do not exist, to an absence of belief that gods do exist. A belief that gods do not exist is sometimes called positive, strong or hard atheism. An absence of belief that gods do exist is sometimes called negative, weak or soft atheism.

    Legally, the European Court of Human Rights has found that secularism is a personal conviction under the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Socially and politically, secularism is the belief that church and state should be separate, and that religious beliefs should not be the basis for civic laws.


    No, it doesn't.

    Promoting something does not make it like a religion.


    No, we are not.

    We make a clear distinction between atheism and secularism.

    When promoting secularism, we campaign actively for the rights of minority faith members was well as atheists.

    How can you campaign for the rights of minority faiths when your own goal is the elimination of faith (i.e. the expansion of atheism)? What you are doing is using the guise of campaigning for minority faiths in order to strengthen your own agenda.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement