How long will Suarez's ban be? Mod warning in OP and post#455

Rayne Wooney

Would England get back in if Uruguay are chucked out :pac:

abelard

7 matches

If Uruguay appeal and lose, does the start date of the "all football activities" ban move back meaning he would miss more of the PL season?

bucketybuck

5 matches

Dubliner28 wrote: »

Whats the odds on him doing this again ? Anyone?

I have no doubt whatsoever that Luis Suarez will be involved in another serious "incident" at some point in his football career. Its clearly in his nature.

The only hope is that its another bite or spit rather than another two footed lunge that breaks somebodies leg.

Or worse, the next time the red mist descends he swings an elbow back and breaks a jaw. This is not hyperbole, with his obvious lack of self control this type of incident is a definite possibility.

Nailz

12 month global ban

rob316 wrote: »

I agree with his ban but a 2 year global ban? Why not just ban him for life.

Because apparently the rules only allow a maximum two year ban.

citytillidie

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

Would England get back in if Uruguay are chucked out :pac:

No why would they, it would be Italy, or a bye for Colombia*





*please be a bye as i have them in sweep stakes

Ranchu

It's a fair ban. Anyone that thought this wasn't coming as soon as it became clear that he had done it a third time was kidding themselves.

If he does it again I'd imagine he will get the full two years.

Gbear

7 matches

No problem with the length of it or these sorts of bans in general, but they have to apply to everyone and not just this case because it's the most publicised.

We'll see what happens next time there's a serious offence committed on the pitch in an international game.

Royal Irish

12 month global ban

It could have been worse from a Liverpool perspective. Banned for the first 9 games of the EPL, and 3 Champions league games. If it was the FA handing out the ban it could of been 15 to 20 games considering he got 10 in the past for biting another player.

The speculation of him moving to a top European club is now done as nobody would want to buy someone who keeps biting other players considering that his next incident could result in up to a years ban. Having Suarez for the 29 league matches he can play in is better than no Suarez at all.

quarryman

He got off light here. He really did.

Good to see he got a club ban too. Cannot understand the logic of Liverpool fans saying it should have just been an international one...

Nerdlingr

12 month global ban

Nerdlingr wrote: »

Not on a wind up at all.
You do notice the word I've highlighted yeah?
United fans do cheer Cantona to this day. He's revered at the club.

Dunno where you're gettign this 'oh he implied united fans applauded cantona after he kicked the fan' from. Cos the post you've quoted doesnt imply that at all.
As I said, you seem to mis-interpret posts all the time and make stuff up out of thin air. Nothing personal, just think of it as constructive criticism.
Have a nice day.

Unreal stuff lol :pac:

One more time to make it clear for you.

Fan this that and the other I don't give a ****....I clearly said that I personally do not applaud it. The end.

Your continuous nonsense excuse for arguments is exhausting.

Have a nice day.

LuckyLloyd

Over 10 matches

quarryman wrote: »

He got off light here. He really did.

Good to see he got a club ban too. Cannot understand the logic of Liverpool fans saying it should have just been an international one...

You can't understand the logic of fans indicating that FIFA shouldn't set a brand new precedent for the incident? I don't really think that's true.

salmocab

Well Im surprised at this FIFA doing the right thing.

ronjo

LuckyLloyd wrote: »

You can't understand the logic of fans indicating that FIFA shouldn't set a brand new precedent for the incident? I don't really think that's true.

Is this the first time such a ban has happened for an incident on the pitch?

Knex*

7 matches

Will this stop clubs from releasing players for International Friendlies if there is a chance that players suspensions can now be carried over to Club games?

Ranchu

LuckyLloyd wrote: »

You can't understand the logic of fans indicating that FIFA shouldn't set a brand new precedent for the incident? I don't really think that's true.

I think Suarez set the brand new precedent in this case. FIFA reacted to it.

c_o_ck p_i_ss chillage

Liverpool should not turn their back on anyone who is allegedly mentally ill. That's my opinion as a Liverpool supporter.

Nerdlingr

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Unreal stuff lol :pac:

One more time to make it clear for you.

Fan this that and the other I don't give a ****....I clearly said that I personally do not applaud it. The end.

Your continuous nonsense excuse for arguments is exhausting.

Have a nice day.

Ha ha, good man mystic Mick . Proving my point once again. You're some laugh. :pac::D:D

Ravenid

7 matches

For everyone saying that Liverpool cant appeal Liverpool can and most probably will take this to the Court of Arbitration for Sport as they are being penalised for something they had nothing to do with.

Suarez was on International Duty. He was not representing Liverpool, he was representing Uruguay. It was up to Óscar Tabárez his and coaches to keep Suarez in check not Brendan Rogers.

TimeToShine

7 matches

c_o_ck p_i_ss chillage wrote: »

Liverpool should not turn their back on anyone who is allegedly mentally ill. That's my opinion as a Liverpool supporter.

Join date.

foggy_lad

I don't follow these soccer forum much and don't watch many games but I feel that along with a 2-3year global ban there should also be criminal charges brought against any player for assault causing harm to another person for a biting incident.

The fact that this is not a first "biting" offence I would ban him from ever playing in or coaching or even attending any match for the rest of his life.

citytillidie

Knex. wrote: »

Will this stop clubs from releasing players for International Friendlies if there is a chance that players suspensions can now be carried over to Club games?

Mystery injuries before international games now for star players

JONJO THE MISER

He is a savage simple as that, should of been banned for a year.
Big time chip on his shoulder just because he grew up poor.

citytillidie

foggy_lad wrote: »

I don't follow these soccer forum much and don't watch many games but I feel that along with a 2-3year global ban there should also be criminal charges brought against any player for assault causing harm to another person for a biting incident.

The fact that this is not a first "biting" offence I would ban him from ever playing in or coaching or even attending any match for the rest of his life.

What about those who throw punches, kick out and headbutt?

c_o_ck p_i_ss chillage

TimeToShine wrote: »

Join date.

1973

Dr.Winston O'Boogie

Ravenid wrote: »

For everyone saying that Liverpool cant appeal Liverpool can and most probably will take this to the Court of Arbitration for Sport as they are being penalised for something they had nothing to do with.

Suarez was on International Duty. He was not representing Liverpool, he was representing Uruguay. It was up to Óscar Tabárez his and coaches to keep Suarez in check not Brendan Rogers.

Liverpool just have just to swallow it, the same as if he broke his leg on international duty.

Also an international ban wasn't sufficient considering he has done it 3 times now, only the player to blame not FIFA.

Utopia Parkway

1 match

foggy_lad wrote: »

I don't follow these soccer forum much and don't watch many games but I feel that along with a 2-3year global ban there should also be criminal charges brought against any player for assault causing harm to another person for a biting incident.

The fact that this is not a first "biting" offence I would ban him from ever playing in or coaching or even attending any match for the rest of his life.

Thank you Danny Mills.

Dubliner28

Does he still get paid ?

Paul Tergat

Uruguay FA to appeal it

also from adidias: 'Adidas "fully supports FIFA’s decision...will discuss all aspects of our future partnership directly with Suarez following the World Cup”.'

Da Shins Kelly

Surprised at the severity of the ban, thought they'd be more lenient. I think it's just though. It's about time he started learning some serious lessons. It's not normal behaviour. He needs to get help for this, because at the moment he's just a terrible case of self-sabotage. Great footballer, but completely lacking in discipline. He's turning himself into a liability. Hope he can get it together.

foggy_lad

citytillidie wrote: »

What about those who throw punches, kick out and headbutt?

Why not the same punishment? Most players at that level are able to play the game without resorting to thuggish behaviour so stop the few who can't in their tracks and stop them infecting young kids with such notions. Send out a clear unambiguous statement that violence is never acceptable and will not be tolerated.