Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread - Mod Notes in OP,22/7

twinex

brinty wrote: »

£35m they can take young Young, Cleverly and that sideshow of a player they sold us last summer

Bob?

Brendan Flowers

Cleverly+Fellani for McCarthy?

adox

Brendan Flowers wrote: »

Cleverly+Fellani for McCarthy?

No thanks.

MagicIRL

Brendan Flowers wrote: »

Cleverly+Fellani for McCarthy?

Fellaini would do a job for Everton. It's a team without a second striker and Kone missed the majority of the last season injured.

Everton fans might scoff at the idea of buying him back, but playing him further forward like Belgium do, and like Moyes did at Everton, could do them wonders.

Rayne Wooney

10 million is a bit ambitious, we should enquire if Arsenal still have the £1 laying around from the Suarez bid.

Backstreet Moyes

Brendan Flowers wrote: »

Cleverly+Fellani for McCarthy?

Ye if you think McCarthy is worth about 30 million but in reality no.

brinty

MagicIRL wrote: »

Fellaini would do a job for Everton. It's a team without a second striker and Kone missed the majority of the last season injured.

Everton fans might scoff at the idea of buying him back, but playing him further forward like Belgium do, and like Moyes did at Everton, could do them wonders.

And they've no Lukaku to bang the goals in this year or Deloufeu to provide assists
baines ain't getting any younger either..

as for someone suggesting mCCarthy for Cleverly...no thanks

Invertpyramid

Nuts102 wrote: »

Ye if you think McCarthy is worth about 30 million but in reality no.

But he's a better player than both and surely that is what matters? Why do fans get so uptight over the cost of a player? It's not your money. Surely you just want the best players available? Let the club worry about "value".

Herrera costing 5 million or 50 million doesn't change how good he is, or how much United needed a midfielder. You aren't a financial advisor, you are a fan.

xtal191

If only Sharp was still the sponsor

Backstreet Moyes

Invertpyramid wrote: »

But he's a better player than both and surely that is what matters? Why do fans get so uptight over the cost of a player? It's not your money. Surely you just want the best players available? Let the club worry about "value".

Herrera costing 5 million or 50 million doesn't change how good he is, or how much United needed a midfielder. You aren't a financial advisor, you are a fan.

Because for the same amount of money you could get a much better player.

Iseedeadpixels

Nuts102 wrote: »

Because for the same amount of money you could get a much better player.

M'villa looks like hes going to Inter for 6.4 million is a good example.

googled eyes

Rumblings on twitter of Nike walking away from the deal with Utd.

Too expensive / aggressive dealings

MagicIRL

redbaron_99

I wouldn't have a problem with trading Young and Cleverley for McCarthy. The way I see it: neither of those two are going to get into the first eleven, where as McCarthy could. And we get two heavy earners off the books.
But we should only pursue McCarthy if our main targets fail. Personally I don't think he's even on the radar. Vidal, Strootman, DeJong, Carvalho, Turan are the types of player the club should be focused on - and I'm quite convinced they are.

redbaron_99

googled eyes wrote: »

Rumblings on twitter of Nike walking away from the deal with Utd.

Too expensive / aggressive dealings

I think that story has already been rubbished.

paulbok

Brendan Flowers wrote: »

Cleverly+Fellani Young for McCarthy Coleman?

FYP

Lucas Hood

Reports saying Adidas have won the kit deal fee £58m a season. That's almost twice Madrids deal.

redbaron_99

Lucas Hood wrote: »

Reports saying Adidas have won the kit deal fee £58m a season. That's almost twice Madrids deal.

Nice. Source??

Adamcp898

MagicIRL wrote: »

Jaysus, as if all the lads hadn't had enough complaining about bad photo editing yesterday. It looks like a six headed monster :eek:

beakerjoe

Lucas Hood wrote: »

Reports saying Adidas have won the kit deal fee £58m a season. That's almost twice Madrids deal.

Id be surprised if its as that big TBH, any source?

Will I Amnt

beakerjoe wrote: »

Id be surprised if its as that big TBH, any source?

I'd be surprised if that's not some more Twitter bullsh*t.

user2011

http://www.reddit.com/r/reddevils/comments/2a5id1/espn_reporting_that_nike_will_not_match_adidas/

@darrenrovell :
2014-07-08 15:40:26 UTC
Sources confirm that Nike has informed Manchester United it will not match adidas for future kit rights. Deal worth $100M+/year.

Peanut Butter Jelly

Deal worth $100M+/year.

:eek:

Lucas Hood

Darren Rovell is espns business reporter and supposedly very reliable.

beakerjoe

When does the Nike deal run out?

Peanut Butter Jelly

beakerjoe wrote: »

When does the Nike deal run out?

July 2015.

titan18

That can't be right

bennyl10

redbaron_99 wrote: »

I think that story has already been rubbished.

Confirmed,Nike are gone

beakerjoe

Really .... Hopefully that new Adidas shirt will have a golden prem badge on its sleeve too

bennyl10

Lucas Hood wrote: »

Darren Rovell is espns business reporter and supposedly very reliable.

Sky reporting it too.

Check out @ SkyNewsBreak's Tweet: https://twitter.com/ SkyNewsBreak/status/ 486547872180367360