Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ryanair B738 EI-DLI damaged at Rome Ciampino Airport

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Grandeeod wrote: »
    Has the Daily Mail found out yet??:D

    If/when they do, it'll be all Irish airline Ryanair's fault.

    P.S. Be sure to watch BA documentary on the BBC next week, darlings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 500 ✭✭✭JOSman


    Ahhhhhh!!!!!!! A bit of filler an it'll be grand.:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 774 ✭✭✭debabyjesus


    Only a scratch sure. Speed tape applied iaw amm...


  • Registered Users Posts: 481 ✭✭mr.anonymous


    Only a scratch sure. Speed tape applied iaw amm...

    SRM, no? ;)


    I'd like to see more pictures of this.

    As I understand it, this kind of occurrence is not investigated because the aircraft was parked and not operating.

    Mr. O'Leary won't be happy!


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,978 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,336 ✭✭✭✭coylemj



    What - no SCREAMING HEADLINES about a NEAR MISS which (had it happened xx hours earlier) could have caused HUNDREDS of DEATHS? :confused:

    Very uncharacteristically matter of fact for a Mail article on FR.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    coylemj wrote: »
    What - no SCREAMING HEADLINES about a NEAR MISS which (had it happened xx hours earlier) could have caused HUNDREDS of DEATHS? :confused:

    Very uncharacteristically matter of fact for a Mail article on FR.

    They did throw in the line 'Ryanair, which was recently voted the UK's worst airline' though!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    If anyone is responsible it would be the ground handling agent for not chocking the nose gear wheel,And if the GPU was still plugged in there would be considerable damage to the front of the aircraft.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,636 ✭✭✭feargale


    They did throw in the line 'Ryanair, which was recently voted the UK's worst airline' though!

    Have we joined the UK again?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    feargale wrote: »
    Have we joined the UK again?

    Now you're sounding like a silly Daily Mail reader.... Ryanair is a European wide airline, with a big UK presence. Hence voted the UK's worst airline, by the UK.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,694 ✭✭✭BMJD


    coylemj wrote: »
    What - no SCREAMING HEADLINES about a NEAR MISS which (had it happened xx hours earlier) could have caused HUNDREDS of DEATHS? :confused:

    Very uncharacteristically matter of fact for a Mail article on FR.
    Daily Fail wrote:
    Witness called it 'surreal moment' and saw 'bits of metal hanging from plane
    aka wings


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭beer enigma


    If anyone is responsible it would be the ground handling agent for not chocking the nose gear wheel,And if the GPU was still plugged in there would be considerable damage to the front of the aircraft.

    Am I right in thinking that in laymen's terms, an aircraft doesn't have the equivalent of a handbrake ? It can brake when landing but when on stand relies on the chocks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Andip wrote: »
    Am I right in thinking that in laymen's terms, an aircraft doesn't have the equivalent of a handbrake ? It can brake when landing but when on stand relies on the chocks.

    It does a parking brake, however the accu pressure decreases whilst on the ground i.e. pressure in the brakes reduces until they deplete hence the need for chocks - When the engines are running there's more then enough pressure to ensure they are effective.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 6,068 Mod ✭✭✭✭LoonyLovegood


    What's the chances of FR fixing it or scrapping/selling the plane? It's eight and a bit years old, so it's one of their older planes that I'd expect they'd sell off when the next 175 start coming in. Or would it be because they'd need every plane they have, they'll try to fix it up?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    CTYIgirl wrote: »
    What's the chances of FR fixing it or scrapping/selling the plane? It's eight and a bit years old, so it's one of their older planes that I'd expect they'd sell off when the next 175 start coming in. Or would it be because they'd need every plane they have, they'll try to fix it up?

    If it's fixable they will definitely repair it. 8 1/2 years old, while old by Ryanair standards is still a relatively new bird in aviation. The average age of a 737 in British Airways for example is over 21 years old!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 525 ✭✭✭Suasdaguna1


    This job will be overseen by boeing just like airbus oversees big jobs done on the buses. Plane will be like new when complete but the bill will be sporty......its not a slap on the stabilizer job.......horizontal stabilizers are not exactly lying around hangars and their associated fittings,...... specialist engineer man hours, rigging, flight test(s) downtime and loss of revenue for aircraft, will implode the final bill. €1m ?? Just a pure speculative guess.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    the bill will be sporty......

    Is there not like "Airplane" insurance?

    Or would the local handlers not be liable for some of the cost?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭beer enigma


    keith16 wrote: »
    Is there not like "Airplane" insurance?

    Or would the local handlers not be liable for some of the cost?

    Its Ryanair, they are probably Third Party fire & Theft :D


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    keith16 wrote: »
    Is there not like "Airplane" insurance?

    Or would the local handlers not be liable for some of the cost?

    The handlers would be liable if they actually handled it and their negligence cause it; if the plane wasn't chocked due to the strike then it'd be very much up in the air (it would be possible to offload pax without handlers due to the airstairs but not baggage so I presume the handlers had to be involved). They would have insurance for this.

    However the handlers are under bankruptcy protection which makes things even more complicated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,336 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    MYOB wrote: »
    if the plane wasn't chocked due to the strike then it'd be very much up in the air

    Wow, there must have been some gale blowing that day ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    coylemj wrote: »
    Wow, there must have been some gale blowing that day ;)

    I tried to think of a better term but gave up as I had someone to boot out of their office at 17:45 to move them :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭youknowwho


    if that's the case prepare to see ciampino being removed from ryanairs flight timetable... the only two hull losses that ryanair have had will both have been at that airport!! :pac:

    What was the last write off?


  • Registered Users Posts: 659 ✭✭✭Katunga


    whether or not it will be repaired is down to will it be worth more as a complete aircraft or as parts.
    recently at the place I work a 737-700 that was only 8 years old was scraped, their is a lot less of a lease demand for 700's than 800's though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭View Profile


    youknowwho wrote: »
    What was the last write off?

    http://avherald.com/h?article=40fc7579


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,264 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    fr336 wrote: »

    That seems like a very fast turn around on that repair.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,738 ✭✭✭knucklehead6


    fr336 wrote: »

    They must've done it on site too.

    Nice job.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,528 ✭✭✭kub


    mickdw wrote: »
    That seems like a very fast turn around on that repair.

    Well they are known for their quick turn arounds.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,264 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    kub wrote: »
    Well they are known for their quick turn arounds.

    Hopefully the cabin crew didn't do this one.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement