Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Barcelona receive two window transfer embargo

  • 02-04-2014 11:38AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭


    From the Fifa website

    http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/organisation/news/newsid=2313003/index.html?intcmp=newsreader_news_picture

    Kudos to MagicIRL for the spot.
    The Disciplinary Committee regarded the infringements as serious and decided to sanction the club with a transfer ban at both national and international level for two complete and consecutive transfer periods, together with a fine of CHF 450,000. Additionally, the club was granted a period of 90 days in which to regularise the situation of all minor players concerned.

    I can't recall the last time a top club was sanctioned like this for dodgy dealings with transfers :O


«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    Yeah, for players under 18 only. Really gonna hurt them!

    Edit: wait...have I read that wrong?!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,571 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    they could be left stuck for a goalkeeper ?


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭Agueroooo


    TheDoc wrote: »
    From the Fifa website

    http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/organisation/news/newsid=2313003/index.html?intcmp=newsreader_news_picture

    Kudos to MagicIRL for the spot.



    I can't recall the last time a top club was sanctioned like this for dodgy dealings with transfers :O

    WOW :eek:

    this part is interesting as I would say there are a number of clubs circulating to see if they can nab maybe a player they previously missed out on..
    days in which to regularise the situation of all minor players concerned


  • Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    Genuine laugh out loud.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    Nerdlingr wrote: »
    Yeah, for players under 18 only. Really gonna hurt them!

    i'd to double take the article aswell, the sanction isn't against them making signings under 18, it's BECAUSE of obscure practice with signings under 18.

    The ban is a national and international ban with no reference to age, implying it's a full ban.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,422 ✭✭✭Lord Trollington


    Will be reduced to a fine on appeal. That I'd be certain of.


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,251 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    Nerdlingr wrote: »
    Yeah, for players under 18 only. Really gonna hurt them!

    Edit: wait...have I read that wrong?!!

    The sanction is for transferring players under the age of 18, the ban is for all players.

    Great to see a big club getting punished for breaking the rules.

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Nerdlingr wrote: »
    Yeah, for players under 18 only. Really gonna hurt them!

    Edit: wait...have I read that wrong?!!

    You did - it's a full on ban for signing someone under 18. I don;t think you're allowed to tie someone under 18 down to a cotract.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Site Banned Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭Agueroooo


    The sanction is for transferring players under the age of 18, the ban is for all players.

    Great to see a big club getting punished for breaking the rules.

    I would say the Naymar situation didn't help with trying to dampen this one down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭token56


    I believe Chelsea had a transfer ban imposed upon them in around 2011, something to do with the transfer of Kakuta.

    Very bad news for Barca. I hope it doesn't get change on appeal though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    Agueroooo wrote: »
    I would say the Naymar situation didn't help with trying to dampen this one down.

    The Neymar situation is an entirely separate investigation, which may include additional or separate sanctions and or punishments.

    Personally don't think this will get winced down. While Chelsea had their's rebuked, I believe that was down to one specific transfer. It would appear here there is a case of serial offences from the club.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,223 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Loooool more then a club indeed. Defence will be funny next year.


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭Agueroooo


    I can see all players out on loan that are close to breaking into the first team getting called back pretty pronto.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,202 ✭✭✭partyguinness


    My initial thoughts was that it had to do with the Neymer signing.

    With Valdes and Puyol gone in July, they do need some urgent back up.

    Cue appeal..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    They'll still be able to loan players in no?


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭Agueroooo


    TheDoc wrote: »
    The Neymar situation is an entirely separate investigation, which may include additional or separate sanctions and or punishments.
    .

    Ohh I know that but definitely wouldn't have helped.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    Nerdlingr wrote: »
    They'll still be able to loan players in no?

    Don't believe so.

    Spanish FA also got a fair rasp on the knuckles for this, apart from a fine having a deadline to resolve the issue with minors and how they are dealt with relating to contracts and buyoutclauses etc.

    Hopefully will see an end to that ridiculous system they have in Spain which makes signing a player there like searching for the Holy Grail.


  • Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    they could be left stuck for a goalkeeper ?


    Ter Stegen was signed on a pre-contract, so they should be alright on that front.

    CB issue is that bit more problematic for them, especially considering Puyol is retiring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Nidgeweasel


    Is there anything regarding their right to appeal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,057 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Nuri Sahin wrote: »
    Ter Stegen was signed on a pre-contract, so they should be alright on that front.

    CB issue is that bit more problematic for them, especially considering Puyol is retiring.

    Depends, he wouldn't be registered as a Barcelona player yet, so could be blocked from actually playing for them even though he'd be at the club.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,540 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    Is there anything regarding their right to appeal?

    I would think they could appeal and even appeal the appeal to the CAS, thus being able to sign away this summer


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭Lennonist


    What exactly are they found guilty of? Did they not register them properly. The article above spells out that they breached regulations but it doesn't go into detail of what exactly Barcelona did wrong. Did they fail to provide adequate education?

    Most clubs sign kids under 18, strange that a club the size of Barcelona would be found in breach of guidelines. They've got a connection with Unicef for years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Nidgeweasel


    batistuta9 wrote: »
    I would think they could appeal and even appeal the appeal to the CAS, thus being able to sign away this summer

    That's what I'm thinking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,421 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    Cue Barca denying any wrongdoing but paying a huge fine anyway, just to avoid the matter "dragging on".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,202 ✭✭✭partyguinness


    Lennonist wrote: »
    What exactly are they found guilty of? Did they not register them properly. The article above spells out that they breached regulations but it doesn't go into detail of what exactly Barcelona did wrong. Did they fail to provide adequate education?

    Most clubs sign kids under 18, strange that a club the size of Barcelona would be found in breach of guidelines. They've got a connection with Unicef for years.


    To be fair, i don't think UNICEF has anything to do with it...unless it was taking scouting to a whole new level of shadiness...:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,222 ✭✭✭✭Will I Amnt


    Ballague saying it's for Jan and Summer 2015 so they will have this window to set themselves up at the back.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,828 ✭✭✭gosplan


    How did Barca let this happen?

    I mean, surely it's very obvious to the authorities when a kid from Asia or South America turns up at La Mesia?

    I get that this used to be standard practice but surely to god Barca would have realised that they couldn't continue to do it once the rules changed.

    I don't particularly care what happens to Barca but if they just blatantly flaunted the rules and moved minors across the world so they'd save on future transfer fees, then this ban really should be upheld.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,828 ✭✭✭gosplan


    Lennonist wrote: »
    What exactly are they found guilty of? Did they not register them properly. The article above spells out that they breached regulations but it doesn't go into detail of what exactly Barcelona did wrong. Did they fail to provide adequate education?

    Most clubs sign kids under 18, strange that a club the size of Barcelona would be found in breach of guidelines. They've got a connection with Unicef for years.

    You're not allowed to sign under-18's from outside the EU unless they're resident in the country already.

    If you think about how Messi arrived at Barca before this rule was in place. That's outlawed now.

    I guess it's to prevent a pointless upheaval in a child's life in case the football doesn't work out, and also to prevent poaching of minors internationally.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭Vinz Mesrine


    Everyone and their mothers dog knows this will not be enforced against Barca. They'll appeal, get a bigger fine and nothing else.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,560 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    I've been saying for a long time now that Barca are up there with the most crooked clubs around. This is further validation of that. Would also be surprised to see the full punishment stick though. With the GK and CB situation they are screwed if it did.


Advertisement