Liveline Thread 27/03/14 to date

DuckHook

At least he had good coffee what with getting his barista to go to court with him.

mix_up

this guy is talking crap , the person who is the registered owner of the car is the one who receives a speeding ticket etc , if the owner was not driving , i.e if their wife etc is behind the wheel , the onus is on the registered owner of the vechile to fill in a designated section of the motoring offenses form and declare that they were not behind the wheel

the result is the person who was driving the vechile will be sent a replacement fine and will accordingly receive penalty points

Mike Guide 69

An Claidheamh wrote: »

Well I saw it years ago, so it would've been different actors. But it was brilliant.

It's around ten plus years old.

Yeah i saw it when Simon Delaney was in it, good play, great the way 2 actors can actually portray a vast array of characters in one show, very funny (thats my plug, pay me Joe, pay me!!!! )

JM Skipton

mix_up wrote: »

this guy is talking crap , the person who is the registered owner of the car is the one who receives a speeding ticket etc , if the owner was not driving , i.e if their wife etc is behind the wheel , the onus is on the registered owner of the vechile to fill in a designated section of the motoring offenses form and declare that they were not behind the wheel

the result is the person who was driving the vechile will be sent a replacement fine and will accordingly receive penalty points

He strikes me as the type of bloke who would say "eh me dog was driving the car ur honour"

Dan Jaman

An Claidheamh wrote: »

Well I saw it years ago, so it would've been different actors. But it was brilliant.

It's around ten plus years old.

Got me interested in it, now. I'll have a look, ta.

An Claidheamh

mix_up wrote: »

this guy is talking crap , the person who is the registered owner of the car is the one who receives a speeding ticket etc , if the owner was not driving , i.e if their wife etc is behind the wheel , the onus is on the registered owner of the vechile to fill in a designated section of the motoring offenses form and declare that they were not behind the wheel

the result is the person who was driving the vechile will be sent a replacement fine and will accordingly receive penalty points

That's what I thought.

In fact it happens in Judge Judy all the time, that the owner is responsible.

But, he is entitled to bring his wife to the small claims court.

Otherwise, it's his problem. This is a non-story.

my friend

mix_up wrote: »

this guy is talking crap , the person who is the registered owner of the car is the one who receives a speeding ticket etc , if the owner was not driving , i.e if their wife etc is behind the wheel , the onus is on the registered owner of the vechile to fill in a designated section of the motoring offenses form and declare that they were not behind the wheel

the result is the person who was driving the vechile will be sent a replacement fine and will accordingly receive penalty points

Ah but he's a salt o de eart dub with a perceived sense of injustice

sudzs

"Big boners week!" :eek:

snubbleste

sudzs wrote: »

"Big boners week!" :eek:

Yes it is.

sudzs

snubbleste wrote: »

Yes it is.

my friend

What's the point of this?

JM Skipton

my friend wrote: »

What's the point of this?

a handy easy hours work for Joe?

mix_up

JM Skipton wrote: »

He strikes me as the type of bloke who would say "eh me dog was driving the car ur honour"

don't get me wrong , the whole speeding thing is a complete revenue raising machine and little else but this geezer obviously ignored the notice he received , if you send back the motoring offense form and declare that you ( the registered owner of the vechile ) were not driving , you will not be summonsed

he obviously done nothing , hence the summons

snubbleste

What's the point of this USA point of information?

An Claidheamh

How many times are they going to say 'car'?

Hitchens

"I was eighteen years old when I went down to Dublin.........."

my friend

caller advocates not complying with the law

Good Ol RTE

bottlebrush

Man with high voice sounds like priest giving a sermon

Harry Angstrom

Jaysus, this is feckin boring.

Mike Guide 69

Hitchens wrote: »

"I was eighteen years old when I went down to Dublin.........."

"Jumped on the first ship and the west is histweey".......:p

Dan Jaman

mix_up wrote: »

don't get me wrong , the whole speeding thing is a complete revenue raising machine and little else but this geezer obviously ignored the notice he received , if you send back the motoring offense form and declare that you ( the registered owner of the vechile ) were not driving , you will not be summonsed

he obviously done nothing , hence the summons

Ignoring the chancers for a moment - if you don't get the first notice, and the only indication you have of a court appearance is the summons, then what to do? You have to either roll over or fight it, and I'm fecked if I'm rolling over for a fecked, inefficient, corrupt system.

JM Skipton

mix_up wrote: »

don't get me wrong , the whole speeding thing is a complete revenue raising machine and little else but this geezer obviously ignored the notice he received , if you send back the motoring offense form and declare that you ( the registered owner of the vechile ) were not driving , you will not be summonsed

he obviously done nothing , hence the summons

You see Joe never lets the facts get in the way of a good whinge, he was sympathising with the caller instead of pulling him on the facts.

snubbleste

Next, the motoring laws of Burkina Faso

Harry Angstrom

"And you can go into a Walmart and buy a gun, Joe. Sure it's a great country altogether".

An Claidheamh

Why would they be on their hands and knees to rob stickers Joe?

Roger_007

JM Skipton wrote: »

He strikes me as the type of bloke who would say "eh me dog was driving the car ur honour"

I know someone who has a brother in USA, anytime he gets a penalty point notice he writes back saying it was his brother that was driving. This happened a few times. His brother came home last year only to discover that he was now disqualified and couldn't get a new licence.

Hostilities are ongoing.............:rolleyes:

my friend

Who's this constitutional expert?

An Claidheamh

right.

snubbleste

my friend wrote: »

Who's this constitutional expert?

It's not John O'Donovan

my friend

Another idiot caller, there's no end to them.