Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brian Cox Makes Me Want to Spew

  • 08-03-2014 7:49pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭


    Am I only person who can't stand this smug twat?


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭robertxxx


    He's great, I love all his program's.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭robvondoom


    Pretty much have a hefty distaste for every celebrity scientist. Basically if you've read one book about Science or Space travel you've heard every word they have to say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,320 ✭✭✭Chet T16


    My missus wants him to make her gag. Same thing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,944 ✭✭✭✭4zn76tysfajdxp


    I thought he was great in X Men 2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,592 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Is that Dr Cox?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,868 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    Am I only person who can't stand this smug twat?

    I saw what you did there, Brain O'Driscoll, Brain Cox.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭ArtyM


    wtf are brain cox?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,689 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    Am I only person who can't stand this smug twat?

    Don't worry about it. Things can only get better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Theres a joke about blowjobs in the tread title somewhere, alright.

    As a bit of trivia, Brian Cox was in D:Ream 20 odd years back (keyboard).



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    Started promisingly with Repo Man, career spiralled downwardly since imo


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,679 ✭✭✭hidinginthebush


    robvondoom wrote: »
    Pretty much have a hefty distaste for every celebrity scientist. Basically if you've read one book about Science or Space travel you've heard every word they have to say.

    I don't know, he has a pretty accessable book about quantum mechanics that helped understand something that made no sence at all in college. His programs are very good at explaining abstract concepts (entropy, for example), plus they're beautifully shot.

    I think he's great. He has an infectious love of science.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    He makes some otherwise ignorant fcukers aware of some basic science.. what is there to hate?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 269 ✭✭Me?


    Most men have their Brain's in their cocks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    People who make learning interesting should be burned . Learning should be a chore. The last thing we need is people knowing stuff.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 16,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭quickbeam


    Love him!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,150 ✭✭✭kumate_champ07


    most people who smile all the time irritate me but he has a genuine love of science thats inspiring


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,412 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    Am I only person who can't stand this smug twat?
    I'm sure you're not. Fire ahead there and spew. Use a bucket though, or your stomach acid could damage the flooring. If any spatters, an alkaline solution should help reduce the effect. That's science, and.........




















    ......... "that's amazing"!

    :D


    I'll get me coat...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 816 ✭✭✭dr strangelove


    Thank jeebus, i'm not the only one.

    I'd love to stick his smug, stupid smiley face in front of the large Hadron collider beam and do some "science" of my own.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Pat is a smug twat


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,320 ✭✭✭Chet T16


    I don't know, he has a pretty accessable book about quantum mechanics that helped understand something that made no sence at all in college. His programs are very good at explaining abstract concepts (entropy, for example), plus they're beautifully shot.

    I think he's great. He has an infectious love of science.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYAsk1bkv2M&feature=youtube_gdata_player


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 4 1 M03 T1M3


    He was great in The 25th Hour, the small bit he had


  • Site Banned Posts: 4 1 M03 T1M3


    Also...



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 378 ✭✭Catphish


    He makes some otherwise ignorant fcukers aware of some basic science.. what is there to hate?


    SMUG GOBSH1TTEY TRAINING COMPLETE POTENTIAL MOD.....


    .......

    ............. STANDBY FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS.......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,679 ✭✭✭hidinginthebush




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    He is to science what One Direction are to music. He is no Patrick Moore. Com'on now. Idiot TV at its most vapid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,547 ✭✭✭Agricola


    Don't think he's smug. He's just really really excited by physics/space and he tends to look like hes stoned when he talks about it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    Catholic much? Bet you like a good mass.

    Your kind are finished.

    ?!?!?!????????

    He is a smug, superficial, self-impressed cnut, that is the issue. Not science.

    If you need someone like Brian Cox to justify the Enlightenment I suggest you go back to using the Trivium to quantify the witchery of sebaceous cysts on elderly spinsters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,826 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    Am I only person who can't stand this smug twat?

    Maybe you should stick with him... He can only get better.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    I don't care what anyone says. I find his Hannibal far superior to Hopkins'.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,890 ✭✭✭DuckSlice


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    He is to science what One Direction are to music. He is no Patrick Moore. Com'on now. Idiot TV at its most vapid.

    he needs to do idiot tv, so small minded dum dums can understand science. i dont think its idiot tv btw, his book "why e=mc^2" is very good and explains a lot using maths no more difficult than Pythagoras's theorem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭entropi


    I don't know, he has a pretty accessable book about quantum mechanics that helped understand something that made no sence at all in college. His programs are very good at explaining abstract concepts (entropy, for example), plus they're beautifully shot.

    I think he's great. He has an infectious love of science.
    You, sir/madam, are an abstract concept...not I :mad:



    :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭Corkfeen


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    He is to science what One Direction are to music. He is no Patrick Moore. Com'on now. Idiot TV at its most vapid.
    What exactly is idiotic about making science accessible to the masses? It can stimulate an interest in the sciences amongst all age groups while remaining entertaining. If one wishes to gain a further interest in the subject,they read and perhaps pursue a career in one of the fields. And I have no doubt that well made science shows result in people becoming scientists in the long run.

    But it's idiot tv according to yourself. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 777 ✭✭✭H2UMrsRobinson


    Tv programs that educate are now idiot tv? I'm sorry but there are about a bajillion people more spew worthy than this chap.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭MRnotlob606


    Hes Gets all the ladies to suck on his matter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,477 ✭✭✭Hootanany


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Theres a joke about blowjobs in the tread title somewhere, alright.

    As a bit of trivia, Brian Cox was in D:Ream 20 odd years back (keyboard).


    I thought they were a Northu band


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    He is to science what One Direction are to music. He is no Patrick Moore. Com'on now. Idiot TV at its most vapid.

    Oh come on! You've never heard of the X-Factor or Jersey shore then?

    I love his (and Moores) shows. I have no problem admitting that accessible shows like his are my main porthole to knowledge of those subjects, and that I find them enjoyable, entertaining and well presented. Cox is easier on the eye than Moore but both of them share the ability to make non sciencey people like me understand things I'd never given much thought to before.

    Moore inspired me to buy my first telescope, to take an interest in the stars and our place among them, and Cox is just as interesting.

    Thats pretty much the opposite of vapid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,477 ✭✭✭Hootanany


    When Moore was first on there was SWF all on the telly thats why he was so popular.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    Hootanany wrote: »
    When Moore was first on there was SWF all on the telly thats why he was so popular.


    No. The Sky at Night was a Magical Programme when I was a child from the opening music to the non patronising content which did not insult the intelligence of the viewer. Patrick Moore had cool rock guitarists on his show - TALKING ABOUT HARD SCIENCE. Brian Cox is still a namby pamby boy band type and always will be.

    The Sky at Night was glorious, absolutely glorious. I still get shudders thinking of the opening music and credits once a month during the winter nights and the lovely photos. The Sky at Night fired the imagination of millions, Brian Cox just comes across as a New Labour councillor who is pretending to be down with Katy Perry's music to be 'hip' with the kids.


  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hootanany wrote: »
    When Moore was first on there was SWF all on the telly thats why he was so popular.


    I don't think so, I think he was popular because he was brilliant at his job and his enthusiasm was unmistakeable.

    I've got a collection of dvds of his shows, he's a brilliant educator.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭Corkfeen


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    No. The Sky at Night was a Magical Programme when I was a child from the opening music to the non patronising content which did not insult the intelligence of the viewer. Patrick Moore had cool rock guitarists on his show - TALKING ABOUT HARD SCIENCE. Brian Cox is still a namby pamby boy band type and always will be.

    The Sky at Night was glorious, absolutely glorious. I still get shudders thinking of the opening music and credits once a month during the winter nights and the lovely photos. The Sky at Night fired the imagination of millions, Brian Cox just comes across as a New Labour councillor who is pretending to be down with Katy Perry's music to be 'hip' with the kids.

    Frankly, I find his programmes to be fascinating shows about mainstream science. The fact that you have described him as a 'namby pamby boy band type' while ignoring the fact that he's highly qualified in his field.

    The productions he appears in are both well received and informative,bringing science to the masses should be commended. Besides ranting, you haven't actually explained what is wrong with his programme. What misinformation and namby pamby nonsense is thought on his shows?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,477 ✭✭✭Hootanany


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    No. The Sky at Night was a Magical Programme when I was a child from the opening music to the non patronising content which did not insult the intelligence of the viewer. Patrick Moore had cool rock guitarists on his show - TALKING ABOUT HARD SCIENCE. Brian Cox is still a namby pamby boy band type and always will be.

    The Sky at Night was glorious, absolutely glorious. I still get shudders thinking of the opening music and credits once a month during the winter nights and the lovely photos. The Sky at Night fired the imagination of millions, Brian Cox just comes across as a New Labour councillor who is pretending to be down with Katy Perry's music to be 'hip' with the kids.

    Im on about the early 80,s


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    No. The Sky at Night was a Magical Programme when I was a child from the opening music to the non patronising content which did not insult the intelligence of the viewer. Patrick Moore had cool rock guitarists on his show - TALKING ABOUT HARD SCIENCE.
    Kind of ironic, since you've had a go at Brian Cox for " pretending to be down with Katy Perry's music to be 'hip' with the kids". Which I don't think he needs to worry too much there, having ad 3 top 10 its, a #1 single, a Brit award and an MTV award before becoming a scientist. You could have picked something better to have a go at, basically. :pac:

    And lets be honest, Patrick Moore was... kind of a sit person. I'll take Cox over him, so long as he's not supporting Enoch Powell, denouncing sex and racial equality, or making such scientifically awesome statements as He wrote that "homosexuals are mainly responsible for the spreading of AIDS (the Garden of Eden is home of Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve)".

    Besides all that tough, I just cant see ow Brian Cox strikes you as smug but this guy doesnt...



    :confused::confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 777 ✭✭✭H2UMrsRobinson


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    Brian Cox is still a namby pamby boy band type and always will be. Brian Cox just comes across as a New Labour councillor who is pretending to be down with Katy Perry's music to be 'hip' with the kids.

    I think if you stop watching programs with Brian Cox in you should see a remarkable improvement in your symptoms. Especially the nausea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 Rebellion


    Why? He's programmes are incredibly interesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,619 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    I think if you stop watching programs with Brian Cox in you should see a remarkable improvement in your symptoms. Especially the nausea.


    This...

    I mean its one thing to rant about BOD (who has been media overload this week), or One Direction who are literally always on the ****ing radio who I appreciate you can't escape, you would need to be literally going out of your way to see Brian Cox. I like him and actively have to seek out his stuff.

    He's not some mega rich, cocaine snorting, vagina munching celebrity worth begrudging, he's a lecturer in Manchester University and a guy who does some work every now and then. So he's a smart dude with an English accent and a minor celebrity profile, hardly worth starting a thread about.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭Courtesy Flush


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    Am I only person who can't stand this smug twat?

    But he thinks you are really cool !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 905 ✭✭✭StompToWork


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    No. The Sky at Night was a Magical Programme when I was a child from the opening music to the non patronising content which did not insult the intelligence of the viewer. Patrick Moore had cool rock guitarists on his show - TALKING ABOUT HARD SCIENCE. Brian Cox is still a namby pamby boy band type and always will be.

    The Sky at Night was glorious, absolutely glorious. I still get shudders thinking of the opening music and credits once a month during the winter nights and the lovely photos. The Sky at Night fired the imagination of millions, Brian Cox just comes across as a New Labour councillor who is pretending to be down with Katy Perry's music to be 'hip' with the kids.

    In some regards, I tend to agree with you. That said, I understand why Brian Cox is as popular as he is. The sad fact is that audiences are changing. In 20 years time, Boards.ie will have a thread in it about how some floppy-haired, middle aged person - who describes their greatest influences as "Justin Beiber and Twitter" - is worse than Brian Cox.

    Of course, by that time, there will be a hell of a lot more people who understand more about physics than most of the young population today will ever dream about knowing.

    As Bob Dylan once said, "The times they are a-chagin'!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    At least Moore appeared on GamesMaster and gave me decent tips and tricks for SNES games.

    I like Brian's stuff and he shows to have a genuine enthusiasm for what he's explaining. I can see how some people might not like him but some women go nuts for him to the point that I'm not even sure they listen to what he's actually saying beyond "The wondaaahs of the univuurse" :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 222 ✭✭Captain Farrell


    I went to school with him. He's a cracking bloke, a talented musician and a highly intelligent man. He never intended to be on TV, but when approached saw it as a chance to get science into the mainstream.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 464 ✭✭Knight who says Meh


    Why do so many articulate and intelligent people get this reaction?
    Richard Dawkin
    Brian Cox
    Steven Fry
    Even Dara o'Brian and David Mitchell.
    I dont geddit. They all seem pleasant enough from de telly.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement