Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Solid fuel heating problem

  • 20-11-2013 2:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24


    Hello. We have a solid fuel (16KW) stove that's supposed to heat several radiators. Instead, when it gets hot, it just dumps a ton of hot water out of the expansion tank, without heating the radiators at all. If we keep a very low fire, we can get two or three lukewarmish radiators. Not exactly what we had in mind.

    Anyone know what this problem might be? I asked the plumber who installed it (five years ago - and it's never worked) but he couldn't fix it. Got another plumber in last year and his only suggestion was to adjust the thermostat so the pump would kick in sooner. That didn't help.

    Would really appreciate any suggestions. Sick of lugging coal around all day and not getting any heat.

    Eithne


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 871 ✭✭✭TPM


    It is hard to say with out seeing the installation.
    It sounds like a circulation problem and the fact that you say it has never worked would suggest there is a problem with the pipe installation (incorrect size, incorrect rise to hot cylinder, too far from hot cylinder, etc.)
    I would strongly recommend that you DO NOT USE THE STOVE untill the issue is corrected.
    you need to get a plumber competent in solid fuel boilers to look at it.
    Could you post some photos which could help identify the issue


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    Thanks TPM. There is quite a long distance between the stove and the hot water cylinder. The stove is in a new extension to the house. Having said that, if the distance is too great, wouldn't the plumber have thought of that before he plumbed it in?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    281221.JPG

    This is an image of the stove, so you can see the two pipes coming out the back. Sorry, it seems to be massive. Jaysus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    These are some close-ups of the pipes, from the left and from the right. Some urgent dusting is needed.

    6034073

    6034073


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    Any pump?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    Yes there's a pump, in the kitchen next to the hot water cylinder. It operates on a thermostat or you can turn it on manually as well. There's a hall between this room, where the stove is, and the kitchen. The pipes run up into the upper floor and then down into the cylinder, as far as I know (though am rapidly getting out of my depth here).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    nehie wrote: »
    Yes there's a pump, in the kitchen next to the hot water cylinder. It operates on a thermostat or you can turn it on manually as well. There's a hall between this room, where the stove is, and the kitchen. The pipes run up into the upper floor and then down into the cylinder, as far as I know (though am rapidly getting out of my depth here).

    What part of the country are you in? Plenty of good guys I'd reccomend on here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    If the pump is on and hot water is still dumped into the header tank then the plumbing is wrong. I can take a good guess at the problem but its tricky to explain any good plumber should be able to see what the problem is in no time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 776 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    nehie wrote: »
    it just dumps a ton of hot water out of the expansion tank,

    Eithne

    1 / Are you saying that the water just flows up the expansion pipe and into the tank in the attic.
    2 / Are you sure the circulation pump is running , can you hear it ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    1 / Are you saying that the water just flows up the expansion pipe and into the tank in the attic.
    2 / Are you sure the circulation pump is running , can you hear it ?

    We don't know that what the pump does, I'd expect it to be a circulating pump to get the water moving between the stove and the cylinder but if the system works as badly as the OP says it does then the pump might not even be in that circuit?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,965 ✭✭✭gifted


    are they 3/4" copper pipes? pipework seems very small, would expect them to be 1" pipes...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 776 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    We don't know

    Sorry I didnt expect that YOU would know if the pump was running as I was responding to the original OP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    Dtp1979 wrote: »
    What part of the country are you in? Plenty of good guys I'd reccomend on here.

    I'd absolutely love a recommendation. That's part of the problem - predicting paying yet another plumber to fail to solve it. But we're in west Clare...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    gifted wrote: »
    are they 3/4" copper pipes? pipework seems very small, would expect them to be 1" pipes...

    The circumference seems to be around 9cm, so calling on school maths and what have you, that should make the pipes around 1" at least I think


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    1 / Are you saying that the water just flows up the expansion pipe and into the tank in the attic.
    2 / Are you sure the circulation pump is running , can you hear it ?

    The pump is definitely running. I don't know if it's powerful or fast enough, but it does run. And as I mentioned before, you do get weak heat to some of the radiators as long as the fire is low.

    Matters are complicated by the fact that there's a range in the kitchen, next to the cylinder and pump. That works brilliantly but isn't capable of heating more than about four rads. Which is why we put in this godforsaken stove.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    If the pump is on and hot water is still dumped into the header tank then the plumbing is wrong. I can take a good guess at the problem but its tricky to explain any good plumber should be able to see what the problem is in no time.

    I'd love to know your guess. (Unless it involves you saying "rip out the whole system and replace it" of course!) Like I said, two plumbers have left the house having failed to fix it.

    Sorry about posting this stream of replies - wasn't sure how to answer everyone's questions any other way. And thanks so much, everyone, for taking an interest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    nehie wrote: »
    I'd love to know your guess. (Unless it involves you saying "rip out the whole system and replace it" of course!) Like I said, two plumbers have left the house having failed to fix it.

    Sorry about posting this stream of replies - wasn't sure how to answer everyone's questions any other way. And thanks so much, everyone, for taking an interest.

    Take as many pics as you can of the hot press and pipe work going to it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    Dammit, I can't, sorry. It's all sealed in behind tongue-&-groove panelling. Plumbers can get at it but it's a bit of a big deal. But like I said, it works fine for the range


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    nehie wrote: »
    Dammit, I can't, sorry. It's all sealed in behind tongue-&-groove panelling. Plumbers can get at it but it's a bit of a big deal. But like I said, it works fine for the range

    Solid fuel is a different, and much more dangerous beast than an oil cooker


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    The range is solid fuel as well! We spend half our lives bringing in coal. And still freezing. And having emergency baths to use up the excess hot water in the system. At least we're clean.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    I had an answer that fitted until you added the range.

    So more questions?

    Do you have one hot water cylinder? If only one (which is obvious really - but we have two) do both the range and the stove heat it?

    Where is the hot water cylinder upstairs or downstairs?

    Only reason I had an answer before was because a mate had a similar set up put in by another mate and it worked as badly as your system because of some very stupid mistakes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    Oh I was really hoping it would be a stupid mistake, and a simple matter to fix!

    Yes there's one cylinder, heated by both range and stove. It's a dual-coil cylinder because there's also an oil boiler (I know I'm really thickening the plot here) so I gather the boiler heats the other coil. We don't use it because we can't afford the sodding oil. But when we do, it works well enough. There is often a little trickle from the expansion tank outlet (in the outside wall) when the oil is on, but nothing like the niagara that happens when the stove is running hot.

    The cylinder is downstairs, in the kitchen, though actually it's a few feet higher than the stove because the house is built on a slope. As the crow flies (or the woman walks) it's about 30 feet away from the stove. The pipes come down to it from the attic, though, I gather.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 871 ✭✭✭TPM


    IMO to start with there isnt enough of a rise on the the top pipe.
    the bottom pipe is rising from the wall to the stove and if this pipe rises in the wall to go upstairs this is also a problem.
    Is the thermostat for the pump located in the hotpress, if so it is too far from the stove.
    30ft (as the crow flies) plus the rise and the drop and the 5 or so elbows and the same again on the return is a very long run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    Ugh, that makes it sound like a disaster - irreparable


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    I think something can be done with it but it needs some thought.

    You can get away with the straight pipes off the side of the boiler provided the hot one then has a good rise on it, I'd also try and keep the colder return pipe low down, under or chased into the floor if necessary before it rises directly up to the cylinder. One inch pipes would seem a better idea to me (they look like 3/4' in the pictures) but to be honest I don't know if its worth using one inch pipe work when the boiler only had 3/4 inch take offs - or are those 1inch to 3/4 inch reducers I can see? There'd also be a lot of hot water in 40ft or more of one inch pipe but it might get the flow going better?

    I'd still like to know exactly how the pump is connected and what areas of the system are pumped, even if the plumbing is really bad the pump should be able to get hot water out of the boiler into the rads quick enough to stop any safety overflow kicking in? Maybe the pump isn't pumping the water around that part of the system. It could for example be pumping water primarily around the rads and have little effect on the water being heated in the stove if its plumbed in wrongly or it could be pumping the water primarily around the stove to the cylinder and giving you only hot water and cold rads - that could be fixable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    I think something can be done with it but it needs some thought.

    You can get away with the straight pipes off the side of the boiler provided the hot one then has a good rise on it, I'd also try and keep the colder return pipe low down, under or chased into the floor if necessary before it rises directly up to the cylinder. One inch pipes would seem a better idea to me (they look like 3/4' in the pictures) but to be honest I don't know if its worth using one inch pipe work when the boiler only had 3/4 inch take offs - or are those 1inch to 3/4 inch reducers I can see? There'd also be a lot of hot water in 40ft or more of one inch pipe but it might get the flow going better?

    I'd still like to know exactly how the pump is connected and what areas of the system are pumped, even if the plumbing is really bad the pump should be able to get hot water out of the boiler into the rads quick enough to stop any safety overflow kicking in? Maybe the pump isn't pumping the water around that part of the system. It could for example be pumping water primarily around the rads and have little effect on the water being heated in the stove if its plumbed in wrongly or it could be pumping the water primarily around the stove to the cylinder and giving you only hot water and cold rads - that could be fixable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 871 ✭✭✭TPM


    Solid fuel boilers are dangerous if they are not installed correctly.
    The primary circuit off thr boiler Must be done in 1" pipe and installed in a way that allows Thermosyphon (the water to circulate to the cylinder/heatleak radiator with out a pump) there can not be any valves on the primary loop.
    and alot more requirements.
    there are circumstances where installation of a solid fuel boiler are not possible or practical(even in places that had one fitted before, just becaused it "worked" doesnt mean it was right or safe)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    TPM wrote: »
    Solid fuel boilers are dangerous if they are not installed correctly.
    The primary circuit off thr boiler Must be done in 1" pipe and installed in a way that allows Thermosyphon (the water to circulate to the cylinder/heatleak radiator with out a pump) there can not be any valves on the primary loop.
    and alot more requirements.
    there are circumstances where installation of a solid fuel boiler are not possible or practical(even in places that had one fitted before, just becaused it "worked" doesnt mean it was right or safe)

    Apologies then for saying you can make it work with the straight pipes off the side off the side of the stove.

    Add to that you obviously can't get a decent Thermosyphon going if both pipes rise together and then go upstairs before coming back down again.

    I have however seen a good few similar installs in recent years where there is no way a thermosyphon can ever be set up naturally and had to have a pump running in order to work - not saying the installations are correct though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    I'm fairly sure they are 1" pipes. The circumference is c.3.5", suggesting a diameter of an inch when you divide by pi don't you know...

    The pipes go both under the floor and up into the attic. I can't answer for what they're doing but I know they're there. I don't know whether or not there are "valves on the primary loop", but if you can give me an idea of what to look for, or where to look, I might be able to find out.

    As for the pump, I'm not sure what business it's in but "hot water and cold rads" definitely fits the description of the problem. The pump was there long before the stove was ever put in; it was working for the range in the old days, so maybe it wasn't properly recruited to take over stove duty as well?

    Anyway I'm not ripping the whole thing out, one way or another. It's what we've got.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    Sorry stove must be bigger than it looks from the picture as to my eye those pipes didn't look big enough to be 1inch.

    To solve the problem you are either going to have get a plumber you really trust to spend some time looking at the system or take the time yourself so you can get some understanding of whats causing the problem. If the pipes are hidden then I can't see how anyone can tell you what the problem is without spending some time checking everything bit by bit.

    If you want to take a look at it yourself then you need to first check if that all important thermosyphon works with no help from any pump. With no other heating on and a fire in the stove and no pump you should notice one of the pipes get warmer (then eventually quite hot) on the cylinder if that never happens before "it just dumps a ton of hot water out of the expansion tank" then the system has failed at the first hurdle.

    My original wild guess was that the pump when it kicks in circulates the water between the cylinder and the rads blocking the movement of heat from the boiler, heat builds up in the boiler that then can only go back (violently?) via the safety into the expansion tank. If the thermosyphon works then it could be the pump that kills it.

    But it really is far to complicated as if you have rads on the range I'd expect to see two pumps one for each system then is the cylinder even big enough to act as a heat sink for two boilers going full belt when the weathers cold? How even can the water in a tank be heated from two boilers and one coil?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    The stove is bigger than it looks in the picture alright. It looks like the sort of brute that should be able to heat your whole house effortlessly...

    When the plumber installed this new, secondary system (with the stove) the only problem he foresaw was that the boilers inside both the range and the stove would be heating each other up. He didn't foresee any of the rest of this messing.

    I'm hoping it's the pump, as you suggest, and that fitting a second pump might even solve it? I confess I've been secretly hoping all this time that it was nothing more serious than an airlock!

    I'll do the test you recommend with lighting the fire and checking the pipes. I do find plumbing very confusing though - all that business with gravity! - so don't hold out much hope of diagnosing it myself, but finding a good plumber has proved to be a problem.

    !! IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN COUNTY CLARE? !!

    Thanks so much for all your help, and for going to all this trouble


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    Just glad no ones told me I'm talking complete rubbish..... so far :)

    The principles are very simple when you draw them out on a piece of paper try http://www.stovefittersmanual.co.uk/ and start at http://www.stovefittersmanual.co.uk/articles/connecting-a-wood-burning-stove-to-central-heating/ for some basics. I'm not quoting that so you can go and do anything yourself but it might help you see where the problem is so you will know if what the plumber is suggesting will be any good. Don't jump straight on the idea of an injector T as a solution to all your problems but it could help the issue.

    I'm not a plumber but I wouldn't use two boilers with one coil fine if you are only using one boiler at a time the flow should stay in one pipe system and perhaps slowly heat the other one but nothing terrible, with both boilers on who knows and you can't for safety reasons put anything like a valve in those pipes to and from the boilers. So before we even start we have what I think is a show stopper, however while I don't like that it doesn't stop heat going to the rads if the pump is pumping water from the boiler to the rads.

    The one pump you have (might you have another hidden somewhere?) can really only pump the water around one system either the range or the stove and one set of rads. If you have both boilers trying to run the same rads that would be another issue.

    How many rads on the range does the range heat different rads to the stove? Does the oil also heat the rads that could be complected as all the systems will be interconnected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    They (stove and range) are both on one system, as far as I know. So what should happen when they're both going is that they have enough capacity between them to heat up all the radiators. That was the theory anyway although it's failed abysmally. In practice the range seems to heat the radiators near it exceptionally well and doesn't venture too much farther.

    I should mention the range is on ALL the time in winter. It's a little old cottagey setup and we keep the range going overnight, so the kitchen won't be Arctic in the morning and we'll have hot water (there's no immersion).

    The oil burner heats all the radiators just fine – apart, as I mentioned, from the little constant leak from the expansion pipe when it's running. It's not a serious leak but it's there. It's only when the stove is lit that we have serious trouble.

    Thanks again, Glass Key, and I'm going to do some swotting now on your links.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    The only good solution I can offer is to separate the systems and put in a second cylinder nearer the stove and heat one part of the cottage (must be a big cottage) from the stove and the rest from the range. So heat say the bedrooms off the new stove and light the stove in the afternoon/evening and if you have two bathrooms then range/oil for one and use the stove for hot water for the other. Guess that's a no go idea, but might be a fall back if all else fails?

    We have two cylinders because I wanted a system for our new range with no pump at all the range does hot water for the kitchen (only a small 3kW boiler for DHW iirc) and just so we don't waste any hot water we have a second hot water tap over the bath. The power can (and sometimes does) go out here and we can still cook and keep warm and thanks to a quirk of the local mains water supply we get a nearly weeks worth of water after everyone else runs out (2 inch supply is downhill half a mile long and only feeds two houses).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    There is no problem having 2 solid fuel appliances heating the one cylinder. Dual coil obviously. All that's needed is the know to pipe it correctly and most importantly safely. OP keep trying different plumbers till your satisfied. The only plumber I know down around there is well retired now. Maybe he'd have a look for you at it and guide you. Jim Matthews is his name. His used to ( and maybe still does ) teach in the college in Shannon, beside the airport. Ring the college and they'll give you his contact details


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    Dtp1979 wrote: »
    There is no problem having 2 solid fuel appliances heating the one cylinder. Dual coil obviously. All that's needed is the know to pipe it correctly and most importantly safely. OP keep trying different plumbers till your satisfied. The only plumber I know down around there is well retired now. Maybe he'd have a look for you at it and guide you. Jim Matthews is his name. His used to ( and maybe still does ) teach in the college in Shannon, beside the airport. Ring the college and they'll give you his contact details

    2 solid fuel appliances and one coil, the other is attached to the oil boiler.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    2 solid fuel appliances and one coil, the other is attached to the oil boiler.

    Ohhhh. OP get a plumber in. And don't light either would be my advise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    The only good solution I can offer is to separate the systems and put in a second cylinder nearer the stove and heat one part of the cottage (must be a big cottage) from the stove and the rest from the range. So heat say the bedrooms off the new stove and light the stove in the afternoon/evening and if you have two bathrooms then range/oil for one and use the stove for hot water for the other. Guess that's a no go idea, but might be a fall back if all else fails?

    We have two cylinders because I wanted a system for our new range with no pump at all the range does hot water for the kitchen (only a small 3kW boiler for DHW iirc) and just so we don't waste any hot water we have a second hot water tap over the bath. The power can (and sometimes does) go out here and we can still cook and keep warm and thanks to a quirk of the local mains water supply we get a nearly weeks worth of water after everyone else runs out (2 inch supply is downhill half a mile long and only feeds two houses).

    Cottage isn't that big (!) but it has a quirky layout because I wanted to build an extension without obliterating the original (famine-era) portion of it. So it's got a big ground floor.

    Two cylinders might be a plan, though there would be a lot of reworking involved upstairs and so on. Power goes out here a lot too, as does mains water. You obviously live in rural Ireland as well! The joys...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 nehie


    Dtp1979 wrote: »
    Ohhhh. OP get a plumber in. And don't light either would be my advise.

    I will definitely get a plumber in. Thanks for your suggestion but Shannon is, inexplicably, 65 miles away from here so I doubt I could persuade him to come out. Just have to take my chances and hope I don't get another halfwit on €25 an hour.

    I'll report back...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    nehie wrote: »
    I will definitely get a plumber in. Thanks for your suggestion but Shannon is, inexplicably, 65 miles away from here so I doubt I could persuade him to come out. Just have to take my chances and hope I don't get another halfwit on €25 an hour.

    I'll report back...

    He thought in Shannon. I'm pretty sure he doesn't live there


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭The Glass Key


    nehie wrote: »
    Cottage isn't that big (!) but it has a quirky layout because I wanted to build an extension without obliterating the original (famine-era) portion of it. So it's got a big ground floor.

    Two cylinders might be a plan, though there would be a lot of reworking involved upstairs and so on. Power goes out here a lot too, as does mains water. You obviously live in rural Ireland as well! The joys...

    Funny you should mention that, our new range is in an extension to a very old cottage (pre first OS map survey at least) and to keep things simple I made it virtually self contained, biggest room is the extension.

    We aren't that rural just 15 minutes from the nearest largish town but everything useful like broadband stops about 5 minutes drive up the road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 871 ✭✭✭TPM


    I have however seen a good few similar installs in recent years where there is no way a thermosyphon can ever be set up naturally and had to have a pump running in order to work - not saying the installations are correct though.
    nehie wrote: »
    Anyway I'm not ripping the whole thing out, one way or another. It's what we've got.

    There are lots of solid fuel boilers that are in place and heating water (i refuse to say working) for years even though they are not correctly installed this may result in a system that provides heat but doesnt do it safely or efficiently.

    An incorrectly installed solid fuel boiler can explode and potentially kill. When you hear a solid fuel boiler bubbling, gurgling, banging, singing the water in it is boiling this produces steam which expands at a rate quick enough to burst a boiler.

    the water can boil if is not passing through the boiler fast enough in relation to the heat produced by the boiler(size of the fire) a circulating pump assists the flow, but the system must also allow for pump failure, or electricity outage.

    and in relation to ripping it out, I am not saying you would have to but if it could potentially kill is it worth leaving it in.
    have you considered replacing it with a nonboiler stove?


Advertisement